[
Abraham, Werner. 2020. Modality in syntax, semantics, and pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Alexiadou, Artemis & Elena Anagnostopoulou. 1998. Parameterizing Agr: Word order, V-movement and EPP-checking. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 16(3). 491–539.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Aoun, Joseph & Yen-hui Audrey Li. 2003. Essays on the representational and derivational nature of grammar: The diversity of wh-constructions. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bayer, Josef. 1999. Final complementizers in hybrid languages. Journal of Linguistics 35(2). 233–271.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bell, Daniel. 2019. Chinese possesses Japanese style scarmbling: The case of Xining Mandarin. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 28(2). 143–178.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chomsky, Noam. 1994. Bare phrase structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Working Papers in Linguistics.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chomsky, Noam. 2001. Derivation by phase. In Michael Kenstowicz (ed.), Ken Hale: A life in language. 1–52. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chomsky, Noam. 2013. Problems of projections. Lingua 130. 33–49.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chomsky, Noam. 2020. The UCLA lectures. LingBuzz/005485.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chomsky, Noam. 2021. Minimalism: Where are we now, and where can we hope to go. Gengo Kenkyu [Journal of the linguistic society of Japan] 160. 1–41.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chomsky, Noam, Ángel J. Gallego & Dennis Ott. 2019. Generative grammar and the faculty of language: Insights, questions, and challenges. Catalan Journal of Linguistics [Special Issue]. 229–261.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cinque, Guglielmo. 1999. Adverbs and functional heads: A cross-linguistic perspective. New York: Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Culicover, Peter. 2013. The role of linear order in the computation of referential dependencies. Lingua 136. 125–144.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dryer, Matthew S. 1997. On the six-way word order typology. Studies in Language 21(1). 69–103.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dryer, Matthew S. 2013. Order of subject, object and verb. In Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds.), The world atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. https://wals.info/chapter/81.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ernst, Thomas. 2002. The syntax of adjuncts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Frey, Werner. 2003. Syntactic conditions on adjunct classes. In Ewald Lang, Claudia Maienborn & Cathrine Fabricius-Hansen (eds.), Modifying adjuncts. 163–209. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gordon, Peter C. & Randall Hendrick. 1998. The representation and processing of coreference in discourse. Cognitive Science 22(4). 389–424.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Grewendorf, Günther. 1998. Aspekte der deutschen Syntax: Eine Rektions-Bindungs-Analyse. Tübingen: Narr.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hacquard, Valentine. 2006. Aspects of modality. Massachusetts Institute of Technology dissertation.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Haider, Hubert. 2000. Adverb placement – convergence of structure and licensing. Theoretical Linguistics 26(1–2). 95–134.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Haider, Hubert. 2013. Symmetry breaking in syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Huang, C.-T. James. 1982. Logical relations in Chinese and the theory of grammar. Massachusetts Institute of Technology dissertation.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Huang, C.-T. James. 2016. The syntax and semantics of prenominals: Construction or composition? Language and Linguistics 17(4). 431–475.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kalin, Laura. 2014. The syntax of OVS word order in Hixkaryana. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 32(4). 1089–1104.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kayne, Richard. 1994. The antisymmetry of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kayne, Richard. 2003. Antisymmetry and Japanese. English Linguistics 20(1). 1–40.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kayne, Richard. 2022. Antisymmetry and externalization. Studies in Chinese Linguistics 43(1). 1–20.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kratzer, Angelika. 1991. Modality. In Arnim von Stechow & Dieter Wunderlich (eds.), Semantik: Ein internationales Handbuch der zeitgenössischer Forschung. 639–650. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Larson, Richard. 1988. On the double object construction. Linguistic Inquiry 19(3). 335–391.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lasnik, Howard. 2001. Subjects, objects, and the EPP. In William D. Davies & Stanley Dubinsky (eds.), Objects and other subjects. 103–121. Dordrecht: kluwer.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Liao, Wei-wen Roger. 2011. The symmetry of syntactic relations. University of Southern California dissertation.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Liao, Wei-wen Roger. 2014. On the loss of identity and emergence of order: Symmetry breaking in linguistic theory. In Kuniya Nasukawa & Henk Van Riemsdijk (eds.), Identity relations in grammar. 289–319. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lin, Tzong-hong Jonah. 2012. Multiple-modal constructions in Mandarin Chinese and their finiteness properties. Journal of Linguistics 48(1). 151–186.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
McCloskey, James. 1996. Subjects and subject positions in Irish. In Robert D. Borsley & Ian Roberts (eds.), The syntax of the celtic languages: A comparative perspective. 241–283. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Miyagawa, Shigeru. 2010. Why agree? Why move?: Unifying agreement-based and discourse-configurational languages. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Narita, Hiroki & Naoki Fukui. 2022. Symmetrizing syntax: Merge, minimality, and equilibria. New York: Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pan, Victor Junnan. 2022. Deriving head-final order in the peripheral domain of Chinese. Linguistic Inquiry 53(1). 121–154.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rivero, Maria-Luisa. 1992. Adverb incorporation and the syntax of adverbs in Modern Greek. Linguistics and Philosophy 15(3). 289–331.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sheehan, Michelle, Theresa Biberauer, Ian G. Roberts & Anders Holmberg. 2017. The final-over-final condition: A syntactic universal. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Simpson, Andrew. 2022. Revisiting the structure of nominals in Japanese and Korean mixed headedness vs. Pure head-finality. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 40(2). 573–597.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Simpson, Andrew & Zoe Wu. 2002. IP-raising, tone sandhi and the creation of sentence-final particles. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 11(1). 67–99.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zhang, Niina. 2006. On the configuration issue of coordination. Language and Linguistics 7(1). 175–223.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zhang, Niina. 2010. Coordination in syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
