Role of Combining Colour Doppler and Grey Scale Ultrasound in Differentiating Benign from Malignant Ovarian Masses

1. Barney SP, Muller CY, Bradshaw KD. Pelvic masses. Med Clin North Am. 2008;92:1143-1161.10.1016/j.mcna.2008.04.00718721656Search in Google Scholar

2. Ackerman S, Irshad A, Lewis M, Anis M. Ovarian cystic lesions: a current approach to diagnosis and management. Radiol Clin North Am. 2013;51:1067–1085.10.1016/j.rcl.2013.07.01024210445Search in Google Scholar

3. Valentin L, Ameye L, Franchi D, Guerriero S, Jurkovic D, Savelli L, et al. Risk of malignancy in unilocular cysts: a study of 1148 adnexal masses classified as unilocular cysts at transvaginal ultrasound and review of the literature. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013;41:80–89.10.1002/uog.1230823001924Search in Google Scholar

4. Medeiros LR, Rosa DD, da Rosa MI, Bozzetti MC. Accuracy of ultrasonography with color Doppler in ovarian tumor: a systematic quantitative review. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2009;19:1214–1220.10.1111/IGC.0b013e3181a386e519823057Search in Google Scholar

5. Laing FC, Allison SJ. US of the ovary and adnexa: to worry or not to worry? Radiographics. 2012;32:1621–1639.Search in Google Scholar

6. Alcázar JL, Mercé LT, Laparte C, Jurado M, López-García G. A new scoring system to differentiate benign from malignant adnexal masses. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003;88:685-692.10.1067/mob.2003.17612634641Search in Google Scholar

7. Sassone AM, Timor-Tritsch IE, Artner A, Westhoff C, Warren WB. Transvaginal sonograpihic characterization of ovarian disease: evaluation of a new scoring system to predict ovarian malignancy. Obstet Gynccol 1991;78:70-76.Search in Google Scholar

8. Caruso A, Caforio L, Testa AC, Ciampelli M, Panici PB, Mancuso S. Transvaginal color Doppler ultrasonography in the presurgical characterization of adnexal masses. Gynecol Oncol.1996;63: 184-191.10.1006/gyno.1996.03048910625Search in Google Scholar

9. Van Calster B, Timmerman D, Bourne T, Testa AC, Van Holsbeke C, Domali E, et al. Discrimination between benign and malignant adnexal masses by specialist ultrasound examination versus serum CA-125. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2007;99:1706–1714.10.1093/jnci/djm19918000221Search in Google Scholar

10. Jung SI. Ultrasonography of ovarian masses using a pattern recognition approach. Ultrasonography. 2015;34:173-182.10.14366/usg.15003448429325797108Search in Google Scholar

11. Levine D, Brown DL, Andreotti RF, Benacerraf B, Benson CB, Brewster WR, et-al. Management of asymptomatic ovarian and other adnexal cysts imaged at US: Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound Consensus Conference Statement. Radiology. 2010;256:943-954.10.1148/radiol.10100213693995420505067Search in Google Scholar

12. Gupta KP, Jain SK. Role of Ultrasonography and Color Doppler to Diagnosis of Pelvic Masses and its Correlation with Histopathological Findings. Int J Sci Stud 2016;4:147-153Search in Google Scholar

13. Timmerman D, Ameye L, Fischerova D, Epstein E, Melis GB, Guerriero S, et al. Simple ultrasound rules to distinguish between benign and malignant adnexal masses before surgery: prospective validation by IOTA group. BMJ. 2010 Dec 14;341:c6839.10.1136/bmj.c6839300170321156740Search in Google Scholar

14. Secil M, Dogra VS. Color Flow Doppler Evaluation of Uterus and Ovaries and Its Optimization Techniques. Ultrasound Clinic 2008; 3: 461–482.10.1016/j.cult.2008.07.004Search in Google Scholar

15. Farnaz, Wahab S, Hassan L. Women with Ovarian Masses. J Postgrad Med Inst 2012; 26: 73-78.Search in Google Scholar

16. Ueland FR, DePriest PD, Pavlik EJ, Kryscio RJ, van Nagell JR. Preoperative differentiation of malignant from benign ovarian tumors: the efficacy of morphology indexing and Doppler flow sonography. Gynecol Oncol. 2003;91:46-50.10.1016/S0090-8258(03)00414-1Search in Google Scholar

17. Jokubkiene L, Sladkevicius P, Valentin L. Does three dimensional power Doppler ultrasound help in discrimination between benign and malignant ovarian masses? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2007;29:215-225.Search in Google Scholar

18. Abbas AM. Zahran KM, Nasr A, Kamel HS. A new scoring model for characterization of adnexal masses based on two-dimensional gray-scale and colour Doppler sonographic features. Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2014;6:68-74.Search in Google Scholar

19. Shah D, Shah S, Parikh J, Bhatt CJ, Vaishnav K, Bala DV. Doppler Ultrasound: A Good and Reliable Predictor of Ovarian Malignancy. J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2013;63:186-189.10.1007/s13224-012-0307-9369613824431635Search in Google Scholar

20. Dhwani D, Desai VA, Verma RN, Shrivastava A. Role of gray scale and color Doppler in differentiating benign from malignant ovarian masses. J Midlife Health. 2010;1:23–25.Search in Google Scholar

21. Malhotra A, Tarafdar S, Tayade AT. Benign versus malignant adnexal masses: Does addition of Color and Spectral Doppler over and above the Gray Scale Ultrasound improves diagnostic efficacy. Sch. J. App. Med. Sci. 2016;4:62-74.Search in Google Scholar

22. Gagandeep C, Avneet B, Gurinder S, Deepak G, Manjit KM, Sanjay S. Role of combining colour Doppler and grey scale ultrasound in characterizing adnexal masses. Journal of Family and Reproductive Health. 2012;6:42-47.Search in Google Scholar