[
Akaike H (1998) Information Theory and an Extension of the Maximum Likelihood Principle. Springer New York, New York, NY, p. 199–213. In Parzen Emanueland Tanabe K and KG (ed) Selected Papers of Hirotugu Akaike. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-1694-0_15
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Araujo MJ, Paula RC, Moraes CB, Pieroni G, Silva PHM (2021) Thinning strategies for Eucalyptus dunnii population: balance between breeding and conservation using spatial variation and competition model. Tree Genetics & Genomes 17: 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11295-021-01523-w
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cappa EP, Cantet RJC (2008) Direct and competition additive effects in tree breeding: Bayesian estimation from an individual tree mixed model. Silvae Genetica 57: 45–56. https://doi.org/10.1515/sg-2008-0008
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cappa EP, Muñoz F, Sanchez L, Cantet RJC (2015) A novel individual-tree mixed model to account for competition and environmental heterogeneity: a Bayesian approach. Tree Genetics and Genomes 11: 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11295-015-0917-3
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cappa EP, Stoehr MU, Xie CY, Yanchuk AD (2016) Identification and joint modeling of competition effects and environmental heterogeneity in three Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii var. menziesii) trials. Tree Genetics and Genomes 12: 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11295-016-1061-4
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Christopoulos D (2017), Roots Extrema and Inflection Points by using Taylor Regression Procedure. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2521403
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dong L, Xie Y, Wu HX, Sun X (2020), Spatial and competition models increase the progeny testing efficiency of Japanese larch. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 50. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjfr-2020-0007
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dutkowski GW, Costa e Silva J, Gilmour AR, Lopez GA (2002) Spatial analysis methods for forest genetic trials. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 32: 2201–2214. https://doi.org/10.1139/x02-111
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dutkowski GW, Costa E Silva J, Gilmour AR, Wellendorf H, Aguiar A (2006) Spatial analysis enhances modeling of a wide variety of traits in forest genetic trials. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 36: 1851–1870. https://doi.org/10.1139/x06-059
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gadow K Von, Gangying Hui (1999) Modelling Forest Development, 1st ed. 213p. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4816-0
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gea LD (1997) Genetic diversity and gain : the concept of a status number. University of Canterbury. Forestry, Christchurch, 129p.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hannrup B, Wilhelmsson L, Danell Ö (1998), Time trends for genetic parameters of wood density and growth traits in Pinus sylvestris L. Silvae Genetica 47: 293–302.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hernández MA, López JA, Cappa EP (2019) Improving Genetic Analysis of Corymbia citriodora subsp. variegata with Single- and Multiple-Trait Spatial-Competition Models. Forest Science 65: 570–580. https://doi.org/10.1093/forsci/fxz020
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ibá (2021) Relatório Anual Ibá. 93p.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Isik F, McKeand SE (2019) Fourth cycle breeding and testing strategy for Pinus taeda in the NC State University Cooperative Tree Improvement Program. Tree Genetics and Genomes 15: 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11295-019-1377-y
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kang H, Namkoong G (1988) Inbreeding effective population size under some artificial selection schemes. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 1988 75:2 75: 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00303973
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Li Y, Kaur S, Pembleton LW, Valipour-Kahrood H, Rosewarne GM, Daetwyler HD (2022) Strategies of preserving genetic diversity while maximizing genetic response from implementing genomic selection in pulse breeding programs. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 135: 1813–1828. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-022-04071-6
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Magnussen S (1989) Effects and Adjustments of Competition Bias in Progeny Trials with Single-Tree Plots. Forest Science 35: 532–547.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Muir WM (2000) The interaction of selection intensity, inbreeding depression, and random genetic drift on short- and long-term response to selection: Results using finite locus and finite population size models incorporating directional dominance. Journal of Animal Science 79: 1–11. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.00.079es1001b
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Muñoz F, Sanchez L (2020) breedR: Statistical Methods for Forest Genetic Resources Analysts.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Neyman J, Pearson ES (1928a) On the Use and Interpretation of Certain Test Criteria for Purposes of Statistical Inference: Part I. Biometrika 20A: 175–240. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/20a.1-2.175
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Neyman J, Pearson ES (1928b) On the Use and Interpretation of Certain Test Criteria for Purposes of Statistical Inference: Part II. Biometrika 20A: 263–294. https://doi.org/10.2307/2332112
]Search in Google Scholar
[
R Core Team (2022) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Resende MDV, Alves R, S. Genética: estratégias de melhoramento e métodos de seleção. In: OLIVEIRA E. B; PINTO JUNIOR J. E. O eucalipto e a Embrapa: quatro décadas de pesquisa e desenvolvimento. Brasília, DF: Embrapa, 2021. Cap. 3. p. 171-202.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Resende MDV (2002) Genética biométrica e estatística no melhoramento de plantas perenes. Embrapa Florestas, Colombo, undefined-975p. Robertson A (1960) A theory of limits in artificial selection. Proceedings of the
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences 153: 234–249. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1960.0099
]Search in Google Scholar
[
RStudio Team (2022) RStudio: Integrated Development Environment for R. Boston, MA.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Silva PHM, Brune A, Alvares CA, et al (2019a) Selecting for stable and productive families of eucalyptus urophylla across a country-wide range of climates in Brazil. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 49:87–95. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjfr-2018-0052
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Silva PHM, Marco M, Alvares CA, et al (2019b) Selection of Eucalyptus grandis families across contrasting environmental conditions. Crop Breeding and Applied Biotechnology 19:47–54. https://doi.org/10.1590/1984-70332019v19n1a07
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wei RP, Lindgren D, Yeh FC (1997) Expected gain and status number following restricted individual and combined-index selection. Genome 40: 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1139/g97-001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
White T (2001) Breeding strategies for forest trees : concepts and challenges. Southern African Forestry Journal 31–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/20702620.2001.10434113
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ye TZ, Jayawickrama KJS (2008) Efficiency of using spatial analysis in first-generation coastal Douglas-fir progeny tests in the US Pacific Northwest. Springer 4: 677–692. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11295-008-0142-4
]Search in Google Scholar
