This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.
Fowler G, Patterson D. Use of maternity surveys in improving the care experience – a review of the evidence. Br J Midwifery. 2013;21(6):410–415. doi: 10.12968/bjom.2013.21.6.410.FowlerGPattersonDUse of maternity surveys in improving the care experience – a review of the evidence201321641041510.12968/bjom.2013.21.6.410Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Blazquez AR, Corchon S, Ferrandiz FE. Validity of instruments for measuring the satisfaction of a woman and her partner with care received during labour and childbirth: Systematic review. Midwifery. 2017;55:103–112. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2017.09.014.BlazquezARCorchonSFerrandizFEValidity of instruments for measuring the satisfaction of a woman and her partner with care received during labour and childbirth: Systematic review20175510311210.1016/j.midw.2017.09.014Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Perriman N, Davis D. Measuring maternal satisfaction with maternity care: A systematic integrative review. Women Birth. 2016;29(3):293–299. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2015.12.004.PerrimanNDavisDMeasuring maternal satisfaction with maternity care: A systematic integrative review201629329329910.1016/j.wombi.2015.12.004Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Sawyer A, Ayers S, Abbott J, Gyte G, Rabe H, Duley L. Measures of satisfaction with care during labour and birth: A comparative review. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013;13(1). doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-13-108.SawyerAAyersSAbbottJGyteGRabeHDuleyLMeasures of satisfaction with care during labour and birth: A comparative review201313110.1186/1471-2393-13-108Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Nilvér H, Begley C, Berg M. Measuring women’s childbirth experiences: A systematic review for identification and analysis of validated instruments. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017;17(1). doi: 10.1186/s12884-017-1356-y.NilvérHBegleyCBergMMeasuring women’s childbirth experiences: A systematic review for identification and analysis of validated instruments201717110.1186/s12884-017-1356-yOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar
Mokkink LB, Prinsen CAC, Patrick DL, Alonso J, Bouter LM, De Vet HCW, Terwee CB. COSMIN methodology for systematic reviews of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) user manual Version 1.0 [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2023 Jan 10]. Available from:
https://cosmin.nl/wp-content/uploads/COSMIN-syst-review-for-PROMs-manual_version-1_feb-2018.pdfMokkinkLBPrinsenCACPatrickDLAlonsoJBouterLMDe VetHCWTerweeCB2018[cited 2023 Jan 10]. Available from: https://cosmin.nl/wp-content/uploads/COSMIN-syst-review-for-PROMs-manual_version-1_feb-2018.pdfSearch in Google Scholar
Hosseini Tabaghdehi M, Keramat A, Shahhosseini Z, Kolahdozan S, Moosazadeh M, Motaghi Z. Development and psychometric properties of Iranian women childbirth experience questionnaire. Nursing Open. 2021;8(3):1360–1368. doi: 10.1002/nop2.752.Hosseini TabaghdehiMKeramatAShahhosseiniZKolahdozanSMoosazadehMMotaghiZDevelopment and psychometric properties of Iranian women childbirth experience questionnaire2021831360136810.1002/nop2.752Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Smith LFP. Development of a multidimensional labour satisfaction questionnaire: Dimensions, validity, and internal reliability. Quality Health Care. 2001;10:17–22.SmithLFPDevelopment of a multidimensional labour satisfaction questionnaire: Dimensions, validity, and internal reliability2001101722Search in Google Scholar
Pozo-Cano MD, Martín-Salvador A, Pérez-Morente MÁ, Martínez-García E, Luna del Castillo JD, Gázquez-López M, et al. Validation of the Women’s Views of Birth Labor Satisfaction Questionnaire (WOMBLSQ4) in the Spanish population. Int J Environ Res Publ Health. 2020;17(15). doi: 10.3390/ijerph17155582.Pozo-CanoMDMartín-SalvadorAPérez-MorenteMÁMartínez-GarcíaELuna del CastilloJDGázquez-LópezMValidation of the Women’s Views of Birth Labor Satisfaction Questionnaire (WOMBLSQ4) in the Spanish population2020171510.3390/ijerph17155582Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Carquillat P, Vendittelli F, Perneger T, Guittier MJ. Development of a Questionnaire for Assessing the Childbirth Experience (QACE). BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017;17(1). doi: 10.1186/s12884-017-1462-x.CarquillatPVendittelliFPernegerTGuittierMJDevelopment of a Questionnaire for Assessing the Childbirth Experience (QACE)201717110.1186/s12884-017-1462-xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar
Rodríguez Coll P, Casañas R, Collado Palomares A, Maldonado Aubian G, Salgado Poveda MI, Espada-Trespalacios X, et al. Validation and psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the Questionnaire for Assessing the Childbirth Experience (QACE). Sexual. 2021;27. doi: 10.1016/j.srhc.2020.100584.Rodríguez CollPCasañasRCollado PalomaresAMaldonado AubianGSalgado PovedaMIEspada-TrespalaciosXValidation and psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the Questionnaire for Assessing the Childbirth Experience (QACE)20212710.1016/j.srhc.2020.100584Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Dencker A, Taft C, Bergqvist L, Lilja H, Berg M. Childbirth experience questionnaire (CEQ): Development and evaluation of a multidimensional instrument. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2010;10(1). doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-10-81.DenckerATaftCBergqvistLLiljaHBergMChildbirth experience questionnaire (CEQ): Development and evaluation of a multidimensional instrument201010110.1186/1471-2393-10-81Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Abbaspoor Z, Moghaddam Banaem L, Ronaghi S, Dencker A. Translation and cultural adaptation of the Childbirth Experience Questionnaire (CEQ) in Iran. Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res. 2019;24(4):296–300. doi: 10.4103/ijnmr.IJNMR_103_18.AbbaspoorZMoghaddam BanaemLRonaghiSDenckerATranslation and cultural adaptation of the Childbirth Experience Questionnaire (CEQ) in Iran201924429630010.4103/ijnmr.IJNMR_103_18Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Mamuk R, Şahin N, Dişsiz M. The Turkish Version of the Childbirth Experience Questionnaire (CEQ): Reliability and validity assessment. Bakırköy Tıp Dergisi. 2019;15(4):265–271. doi: 10.4274/BTDMJB.galenos.2019.20190123082356.MamukRŞahinNDişsizMThe Turkish Version of the Childbirth Experience Questionnaire (CEQ): Reliability and validity assessment201915426527110.4274/BTDMJB.galenos.2019.20190123082356Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Kazemi S, Dencker A, Pazandeh F, Montazeri A, Sedigh-Mobarakabadi S, Hajian S. Psychometric evaluation of the Persian version of the Childbirth Experience Questionnaire (CEQ). Biomed Res Int. 2020;6879283. doi: 10.1155/2020/6879283.S.KazemiSDenckerAPazandehFMontazeriASedigh-MobarakabadiSHajianSPsychometric evaluation of the Persian version of the Childbirth Experience Questionnaire (CEQ)2020687928310.1155/2020/6879283.SOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar
Patabendige M, Palihawadana TS, Herath RP, Wijesinghe PS. Childbirth Experience Questionnaire (CEQ) in the Sri Lankan setting: Translation, cultural adaptation and validation into the Sinhala language. BMC Res Notes. 2020;13(1). doi: 10.1186/s13104-020-05380-z.PatabendigeMPalihawadanaTSHerathRPWijesinghePSChildbirth Experience Questionnaire (CEQ) in the Sri Lankan setting: Translation, cultural adaptation and validation into the Sinhala language202013110.1186/s13104-020-05380-zOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar
da Silva Vieira RCM., Ferreira CHJ, de Carvalho Cavalli R, do Prado MLR, Beleza ACS, Driusso P. Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric evaluation of the Brazilian Portuguese version of the Childbirth Experience Questionnaire. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020; 20:477. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-03163-9.da Silva VieiraRCMFerreiraCHJde Carvalho CavalliRdo PradoMLRBelezaACSDriussoPCross-cultural adaptation and psychometric evaluation of the Brazilian Portuguese version of the Childbirth Experience Questionnaire20202047710.1186/s12884-020-03163-9Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Boie S, Lauridsen HH, Glavind J, Smed MK, Uldbjerg N, Bor P. The Childbirth Experience Questionnaire (CEQ)—validation of its use in a Danish-speaking population of new mothers stimulated with oxytocin during labour. PLoS ONE 2020;15(5):e0233122. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233122.BoieSLauridsenHHGlavindJSmedMKUldbjergNBorPThe Childbirth Experience Questionnaire (CEQ)—validation of its use in a Danish-speaking population of new mothers stimulated with oxytocin during labour2020155e023312210.1371/journal.pone.0233122Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Parchaa T, Togoobaatar G, Fukuzawa RK, Chunagsuren B, Tseleejav B, Nyam N, Katsumata AT. Translation and validation of the Mongolian version of the Childbirth Experience Questionnaire. J Patient Exp. 2021; 8:23743735211060636. doi: 10.1177/23743735211060636.ParchaaTTogoobaatarGFukuzawaRKChunagsurenBTseleejavBNyamNKatsumataATTranslation and validation of the Mongolian version of the Childbirth Experience Questionnaire202182374373521106063610.1177/23743735211060636Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Kalok A, Nordin N, Sharip S, Abdul Rahman R, Shah SA, Abdullah Mahdy Z, Kamisan Atan I. Psychometric evaluation of the Malay version of the Childbirth Experience Questionnaire (CEQ-My). Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(13):7644. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19137644.KalokANordinNSharipSAbdul RahmanRShahSAAbdullah MahdyZKamisan AtanIPsychometric evaluation of the Malay version of the Childbirth Experience Questionnaire (CEQ-My)20221913764410.3390/ijerph19137644Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Marques MJP, Zangão O, Miranda L, Sim-Sim M. Childbirth Experience Questionnaire: Cross-cultural validation and psychometric evaluation for European Portuguese. Womens Health (Lond). 2022;18:17455057221128121. doi: 10.1177/17455057221128121.MarquesMJPZangãoOMirandaLSim-SimMChildbirth Experience Questionnaire: Cross-cultural validation and psychometric evaluation for European Portuguese2022181745505722112812110.1177/17455057221128121Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Zhu X, Wang Y, Zhou H, Qiu L, Pang R. Adaptation of the Childbirth Experience Questionnaire (CEQ) in China: A multisite crosssectional study. PLoS ONE. 2019;14(4):e0215373. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0215373.ZhuXWangYZhouHQiuLPangRAdaptation of the Childbirth Experience Questionnaire (CEQ) in China: A multisite crosssectional study2019144e021537310.1371/journal.pone.0215373Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Dencker A, Bergqvist L, Berg M, Greenbrook JTV, Nilsson C, Lundgren I. Measuring women’s experiences of decision-making and aspects of midwifery support: A confirmatory factor analysis of the revised Childbirth Experience Questionnaire. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020;20(1). doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-02869-0.DenckerABergqvistLBergMGreenbrookJTVNilssonCLundgrenIMeasuring women’s experiences of decision-making and aspects of midwifery support: A confirmatory factor analysis of the revised Childbirth Experience Questionnaire202020110.1186/s12884-020-02869-0Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Ghanbari-Homayi S, Dencker A, Fardiazar Z, Jafarabadi M A, Mohammad-Alizadeh-Charandabi S, Meedya S, et al. Validation of the Iranian version of the childbirth experience questionnaire 2.0. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019;19(1). doi: 10.1186/s12884-019-2606-y.Ghanbari-HomayiSDenckerAFardiazarZJafarabadiMAMohammad-Alizadeh-CharandabiSMeedyaSValidation of the Iranian version of the childbirth experience questionnaire 2.0201919110.1186/s12884-019-2606-yOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar
Walker KF, Dencker A, Thornton JG. Childbirth experience questionnaire 2: Validating its use in the United Kingdom. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X. 2019;5:100097. doi: 10.1016/j.eurox.2019.100097.WalkerKFDenckerAThorntonJGChildbirth experience questionnaire 2: Validating its use in the United Kingdom2019510009710.1016/j.eurox.2019.100097Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Hollins Martin CJ, Martin CR. Development and psychometric properties of the Birth Satisfaction Scale-Revised (BSS-R). Midwifery. 2014;30(6):610–619. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2013.10.006.Hollins MartinCJMartinCRDevelopment and psychometric properties of the Birth Satisfaction Scale-Revised (BSS-R)201430661061910.1016/j.midw.2013.10.006Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Jefford E, Hollins Martin CJ, Martin CR. Development and validation of the Australian version of the Birth Satisfaction Scale-Revised (BSS-R). J Reprod Infant Psychol. 2018;36(1):42–58. doi: 10.1080/02646838.2017.1396302.JeffordEHollins MartinCJMartinCRDevelopment and validation of the Australian version of the Birth Satisfaction Scale-Revised (BSS-R)2018361425810.1080/02646838.2017.1396302Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Škodová Z, Nepelová Z, Grendár M, Bašková M. Psychometric properties of the Slovak version of the Birth Satisfaction Scale (BSS) and Birth Satisfaction Scale-Revised (BSS-R). Midwifery. 2019;79. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2019.102550.ŠkodováZNepelováZGrendárMBaškováMPsychometric properties of the Slovak version of the Birth Satisfaction Scale (BSS) and Birth Satisfaction Scale-Revised (BSS-R)20197910.1016/j.midw.2019.102550Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Romero-Gonzalez B, Peralta-Ramirez MI, Caparros-Gonzalez RA, Cambil-Ledesma A, Hollins Martin CJ, Martin CR. Spanish validation and factor structure of the Birth Satisfaction Scale-Revised (BSS-R). Midwifery. 2019;70:31–37. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2018.12.009.Romero-GonzalezBPeralta-RamirezMICaparros-GonzalezRACambil-LedesmaAHollins MartinCJMartinCRSpanish validation and factor structure of the Birth Satisfaction Scale-Revised (BSS-R)201970313710.1016/j.midw.2018.12.009Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Skvirsky V, Taubman–ben-ari O, Hollins Martin CJ, Martin CR. Validation of the Hebrew Birth Satisfaction Scale – Revised (BSS-R) and its relationship to perceived traumatic labour. J Reprod Infant Psychol. 2020;38(2):214–220. doi: 10.1080/02646838.2019.1600666.SkvirskyVTaubman–ben-ariOHollins MartinCJMartinCRValidation of the Hebrew Birth Satisfaction Scale – Revised (BSS-R) and its relationship to perceived traumatic labour202038221422010.1080/02646838.2019.1600666Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Martin CR, Jefford E, Hollins Martin CJ. Crisis, what crisis? Replicability of the key measurement characteristics of the Australian version of the Birth Satisfaction Scale—Revised. Int J Childbirth. 2020;10(3):140–150. doi: 10.1891/IJCBIRTH-D-20-00006.MartinCRJeffordEHollins MartinCJCrisis, what crisis? Replicability of the key measurement characteristics of the Australian version of the Birth Satisfaction Scale—Revised202010314015010.1891/IJCBIRTH-D-20-00006Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Nasiri S, Kariman N, Ozgoli G. Psychometric properties of the Iranian version of Birth Satisfaction Scale-Revised. J Res Med Sci. 2020;25:90. doi: 10.4103/jrms.JRMS_248_19.NasiriSKarimanNOzgoliGPsychometric properties of the Iranian version of Birth Satisfaction Scale-Revised2020259010.4103/jrms.JRMS_248_19Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Nespoli A, Colciago E, Fumagalli S, Locatelli A, Hollins Martin CJ, Martin CR. Validation and factor structure of the Italian version of the Birth Satisfaction Scale-Revised (BSS-R). J Reprod Infant Psychol. 2021;39(5):516–531. doi: 10.1080/02646838.2020.1836333.NespoliAColciagoEFumagalliSLocatelliAHollins MartinCJMartinCRValidation and factor structure of the Italian version of the Birth Satisfaction Scale-Revised (BSS-R)202139551653110.1080/02646838.2020.1836333Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Omani-Samani R, Hollins Martin CJ, Martin CR, Maroufizadeh S, Ghaheri A, Navid B. The Birth Satisfaction Scale-Revised Indicator (BSS-RI): A validation study in Iranian mothers. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2021:34(11):1827–1831. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2019.1651265.Omani-SamaniRHollins MartinCJMartinCRMaroufizadehSGhaheriANavidBThe Birth Satisfaction Scale-Revised Indicator (BSS-RI): A validation study in Iranian mothers202134111827183110.1080/14767058.2019.1651265Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Mortazavi F, Mehrabadi M, Hollins Martin CJ, Martin CR. Psychometric properties of the birth satisfaction scale-revised (BSS-R) in a sample of postpartum Iranian women. Health Care Women Int. 2021;42(4–6):836–851. doi: 10.1080/07399332.2020.1802464.MortazaviFMehrabadiMHollins MartinCJMartinCRPsychometric properties of the birth satisfaction scale-revised (BSS-R) in a sample of postpartum Iranian women2021424–683685110.1080/07399332.2020.1802464Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Zafar S, Tayyab F, Liaqat A, Sikander S, Hollins Martin CJ, Martin CR. Translation and validation of the Birth Satisfaction Scale-Revised in Urdu for use in Pakistan. Int J Childbirth. 2021;11(2):72–83. doi: 10.1891/IJCBIRTH-D-21-00001.ZafarSTayyabFLiaqatASikanderSHollins MartinCJMartinCRTranslation and validation of the Birth Satisfaction Scale-Revised in Urdu for use in Pakistan2021112728310.1891/IJCBIRTH-D-21-00001Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Emmens B, Hollins Martin CJ, Martin CR. Translation and validation of the Dutch version of the Birth Satisfaction Scale-Revised (BSS-R). J Reprod Infant Psychol. 2021;1–15. doi: 10.1080/02646838.2021.1979200.EmmensBHollins MartinCJMartinCRTranslation and validation of the Dutch version of the Birth Satisfaction Scale-Revised (BSS-R)202111510.1080/02646838.2021.1979200Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Radoš NS, Matijaš M, Brekalo M, Hollins Martin CJ, Martin CR. Further validation of the Birth Satisfaction Scale-Revised: Factor structure, validity, and reliability. Curr Psychol. 2022; 42:13693–13702. doi: 10.1007/s12144-021-02688-2.RadošNSMatijašMBrekaloMHollins MartinCJMartinCRFurther validation of the Birth Satisfaction Scale-Revised: Factor structure, validity, and reliability202242136931370210.1007/s12144-021-02688-2Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Anikwe Ch, Osita US, Mbanefo OP, Asiegbu OGK, Nnadozie UU, Eleje GU, et al. The Birth Satisfaction Scale: Igbo adaptation, validation, and reliability study. Qeios ID: GOVO55, 2022. doi:10.32388/GOVO55.2.AnikweChOsitaUSMbanefoOPAsiegbuOGKNnadozieUUElejeGUThe Birth Satisfaction Scale: Igbo adaptation, validation, and reliability studyGOVO55202210.32388/GOVO55.2Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Özdemir Gökmen Ö, Erbil N, Demirbağ B. Adaptation of Birth Satisfaction Scale-Revised to Turkish society. Middle Black Sea J Health Scien. 2022;8(4):490–505. doi: 10.19127/mbsjohs.1080337.Özdemir GökmenÖErbilNDemirbağBAdaptation of Birth Satisfaction Scale-Revised to Turkish society20228449050510.19127/mbsjohs.1080337Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Ratislavová K, Hendrych Lorenzová E, Hollins Martin CJ, Martin CR. Translation and validation of the Czech Republic version of the Birth Satisfaction Scale-Revised (BSS-R). J Reprod Infant Psychol. 2022;1–17. doi: 10.1080/02646838.2022.2067837.RatislavováKHendrych LorenzováEHollins MartinCJMartinCRTranslation and validation of the Czech Republic version of the Birth Satisfaction Scale-Revised (BSS-R)202211710.1080/02646838.2022.2067837Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
WHO. Intrapartum care for a positive childbirth experience: WHO recommendations. Geneva: World Health Organization [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2023 July 20]. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241550215WHOGenevaWorld Health Organization [Internet]2018[cited 2023 July 20]. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241550215Search in Google Scholar
Nijagal MA, Wissig S, Stowell C, Olson E, Amer-Wahlin I, Bonsel G, et al. Standardized outcome measures for pregnancy and childbirth, ICHOM proposal. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018;18(1). doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3732-3.NijagalMAWissigSStowellCOlsonEAmer-WahlinIBonselGStandardized outcome measures for pregnancy and childbirth, ICHOM proposal201818110.1186/s12913-018-3732-3Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Hollins Martin CJ, Martinez LJ, Martin CR. Measuring women’s experiences of childbirth using the Birth Satisfaction Scale-Revised (BSS-R). Br J Midwifery. 2020;28(5):306–312. doi: 10.12968/bjom.2020.28.5.306.Hollins MartinCJMartinezLJMartinCRMeasuring women’s experiences of childbirth using the Birth Satisfaction Scale-Revised (BSS-R)202028530631210.12968/bjom.2020.28.5.306Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Hollins Martin CJ, Martin CR. The Birth Satisfaction Consortium [Internet]. 2023 [cited 2023 July 20]. Available from: https://www.bss-r.co.uk/about/Hollins MartinCJMartinCR2023[cited 2023 July 20]. Available from: https://www.bss-r.co.uk/about/Search in Google Scholar
Prinsen CAC, Mokkink LB, Bouter LM, Alonso J, Patrick DL, de Vet HCW, Terwee CB. COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures. Qual Life Res. 2018;27(5):1147–1157. doi: 10.1007/s11136-018-1798-3.PrinsenCACMokkinkLBBouterLMAlonsoJPatrickDLde VetHCWTerweeCBCOSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures20182751147115710.1007/s11136-018-1798-3Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Kahalon R, Preis H, Benyamini Y. Who benefits most from skin-to-skin mother-infant contact after birth? Survey findings on skin-to-skin and birth satisfaction by mode of birth. Midwifery. 2021;92. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2020.102862.KahalonRPreisHBenyaminiYWho benefits most from skin-to-skin mother-infant contact after birth? Survey findings on skin-to-skin and birth satisfaction by mode of birth20219210.1016/j.midw.2020.102862Open DOISearch in Google Scholar