[
1. Ågotnes T. and Wooldridge, M. Optimal social laws. in Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, AAMAS, 1, 2010, pp. 667–674.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
2. Almpani, S. and Stefaneas, P. On proving and argumentation. AIC 2017, 5th International Workshop on Artificial Intelligence and Cognition, Larnaka, 2017.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
3. Almpani, S. and Stefaneas, P. and Vandoulakis, I. On the Role of argumentation in discovery proof-events. C3GI 2017, 6th International Workshop on Computational Creativity, Concept Invention, and General Intelligence, Madrid, 2017.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
4. Arkin, R. Governing Lethal Behavior in Autonomous Robots. CRC Press, 2009.10.1201/9781420085952
]Search in Google Scholar
[
5. Blass, J. and Forbus, K. Moral Decision-Making by Analogy: Generalizations vs. Exemplars. AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence; Twenty-Ninth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Austin, Jan. 2015.10.1609/aaai.v29i1.9226
]Search in Google Scholar
[
6. Bringsjord, S. and Arkoudas, K. and Bello, P. Toward a General Logicist Methodology for Engineering Ethically Correct Robots. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 21, 2006, pp. 38–44.10.1109/MIS.2006.82
]Search in Google Scholar
[
7. Cunneen, M. and Mullins, M. and Murphy, F. and Gaines, S. Artificial Driving Intelligence and Moral Agency: Examining the Decision Ontology of Unavoidable Road Traffic Accidents through the Prism of the Trolley Dilemma. Applied Artificial Intelligence, 33 (3), 2019, pp. 267–293.10.1080/08839514.2018.1560124
]Search in Google Scholar
[
8. Danaher, J. Welcoming Robots into the Moral Circle: A Defence of Ethical Behaviourism. Sci Eng Ethics, Jun. 2019.10.1007/s11948-019-00119-x31222612
]Search in Google Scholar
[
9. Dennis, L. and Fisher, M. and Slavkovik, M. and Webster, M. Formal verification of ethical choices in autonomous systems. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 77, Mar. 2016, pp. 1–14.10.1016/j.robot.2015.11.012
]Search in Google Scholar
[
10. Dennis, L. A. and Fisher, M. and Winfield, A. F. T. Towards Verifiably Ethical Robot Behaviour. arXiv:1504.03592 [cs], Apr. 2015, Accessed: Jul. 02, 2020. [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/1504.03592.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
11. Dignum, V. Ethics in artificial intelligence: introduction to the special issue. Ethics and Information Technology, 20, 2018, doi: 10.1007/s10676-018-9450-z.10.1007/s10676-018-9450-z
]Search in Google Scholar
[
12. Flanagan, M. and Howe, D. and Nissenbaum, H. Embodying values in technology: Theory and practice. Information Technology and Moral Philosophy, 2008, pp. 322–353.10.1017/CBO9780511498725.017
]Search in Google Scholar
[
13. Floridi L. and Sanders, J. W. On the Morality of Artificial Agents. Minds and Machines, 14, 2004, pp. 349–379.10.1023/B:MIND.0000035461.63578.9d
]Search in Google Scholar
[
14. Gomila, A. and Müller, V. Challenges for Artificial Cognitive Systems. Journal of Cognitive Science, 13, 2012, pp. 453–469.10.17791/jcs.2012.13.4.453
]Search in Google Scholar
[
15. Hofmann, B. Ethical Challenges with Welfare Technology: A Review of the Literature. Science and engineering ethics, 19, 2012.10.1007/s11948-011-9348-122218998
]Search in Google Scholar
[
16. Iba, W. and Langley, P. Exploring Moral Reasoning in a Cognitive Architecture. Thirty-Third Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, Expanding the Space of Cognitive Science Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, Boston, 20-23 Jul 2011.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
17. Kakas, A. and Michael, L. Cognitive Systems: Argument and Cognition. IEEE Intelligent Informatics Bulletin, 17, 2016, pp. 14–20.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
18. Kakas, A. and Moraitis, P. Argumentation Based Decision Making for Autonomous Agents. in Proceedings of the Interantional Conference on Autonomous Agents, 2, 2003, pp. 883–890.10.1145/860575.860717
]Search in Google Scholar
[
19. Lutz, C. and Tamò Larrieux, A. RoboCode-Ethicists – Privacy-friendly robots, an ethical responsibility of engineers?. ACM Web Science, Oxford, 7, 2015.10.1145/2786451.2786465
]Search in Google Scholar
[
20. Malle, B. and Scheutz, M. Learning How to Behave: Moral Competence for Social Robots. Handbuch Maschinenethik, 2019, pp. 1–24.10.1007/978-3-658-17484-2_17-1
]Search in Google Scholar
[
21. Fisher, M. and Dennis, L. and Webster, M. Verifying autonomous systems. Commun. ACM, 56 (9), Sep. 2013, pp. 84–93.10.1145/2494558
]Search in Google Scholar
[
22. Pereira, L. and Saptawijaya, A. Modelling Morality with Prospective Logic. in International Journal of Reasoning-based Intelligent Systems, 1, 2007, pp. 99–111.10.1007/978-3-540-77002-2_9
]Search in Google Scholar
[
23. Robertson, L. J. and Abbas, R. and Alici, G. and Munoz, A. and K. Michael. Engineering- Based Design Methodology for Embedding Ethics in Autonomous Robots. Proceedings of the IEEE, 107 (3), 2019, pp. 582–599.10.1109/JPROC.2018.2889678
]Search in Google Scholar
[
24. Sisk, B. A. and Mozersky, J. and Antes, A. L. and DuBois, J. M. The ‘Ought-Is’ Problem: An Implementation Science Framework for Translating Ethical Norms Into Practice. The American Journal of Bioethics, 20 (4), Apr. 2020, pp. 62–70.10.1080/15265161.2020.1730483716465932208070
]Search in Google Scholar
[
25. Tzafestas, S. Ethics in Robotics and Automation: A General View. International Robotics and Automation Journal (IRAT-J), 4, 2018.10.15406/iratj.2018.04.00127
]Search in Google Scholar
[
26. Vakkuri, V. and Kemell, K.-K. and Abrahamsson, P. Implementing Ethics in AI: An industrial multiple case study. ArXiv, abs/1906.12307, 2019.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
27. Wynsberghe, A. Designing Robots for Care: Care Centered Value-Sensitive Design. Science and engineering ethics, 19, 2012.10.1007/s11948-011-9343-6366286022212357
]Search in Google Scholar
[
28. Winfield, A. F. and Michael, K. and Pitt, J. and Evers, V. Machine Ethics: The Design and Governance of Ethical AI and Autonomous Systems [Scanning the Issue]. Proceedings of the IEEE, 107 (3), Mar. 2019, pp. 509–517.10.1109/JPROC.2019.2900622
]Search in Google Scholar
