[Bucher, E. 2004. Law of Contract. In F. Dessemontet and T. Ansay (eds.), Introduction to Swiss Law, 3rd edition (pp. 103–137). The Hague – Boston – London: Kluwer Law International.]Search in Google Scholar
[Dajczak, W. 2012. The Nature of the Contract. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Naukowe UAM.]Search in Google Scholar
[Foster, N. 2013. Austrian Legal System and Laws. Routledge.10.4324/9781843145356]Search in Google Scholar
[Fu, J. 2013. Freedom of Contract in the EU and China. Journal of International Commercial Law and Technology, 8, 274.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gebhardt, I., and Schulz, T. 2003. Introduction to the German Civil Code. In I. Gebhardt, Y. Zhang, and R. Schröder (eds.), Comparative Analysis on the Chinese Contract Law (pp. 5–11). Berlin: Berliner Wissenschafts-Verlag GmbH.]Search in Google Scholar
[Han, S. 2012. A Snapshot of Chinese Contract Law from an Historical and Comparative Perspective. In Towards a Chinese Civil Code: Comparative and Historical Perspectives. Leiden/Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hsu, S. C. 2007. Contract Law of the People’s Republic of China. Minnesota Journal of International Law, 16, 115–162.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kim, C. J. 2000. Korean Attitudes Toward Law. Pacific Rim Law & Policy Journal, 10 (1).]Search in Google Scholar
[Kim, J. H. 2013. Development of Security Rights Law since the Codification of the Civil Code of Korea. Journal of Korean Law, 13, 271.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kitagawa, Z. 2008. Development of Comparative Law in East Asia. In M. Reimann & R. Zimmermann (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Law (pp. 235–260). Oxford: Oxford University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Korea Legislation Research Institute. 2012. Introduction to Korean Law. Seoul: Springer Science and Business Media.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kornet, N. 2010. Contracting in China: Comparative Obsrvations on Freedom of Contract, Contract Formation, Battle of Forms and Standard Form Contracts. Electronic Journal of Comparative Law, 14 (1), 1–31.10.2139/ssrn.1756750]Search in Google Scholar
[Kubacki, A. D. 2013. Teksty paralelne jako narzêdzie pomocnicze przy sporz1dzaniu tłumaczeñ (specjalistycznych). Comparative Legilinguistics, 13, 145–157.10.14746/cl.2013.13.09]Search in Google Scholar
[Lando, O., Clive, E., Prum, A., and Zimmerman, R. (eds.). 2003. Principles of European Contract Law – Part III. The Hague – London – New York: Kluwer Law International.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ling, B. 2002. Contract Law in China. Hong Kong: Sweet and Maxwell Asia.]Search in Google Scholar
[Liu, G. 2017, “Social Public Interest” in Chinese Laws: A Fake or An Innovative Legal Term? Paper presented at the The 12th Conference on Translation, Interpreting and Comparative Legilinguistics. Kołobrzeg, Poland.]Search in Google Scholar
[Matulewska, A. 2010. Deontic Modality and Modals in the Language of Contracts. Comparative Legilinguistics, 2, 75–92.10.14746/cl.2010.2.07]Search in Google Scholar
[Matulewska, A. 2013. Legilinguistic Translatology: A Parametric Approach to Legal Translation. Bern: Peter Lang International Academic Publishers.10.3726/978-3-0351-0535-3]Search in Google Scholar
[Morin, A. 2014. Efficiency and Swiss Contract Law. In K. Mathis (ed.), Law and Economics in Europe (pp. 207–230). Dordrecht: Springer Science and Business Media.10.1007/978-94-007-7110-9_9]Search in Google Scholar
[Radwański, Z. and Olejniczak, A. 2011. Prawo cywilne – część ogólna. Warszawa: C.H. Beck.]Search in Google Scholar
[Song B. and Guo Y. 2013. Shiyong Minfa Zongze 施用民法总则. Beijing: Falü Chubanshe. 法律出版社 Song S-H. (ed.). 1996. Korean Law in the Global Economy. Seoul: Bak Young Sa.]Search in Google Scholar
[Soulier, J.-L. 2016. Ordinance of February 10, 2016 for the reform of French contract law: The principle of the binding force of contracts is considerably undermined by the new provisions of the French Civil Code.]Search in Google Scholar
[Sójka-Zielińska, K. 2007. Kodeks Napoleona: Historia i współczesność. Warszawa: LexisNexis.]Search in Google Scholar
[Sójka-Zielińska, K. 2009. Historia Prawa. Warszawa: LexisNexis.]Search in Google Scholar
[Sugeno, K. 2002. Japanese Employment and Labor Law. Durham: Carolina Academic Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Sun, X., Ellinghaus, M. P. and Wright, E. W. (eds.). 2013. Zhongguo Renmin Gongheguo Hetong Fa fu Zuigao Renmin Fayuan guanyu Zhongguo Renmin Gongheguo Hetong Fa sifa jieshi (shuang yu) 中华人民共和国合同法附最高人 民法院关于适用《中华人民共和国合同法》司法解释 (双语版) Contract Law of the People’s Republic of China with the Judicial Interpretations of the Supreme People’s Court (Bilingual Version). Beijing: Qinghua Daxue Chubanshe. 清华大学出版社]Search in Google Scholar
[Wan, M. (ed.). 2012. Reading the Legal Case: Cross Currents Between Law and the Humanities. Oxon / New York: Routledge.]Search in Google Scholar
[Wei, Z. 2013. Minfa 房法. Beijing: Beijing Daxue Chubanshe 北京大学出版社.]Search in Google Scholar
[Wojciechowska, A. 2013. Granice swobody umów w hiszpañskim, angielskim i pol-skim jêzyku prawnym (unpublished master thesis). Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznan, Poznań.]Search in Google Scholar
[Wu, B., Zhang, L. and Luo, Y. 2012. Hetongfa Gailun 合同法槪论 . Chengdu: Bashu Shushe 巴蜀书社.]Search in Google Scholar
[Zhang, M. 2006. Chinese Contract Law: Theory and Practice. Leiden/Boston: BRILL.]Search in Google Scholar
[Zhou, X. 2003. Provisions on Validity of Contract in the Contract Law of China. In I. Gebhardt, Zhang Yuqing, and R. Schröder (eds.), Comparative Analysis on the Chinese Contract Law (pp. 93–105). Berlin: Berliner Wissenschafts-Verlag GmbH.]Search in Google Scholar
[Zweigert, K. and Kötz, H. 1998. An Introduction to Comparative Law. Oxford–New York: Clarendon Press and Oxford University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
