[
1. Aristotle. Topics. In the complete works of Aristotle, vol. I, ed. Jonathan Barnes. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1991.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
2. Atlas, J. Philosophy Without Ambiguity. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
3. Chang, C.-H., & Krulee, G. Resolution of ambiguity in Chinese and its application to machine translation. Machine Translation, 6(4), 1991, pp. 279–315.10.1007/BF00417653
]Search in Google Scholar
[
4. Chapman, S., & Routledge, C. (Eds.). Key Ideas in Linguistics and the Philosophy of Language. Edinburgh University Press, 2009.10.1515/9780748631421
]Search in Google Scholar
[
5. Crivelli, P. Aristotle on Truth, Cambridge, 2004.10.1017/CBO9780511482496
]Search in Google Scholar
[
6. Degano, C. Corpus linguistics and argumentation: Retrieving argumentative patterns in UK prime ministerial debates. Journal of Argumentation in Context 5(2), 2016, pp.113-138.10.1075/jaic.5.2.01deg
]Search in Google Scholar
[
7. Golitsis, P. “Aristotle on Ambiguity”. Strategies of Ambiguity in Ancient Literature, edited by Martin Vöhler, Therese Fuhrer and Stavros Frangoulidis, Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter, 2021, pp. 11-28.10.1515/9783110715811-002
]Search in Google Scholar
[
8. Halliday, M.A.K. & R. Hasan. Language, context and text: a social semiotic perspective. Deakin University Press, 1985.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
9. Halliday, M.A.K. An introduction to functional grammar.2nd edition. London: Edward Arnold, 1994.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
10. Halliday, M. A. K. The notion of context in language education. Jonathan J. Webster (ed.), Language and education. Volume 7 in the collected works of M. A. K. Halliday, 250–264. London & New York: Continuum, 2007.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
11. Hamblin, C. L. Fallacies. London: Methuen, 1970.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
12. Hinton, M. Corpus Linguistics Methods in the Study of (Meta)Argumentation. Argumentation 35, 2021, pp. 435–455.10.1007/s10503-020-09533-z
]Search in Google Scholar
[
13. Horn, L.R.A pragmatic approach to certain ambiguities. Linguist Philos 4, 1981, pp. 321–358.10.1007/BF00304400
]Search in Google Scholar
[
14. Hutchby, I. Oh’, Irony and Sequential Ambiguity in Arguments. Discourse & Society 12 (2), 2001, pp. 123–41.10.1177/0957926501012002001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
15. Jackson, S. Frans H. van Eemeren and Wu Peng (ed.). Contextualizing Pragma-Dialectics: John Benjamins, Amsterdam/Philadelphia, Volume 12 of the Argumentation in Context Series. Argumentation 32 (2), 2017, pp. 293-299.10.1007/s10503-018-9459-9
]Search in Google Scholar
[
16. Jaszczolt, K. Discourse, beliefs and intentions. Oxford: Elsevier, 1999.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
17. Koniak, P. and Cwalina, W. Does it pay to avoid speaking straight about controversial issues? Impact of argumentative ambiguity on the perception of the speaker, Journal of Communication Management, Vol. 26 No. 1, 2022, pp. 84-9710.1108/JCOM-11-2020-0154
]Search in Google Scholar
[
18. Larina, T., Ozyumenko V. and Ponton D. Persuasion strategies in media discourse about Russia: Linguistic ambiguity and uncertainty. Lodz Papers in Pragmatics Levinson, S. Presumptive meanings: The theory of generalized Conversational 22 implicature. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 2019.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
19. Levinson, S. C. Presumptive meanings: The theory of generalized conversational implicature. The MIT Press, 2000.10.7551/mitpress/5526.001.0001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
20. Malinowski, B. The problem of meaning in primitive languages. Charles K. Ogden & Ian A. Richards (eds.), The meaning of meaning, London: Routledge, 1935, pp. 146–152.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
21. Postal, P. On Certain Ambiguities. In Linguistic Inquiry, 5, 3, 1974.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
22. Schiaparelli, A. Aristotle on the fallacies of combination and division in Sophistici Elenchi 4. History and Philosophy of Logic, 2003.10.1080/0144534031000096145
]Search in Google Scholar
[
23. Smith, L. W. John-Steiner, V., Panofsky, C. P., Smith, L. W (eds.). “Context.” Sociocultural Approaches to Language and Literacy: An Interactionist Perspective. Cambridge University Press, 1994.10.1017/CBO9780511897047
]Search in Google Scholar
[
24. van Eemeren, F. H. Strategic maneuvering in argumentative discourse: Extending the pragma- dialectical theory of argumentation. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 2010.10.1075/aic.2
]Search in Google Scholar
[
25. van Eemeren, F. H. Strategic maneuvering in argumentative discourse in political deliberation. Journal of Argumentation in Context 2 (1), 2013, pp. 10-31.10.1075/jaic.2.1.01eem
]Search in Google Scholar
[
26. Walton, D. N. Informal logic: A pragmatic approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
27. https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/definition/american_english/seal_2
]Search in Google Scholar
[
28. https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/definition/english/make_1?q=make
]Search in Google Scholar
