[
Abric, J.C. (1993) Central system, Peripheral system: Their functions and Roles in the Dynamics of Social representations. Papers on Social Representation, Vol. 2 (2): 75–78.]Search in Google Scholar
[
Abric, J.-C. (1994). Représentations sociales: aspects théoriques. In J.-C. Abric (Org.). Pratiques sociales et representations (pp. 11–36). Paris: PUF.]Search in Google Scholar
[
Asgeirsson, H. (2020) The Nature and Value of Vagueness in Law. Oxford: Hart Publishing.]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bajčić, M. (2018) Coping with Vague EU Legal Concepts. In Sander, G. G., Tomljenović, V., Bodiroga-Vukobrat, N. (eds) Transnational, European, and National Labour Relations. Springer, 97–107. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02219-2_6]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bix, B. H.L.A. (1991) Hart and the “Open Texture” of Language. Law and Philosophy 10(1): 51–72.]Search in Google Scholar
[
Braun, V., Clarke, V. (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology 3(2): 77–101.]Search in Google Scholar
[
Brown, H.I. (1986) Sellars, concepts and conceptual change. Synthese 68(2): 275–307.]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chaib, M., Danermark, B., Selander, S. (2011) Introduction: Social Knowledge – Shared, Transmitted, Transformed. In Chaib, M. and others (eds), Education, Professionalization and Social Representations (pp. 1–16), Routledge.]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dahlgren, K. (1985) The Cognitive Structure of Social Categories. Cognitive Science 9: 379–398.]Search in Google Scholar
[
Daneš, F. (1966) The Relation of Centre and Periphery as a Language Universal. In: Travaux linguistiques de Prague 2: 9–21.]Search in Google Scholar
[
Durkheim, E. (1912/1995) The Elementary Forms of the Religious Life. New York: Free Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[
Flick, U., Foster, J. (2008) Social representations. In Willig, C. and Stainton-Rogers, W. (eds) The Sage handbook of qualitative methods in psychology. (London: Sage Publications), pp. 195–214.]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fodor, J. (2003) Hume Variations (Oxford: Oxford University Press).]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gadamer, H.-G. (1971) Die Begriffsgeschichte und die Sprache der Philosophie. Opladen: West-deutscher Verlag.]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gadamer, Hans-Georg. (1989) Truth and Method (second edition). Trans. Joel Weinsheimer and Donald G. Marshall. New York: Crossroad.]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hjørland, B. (2009) Concept Theory. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 60(8): 1519–1536.]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hart, H. L. A. (1994) The Concept of Law. 2nd ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[
Heck, P. (1914) Gesetzauslegung und Interessenjurisprudenz. (Tübingen: Verlag von J.C.B. Mohr)]Search in Google Scholar
[
Heck, P. (1932) Begriffsbildung und Interessenjurisprudenz. (Tübinhen: J.C.B. Mohr)]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hlouch, L. (2013) Právní interpretace. In Harvánek, J. and others. Právní teorie. Plzenˇ: Aleš Cˇ eněk.]Search in Google Scholar
[
Holton, R. (1997) Bourdieu and Common Sense. SubStance 26(3): 38–52.]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ipsen, G. (1924) Der alte Orient und die Indogermanen. In: Friedrich, H. et al. (eds.). Stand und Aufgaben der Sprachwissenschaft. Heidelberg, pp. 200–237.]Search in Google Scholar
[
James, W. (1890) The principles of psychology. New York: Dover Publications.]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jaspars, J. and Fraser, C. (1984). Attitudes and social representations. In R. M. Farr and S. Moscovici (eds), Social Representations (pp. 101–123). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lakoff, G. (1987) Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things. What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago, Londy’n: The University of Chicago Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[
Laurence, S. Margolis, E. (1999) Concepts and Cognitive Science. In Margolis, E., Laurence, S. Concepts. Core Readings. MIT Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lheureux, F., Rateau, P. and Guimelli, C. (2008) Hiérarchie structurale, condition-nalité et normativité des représentations sociales. Cahiers Internationaux de Psychologie Sociale 77: 41–55.]Search in Google Scholar
[
Marková, I. (1996). Towards an epistemology of social representations. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 26(2): 177–193.]Search in Google Scholar
[
Marková, I. (2003) Dialogicality and Social Representations. The Dynamics of Mind. Cambridge: CUP.]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mates, P. (2007) K problematice neurčitých právních pojmů ve správním právu. Právní rozhledy 9: 326–329.]Search in Google Scholar
[
McInnis, R.G. (1995) The Lexicology of scholarly concepts. In Baxter, P.M. (ed) Social science reference services (27–56). Binghampton, Haworth Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[
Medin, D. (1989) Concepts and Conceptual Structure. American Psychologist 44: 1469–1481.]Search in Google Scholar
[
Moscovici, S. (1961) La psychanalyse, son image et son public. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.]Search in Google Scholar
[
Moscovici, S. (1973). Preface. In C. Herzlich (ed.), Health and Illness (pp. V–VII). London: Academic Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[
Moscovici, S. (1963) Attitudes and opinions. Annual Review of Psychology 14: 231–260.]Search in Google Scholar
[
Moscovici, S. (2000). Social Representations. Explorations in Social Psychology. Edited by Gerard Duveen. Cambridge: Polity Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[
Moscovici, S. and Hewstone, M. (1983). Social representations and social explanations: from the ‘naive’ to the ‘amateur’ scientist. In M. Hewstone (ed.), Attribution Theory: Social and Functional Extensions (pp. 98–125). Oxford: Blackwell.]Search in Google Scholar
[
Myška, M., Smejkalová, T., Savelka, J., Skop, M. (2012) Creative Commons and Grand Challenge to Make Legal Language Simple. In Palmirani, M., Pagallo, U., Casanovas, P., Sartor, G. (eds) AI Approaches to the Complexity of Legal Systems. Springer.]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pinker, S. (2007) The Stuff of Thought: Language as a Window into Human Nature (London: Penguin).]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rosch, E., Mervis, C. (1975) Family Resemblances: Studies in the Internal Structure of Categories. Cognitive Psychology 7: 573–605.]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rosch, E. (1978/1999) Principles of Categorization. In Margolis, E., Laurence, S. Concepts: Core Readings, 1978/1999, 189–206.]Search in Google Scholar
[
Schauer, F. (1987) Precedent. Stanford Law Review 39(3): 571–605.]Search in Google Scholar
[
Skop, M. (2013) …právo jazyk a příběh. Auditorium.]Search in Google Scholar
[
Skrebtsova, T. (2014) The Concepts Centre and Periphery in the History of Linguistics: From Field Theory to Modern Cognitivism. Respectus Philologicus 26(31): 144ff.]Search in Google Scholar
[
Simmonaes, I. (2007) Vague legal concepts. A contradictio in adjecto? Translated by Benjamin D. Tyrybon. In Antia, B.E. Indeterminacy in Terminology and LSP. Studies in honour of Heribert Picht. John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 119–134.]Search in Google Scholar
[
Smejkalová, T. (2023) Case Law and Collective Construction of Meaning. Utrecht Law Review 19(1): 87–104. DOI: 10.36633/ulr.833]Search in Google Scholar
[
Smejkalová, T. (2024) Legal Concepts as Social Representations. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law 37(1): 165–188. DOI: 10.1007/s11196-023-10066-3]Search in Google Scholar
[
Smejkalová, T. et al. (2022) Veřejný pořádek, důstojnost soudce a judikatura: Tři studie využití přístupu sociálních reprezentací v analýze právních pojmů. Brno: MUNIPress.]Search in Google Scholar
[
Smejkalová, T. and Štěpáníková, M. (2021) Conceptualization of “public order” within Czech legal style. In: Smejkalová, T. et al. (eds.) Argumentation 2021. Brno: Masarykova univerzita, pp. 1–31. DOI: http://doi.org/10.5817/CZ.MUNI.P210-9972-2021]Search in Google Scholar
[
Stěpáníková, M. and Smejkalová, T. (2022) Hledání jádra pojmu veřejný pořádek. Právník 8: 753–773.]Search in Google Scholar
[
Temmerman, R. (2000) Towards New Ways of Terminology Description. The sociocognitive approach. (John Benjamins B.V.)]Search in Google Scholar
[
Thagard, P. (1992) Conceptual revolutions. Princeton University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[
Vachek, J. (1966) On the Integration of the Peripheral Elements into the System of Language. Travaux linguistiques de Prague 2: 32–33.]Search in Google Scholar
[
Verheggen, T. and Baerveldt, C. (2007) We don’t share! The social representation approach, enactivism and the ground for an intrinsically social psychology, Culture & Psychology 13(1): 5–27.]Search in Google Scholar
[
Voelklein, C. and Howarth, C. (2005) A Review of Controversies about Social Representations Theory: A British Debate, Culture & Psychology 11: 431–454.]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wachelke, J. (2012) Social Representations: A Review of Theory and Research from the Structural Approach. Universitas Psychologica, 11 (3): 729–741.]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wagner, W., Duveen, G., Farr, R., Jovchelovitch, S., Lorenzi-Cioldi, F., Marková, I., Rose, D. (1999) Theory and method of social representations. Asian Journal of Social Psychology 2: 95–125.]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wagner, W. et al. (1995) How sperm dominates the ovum – Objectification by metaphor in the social representation of conception. European Journal of Social Psychology, 25: 671–688.]Search in Google Scholar
[
Waismann, F. (1945) ‘Verifiability’. Proceedings of the Aristetolian Society, Supplementary Volume 19 (1945): 119–150.]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wittgenstein, L. (1958) Philosophical Investigations (2nd edition) Transl. G.E.M. Anscombe. (Oxford: Basil Blackwell)]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wolter, R. (2018) The Structural Approach to Social Representations: Bridges between Theory and Methods. Pscio-USF, Baranca Paulista 23(4): 621–631.]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zeifert, M. (2022) Rethinking Hart: From Open Texture to Prototype Theory-Analytic Philosophy Meets Cognitive Linguistics. Int J Semiot Law 35: 409–430 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-020-09722-9]Search in Google Scholar
Profil Orcid