[Acedo-Matellán, Víctor. 2016. The morphosyntax of transitions: A case study in Latin and other languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198733287.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[Ackema, Peter & Maaike Schoorlemmer. 1994. The middle construction and the syntax-semantics interface. Lingua 93(1). 59–90.10.1016/0024-3841(94)90353-0]Search in Google Scholar
[Ackema, Peter & Maaike Schoorlemmer. 2017. Middles. In Martin Everaert & Henk C. van Riemsdijk (eds.), The Wiley Blackwell companion to syntax, 2nd edn, 2499–2573. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.10.1002/9781118358733.wbsyncom091]Search in Google Scholar
[Alexiadou, Artemis, Hagit Borer & Florian Schäfer (eds.). 2014. The syntax of roots and the roots of syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199665266.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[Aronoff, Mark. 1994. Morphology by itself: Stems and inflectional classes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Boeckx, Cedric & Sandra Stjepanović. 2001. Head-ing toward PF. Linguistic Inquiry 32(2). 345–355.10.1162/00243890152001799]Search in Google Scholar
[Borer, Hagit. 2013. Structuring sense. Vol. 3, Taking form. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199263936.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[Cao, Hong. 2004. Lun zhongdongju de jufa gouzao tedian [On the syntactic features of middle constructions in Chinese]. Shijie Hanyu Jiaoxue [Chinese teaching in the world] 3. 38–48.]Search in Google Scholar
[Cao, Hong. 2005. Lun zhongdongju de yuyi biaoda tedian [On semantic features of middle constructions in Chinese]. Zhongguo Yuwen [Studies of the Chinese language] 3. 205–213.]Search in Google Scholar
[Chao, Yuen Ren. 1968. A grammar of spoken Chinese. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Chen, Matthew. 1987. The syntax of Xiamen tone sandhi. Phonology Yearbook 4. 109–150.10.1017/S0952675700000798]Search in Google Scholar
[Cheng, L.-S. Lisa. 1989. Transitivity alternations in Mandarin Chinese. In Marjorie K. M. Chan & Thomas Boyden Ernst (eds.), Proceedings of the 3rd Ohio State University Conference on Chinese Linguistics, 81–94. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Linguistics Club.]Search in Google Scholar
[Cheng, L.-S. Lisa. 2008. Deconstructing the shi . . . de construction. The Linguistic Review 25. 235–266.10.1515/TLIR.2008.007]Search in Google Scholar
[Cheng, L.-S. Lisa & C. T. James Huang. 1994. On the argument structure of resultative compounds. In Matthew Chen & Ovid Tzeng (eds.), Interdisciplinary studies on language and language change in honor of William S.-Y. Wang, 187–221. Taipei: Pyramid.]Search in Google Scholar
[Chomsky, Noam. 1981. Lectures on government and binding: The Pisa lectures. Dordrecht: Foris Publications.]Search in Google Scholar
[Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Chomsky, Noam. 2001. Derivation by Phase. In Michael Kenstowicz (ed.), Ken Hale: A life in language, 1–52. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Chomsky, Noam. 2004. Beyond explanatory adequacy. In Belletti, Adriana (ed.), Structures and beyond, 104–131. Oxford: Oxford University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Chomsky, Noam, Angel J. Gallego & Dennis Ott. 2019. Generative grammar and the faculty of language: Insights, questions, and challenges. In Fernando Martínez-Gil & Maria Ohannesian (eds.), Stress and its phonological interactions. [Special issue]. Catalan Journal of Linguistics 18. 229–261.]Search in Google Scholar
[Cinque, Guglielmo. 1988. On Si constructions and the theory of Arb. Linguistic Inquiry 19(4). 521–581.]Search in Google Scholar
[De Belder, Marijke & Jeroen van Craenenbroeck. 2015. How to merge a root. Linguistic Inquiry 46(4). 625–655.10.1162/LING_a_00196]Search in Google Scholar
[Ding, Shengshu, Shuxiang Lü, Rong Li, Dexuan Sun, Xiechu Guan, Jing Fu, Shengzhang Huang & Zhiwen Chen. 1961. Xiandai hanyu yufa jianghua [Lecture notes in Chinese grammar]. Beijing: The Commercial Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Dong, Xiufang. 2015. Shanggu Hanyu xushi yupian zhong you huati kongzhi de shenglüe moshi [Topic-controlled ellipsis in Ancient Chinese]. Zhongguo Yuwen [Studies of the Chinese language] 4. 306–314.]Search in Google Scholar
[Dowty, David. 1991. Thematic proto-roles and argument selection. Language 67(3). 547–619.10.1353/lan.1991.0021]Search in Google Scholar
[Embick, David. 2000. Features, syntax, and categories in Latin perfect. Linguistic Inquiry 31(2). 185–230.]Search in Google Scholar
[Embick, David. 2004. On the structure of resultative participles in English. Linguistic Inquiry 35(3). 355–392.10.1162/0024389041402634]Search in Google Scholar
[Embick, David. 2015. The morpheme: A theoretical introduction. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9781501502569]Search in Google Scholar
[Embick, David & Rolf Noyer. 2001. Movement operations after syntax. Linguistic Inquiry 32(4). 555–595.10.1162/002438901753373005]Search in Google Scholar
[Embick, David & Rolf Noyer. 2007. Distributed morphology and the syntax/morphology interface. In Gillian Ramchand & Charles Reiss (eds.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic interfaces, 289–324. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199247455.013.0010]Search in Google Scholar
[Erlewine, Michael Yoshitaka. 2017. Low sentence-final particles in Mandarin Chinese and the final-over-final constraint. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 26(1). 37–75.10.1007/s10831-016-9150-9]Search in Google Scholar
[Ernst, Thomas. 2016. Modification of stative predicates. Language 92(2). 237–274.10.1353/lan.2016.0042]Search in Google Scholar
[Fagan, Sarah. 1988. The English middle. Linguistic Inquiry 19. 181–203.]Search in Google Scholar
[Fagan, Sarah. 2009. The syntax and semantics of middle constructions, 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Fan, Jiyan. 1985. Wuding NP zhuyuju [Sentences with indefinite subjects]. Zhongguo Yuwen [Studies of the Chinese language] 5. 321–328.]Search in Google Scholar
[Feng, Shengli & Chunhong Shi. 2018. Lun yuti yufa de jiben yuanli, danwei cengji he yuti xitong [The principles, hierarchical units and register system of register grammar] Shijie Hanyu Jiaoxue [Chinese teaching in the world] 32(3). 302–325.]Search in Google Scholar
[Féry, Caroline. 2013. Focus as prosodic alignment. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 31. 683–734.10.1007/s11049-013-9195-7]Search in Google Scholar
[Gallego, Ángel. 2014. Roots and phases. In Artemis Alexiadou, Hagit Borer & Florian Schäfer (eds.), The syntax of roots and the roots of syntax, 192–207. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199665266.003.0009]Search in Google Scholar
[Gong, Qianyan. 1980. Xiandai Hanyu li de shoushi zhuyu ju [Patient-subject constructions in modern Chinese]. Zhongguo Yuwen [Studies of the Chinese language] 5. 84–96.]Search in Google Scholar
[Halle, Morris & Alec Marantz. 1993. Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection. In Ken Hale & Sameul J. Keyser (eds.), The view from Building 20: Essays in linguistics in honor of Sylvain Bromberger, 111–176. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Halle, Morris & Alec Marantz. 1994. Some key features of distributed morphology. In Adrew Carnie, Heidi Harley & Tony Bures (eds.), Papers on phonology and morphology, 275–288. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 21. Cambridge, MA: MIT, MIT Working Papers in Linguistics.]Search in Google Scholar
[Harley, Heidi. 2005. How do verbs get their names? Denominal verbs, manner incorporation and the ontology of verb roots in English. In Nomi Erteschik-Shir & Tova Rapoport (eds.), The syntax of aspect: Deriving thematic and aspectual interpretation, 42–64. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199280445.003.0003]Search in Google Scholar
[Harley, Heidi 2014. On the identity of roots. Theoretical Linguistics 40. 225–276.10.1515/tl-2014-0010]Search in Google Scholar
[Harley, Heidi & Rolf Noyer. 1999. State-of-the-article: Distributed morphology. Glot International 4(4). 3–9.]Search in Google Scholar
[Haugen, Jason D. & Daniel Siddiqi. 2013. Roots and the derivation. Linguistic Inquiry 44(3). 493–517.10.1162/LING_a_00136]Search in Google Scholar
[Hoekstra, Teun & Ian Roberts. 1993. Middle Constructions in Dutch and English. In Eric Reuland & Werner Abraham (eds.), Knowledge and language. Vol. 2, Lexical and conceptual structure, 183–220. Berlin: Springer.10.1007/978-94-011-1842-2_9]Search in Google Scholar
[Hole, Daniel. 2004. Focus and background marking in Mandarin Chinese: System and theory behind cai, jiu, dou and ye. London & New York: Routledge Curzon, 2004.10.4324/9780203565193]Search in Google Scholar
[Hu, Xuhui. 2018. Encoding events-functional structure and variation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780198808466.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[Hu, Xuhui. 2019. Kuayuyan shijiao xia de Hanyu zhongdongju yanjiu [Chinese middles: A cross-linguistic perspective]. Dangdai Yuyanxue [Contemporary linguistics] 1. 83–103.]Search in Google Scholar
[Huang, C.-T. James. 1982. Logical relations in Chinese and the theory of grammar. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology dissertation.]Search in Google Scholar
[Huang, C.-T. James. 1988. Wo pao de kuai and Chinese phrase structure. Language 64. 274–311.10.2307/415435]Search in Google Scholar
[Huang, C.-T. James. 1992. Complex predicates in control. In Richard K. Larson, Sabine Iatridou, Utpal Lahiri & James Higginbotham (eds.), Control and grammar, 109–147. Dordrecht: Kluwer.10.1007/978-94-015-7959-9_4]Search in Google Scholar
[Huang, C.-T. James. 1997. On lexical structure and syntactic projection. Chinese Languages and Linguistics 3. 45–89.]Search in Google Scholar
[Huang, C.-T. James. 2006. Resultatives and unaccusatives: A parametric view. Bulletin of the Chinese Linguistic Society of Japan 253. 1–43.10.7131/chuugokugogaku.2006.1]Search in Google Scholar
[Huang, C.-T. James. 2015. On syntactic analyticity and parametric theory. In Y.-H. Audrey Li, Andrew Simpson & W. -T. Dylan Tsai (eds.), Chinese syntax in a cross-linguistic perspective, 1–50. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199945658.003.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[Huang, C.-T. James, Y.-H. Audrey Li & Yafei Li. 2009. The syntax of Chinese. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Irwin, Patricia. 2019. How do you smile along a path? The Linguistic Review 36(3). 343–363.10.1515/tlr-2019-2021]Search in Google Scholar
[Jackendoff, Ray S. 1972. Semantic interpretation in generative grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Jensen, John T. 1990. Morphology: Word structure in generative grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.10.1075/cilt.70]Search in Google Scholar
[Katz, Graham. 2008. Manner modification of state verbs. In Louise McNally & Christopher Kennedy (eds.), Adjectives and adverbs, 220–248. Oxford: Oxford University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kayne, Richard. 1994. The antisymmetry of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kearns, Kate. 2011. Semantics, 2nd edn. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1007/978-0-230-35609-2]Search in Google Scholar
[Keyser, Sameul J. & Thomas Roeper. 1984. On the middle and ergative constructions in English. Linguistic Inquiry 15. 381–416.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kong, Lingda. 1986. Guanyu dongtai zhuci guo1 he guo2 [On dynamic auxiliary guo1 and guo2], Zhongguo Yuwen [Studies of the Chinese language] 4. 272–276.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lee, Thomas Hun-Tak & Zhuang Wu. 2019. The acquisition of nominal structure, word order and referentiality in Chinese: Corpus and experimental findings on the numeral phrase. In Jianhua Hu & Haihua Pan (eds.), Interfaces in grammar, 301–340. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/lfab.15.11lee]Search in Google Scholar
[Levin, Beth & Malka Rappaport Hovav. 2005. Argument realization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511610479]Search in Google Scholar
[Li, Charles N. & Sandra A. Thompson 1981. Mandarin Chinese: A functional reference grammar. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Li, Liding. 1963. Dai “de” zi de buyu ju [Sentences with de-complements], Zhongguo Yuwen [Studies of the Chinese language] 5. 396–410.]Search in Google Scholar
[Li, Y-.H. Audrey. 1987. Duration phrases: Distributions and interpretations. Journal of the Chinese Language Teachers Association 22(3). 27–65.]Search in Google Scholar
[Li, Y.-H. Audrey. 1998. Argument determiner phrases and number phrases. Linguistic Inquiry 29. 693–702.10.1162/ling.1998.29.4.693]Search in Google Scholar
[Lin, Jimmy. 2004. Event structure and the encoding of arguments: The syntax of the Mandarin and English verb phrase. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology dissertation.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lin, Tzong-Hong Jonah. 2001. Light verb syntax and the theory of phrase structure. Irvine, CA: University of California, Irvine dissertation.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lin, Tzong-Hong Jonah. 2011. Finiteness of clauses and raising of arguments in Mandarin Chinese. Syntax 14. 48–73.10.1111/j.1467-9612.2010.00145.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Liu, Yuehua. 1988. Dongtai zhuci “guo2, guo1, le1” yongfa bijiao. Yuwen Yanjiu [Linguistic Research] 1. 6–16.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lü, Shuxiang. 1987. Shuo “sheng” he “bai” [On win and lose]. Zhongguo Yuwen [Studies of the Chinese language] 1. 1–5.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lü, Shuxiang (ed.). 1999. Xiandai Hanyu baibai ci [On eight hundred words in Modern Chinese], rev. edn. Beijing: The Commercial Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lu, Yingshun. 1991. Tantan le1 he le2 de qubie fangfa [On how to distinguish le1 and le2]. Zhongguo Yuwen [Studies of the Chinese language] 4. 275–278.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ma, Xiwen. 1987. Yu dongjieshi dongci youguan de mouxie jushi [Some VR-releated constructions]. Zhongguo Yuwen [Studies of the Chinese language] 6. 424–441.]Search in Google Scholar
[Maienborn, Claudia. 2005. On the limits of the Davidsonian approach: The case of copular sentences. Theoretical Linguistics 31. 275–316.10.1515/thli.2005.31.3.275]Search in Google Scholar
[Marantz, Alec. 1984. On the nature of grammatical relations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Marantz, Alec. 1988. Clitics, morphological merger, and the mapping to phonological structure. In Michael Hammond & Michael Noonan (eds.), Theoretical morphology, 253–270. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Mare, María. 2018. Issues on word formation. The case of Latin circum. The Linguistic Review 35(1). 121–159.10.1515/tlr-2017-0019]Search in Google Scholar
[Martinović, Martina. 2019. Interleaving syntax and postsyntax: Spellout before syntactic movement. Syntax 22(4). 378–418.10.1111/synt.12169]Search in Google Scholar
[Matushansky, Ora. 2006. Head movement in linguistic theory. Linguistic Inquiry 37(1). 69–109.10.1162/002438906775321184]Search in Google Scholar
[Mittwoch, Anita, Rodney Huddleston & Peter Collins. 2002. The Clause: Adjuncts. In Rodney Huddleston & Geoffrey K. Pullum (eds.), The Cambridge grammar of the English language, 663–784. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781316423530.009]Search in Google Scholar
[Packard, Jerome L. 2000. The morphology of Chinese: A linguistic and cognitive approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511486821]Search in Google Scholar
[Pan, Haihua & Jingquan Han. 2005. Xianxing feibinge dongci jiegou de jufa yanjiu [The syntax of surface unaccusative constructions] Yuyan Yanjiu [Language research] 3. 1–13.]Search in Google Scholar
[Pan, Victor Junnan. 2017. Derivation of the apparent narrow scope of sentence-final particles in Chinese. Studies in Chinese Linguistics 39(2). 99–125.10.2478/scl-2018-0004]Search in Google Scholar
[Pan, Victor Junnan. 2019a. System repairing strategy at interface wh-in-situ in Mandarin. Chinese. In Jianhua Hu & Haihua Pan (eds.), Interfaces in grammar, 133–166. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/lfab.15.06pan]Search in Google Scholar
[Pan, Victor Junnan. 2019b. Architecture of the periphery in Chinese: Cartography and minimalism. London & New York: Routledge.10.4324/9781315158228]Search in Google Scholar
[Paul, Waltraud. 2014. Why particles are not particular: Sentence-final particles in Chinese as heads of a split CP. Studia Linguistica 68(1). 77–115.10.1111/stul.12020]Search in Google Scholar
[Paul, Waltraud & John Whitman. 2008. Shi…de focus cleft in Mandarin Chinese. The Linguistic Review 25. 413–451.10.1515/TLIR.2008.012]Search in Google Scholar
[Pensalfini, Robert. 1997. Jingulu grammar, cictionary, and texts. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology dissertation.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ramchand, Gillian. 2008. Verb meaning and the lexicon: A first-phase syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511486319]Search in Google Scholar
[Ramchand, Gillian. 2013. Argument structure and argument structure alternations. In Marcel den Dikken (ed.), The Cambridge handbook of generative syntax, 265–321. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511804571.013]Search in Google Scholar
[Rappaport Hovav, Malka & Beth Levin. 1998. Building verb meanings. In Butt Miriam & Wilhelm Geuder (eds.), The projection of arguments: Lexical and compositional factors, 97–134. Standford, CA: CSLI Publications.]Search in Google Scholar
[Rappaport Hovav, Malka & Beth Levin. 2001. An event structure account of English resultatives. Language 77. 766–797.10.1353/lan.2001.0221]Search in Google Scholar
[Richards, Norwin. 2016. Contiguity theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/10542.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[Roberts, Ian. 1986. The representation of implicit and dethematized subjects. Foris: Dordrecht.10.1515/9783110877304]Search in Google Scholar
[Rong, Jin. 2006. Hanyu kouyuti shoushi qianzhiju [Patient-subject constructions in spoken Chinese] Beijing Daxue Xuebao [Journal of Peking University] (Philosophy and Social Sciences) 4. 114–120.]Search in Google Scholar
[Simpson, Andrew & Zoe Xiu-Zhi Wu. 2002. From D to T — Determiner incorporation and the creation of tense. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 11. 169–209.10.1023/A:1014934915836]Search in Google Scholar
[Stroik, Thomas. 1992. Middles and movement. Linguistic Inquiry 23. 127–137.]Search in Google Scholar
[Sung, Kou-Ming. 1994. Case assignment under incorporation. Los Angeles: University of California, Los Angeles dissertation.]Search in Google Scholar
[Talmy, Leonard. 2000. Toward a cognitive semantics. Vol. 2, Typology and process in concept structuring. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/6848.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[Tang, C.-C. Jane. 1990. Chinese phrase structure and the extended X’-theory. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University dissertation.]Search in Google Scholar
[Tang, C.-C. Jane. 2001. Functional projections and adverbial expressions in Chinese. Language and Linguistics 2. 203–241.]Search in Google Scholar
[Tang, Sze-Wing. 2006. Hanyu fangyan shoushi huatiju leixing de canshu fenxi [A parametric approach to the typology of subtopics in Chinese dialects]. Yuyan Kexue [Linguistic sciences] 6. 3–11.]Search in Google Scholar
[Tang, Sze-Wing. 2019. Xingshi Hanyu jufaxue [Formal Chinese syntax], 2nd edn. Shanghai: Shanghai Educational Publishing House.]Search in Google Scholar
[Teng, Shou-Hsin. 1979. Remarks on cleft sentences in Chinese. Journal of Chinese Linguistics 7(1). 101–114.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ting, Jen. 2006. The middle construction in Mandarin Chinese and the presyntactic approach. Concentric Studies in Linguistics 32(1). 89–117.]Search in Google Scholar
[Travis, Lisa. 1988. The syntax of adverbs. McGill Working Papers in Linguistics: Special Issue on Comparative Germanic Syntax. 280–310.]Search in Google Scholar
[Trotzke, Andreas. 2015. Rethinking syntactocentrism: Architectural issues and case studies at the syntax-pragmatics interface. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.10.1075/la.225]Search in Google Scholar
[Truckenbrodt, Hubert. 1999. On the relation between syntactic phrases and phonological phrases. Linguistic Inquiry 30. 219–256.10.1162/002438999554048]Search in Google Scholar
[Tsai, W.-T. Dylan. 2001. On subject specificity and theory of syntax-semantics interface. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 10. 129–168.10.1023/A:1008321327978]Search in Google Scholar
[Tsai, W.-T. Dylan. 2007. Chongwen “weishenme wen zenmeyang, zenmeyang wen weishenme”—Tan Hanyu yiwenju he fanshenju zhong de neiwai zhuangyu [‘The hows of why and the whys of how’ revisited: On inner and outer adverbials in Chinese interrogative and reflexive sentences]. Zhongguo Yuwen [Studies of the Chinese language] 3. 195–207.]Search in Google Scholar
[Tsai, W.-T. Dylan. 2008a. Left periphery and how-why alternations. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 17(2). 83–115.10.1007/s10831-008-9021-0]Search in Google Scholar
[Tsai, W.-T. Dylan. 2008b. Tense anchoring in Chinese. Lingua 118. 675–686.10.1016/j.lingua.2007.09.002]Search in Google Scholar
[Wang, Changsong. 2014. Exploring the interface between syntax and morphology—A case study of de. Beijing: Beijing Language and Culture University dissertation.]Search in Google Scholar
[Wang, Changsong. 2017. On some asymmetries and derivation of potential de construction in Chinese. Language and Linguistics 18(4). 647–698.10.1075/lali.18.4.04wan]Search in Google Scholar
[Wang, Changsong & Wei Chin. 2016. Jufa-yinxi jiekou shiyuxia de rongnaju yanjiu [A study on flip-flop sentences in Chinese from the syntax-phonology interface]. Yuyan Jiaoxue yu Yanjiu [Language teaching and linguistic studies] 6. 48–58.]Search in Google Scholar
[Wang, Changsong & Wei Chin. 2018. Cong fenbushi xingtaixue kan Hanyu “V+shiliang duanyu” disanzhong yuyi jiedu de jufa gouzao [A DM-based inquiry into the syntactic structure of the third reading of “V+ DurP” in Chinese]. Shijie Hanyu Jiaoxue [Chinese teaching in the world] 4. 456–474.]Search in Google Scholar
[Wang, Jianian. 2008. Shoushi zhuyuju de shengcheng liju [The generative motivation of the Patient-Subject sentences]. Yuyan Jiaoxue yu Yanjiu [Language teaching and linguistic studies] 3. 45–49.]Search in Google Scholar
[Wu, C.-H. Teresa. 2004. On de/bu and the syntactic nature of resultative verbal compounding. Language and Linguistics 5(1). 271–329.]Search in Google Scholar
[Xiong, Jiajuan. 2018. Chinese middle constructions: Lexical middle formation. Beijing: Peking University Press & Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.]Search in Google Scholar
[Yang, Daran & Gong Cheng. 2018. Hanyu huodonglei dongci de lunyuan jiaoti jiqi jufa gouzao [The argument alternation of Chinese activity verbs and their syntactic constructions]. Zhongguo Yuwen [Studies of the Chinese language] 6. 657–671.]Search in Google Scholar
[Yip, Po-Ching & Don Rimmington. 2016. Chinese: A comprehensive grammar, 2nd edn. London & New York: Routledge.10.4324/9781315732930]Search in Google Scholar
[Zhan, Renfeng. 1992. Shoushi zhuyuju (ming-dong shi) de shibie [On the demarcation of patient-subject (NP-V) sentences]. In Editorial Office of Studies of the Chinese Language (ed.), Yufa yanjiu he tansuo [Grammar research and inquiry] 6. 190–204. Beijing: Yuwen Chubanshe.]Search in Google Scholar
[Zhu, Dexi. 1982. Yufa jiangyi [Lecture notes in Chinese grammar]. Beijing: The Commercial Press.]Search in Google Scholar
