Subject-Object Asymmetry in the Production of Relative Clauses in Cantonese

Arnon, Inbal. 2010. Rethinking child difficulty: The effect of NP type on children’s processing of relative clauses in Hebrew. Journal of Child Language 37(1). 27–57.10.1017/S030500090900943XOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

Benedict, Helen. 1979. Early lexical development: Comprehension and production. Journal of Child Language 6(2). 183–200.10.1017/S0305000900002245Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Brandt, Silke, Evan Kidd, Elena Lieven & Michael Tomasello. 2009. The discourse bases of relativization: An investigation of young German and English-speaking children’s comprehension of relative clauses. Cognitive Linguistics 20(3). 539–570.10.1515/COGL.2009.024Search in Google Scholar

Cheng, Lisa Lai-Shen & Rint Sybesma. 1999. Bare and not-so-bare nouns and the structure of NP. Linguistic Inquiry 30(4). 509–542.10.1162/002438999554192Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Collins, Chris. 2005. A smuggling approach to the passive in English. Syntax 8(2). 81–120.10.1111/j.1467-9612.2005.00076.xSearch in Google Scholar

Contemori, Carla & Adriana Belletti. 2014. Relatives and passive object relatives in Italian-speaking children and adults: Intervention in production and comprehension. Applied Psycholinguistics 35(6). 1021–1053.10.1017/S0142716412000689Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Diessel, Holger. 2007. A construction-based analysis of the acquisition of East Asian relative clauses. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 29(2). 311–320.10.1017/S0272263107070167Search in Google Scholar

Durrleman, Stephanie. 2017. Featural mismatches and the comprehension of relative clauses in French: Comparing gender and number. Paper presented at the 13th Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition Conference (GALA 13), Universitat de les Illes Balears, 7–9 September.Search in Google Scholar

Fox, Barbara A., & Sandra A. Thompson. 1990. A discourse explanation of the grammar of relative clauses in English conversation. Language 66(2). 297–316.10.2307/414888Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Friedmann, Naama, Adriana Belletti & Luigi Rizzi. 2009. Relativized relatives: Types of intervention in the acquisition of A-bar dependencies. Lingua 119(1). 67–88.10.1016/j.lingua.2008.09.002Search in Google Scholar

Gibson, Edward. 1998. Linguistic complexity: Locality of syntactic dependencies. Cognition 68(1). 1–76.10.1016/S0010-0277(98)00034-19775516Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Gibson, Edward. 2000. The dependency locality theory: A distance-based theory of linguistic complexity. In Alec Marantz, Yasushi Miyashita & Wayne O’Neil (eds.), Image, language, brain: Papers from the First Mind Articulation Project Symposium, 95–126.Search in Google Scholar

Guasti, Maria T. & Anna Cardinaletti. 2003. Relative clause formation in Romance child’s production. Probus 15(1). 47–89.10.1515/prbs.2003.005Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Hsiao, Franny & Edward Gibson. 2003. Processing relative clauses in Chinese. Cognition 90(1). 3–27.10.1016/S0010-0277(03)00124-0Search in Google Scholar

Jäger, Lena, Zhong Chen, Qiang Li, Chien-Jer Charles Lin & Shravan Vasishth. 2015. The subject-relative advantage in Chinese: Evidence for expectation-based processing. Journal of Memory and Language 79–80. 97–120.10.1016/j.jml.2014.10.005Search in Google Scholar

Kidd, Evan, Angel Chan & Joie Chiu. 2015. Cross-linguistic influence in simultaneous Cantonese–English bilingual children’s comprehension of relative clauses. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 18(3). 438–452.10.1017/S1366728914000649Search in Google Scholar

Labelle, Marie. 1990. Predication, wh-movement, and the development of relative clauses. Language Acquisition 1(1). 95–119.10.1207/s15327817la0101_4Search in Google Scholar

Lau, Elaine. 2006. The acquisition of relative clauses by Cantonese children: An experimental approach. Hong Kong: The University of Hong Kong M.phil thesis.Search in Google Scholar

Lau, Elaine. 2016. Acquisition of relative clauses in Cantonese: A multi-factorial analysis. Manoa, HI: University of Hawai’i at Manoa dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Lin, Chien-Jer Charles & Thomas G. Bever. 2006. Subject preference in the processing of relative clauses in Chinese. In Donald Baumer, David Montero & Michael Scanlon (eds.), Proceedings of the 25th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, 254–260. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Search in Google Scholar

Luke, Kang Kwong & May L. Y. Wong. 2015. The Hong Kong Cantonese corpus: Design and uses. In Benjamin K. Tsou & Oi Yee Kwong (eds.), Linguistic Corpus and Corpus Linguistics in the Chinese Context. [Monograph series number 25]. Journal of Chinese linguistics, 309–330.Search in Google Scholar

Mak, Willem M., Wietske Vonk & Herbert Schriefers. 2002. The influence of animacy on relative clause processing. Journal of Memory and Language 47(1). 50–68.10.1006/jmla.2001.2837Search in Google Scholar

Mak, Willem M., Wietske Vonk & Herbert Schriefers. 2006. Animacy in processing relative clauses: The hikers that rocks crush. Journal of memory and language 54(4). 466–490.10.1016/j.jml.2006.01.001Search in Google Scholar

Matthews, Stephen & Virginia Yip. 2001. Aspects of contemporary Cantonese grammar: The structure and stratification of relative clauses. In Hilary Chappell (ed.), Sinitic grammar: Synchronic and diachronic perspectives. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Matthews, Stephen & Virginia Yip. 2013. Cantonese: A comprehensive grammar. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203835012Search in Google Scholar

Matthews, Stephen & Virginia Yip. 2017. Noun-modifying clauses in Cantonese. In Yoshiko Matsumoto, Bernard Comrie & Peter Sells (eds.), Noun-modifying clause constructions in languages of Eurasia: Rethinking theoretical and geographical boundaries, 105–120. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.116.06matSearch in Google Scholar

McDaniel, Dana, Cecile McKee & Judy B. Bernstein. 1998. How children’s relatives solve a problem for minimalism. Language 74(2). 308–334.10.1353/lan.1998.0177Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Novogrodsky, Rama & Naama Friedmann. 2006. The production of relative clauses in syntactic SLI: A window to the nature of the impairment. Advances in Speech Language Pathology 8(4). 364–375.10.1080/14417040600919496Search in Google Scholar

O’Grady, William. 1997. Syntactic development. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Pozniak, Céline, Jiaying Huang & Barbara Hemforth. 2017. Relative clause processing, structural and linear distance matter – Evidence from Mandarin, Cantonese and English Visual World experiments. Paper presented at the 30th Annual CUNY Conference on Human Sentence Processing, MIT, 30 March–1 April.Search in Google Scholar

Reali, Florencia & Morten H. Christiansen. 2007. Word chunk frequencies affect the processing of pronominal object-relative clauses. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 60(2). 161–170.10.1080/17470210600971469Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Simpson, Andrew. 2001. Definiteness agreement and the Chinese DP. Language and Linguistics, 2(1). 125–156.Search in Google Scholar

Smolensky, Paul. 1996. On the comprehension/production dilemma in child language. Linguistic Inquiry 27(4). 720–731.Search in Google Scholar

Tang, Sze-Wing. 2000. Yueyu beidongju shishizhe de shenglue he yuanze-yu-canshu yufa [Omission of the agent argument in Cantonese passives and the principles-and-parameters framework], Zhongwen Xuekan [The Chinese academic journal] 2. 243–260.Search in Google Scholar

Tang, Sze-Wing. 2001. A complementation approach to Chinese passives and its consequences. Linguistics 39(2). 257–295.10.1515/ling.2001.011Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Tavakolian, Susan. 1981. The conjoined-clause analysis of relative clauses. In Susan Tavakolian (ed.), Language acquisition and linguistic theory, 167–187. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Traxler, Matthew J., Robin K. Morris & Rachel E. Seely. 2002. Processing subject and object relative clauses: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Memory and Language 47(1). 69–90.10.1006/jmla.2001.2836Search in Google Scholar

Traxler, Matthew J., Rihana S. Williams, Shelley A. Blozis & Robin K. Morris. 2005. Working memory, animacy, and verb class in the processing of relative clauses. Journal of Memory and Language 53(2). 204–224.10.1016/j.jml.2005.02.010Search in Google Scholar

Utzeri, Irene. 2007. The production and the acquisition of subject and object relative clauses in Italian: A comparative experimental study. In Kensuke Takita & Chisato Fuji (eds.), Papers from the consortium workshops on linguistic theory, 2006–2007, vol. 1. [Special issue 3]. Nanzan Linguistics. 283–313.Search in Google Scholar

Vasishth, Shravan, Zhong Chen, Qiang Li & Gueilan Guo. 2013. Processing Chinese relative clauses: Evidence for the subject-relative advantage. PLoS One 8(10), e77006.10.1371/journal.pone.0077006Search in Google Scholar

Wu, Fuyun, Elsi Kaiser & Elaine Andersen. 2010. Subject preference, head animacy and lexical cues: A corpus study of relative clauses in Chinese. In Hiroko Yamashita, Yuki Hirose & Jerome Packard (eds.), Processing and producing head-final structures, 173–193. Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/978-90-481-9213-7_9Search in Google Scholar

Wu, Fuyun, Elsi Kaiser & Elaine Andersen. 2012. Animacy effects in Chinese relative clause processing. Language and Cognitive Processes 27(10). 1489–1524.10.1080/01690965.2011.614423Search in Google Scholar

Yip, Virginia & Stephen Matthews. 2007. Relative clauses in Cantonese-English bilingual children: Typological challenges and processing motivations. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 29(2), 277–300.10.1017/S0272263107070143Search in Google Scholar

Yu, Dominic. 2006. Relative clauses and nominal modifiers in Cantonese. Unpublished manuscript, University of California, Berkeley. Available on http://linguistics.berkeley.edu/~dom/cantonese-rc.pdf.Search in Google Scholar