1. bookTom 11 (2022): Zeszyt 3-4 (December 2022)
Informacje o czasopiśmie
License
Format
Czasopismo
eISSN
2299-0518
Pierwsze wydanie
03 Oct 2014
Częstotliwość wydawania
4 razy w roku
Języki
Angielski
Otwarty dostęp

Trends in Argumentation Logic

Data publikacji: 05 Jan 2023
Tom & Zeszyt: Tom 11 (2022) - Zeszyt 3-4 (December 2022)
Zakres stron: 1 - 5
Informacje o czasopiśmie
License
Format
Czasopismo
eISSN
2299-0518
Pierwsze wydanie
03 Oct 2014
Częstotliwość wydawania
4 razy w roku
Języki
Angielski

1. Alchourrón, C., P. Gärdenfors, D. Makinson, On the logic of theory change: Partial meet contraction and revision functions, Journal of Symbolic Logic 50, 1985, pp. 510-530.10.2307/2274239 Search in Google Scholar

2. Almpani, S., Y. Kiouvrekis, P. Stefaneas, P. Frangos, Computational Argumentation for Medical Device Regulatory Classification, International Journal on Artificial Intelligence Tools 31, 2022, DOI: 10.1142/S021821302250005110.1142/S0218213022500051 Search in Google Scholar

3. Barbashina, E., E. Lisanyuk, Leon Petrażycki on Norms and Their Logical Study, Studia Humana 7: 4, 2018, pp. 30-38.10.2478/sh-2018-0021 Search in Google Scholar

4. Dung, P.M., On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming, and n-person games, Artificial Intelligence 77, 1995, pp. 321-357.10.1016/0004-3702(94)00041-X Search in Google Scholar

5. Eemeren van, F.H., R. Grootendorst, A Systematic Theory of Argumentation. The Pragmadialectical Approach, Cambridge University Press, 2004.10.1017/CBO9780511616389 Search in Google Scholar

6. Gabbay, D. M., K. Schlechta, A New Perspective on Nonmonotonic Logics, Springer International Publishing AG, 2016.10.1007/978-3-319-46817-4 Search in Google Scholar

7. Kirillova, N., E. Lisanyuk, Truth and legal argumentation in Fyodor Dostoevsky’s, The Karamazov Brothers, Tomsk State University Journal of Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science 48, 2019, pp. 193-204.10.17223/1998863x/48/19 Search in Google Scholar

8. Lisanyuk, E., Argumentation, Pavilionis’s meaning continuum and the Kitchen Debate, Problemos 88, 2015, pp. 95-113.10.15388/Problemos.2015.88.8481 Search in Google Scholar

9. Lisanyuk E. Logical theories of rational behavior, law and argumentation [Логічні теорії раціональної поведінки, право і аргументація], Philosophy of law and contemporary theory of law [Філософія права і загальна теорія права] 1–2, 2014, pp. 148-159, in Ukrainian. Search in Google Scholar

10. Pollock, J. L., Defeasible Reasoning and Degrees of Justification, Argument and Computation 1 (1), 2010, pp. 7-22.10.1080/19462161003728921 Search in Google Scholar

11. Prakken, H., Formalising debates about law-making proposals as practical reasoning, [in:] M. Araszkiewicz, K. Pleszka (eds.), Logic in the Theory and Practice of Lawmaking. Legisprudence Library Series, Springer, 2015.10.1007/978-3-319-19575-9_11 Search in Google Scholar

12. Schumann, A. Did the Neo-Babylonians construct a Symbolic Logic for legal proceedings? Journal of Applied Logics – IfCoLog Journal of Logics and Their Applications 6: 1, 2019, pp. 31-82. Search in Google Scholar

13. Schumann, A. Archaeology of Logic, Taylor & Francis Group, 2023. Search in Google Scholar

Polecane artykuły z Trend MD

Zaplanuj zdalną konferencję ze Sciendo