Otwarty dostęp

The Hypothesis of Change from Above in the History of English: State of the Art and Perspectives

Studia Anglica Posnaniensia's Cover Image
Studia Anglica Posnaniensia
Special issue on Change from above in the history of English. Edited by Nikolaos Lavidas

Zacytuj

Ball, Catherine. 1996. A diachronic study of relative markers in spoken and written English. Language Variation and Change 8.2. 227–258. DOI: 10.1017/S095439450000115010.1017/S0954394500001150Search in Google Scholar

Barber, Charles. 1997. Early Modern English. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Beal, Joan C. & Karen P. Corrigan. 2002. Relatives in Tyneside and Northumbrian English. In Patricia Poussa (ed.), Relativization on the North Sea littoral, Munich: Lincom Europa. 125–134.Search in Google Scholar

Beal, Joan C. & Karen P. Corrigan. 2007. “Time and Tyne”: A corpus-based study of variation and change in relativization stategies in Tyneside English. In Stephan Elspaß, Nils Langer, Joachim Scharloth, and Wim Vandenbussche (eds.), Germanic language histories ʽfrom belowʼ (1700–2000), Berlin & New York, NY: Walter de Gruyter, 99–114. DOI: 10.1515/9783110925463.9910.1515/9783110925463.99Search in Google Scholar

Bergs, Alexander. 2011. Social networks and historical sociolinguistics. Studies in morphosyntactic variation in the Paston Letters (1421–1503). Berlin & Boston, MA: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI: 10.1515/978311092322310.1515/9783110923223Search in Google Scholar

Bickerton, Derek. 1980. Decreolisation and the creole continuum. In Albert Valdman & Arnold Highfield (eds.), Theoretical orientations in creole studies, New York, NY: Academic Press. 109–127.Search in Google Scholar

Blank, Paula. 2006. The Babel of Renaissance English. In Lydia Mugglestone (ed.), The Oxford history of English, Oxford: Oxford University Press. 262–297.Search in Google Scholar

Curzan, Anne. 2014. Fixing English: Prescriptivism and language history. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO978113910732710.1017/CBO9781139107327Search in Google Scholar

D’Arcy, Alexandra. 2012. The diachrony of quotation: Evidence from New Zealand English. Language Variation and Change 24.3. 343–369. DOI: 10.1017/S095439451200016610.1017/S0954394512000166Search in Google Scholar

D’Arcy, Alexandra & Sali A. Tagliamonte. 2010. Prestige, accommodation, and the legacy of relative who. Language in Society 39.3. 383–410. DOI: 10.1017/S004740451000020510.1017/S0047404510000205Search in Google Scholar

Dekeyser, Xavier. 1984. Relativizers in early Modern English: A dynamic quantitative study. In Jacek Fisiak (ed.), Historical syntax. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 61–87. DOI: 10.1515/9783110824032.6110.1515/9783110824032.61Search in Google Scholar

Denison, David. 1993. Some recent changes in the English verb. In Maurizio Gotti (ed.), English Diachronic Syntax, Milan: Guerini. 15–33.Search in Google Scholar

Denison, D. 2007. Syntactic surprises in some English letters: The underlying progress of the language. In Stephan Elspaß, Nils Langer, Joachim Scharloth, and Wim Vandenbussche (eds.), Germanic language histories ʽfrom belowʼ (1700–2000), Berlin & New York, NY: Walter de Gruyter. 115–128. DOI: 10.1515/9783110925463.11510.1515/9783110925463.115Search in Google Scholar

Fisher, John H. 1996. The emergence of Standard English. Lexington, KY: University of Kentucky Press.Search in Google Scholar

Fletcher, Anthony. 1995. Gender, sex, and subordination in England, 1500–1800. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Fowler, Henry W. 1926. A dictionary of Modern English usage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Gelderen, Elly van. 2004. Economy, innovation, and prescriptivism: From Spec to Head and Head to Head. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 7. 59–98. DOI: 10.1023/B:JCOM.0000003601.53603.b210.1023/B:JCOM.0000003601.53603.b2Search in Google Scholar

Guy, Gregory R. 1990. The sociolinguistic types of language change. Diachronica 7.1. 47–67. DOI: 10.1075/dia.7.1.04guy10.1075/dia.7.1.04guySearch in Google Scholar

Hernández-Campoy, Juan M. & J. Camilo Conde-Silvestre. 1999. The social diffusion of linguistic innovations in fifteenth century England: Chancery spellings in private correspondence. Cuadernos de Filología Inglesa 8. 251–274.Search in Google Scholar

Kerswill, Paul. 1996. Children, adolescents, and language change. Language Variation and Change 8.2. 177–202. DOI: 10.1017/S095439450000113710.1017/S0954394500001137Search in Google Scholar

Killie, Kristin. 2004. Subjectivity and the English progressive. English Language and Linguistics 8.1. 25–46. DOI: 10.1017/S136067430400123610.1017/S1360674304001236Search in Google Scholar

Kim, Dong-Hyuk. 2012. Early Biblical Hebrew, Late Biblical Hebrew, and linguistic variability: A sociolinguistic evaluation of the linguistic dating of biblical texts. Leiden: Brill.10.1163/9789004235618Search in Google Scholar

Klein, Lawrence E. 1994. Shaftesbury and the culture of politeness: Moral discourse and cultural politics in early eighteenth-century England. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO978051165997310.1017/CBO9780511659973Search in Google Scholar

Klemola, Juhani. 2002. Periphrastic DO: Dialectal distribution and origins. In Markku Filppula, Juhani Klemola & Heli Pitkänen (eds.), The Celtic roots of English, Joensuu: University of Joensuu. 199–210.Search in Google Scholar

Kroch, Anthony S. 1978. Toward a theory of social dialect variation. Language in Society 7.1. 17–36. DOI: 10.1017/S004740450000531510.1017/S0047404500005315Search in Google Scholar

Kroch, Anthony S. 1989. Reflexes of grammar in patterns of language change. Language Variation and Change 1.3. 199–244. DOI: 10.1017/S095439450000016810.1017/S0954394500000168Search in Google Scholar

Labov, William. 1965. On the mechanism of linguistic change. Georgetown Monographs on Language and Linguistics 18. 91–114.Search in Google Scholar

Labov, William. 1966 [2006]. The social stratification of English in New York City. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO978051161820810.1017/CBO9780511618208Search in Google Scholar

Labov, William. 1990. The intersection of sex and social class in the course of linguistic change. Language Variation and Change 2.2 205–254. DOI: 10.1017/S09543945000003310.1017/S0954394500000338Search in Google Scholar

Labov, William. 1994. Principles of linguistic change. Vol. 1: Internal factors. Oxford & Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Labov, William. 2001. Principles of linguistic change. Vol. 2: Social factors. Oxford & Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Labov, William. 2007. Transmission and diffusion. Language 83.2, 344–387. DOI: 10.1353/lan.2007.008210.1353/lan.2007.0082Search in Google Scholar

Labov, William., Sharon Ash & Charles Boberg. 2006. The Atlas of North American English: Phonetics, phonology and sound change. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI: 10.1515/978311016746710.1515/9783110167467Search in Google Scholar

Lavidas, Nikolaos & Alexander Bergs. 2020. On historical language contact in English and its types: State of the art and new directions. Linguistics Vanguard 6s2: 20200010. DOI: 10.1515/lingvan-2020-001010.1515/lingvan-2020-0010Search in Google Scholar

Ljosland, Ragnhild. 2012. The establishment of the Scots language in Orkney. New Orkney Antiquarian Journal 6. 65–80.Search in Google Scholar

Macaulay, Ronald. 2006. Pure grammaticalization: The development of a teenage intensifier. Language Variation and Change 18.3 267–283. DOI: 10.1017/S095439450606013310.1017/S0954394506060133Search in Google Scholar

Michael, Lev. 2014. Social dimensions of language change. In Claire Bowern & Bethwyn Evans (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Historical Linguistics, London: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9781315794013.ch2210.4324/9781315794013.ch22Search in Google Scholar

Milroy, James & Leslie Milroy. 1993. Mechanisms of change in urban dialects. The role of class, social network and gender. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 3.1, 57–77. DOI: 10.1111/j.1473-4192.1993.tb00043.x10.1111/j.1473-4192.1993.tb00043.xSearch in Google Scholar

Montgomery, Michael B. 1989. The standardization of English relative clauses. In Joseph B. Trahern (ed.), Standardizing English: Essays in the history of language change, in Honor of John Hurt Fisher, Knoxville, TN: University of Tennessee Press. 111–138.Search in Google Scholar

Mustanoja, Tauno. F. 1960. A Middle English syntax. Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.Search in Google Scholar

Nevalainen, Terttu. 1998. Social mobility and the decline of multiple negation in Early Modern English. In Jacek Fisiak & Marcin Krygier (eds.), Advances in English historical linguistics, Berlin & New York, NY: Mouton de Gruyter. 263–292. DOI: 10.1515/9783110804072.26310.1515/9783110804072.263Search in Google Scholar

Nevalainen, Terttu. 2000. Processes of supralocalisation and the rise of Standard English in the early Modern period. In Ricardo Bermúdez-Otero, David Denison, Richard M. Hogg & C. B. McCully (eds.), Generative theory and corpus studies: A dialogue from 10 ICEHL. Berlin & New York, NY: Mouton de Gruyter, 329–372. DOI: 10.1515/9783110814699.32910.1515/9783110814699.329Search in Google Scholar

Nevalainen, Terttu. 2006. Negative concord as an English ‘vernacular universal’: Social history and linguistic typology. Journal of English Linguistics 34.3. 257–278. DOI: 10.1177/007542420629314410.1177/0075424206293144Search in Google Scholar

Nevalainen, Terttu & Helena Raumolin-Brunberg. 2000. The changing role of London on the linguistic map of Tudor and Stuart England. In Dieter Kastovsky & Arthur Mettinger (eds.), The history of English in a social context: A contribution to historical sociolinguistics, Berlin & New York, NY: Mouton de Gruyter. 279–338. DOI: 10.1515/9783110810301.27910.1515/9783110810301.279Search in Google Scholar

Nevalainen, Terttu & Helena Raumolin-Brunberg. 2003. Historical sociolinguistics: Language change in Tudor and Stuart England. London: Pearson Education.Search in Google Scholar

Nurmi, Arja. 1999. A social history of perophrastic DO. Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.Search in Google Scholar

Pratt, Lynda & David Denison. 2000. The language of the Southey-Coleridge circle. Language Sciences 22.3. 401–422. DOI: 10.1016/S0388-0001(00)00013-910.1016/S0388-0001(00)00013-9Search in Google Scholar

Raumolin-Brunberg, Helena 2005. Language change in adulthood: Historical letters as evidence. European Journal of English Studies 9.1. 37–51. DOI: 10.1080/1382557050006812510.1080/13825570500068125Search in Google Scholar

Rissanen, Matti. 1991. Spoken language and the history of do-periphrasis. In Dieter Kastovsky (ed.), Historical English syntax, Berlin & New York, NY: Mouton de Gruyter. 321–342. DOI: 10.1515/9783110863314.32110.1515/9783110863314.321Search in Google Scholar

Rissanen, Matti. 1999. Syntax. In Roger Lass (ed.), The Cambridge history of the English language. Vol. 3: 1476–1776. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 187–331.10.1017/CHOL9780521264761.005Search in Google Scholar

Romaine, Suzanne. 1980. A critical overview of the methodology of urban British sociolinguistics. English World-Wide 1.2. 163–198. DOI: 10.1075/eww.1.2.02rom10.1075/eww.1.2.02romSearch in Google Scholar

Romaine, Suzanne. 1982. Socio-historical linguistics: Its status and methodology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511720130Search in Google Scholar

Rydén, Mats. 1983. The emergence of who as a relativizer. Studia Linguistica 37.2. 126–134. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9582.1983.tb00317.x10.1111/j.1467-9582.1983.tb00317.xSearch in Google Scholar

Samuels, M. L. 1963. Some applications of Middle English dialectology. English Studies 44. 81–94. DOI: 10.1080/0013838630859715510.1080/00138386308597155Search in Google Scholar

Smith, Jeremy. 1996. An historical study of English: Function, form and change. London & New York, NY: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Tagliamonte, Sali. A. 2006. “So cool, right?” Canadian English entering the 21st century. Canadian Journal of Linguistics 51.2–3. 309–331. DOI: 10.1017/S000841310000412610.1017/S0008413100004126Search in Google Scholar

Tagliamonte, Sali. A., Jennifer Smith & Helen Lawrence. 2005. No taming the vernacular! Insights from the relatives in northern Britain. Language Variation and Change 17.1. 75–112. DOI: 10.1017/S095439450505004010.1017/S0954394505050040Search in Google Scholar

Tieken-Boon van Ostade, Ingrid. 1996. Social network theory and eighteenth-century English: The case of Boswell. In Derek Britton (ed.). English historical linguistics 1994, Amsterdam & Philadelphia, PA: Benjamins. 327–337. DOI: 10.1075/cilt.135.23tie10.1075/cilt.135.23tieSearch in Google Scholar

Tieken-Boon van Ostade, Ingrid. 1997. Lowth’s corpus of prescriptivism. In Terttu Nevalainen & Leena Kahlas-Tarkka (eds.), To explain the present: Studies in the changing English language in honour of Matti Rissanen, Helsinki: Société Néophilologique. 451–463.Search in Google Scholar

Tieken-Boon van Ostade, Ingrid. 2000a. Robert Dodsley and the genesis of Lowthʼs Short introduction to English grammar. Historiographia Linguistica 27.1. 21–36. DOI: 10.1075/hl.27.1.03tie10.1075/hl.27.1.03tieSearch in Google Scholar

Tieken-Boon van Ostade, Ingrid. 2000b. Social network analysis and the language of Sarah Fielding. European Journal of English Studies 4.3. 291–301. DOI: 10.1076/1382-5577(200012)4:3;1-S;FT29110.1076/1382-5577(200012)4:3;1-S;FT291Search in Google Scholar

Tieken-Boon van Ostade, Ingrid. 2005. Of social networks and linguistic influence: The language of Robert Lowth and his correspondents. In: J. Camilo Conde-Silvestre & Juan Hernández-Campoy (eds.), Sociolinguistics and the history of English: Perspectives and problems. Murcia: Universidad de Murcia. 135–157.Search in Google Scholar

Tottie, Gunnel. 1997. Relatively speaking: Relative marker usage in the British National Corpus. In Terttu Nevalainen & Leena Kahlas-Tarkka (eds.), To explain the present: Studies in the changing English language in honour of Matti Rissanen, Helsinki: Société Néophilologique. 465–481.Search in Google Scholar

Trotter, David. 2000. Anglo-Norman’. In Glanville Price (ed.), Languages of the British Isles, Oxford: Blackwell. 197–206.Search in Google Scholar

Trudgill, Peter. 1974. The social differentiation of English in Norwich. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Wodak, Ruth & Gertraud Benke. 1997. Gender as a sociolinguistic variable: New perspectives on variation studies. In Florian Coulmas (ed.), The handbook of sociolinguistics, Oxford: Blackwell. 127–150. DOI: 10.1002/9781405166256.ch810.1002/9781405166256.ch8Search in Google Scholar

Wright, Laura. 2000. The development of Standard English, 1300–1800: Theories, descriptions, conflicts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO978051155175810.1017/CBO9780511551758Search in Google Scholar