Attitudes Towards Genetically Modified Organisms in Slovenia: Between Knowledge and Myths / Stališča Do Genetsko Modificiranih Organizmov V Sloveniji: Poznavanje In Miti

1. Marks LA, Kalaitzandonakes N. Mass media communications about agrobiotechnology. AgBioForum 2001; 4: 199-208.Search in Google Scholar

2. Paparini A, Romano-Spica V. Public health issues related with the consumption of food obtained from genetically modified organism. Biotechnol Annu Rev 2004; 10: 85-122.10.1016/S1387-2656(04)10004-5Search in Google Scholar

3. Regulation (EC) No. 1829/2003 of the European parliament and of the council of 22 September 2003. Off J EU 268/1.Search in Google Scholar

4. EFSA panel on genetically modified organisms (GMO); scientific opinion on guidance for risk assessment of food and feed from genetically modified plants. EFSA J 2011; 9: 2150. Available online: www.efsa.europa.eu/efsajournal.htm10.2903/j.efsa.2011.2150Search in Google Scholar

5. Eurobarometer 64.3. The Europeans and biotechnology in 2005: patterns and trends. Bruxelles: TNS, 2006.Search in Google Scholar

6. Eurobarometer 73.1. Biotechnology. Bruxelles: TNS, 2010.Search in Google Scholar

7. Umanotera. Telefonska mnenjska raziskava o GSO. Slovenska fundacija za trajnostni razvoj, 2002.Search in Google Scholar

8. Kirinčič S, Tivadar B. Odnos prebivalcev Slovenije do uživanja gensko spremenjene hrane. Ljubljana: Biotehniška fakulteta, 2005.Search in Google Scholar

9. ZPS. Javno mnenjska anketa o gensko spremenjenih organizmih. Ljubljana: Zveza potrošnikov Slovenije, 2007.Search in Google Scholar

10. Boccaletti S, Moro D. Consumer willingness-to-pay for GM food products in Italy. AgBioForum 2000; 3: 259-267.Search in Google Scholar

11. Allum N, Sturgis P, Tabourazi D, Brunton-Smith I. Science knowledge and attitudes across cultures: a meta-analysis. Public Underst Sci 2008; 17: 35-54.10.1177/0963662506070159Search in Google Scholar

12. Fischhoff B, Fischhoff I. Publics’ opinions about biotechnologies. AgBioForum 2001; 4: 155-162.Search in Google Scholar

13. Ekborg M. Opinion building on a socioscientific issue. J Biolog Educ 2008; 42: 60-65.10.1080/00219266.2008.9656112Search in Google Scholar

14. Morris SH, Adley CC. Genetically modified food issues: attitudes of Irish university scientists. Brit Food J 2000; 102: 669-691.10.1108/00070700010362040Search in Google Scholar

15. Ronteltap A, van Trijp JCM, Reneb RJ, Frewer LJ. Consumer acceptance of technology-based food innovations: lessons for the future of nutrigenomics. Appetite 2007; 49: 1-7.10.1016/j.appet.2007.02.00217382433Search in Google Scholar

16. Scholderer J, Frewer LJ. The biotechnology communication paradox. J ConsumPolicy 2003; 26: 125-157.Search in Google Scholar

17. House L, Lusk J, Jaeger S, Traill WB, Moore M, Valli C, Morrow B, Yee WMS. Objective and subjective knowledge. AgBioForum 2005; 7: 113-123.Search in Google Scholar

18. Prokop P, Leskova A, Kubiatko M, Diran C. Slovakian student’s knowledge of and attitudes toward biotechnology. Int J Sci Educ 2007; 29: 895-907.10.1080/09500690600969830Search in Google Scholar

19. Thomas, M. Digital education. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011.Search in Google Scholar

20. Erjavec K, Zajc J. Stališča slovenskih medijev o gensko spremenjenih organizmih. Družboslovne razprave 2011; 27: 25-43.Search in Google Scholar

21. Hamstra IA. Public opinion about biotechnology. The Hague: Cambridge Biomedical Consultants Limited; 1998.Search in Google Scholar

22. EFSA. Genetically modified organisms. 2011. Available from: http://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/gmotopics/topic/gmo.htmSearch in Google Scholar