[
Arnon, I., & Snider, N. (2010). More than words: Frequency effects for multi-word phrases. Journal of Memory and Language, 62, 67–87.10.1016/j.jml.2009.09.005
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bierwiaczonek, B. (2016). An introductory English grammar in constructions. Częstochowa: Wydawnictwo AJD.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bybee, J. (2010). Language, cognition, and usage. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511750526
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bybee, J., & Hopper, P. J. (Eds.) (2001). Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure. Amsterdam: Benjamins (Typological studies in language, 45).10.1075/tsl.45
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Collins, P. (1994). Extraposition in English. Functions of Language, 1, 7–24.10.1075/fol.1.1.03col
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Croft, W. (2000). Explaining language change: An evolutionary approach. London: Longman.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Diessel, H. (2015). Usage-based construction grammar. In E. Dąbrowska & D. Divjak (Eds.), Handbook of cognitive linguistics (pp. 295–321). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Diessel, H. (2017). Usage-based linguistics. In M. Aronoff (Ed.), Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Linguistics. New York: Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Erdmann, P. (1990). Discourse and grammar: Focusing and defocusing in English. Tübingen: Niemeyer.10.1515/9783111637754
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fillmore, Ch. J. (1982). Frame semantics. In The Linguistic Society of Korea (ed.), Linguistics in the morning calm (pp. 111–137). Seoul: Hanshin Publishing Company.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fillmore, Ch. J., & Baker, C. (2010). A frames approach to semantic analysis. In B. Heine & H. Narrog, The Oxford handbook of linguistic analysis (pp. 791–816). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fillmore, Ch. J., Johnson, Ch. R., & Petruck, M. R. L. (2003). Background to FrameNet. International Journal of Lexicography, 16(3), 235–250.10.1093/ijl/16.3.235
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fontenelle, T. (Ed.) (2003). Special issue on FrameNet and frame semantics. International Journal of Lexicography, 16(3), 231–385.10.1093/ijl/16.3.231
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Goldberg, A. E. (2006). Constructions at work. The nature of generalization in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hilpert, M. (2014). Construction grammar and its application to English. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kaleta, A. (2014). English clausal complementation: A usage-based approach. Piotrków Trybunalski: Naukowe Wydawnictwo Piotrkowskie.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kim, J.-B., & Davies, M. A. (2016). The INTO-CAUSATIVE construction in English: A construction-based perspective. English Language and Linguistics, 20(1), 55–83.10.1017/S1360674315000271
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lakoff, G. (1996). Sorry, I’m not myself today: The metaphor system for conceptualizing the self. In G. Fauconnier & E. Sweetser (Eds.), Space worlds and grammar (pp. 91–123). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Langacker, R. (1987). Foundations of cognitive grammar. Theoretical prerequisites. Volume I. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Perek, F. (2015). Argument structure in usage-based construction grammar: Experimental and corpus-based perspectives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Radden, G., & Dirven, R. (2007). Cognitive English grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/clip.2
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ruiz de Mendoza, F. J., & Galera, A. (2014). Cognitive modelling. A linguistic perspective. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Schmid, H.-J. (2000). English abstract nouns as conceptual shells. From corpus to cognition. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110808704
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Schmid, H.-J., & Küchenhoff, H. (2013). Collostructional analysis and other ways of measuring lexicogrammatical attraction: Theoretical premises, practical problems and cognitive underpinnings. Cognitive Linguistics, 24(3), 531–577.10.1515/cog-2013-0018
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Stefanowitsch, A. (2014). Collostructional analysis: A case study of the English into-causative. In T. Herbst, H.-J. Schmid, & S. Faulhaber, Constructions, collocations and patterns (pp. 217–238). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Taylor, J. R. (2000). Possessives in English: An exploration in cognitive grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tomasello, M. (2003). Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wiliński, J. (2017). On the brink of-noun vs. on the verge of-noun: A distinctive-collexeme analysis. Research in Language, 15(4), 425–443.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wiliński, J. (2018). Adjectives in extraposed constructions with that-clauses: A quantitative corpus-driven analysis. Brno Studies in English, 44(1), 83–102.10.5817/BSE2018-1-5
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wiliński, J. (2020). The preposition under and its noun collocates in the under-NOUN pattern: A quantitative corpus-based investigation. Crossroads. A Journal of English Studies, 31, 23–43.10.15290/cr.2020.31.4.02
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Yoon, J., & Wulff, S. (2016). A corpus-based study of infinitival and sentential complement constructions in Spanish. In S. Th. Gries & J. Yoon (Eds.), Corpus-based approaches to construction grammar (pp. 145–164). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
]Search in Google Scholar
