Cognition, Relevance and Ideology Formation through Travel Documentaries: A Longitudinal Approach to Audiences

Angouri, J. and Wodak, R. (2014). ‘They became big in the shadow of the crisis’: the Greek success story and the rise of the far right. Discourse & Society, 25, pp. 540–565. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926514536955Search in Google Scholar

Barthes, R. (1977). Image, Music, Text. London: Fontana.Search in Google Scholar

Baudry, J.L. and Williams, A. (1974). Ideological effects of the basic cinematographic apparatus. Film Quarterly, 28, pp. 39–47. https://doi.org/10.2307/1211632Search in Google Scholar

Benwell, B. (2007). New sexism? Readers’ responses to the use of irony in men’s magazines. Journalism Studies, 8, pp. 539–549. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616700701411797Search in Google Scholar

Castaldi, J. (2021). A multimodal analysis of the representation of the Rohingya crisis in BBC’s Burma with Simon Reeve (2018): Integrating Audience Research in Multimodal Critical Discourse Studies. Multimodal Communication, 10(1), pp. 55–72. https://doi.org/10.1515/mc-2020-0014Search in Google Scholar

Castaldi, J. (2022). Cognition and ideological effects in the interaction between viewers and BBC travel documentaries: Combining multimodal critical discourse analysis and audience research. Canterbury Christ Church University. Doctoral Dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Castaldi, J. (2024). Keeping the myth of the British Empire alive: Combining a multimodal analysis of two BBC travel documentaries with audience research. In E. Zantides and S. Andreou (eds.), Semiotics and Visual Communication IV: Myths of Today (pp. 331–353). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

Chouliaraki, L. (2000). National identities in late modernity. A case study of audience reception. In M. Reisigl and R. Wodak (eds.), The Semiotics of Racism. Approaches in Critical Discourse Analysis (pp. 305–330). Vienna: Passagen Verlag.Search in Google Scholar

Chouliaraki, L. (2003). Mediated experience and youth identities in a post-traditional order. In A. Georgakopoulou and J.K. Androutsopoulos (eds.). Discourse Constructions of Youth Identities (pp. 303–331). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Search in Google Scholar

Condit, C. (1991). The rhetorical limits of polysemy. In R.K. Avery and D. Eason (eds.), Critical Perspectives on Media and Society (pp. 365–386). New York: The Guilford Press.Search in Google Scholar

Curran, J. (2002). Media and Power. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Demetriou, D. (2018). Discourse on immigration in the UK: representations and evaluations of Romanians and Bulgarians as ‘benefit tourists’. PhD Thesis, Canterbury Christ Church University. Available at: https://www.proquest.com/openview/5ebe4ee6a4955fd1c35264925cff3600/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=51922&diss=y(Accessed 7 June 2024).Search in Google Scholar

Edwards, E.B. (2016). “It’s irrelevant to me!” Young black women talk back to VH1’s Love and Hip Hop New York. Journal of Black Studies, 47, pp. 273– 292. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021934715627124Search in Google Scholar

Forceville, C. (1996). Pictorial Metaphor in Advertising. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Forceville, C. (1999a). Educating the eye? Kress and Van Leeuwen’s reading images: The grammar of visual design (1996). Language and Literature, 8(2), pp. 163–178. https://doi.org/10.1177/096394709900800204Search in Google Scholar

Forceville, C. (1999b). Art or ad? The influence of genre-attribution on the interpretation of images. SPIEL, 18(2), pp. 279–300.Search in Google Scholar

Forceville, C. (2020). Visual and Multimodal Communication: Applying the Relevance Principle. New York: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Gerbner, G. and Gross, L. (1976). Living with television: The violence profile. Journal of Communication, 26(2), pp. 172–194.Search in Google Scholar

Giles, D. (2003). Media Psychology. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Search in Google Scholar

Hall, S. (1980/2005). Encoding and decoding in the television discourse. In S. Hall, D. Hobson, A. Lowe and P. Willis (eds.), Culture, Media, Language: Working Papers in Cultural Studies, 1972–79 (pp. 117–127). London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Hart, C. (2018). ‘Riots engulfed the city’: An experimental study investigating the legitimating effects of fire metaphors in discourses of disorder. Discourse & Society, 29(3), pp. 279–298. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926517734663Search in Google Scholar

He, J. (2019). Two-layer reading positions in comments on online news discourse about China. Discourse & Communication, 13, pp. 473–496. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481319856206Search in Google Scholar

Ifantidou, E. and Tzanne, A. (2006). Multimodality and relevance in the Athens 2004. Olympic Games televised promotion. Revista Alicantina de Estudios Ingleses, No. 19 (Nov. 2006); pp. 191–210. http://hdl.handle.net/10045/5176Search in Google Scholar

Kosetzi, K. (2007). Representations of women in terms of gender roles and sexual practices in Σχεδ?ν Π?τ? (ΣΠ) ‘Almost Never’: the text and the audience. PhD Thesis, Lancashire, England, Lancaster University.Search in Google Scholar

Montgomery, M. (2007). The Discourse of Broadcast News. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Paterson, L.L., Coffey-Glover, L., and Peplow, D. (2016). Negotiating stance within discourses of class: reactions to benefits street. Discourse & Society, 27, pp. 195–214. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926515611558Search in Google Scholar

Phelan, S. (2018). Critical discourse analysis and media studies. In J. Flowerdew and J.E. Richardson (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Critical Discourse Studies (pp. 285–297). London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Phillips, L. (1999). Risk, reflexivity and democracy: mediating expert knowledge in the news. Nordicom Review, 21, pp. 115–35. 10.1515/nor-2017-0389Search in Google Scholar

Richardson, K. (1994). Interpreting breadline Britain. In U.H. Meinhof and K. Richardson (eds.), Text, Discourse and Context: Representations of Poverty in Britain (pp. 93–121). London: Longman.Search in Google Scholar

Richardson, K. (2000). Intertextuality and the discursive construction of knowledge: the case of economic understanding. In U.H. Meinhof and J. Smith (eds.). Intertextuality and the Media: From Genre to Everyday Life (pp. 76– 97). Manchester: Manchester University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Piazza, R. and Haarman, L. (2016). A pragmatic cognitive model for the interpretation of verbal-visual communication in television news programmes. Visual Communication, 15(4), pp. 461–486. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470357215621688Search in Google Scholar

Schrøder, K.C., Drotner, K., Kline, S. and Murray, C. (2003). Researching Audiences. London: Arnold.Search in Google Scholar

Sperber, D. and Wilson, D. (1995). Relevance: Communication and Cognition (2^nd Ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Sullivan, J.L. (2019). Media Audiences: Effects, Users, Institutions, and Power. Sage Publications.Search in Google Scholar

Van Dijk, T.A. (1998). Ideology: A Multidisciplinary Approach. London: Sage.Search in Google Scholar

Van Leeuwen, T. (1996). The representation of social actors. In C.R. Caldas-Coulthard and M. Coulthard (eds.), Texts and Practices: Readings in Critical Discourse Analysis (pp. 32–70). London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Walton, M.J. (2016). Buddhism, Politics and Political Thought in Myanmar. New York: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Yus, F. (1998). Relevance theory and media discourse: A verbal-visual model of communication. Poetics, 25(5), pp. 293–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-422X(97)00020-XSearch in Google Scholar

Yus, F. (2011). Cyberpragmatics: Internet-mediated Communication in Context. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.Search in Google Scholar

Yus, F. (2016). Humour and Relevance. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.Search in Google Scholar

Yus, F., (2022) Smartphone Communication: Interactions in the App Ecosystem. London and New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar