1. bookTom 70 (2021): Zeszyt 1 (January 2021)
Informacje o czasopiśmie
License
Format
Czasopismo
eISSN
2509-8934
Pierwsze wydanie
22 Feb 2016
Częstotliwość wydawania
1 raz w roku
Języki
Angielski
access type Otwarty dostęp

Vectors of Efficiency in Hybrid Poplar Genotype Testing

Data publikacji: 28 Mar 2021
Tom & Zeszyt: Tom 70 (2021) - Zeszyt 1 (January 2021)
Zakres stron: 39 - 56
Informacje o czasopiśmie
License
Format
Czasopismo
eISSN
2509-8934
Pierwsze wydanie
22 Feb 2016
Częstotliwość wydawania
1 raz w roku
Języki
Angielski
Abstract

The Natural Resources Research Institute Hybrid Poplar Program breeds and tests genetically improved clones for bio-mass production and environmental services. The testing process progresses from Nursery Progeny Tests (NPT) to Family Field Trials (FFT) to Clone Trials (CT) to Yield Blocks (YB), with limited replication of many clones in FFT and CT and a limited number of highly selected clones set out in monoclonal blocks (YB) to approximate the conditions of commercial plantations. We used correlation vectors, R2 (coefficient of determination) and rs (Spearman’s Coefficient) for growth (DBH2) and McFadden’s Pseudo R2 for canker severity score, to determine where testing times could be altered (age – age correlations) and whole testing steps eliminated. FFT can be shortened from 5 years to 4 years. In CT, rank correlations between age 5 (half-rotation) and age 9/10 (full rotation) were significant (R2 = 0.39 – 0.72), but age 5 selection missed 44 % of the top ten clones at age 9/10. Clone rank in CT at full, but not half, rotation was correlated with rank at full rotation in YB. Choosing clones at 9 years in CT adds 4 years but allows possible elimination of YB for clone selection. Both FFT and CT are necessary. Canker abundance and severity in CT at full rotation cannot be determined at earlier ages. An aggressive strategy saves 6 years of testing.

Keywords

Ares A (2002) Changes through time in traits of poplar clones in selection trials. New Forests 23:105–119. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:101568770850510.1023/A:1015687708505 Search in Google Scholar

Bacenetti J, Bergante S, Facciotto G, Fiala M (2016) Woody biofuel production from short rotation coppice in Italy: Environmental-impact assessment of different species and crop management. Biomass & Bioenergy 94:209–219. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2016.09.00210.1016/j.biombioe.2016.09.002 Search in Google Scholar

Baltunis B, Brawner JT (2010) Clonal stability in Pinus radiata across New Zealand and Australia. I. Growth and form traits. New Forests 40: 305-322. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-010-9201-410.1007/s11056-010-9201-4 Search in Google Scholar

Berguson W, Eaton J, Stanton B (2010) Development of hybrid poplar for commercial production in the United States: The Pacific Northwest and Minnesota experience. In: Braun R, D Karlen and D Johnson (eds) Sustainable Feedstocks for Advanced Biofuels, Sustainable Alternative Fuel Feedstock Opportunities, Challenges and Roadmaps for Six U.S. Regions. Proceedings, Sustainable Feedstock for Advance Biofuels Workshop. Ankeny, IA: Soil and Water Conservation Society, pp 282–299. Search in Google Scholar

Berguson WE, McMahon BG, Riemenschneider DE (2017) Additive and non-additive genetic variances for tree growth in several hybrid poplar populations and implications regarding breeding strategy. Silvae Genetica 66:33–39. https://doi.org/10.1515/sg-2017-000510.1515/sg-2017-0005 Search in Google Scholar

Bisoffi S (1993) Age-age correlations for the evaluation of forest reproductive material. In: Terrasson D (ed) Proceedings, Quality of Forest Reproductive Material in the Field of Application of European Community Rules, European Commission, Paris, 9–10 December, 1993. CEMAGREF Editions, pp 75–91. Search in Google Scholar

Bisoffi S, Gullberg U (1996) Poplar breeding and selection strategies. In: Stettler RF, HD Bradshaw Jr, PE Heilman and TM Hinckley (eds) Biology of Populus and its Implications for Management and Conservation – Part I. Ottawa, ON: NRC Research Press, National Research Council of Canada, pp 139–158. Search in Google Scholar

Brown KR, Beall FD, Hogan GD (1996) Establishment-year height growth in hybrid poplars; relations with longer-term survival. New Forests 12(2):175– 186. Search in Google Scholar

Chiba S, Nagata Y (1972) Rust resistance and growth of Populus maximowiczii clones selected from the progenies of intraspecific hybridization. Tokyo, Japan: Proceedings, IUFRO Genetics – SABRAO Joint Symposia, C-6(V), pp 1–7. Search in Google Scholar

Dunnell KL, Berguson B, McMahon B, LeBoldus JM (2016) Variation in resistance of Populus nigra to Sphaerulina musiva in the North-Central United States. Plant Disease 100:287-291. https://doi.org/10.1094/pdis-05-15-0516-re10.1094/PDIS-05-15-0516-RE30694132 Search in Google Scholar

Foster GS (1986) Provenance variation of eastern cottonwood in the lower Mississippi Valley. Silvae Genetica 35(1):32–38. Search in Google Scholar

Ghezehei SB, Nichols EG, Maier CA, Hazel DW (2019) Adaptability of Populus to physiography and growing conditions in the Southeastern USA. Forests 10:118. https://doi.org/10.3390/f1002011810.3390/f10020118 Search in Google Scholar

Ghezehei SB, Wright J, Zalesny RS, Guthrie Nichols E, Hazel DW (2020) Matching site-suitable poplars to rotation length for optimized productivity. Forest Ecology and Management 457:117670. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2019.11767010.1016/j.foreco.2019.117670 Search in Google Scholar

Gwaze DP, Bridgewater FE, Byram TD, Woolliams JA, Williams CG (2000) Predicting age-age genetic correlations in tree-breeding programs; a case study of Pinus taeda L. Theoretical Applications of Genetics 100:199–206. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122005002710.1007/s001220050027 Search in Google Scholar

Kaczmarek DJ, Coyle DR, Coleman MD (2013) Survival and growth of a range of Populus clones in central South Carolina USA through age ten: Do early assessments reflect longer-term survival and growth trends? Biomass & Bio-energy 49:260–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2012.12.00510.1016/j.biombioe.2012.12.005 Search in Google Scholar

Krinard RM (1988) Volume equations for plantation cottonwood trees (Populus deltoides). USDA Forest Service, Southern Forest Experiment Station, SO-347, 4 p. https://doi.org/10.2737/SO-RN-347.10.2737/SO-RN-347 Search in Google Scholar

Kumar D, Singh NB (2001) Age-age correlations for early selection of clones of Populus in India. Silvae Genetica 50(3):103–108. Search in Google Scholar

Lazarus W, Headley WL, Zalesny RS (2015) Impacts of supplyshed-level differences in productivity and land costs on the economics of hybrid poplar production in Minnesota, USA. Bioenergy Research 8(1):231–248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-014-9520-y10.1007/s12155-014-9520-y Search in Google Scholar

Libby WJ (1987) Testing for clonal forestry. Annales Forestales 13(1–2):69–75. Search in Google Scholar

McDonald BA (2014) Using dynamic diversity to achieve durable disease resistance in agricultural ecosystems. Tropical Plant Pathology 39(3):191–196 https://doi.org/10.1590/S1982-5676201400030000110.1590/S1982-56762014000300001 Search in Google Scholar

Mohn CA, Randall WK (1971) Inheritance and correlation of growth characters in Populus deltoides. Silvae Genetica 20:182–184. Search in Google Scholar

Mohrdiek O (1979) Juvenile-mature and trait correlations in some aspen and poplar trials. Silvae Genetica 28:107–111. Search in Google Scholar

Nelson ND, Berguson WE, McMahon BG, Cai M, Buchman DJ (2018) Growth performance and stability of hybrid poplar clones in simultaneous tests on six sites. Biomass & Bioenergy 118:115–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2018.08.00710.1016/j.biombioe.2018.08.007 Search in Google Scholar

Nelson ND, Berguson WE, McMahon BG, Meilan R, Smart LB, Gouker FE, Bloese P, Miller R, Volk TA, Cai M, Buchman D (2019) Discovery of geographically robust hybrid poplar clones. Silvae Genetica 68(1):101–110. https://doi.org/10.2478/sg-2019-001810.2478/sg-2019-0018 Search in Google Scholar

Nelson ND, Meilan R, Berguson WE, McMahon BG, Cai M, Buchman D (2019) Growth performance of hybrid poplar clones on two agricultural sites with and without early irrigation and fertilization. Silvae Genetica 68(1):58–66. https://doi.org/10.2478/sg-2019-001110.2478/sg-2019-0011 Search in Google Scholar

Niemczyk M, Thomas BR (2020) Growth parameters and resistance to Sphaerulina musiva-induced canker are more important than wood density for increasing genetic gain from selection of Populus spp. Hybrids for northern climates. Annals of Forest Science 77:26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13595-020-0931-y10.1007/s13595-020-0931-y Search in Google Scholar

Randall WK, Cooper DT (1973) Predicted genotypic gain from cottonwood clonal tests. Silvae Genetica 22:165–167. Search in Google Scholar

Stanton BJ (2001) Clonal variation in basal area growth patterns during stand development in hybrid poplar. Can. J. For. Res. 31 (12):2059–2066. https://doi.org/10.1139/x01-15010.1139/x01-150 Search in Google Scholar

Tabima JF, Sondreli KL, Kerio S, Feau N, Sakalidis ML, Hamelin RC, LeBoldus JM (2020) Population genomic analyses reveal connectivity via human-mediated transport across Populus plantations in North America and an undescribed subpopulation of Sphaerulina musiva. MPMI 33(2):189–199. https://doi.org/10.1094/MPMI-05-19-0131-R10.1094/MPMI-05-19-0131-R31593527 Search in Google Scholar

Tsarev AP (1977) Minimum age for evaluating growth rate of Populus in variety trials. Lesovendenie 3:67–71. Search in Google Scholar

US Department of Energy (US DOE) (2016) 2016 Billion-Ton Report: Advancing Domestic Resources for a Thriving Bioeconomy. In: Langholtz MH, BJ Stokes and LM Eaton (Leads) Volume 1: Economic Availability of Feedstocks. Oak Ridge, TN: Oak Ridge National Laboratory, ORNL/TM-2016/160. http://doi.org/10.2172/127165110.2172/1271651 Search in Google Scholar

White CC, Adams WT, Neale DB (2007) Forest Genetics. Wallingford Oxfordshire, United Kingdom: CAB International. https://doi.org/10.1079/9781845932855.000010.1079/9781845932855.0000 Search in Google Scholar

Wilkinson RC (1973) Inheritance and correlation of growth characters in hybrid poplar clones. In: Proceedings, Northeastern Forest Tree Improvement Conference. Durham, NH: University of New Hampshire, pp 121–130. Search in Google Scholar

Wu HX (1999) Study of early selection in tree breeding. 2. Advantage of early selection through shortening the breeding cycle. Silvae Genetica 48(2):78–83. Search in Google Scholar

Yaneza, MA, Zamudio F, Espinoza S, Ivkovic M, Guerra F, Espinosa C, Baettig RM (2019) Genetic variation and growth stability of hybrid poplars in high-density short-rotation coppice stands in central Chile. Biomass and Bioenergy 120:84–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2018.11.01110.1016/j.biombioe.2018.11.011 Search in Google Scholar

Ying CC, Bagley WT (1976) Genetic variation in eastern cottonwood in an eastern Nebraska provenance study. Silvae Genetica 25:67–73. Search in Google Scholar

Zhang P, Wu F, Kang X (2013) Genetic control of fiber properties and growth in triploid hybrid clones of Populus tomentosa. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 28(7):621–630. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02827581.2013.82986810.1080/02827581.2013.829868 Search in Google Scholar

Polecane artykuły z Trend MD

Zaplanuj zdalną konferencję ze Sciendo