[
1. SIENNA: Technology, ethics and human rights. https://sienna-project.eu/ accessed June 21st 2021.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
2. SIENNA D3.4: Ethical analysis of human enhancement technologies. https://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/documents/downloadPublic?documentIds=080166e5cf2e83d0&appId=PPGMS accessed June 21st 2021.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
3. Ricci. G. Pharmacological human enhancement: an overview of the looming bioethical and regulatory challenges. Front. Psychiatry 11, 2020, 53.10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00053703702132127792
]Search in Google Scholar
[
4. Braddock, M. Limitations for colonisation and civilisation build and the potential for human enhancements (Szocik, K. ed.). In: Human enhancements for space missions. Lunar, Martian and future missions to the outer planets, Springer publishers, 2020, pp.71-94.10.1007/978-3-030-42036-9_5
]Search in Google Scholar
[
5. Lou, Z., Wang, L., Jiang, K., Wei, Z., Shen. G. Reviews of wearable healthcare systems: materials, devices and system integration. Materials Sci. Eng: R: Reports 140, 2020, 100523.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
6. Chuang, A.T., Margo, C.E., Greenberg, P.B. Retinal implants: a systematic review. Brit. J. Ophthalmol. 98, 2014, pp. 852-856.10.1136/bjophthalmol-2013-30370824403565
]Search in Google Scholar
[
7. Cinel, C., Valeriani, D., Poli, R. Neurotechnologies for human cognitive augmentation: current state of the art and future prospects. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 13, 2019, id13.10.3389/fnhum.2019.00013636577130766483
]Search in Google Scholar
[
8. Herrojo, C,, Paredes, F., Mata-Contreras, J., Martín F. Chipless-RFID: A review and recent developments. Sensors 19, 2019, 3385.10.3390/s19153385669576731374987
]Search in Google Scholar
[
9. Carrigan, M. & Porpora, D.V. (eds.). Post-human futures: human enhancement, artificial intelligence and social theory (1st edn.), 2021, Routledge publishers.10.4324/9781351189958-1
]Search in Google Scholar
[
10. Johannes, M.S., Bigelow, J.D., Burck, J.M., Harshbarger, S.D., Kozlowski, M.V. et al. An overview of the developmental process for the modular prosthetic limb. Johns Hopkins APL Technical Digest 30, 2011, pp. 2017-2216.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
11. Ortiz-Catalan, M., Mastinu, E., Sassu, P., Aszmann, O., Brånemark, R. Self-contained neuromusculoskeletal arm prostheses. New Engl. J. Med. 382, 2020, pp.1732-1738.10.1056/NEJMoa191753732348644
]Search in Google Scholar
[
12. Yu, K.E., Perry, B.N., Moran, C.W., Arminger, R.S., Johannes, M.S. et al. Clinical evaluation of the revolutionizing prosthetics modular prosthetic limb system for upper extremity amputees. Sci. Rep. 11, 2021, 954.10.1038/s41598-020-79581-8780674833441604
]Search in Google Scholar
[
13. Dermody, G., Whitehead, L., Wilson, G., Glass, C. The role of virtual reality in improving health outcomes for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review. J. Med. Internet Res. 22, 2020, e17331.10.2196/17331729641432478662
]Search in Google Scholar
[
14. Jerdan, S.W., Grindle, M., van Woerden, H.C., Kamel Boulos, M.N. Head-mounted virtual reality and mental health: critical review of current research. JMIR Serious Games 6, 2018, e14.10.2196/games.9226605470529980500
]Search in Google Scholar
[
15. Lu, T.C., Fu, C.M., Ma, M.H., Fang, C.C., Turner, A.M. Healthcare applications of smart watches. A systematic review. Appl. Clin. Inform. 7, 2016, pp.850-869.10.4338/ACI-2016-03-R-0042505255427623763
]Search in Google Scholar
[
16. Siepmann, C., Kowalczuk, P. Understanding continued smartwatch usage: the role of emotional as well as health and fitness factors. Electron Markets. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-021-00458-3, accessed 21st June 2021.10.1007/s12525-021-00458-3
]Search in Google Scholar
[
17. Czech, A. Brain-computer interface use to control military weapons and tools, In Paszkiel S (eds). Control, computer engineering and neuroscience. ICBCI 2021. Advances in intelligent systems and computing, vol 1362, 2021, Springer, Cham publishers.10.1007/978-3-030-72254-8_20
]Search in Google Scholar
[
18. Braided Communications. https://www.f6s.com/braidedcommunications, accessed June 20th 2021.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
19. Sawicki, G.S., Beck, O.N., Kang, I., Young, A.J.The exoskeleton expansion: improving walking and running economy. J. NeuroEngineering Rehabil. 17, 2020, 25.10.1186/s12984-020-00663-9702945532075669
]Search in Google Scholar
[
20. Fosch-Villaronga, E., Özcan, B. The progressive intertwinement between design, human needs and the regulation of care technology: the case of lower-limb exoskeletons. Int. J. of Soc. Robotics 12, 2020, pp. 959–972.10.1007/s12369-019-00537-8
]Search in Google Scholar
[
21. X1, https://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/atoms/files/fs-x1_fact_sheet.pdf, accessed 21st June 2021.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
22. Hirakawa, M.P., Krishnakumar, R., Timlin, J.A., Carney, J.P., Butler, K.S. Gene editing and CRISPR in the clinic: current and future perspectives. Biosci. Rep. 40, 2020, BSR20200127.10.1042/BSR20200127714604832207531
]Search in Google Scholar
[
23. Sun, Q.R.The legal risk of human enhancement technology and its regulation in China. Open J. Soc. Sci. 9, 2021, pp.39-53.10.4236/jss.2021.95004
]Search in Google Scholar
[
24. Ethics of genome editing, European Commission 2021. https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/default/files/research_and_innovation/ege/ege_ethics_of_genome_editing-opinion_publication.pdf. Accessed June 21st 2021.
]Search in Google Scholar
| 05 kwi 2022