[- Baayen, R., H., Lieber, R. (1991). Productivity and English derivation: a corpus-based study. In “Linguistics”, 29, pp. 801-843.10.1515/ling.1991.29.5.801]Search in Google Scholar
[- Baayen, R., H. (1992). Quantitative aspects of morphological productivity. Yearbook of Morphology: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp.109-149.10.1007/978-94-011-2516-1_8]Search in Google Scholar
[- Baayen, H. (2001). Word frequency distributions. Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht.10.1007/978-94-010-0844-0]Search in Google Scholar
[- Baayen, R., H. (1994a). Derivational productivity and text typology. In: ”Journal of Quantitative Linguistics” 1, 16-34.10.1080/09296179408589996]Search in Google Scholar
[- Baayen, R., H., Renouf, A. (1996). Chronicling The Times: Productive lexical innovations in an English newspaper. In: ”Language” 72, 69-96.10.2307/416794]Search in Google Scholar
[- Baayen, R., H., Neijt, A. (1997). Productivity in context: a case study of a Dutch suffix. In: “Linguistics”, 35: 565-587.]Search in Google Scholar
[- Bauer, L. (1973). English word-formation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, London, UK.]Search in Google Scholar
[- Bauer, L. (1983). English Word-Formation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[- Bauer, L. (1998). When is a sequence of two nouns a compound in English? In: “English Language and Linguistics”, 2, 65-86.10.1017/S1360674300000691]Search in Google Scholar
[-]Search in Google Scholar
[- Bauer, L. (2000a). Word. In: Geert Booij, Christian Lehmann and Joachim Mugdan (eds.). Morphology. An International Handbook on Inflection and Word-Formation, Volume 1, 247-257. Berlin/New York: de Gruyter.]Search in Google Scholar
[- Bauer, L. (2000b). Compounding. In: Geert Booij, Christian Lehmann and Joachim]Search in Google Scholar
[- Mugdan (eds.). Morphology. An International Handbook on Inflection and Word-]Search in Google Scholar
[- Formation, Volume 1, 695-707. Berlin/New York: de Gruyter.]Search in Google Scholar
[-]Search in Google Scholar
[- Bauer, L. (2001). Morphological productivity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511486210]Search in Google Scholar
[- Campbell, L., Kaufman, Т., Smith-Stark, C. (1986). Meso-America as Linguistic Area. In: “Language”, 62: 3, pp. 530-570.]Search in Google Scholar
[- Corbin, D. (1987). Morphologie dérivationelle et structuration du lexique. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.]Search in Google Scholar
[- Fernández-Domínguez, J., A. Díaz-Negrillo and P. Štekauer. (2007). How is low morphological productivity measured? In “Atlantis” 29, pp. 29-54.]Search in Google Scholar
[- Fernández-Domínguez, J. (2008). Productivity measurement of English compounding based on a corpus of the nominal type. University of Jaén: Unpublished PhD dissertation.]Search in Google Scholar
[- Fernández-Domínguez, J. (2009). Productivity in word-formation. An approach to N+N compounding. Bern: Peter Lang.]Search in Google Scholar
[- Fernández-Domínguez, J. (2010). Productivity vs. Lexicalization: Frequency –based Hypothesis on word formation. Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics, Volume 46, Issue 2, retrieved 3.4.2015, from https://www.academia.edu/4782195/Productivity_vs._lexicalization_Frequency-based_hypotheses_on_word-formation.]Search in Google Scholar
[- Fernández-Domínguez, J. (2013). Morphological productivity measurement: exploring qualitative versus quantitative approaches. In: “English Studies”, 94(4), pp. 422-447.10.1080/0013838X.2013.780823]Search in Google Scholar
[- Finegan, E. (2007). Language: Its Structure and Use. Thomson Wadsworth, 5th edition.]Search in Google Scholar
[- Plag, I. (1999). Morphological Productivity. Structural Constraints in English Derivation. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.]Search in Google Scholar
[- Plag, I., Dalton-Puffer, C., Baayen, H. (1999). Productivity and register. In: ”English Language and Linguistics” 3, pp. 209-228.]Search in Google Scholar
[- Plag, I. (2003). Word – Formation in English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511841323]Search in Google Scholar
[- Plag, I. (2004). Syntactic category information and the semantics of derivational morphological rules. Folia Linguistica 38 (3-4), pp.193- 225.10.1515/flin.2004.38.3-4.193]Search in Google Scholar
[- Sabri, F., M. (2003). Word –Formation Analysis: The Productivity of Compounding in English Short Stories. Retrieved on 09. 03.2015, from https://www.academia.edu/4271189/Word_Formation_Analysis_The_Productivity_of_Compounding_in_English_Short_Stories]Search in Google Scholar
