Frame Modeling Method in Teaching and Learning Legal Terminology

ABC of International Law. 2009. Retrieved from https://www.eda.admin.ch/content/dam/eda/en/documents/publications/Voelkerrecht/ABC-des-Voelkerrechts_en.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

Baffy, M. 2017. ‘Shifting frames to construct a Legal English class.’ Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 25 (1): 58–70.10.1016/j.jeap.2016.11.003Search in Google Scholar

Bhatia, V.K. 2012. ‘Critical reflections on genre analysis.’ Ibÿerica 24, 17–28. Retrieved from http://journaldatabase.info/articles/critical_reflections_on_genre_analysis.htmlSearch in Google Scholar

Blackledge, A. and A. Greese, 2008. ‘Contesting ‘language’ as ‘heritage’: negotiation of identities in late modernity.’ Applied Linguistics, 29 (4): 533–554. Oxford University Press.10.1093/applin/amn024Search in Google Scholar

Brown, S.W. 2006. Legal Terminology. Delmar: Cengage Learning.Search in Google Scholar

Budd, J.W. 2004. ‘Mind maps as classroom exercises.’ Journal of Economic Education, 35 (1): 35–46. DOI: 10.3200/JECE.35.1.35-4610.3200/JECE.35.1.35-46Search in Google Scholar

Chovancova, B. 2016. ‘Mediation in legal English teaching.’ Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric, 45 (58). DOI: 10.1515/slgr-2016-001310.1515/slgr-2016-0013Search in Google Scholar

Fransella, F. (ed). 2003. International Handbook of Personal Construct Psychology. Chichester: Wiley.10.1002/0470013370Search in Google Scholar

Galskova, N.D. and N.I. Gez. 2004. Teoriya obucheniya inostrannym yazykam: Lingvodidaktika i metodika [The theory of foreign languages teaching. Language didactics and methodology]. Moskva: Akademiya.Search in Google Scholar

Halper, M., Gu, H., Perl, Y. and Ch. Ochs. 2015. ‘Abstraction networks for terminologies: Supporting management of “big knowledge”.’ Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, 64 (1): 1–16.10.1016/j.artmed.2015.03.005Search in Google Scholar

Hanewald, R. 2012. ‘Cultivating lifelong learning skills in undergraduate students through the collaborative creation of digital knowledge maps.’ Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 69: 847–853.10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.12.007Search in Google Scholar

Hartig, A. J. 2016. ‘Intersections between law and language: disciplinary concepts in second language legal literacy.’ Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric, 45 (58): 69–86. DOI: 10.1515/slgr-2016-001610.1515/slgr-2016-0016Search in Google Scholar

Hoffman, C. 2011. ‘Using discourse analysis methodology to teach “legal English”.’ International Journal of Law, Language, & Discourse, 1 (2): 1–19.Search in Google Scholar

Ignatkina, A.L. 2016. ‘Kompozitsionnoe var’irovanie semantiki idiom SPIN DOCTOR i FLAK CATCHER v amerikanskom i britanskom variantakh angliyskogo yazyka’ [‘Components variance in the semantic framework of the idioms SPIN DOCTOR and FLAK CATCHER in American and British English’]. Yazyk I mir izuchaemogo yazyka [Language and the world of the studied language], 7: 34–37.Search in Google Scholar

Janis, M.W. 1999. An Introduction to International Law. Third Edition. New York: Aspen Law and Business.Search in Google Scholar

Jing, C. 2016. ‘Research on the Functional Foreign Linguistics Based on Complex Adaptive System.’ Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 66–70. DOI:10.2991/icesame-16.2016.1410.2991/icesame-16.2016.14Search in Google Scholar

Khizhnyak, S. P. 2015. ‘Mezhkul’turnaya professional’naya kommunikatsia yuristov v lingvodidakticheskom osveschenii’ [‘Intercultural Professional Communication of Lawyers in Linguistic and Didactic Aspects’]. Izv. Saratovskogo universiteta. Nov. ser. Ser. Filosofiya. Psichologiya. Pedagogika [Saratov University Review. New Series. Philosophy. Psychology. Pedagogy], 15, issue. 2: 105–109.10.18500/1819-7671-2015-15-2-105-109Search in Google Scholar

Khizhnyak, S. P. 2016. Kognitivnaya problematika v obschei teorii termina [Cognitive problem in the general theory of a term [monograph]]. Saratov: ‘Nauka’.Search in Google Scholar

Krashen, D.S. 2002. Second Language Acquisition and Second Language Learning. Retrieved from http://www.sdkrashen.com/content/books/sl_acquisition_and_learning.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

Lum, J., Conti-Ramsden, G., Page, D., and M. T. Ullman. 2012. ‘Working, declarative and procedural memory in specific language impairment.’ Cortex, 48 (9): 1138–1154.10.1016/j.cortex.2011.06.001Search in Google Scholar

Minsky, M. 1974. A Framework for Representing Knowledge. Retrieved from http://courses.media.mit.edu/2004spring/mas966/Minsky%201974%20Framework%20for%20knowledge.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

Oxford Dictionary of Law. Fifth edition. 2002. Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Reimerink, A., de Quesada, M. G., and S. Montero-Martinez. 2010. ‘Contextual information in terminological knowledge bases: A multimodal approach.’ Journal of Pragmatics, 42 (7): 1928–1950.10.1016/j.pragma.2009.12.008Search in Google Scholar

Random House Webster’s Dictionary of the Law. 2000. Random House, New York.Search in Google Scholar

Robinson, P., and N. C. Ellis (eds). 2008. Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics and Second Language Acquisition. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780203938560Search in Google Scholar

Sierocka, H. 2014. ‘Cultural dimensions of legal discourse.’ Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric, 38 (51). DOI: 10.2478/slgr-2014-003910.2478/slgr-2014-0039Search in Google Scholar

Sierocka, H. 2016. ‘Action research in designing and implementing courses of English for Legal Purposes.’ Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric, 45 (58). DOI: 10.1515/slgr-2016-002610.1515/slgr-2016-0026Search in Google Scholar

Turner, B. O., Crossley, M. L., and F. J. Ashby. 2017. ‘Hierarchical control of procedural and declarative category-learning systems.’ NeuroImage, 150 (15): 150–161.10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.02.039Search in Google Scholar

Van Dijk, T.A. 2008. Discourse and Context. A Sociocognitive approach. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511481499Search in Google Scholar

Vyushkina, E. 2016. ‘Legal English through movies: development of professional communicative competence.’ Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric, 45 (58). DOI: 10.1515/SLGR-2016-002710.1515/slgr-2016-0027Search in Google Scholar