Corporate Sustainability – From a Fuzzy Concept to a Coherent Reality

Abraham, T., & Dao, V. (2017). An Empirical Investigation of Sustainability Innovation Systems and the Stages of Sustainability Maturity. https://aisel.aisnet.org/amcis2017/GreenIS/Presentations/4/.Search in Google Scholar

Adams, C., & Narayanan, V. (2007). The ‘standardization’ of sustainability reporting. Sustainability accounting and accountability, 70-85.10.4324/NOE0415384889.ch4Search in Google Scholar

Ameer, R., & Othman, R. (2012). Sustainability practices and corporate financial performance: A study based on the top global corporations. Journal of Business Ethics, 108(1), 61-79.10.1007/s10551-011-1063-ySearch in Google Scholar

Baumgartner, R. J., & Ebner, D. (2010). Corporate sustainability strategies: sustainability profiles and maturity levels. Sustainable Development, 18(2), 76-89.10.1002/sd.447Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Brown, B. J., Hanson, M. E., Liverman, D. M., & Merideth, R. W. (1987). Global Sustainability: Toward Definition. Environmental Management, 11(6), 713-719.10.1007/BF01867238Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Clayton, T., & Radcliffe, N. (2015). Sustainability: a systems approach. Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Communication From The Commission (2017). Guidelines on non-financial reporting. (Methodology for reporting non-financial information). (2017/C 215/01). http://eurlex.europa.eu.Search in Google Scholar

Corporate Knights (2015a). 2016 Global 100 methodology. http://www.corporateknights.com/reports/2016-global-100/2016-global-100-methodology-14419904/.Search in Google Scholar

Corporate Knights (2016). 2016 Global 100 results. 100 World’s Most Sustainable Corporations. http://www.corporateknights.com/magazines/2016-global-100-issue/2016-global-100-results-14533333/.Search in Google Scholar

Corporate Knights (2016a). 2017 Global 100 Methodology. http://www.corporateknights.com/wpcontent/uploads/2017/01/2017-Global-100_Methodology-Final.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

Corporate Knights (2017). 2017 Global 100 results. 100 World’s Most Sustainable Corporations. http://www.corporateknights.com/magazines/2017-global-100-issue/2017-global-100-results-14846083/.Search in Google Scholar

Corporate Knights (2017a). 2018 Global 100 Methodology. http://www.corporateknights.com/reports/2018-global-100/2017-global-100-methodology-2-15068539/.Search in Google Scholar

Corporate Knights (2018). 2018 Global 100 results. 100 World’s Most Sustainable Corporations. http://www.corporateknights.com/magazines/2018-global-100-issue/2018-global-100-results-15166618/.Search in Google Scholar

Directive 2014/95/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 October 2014 amending Directive 2013/34/EU as regards disclosure of non-financial and diversity information by certain large undertakings and groups. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legalcontent/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32014L0095.Search in Google Scholar

Ditlev Simonsen, C. D., & Midttun, A. (2011). What motivates managers to pursue corporate responsibility? A survey among key stakeholders. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 18(1), 25-38.10.1002/csr.237Search in Google Scholar

Engardio, P., Capell, K., Carey, J., & Hall, K. (2007). Beyond the green corporation: Imagine a world in which eco-friendly and socially responsible practices actually help a company’s bottom line. It’s closer than you think. Business Week, 4019, 50.Search in Google Scholar

Epstein, M. J., & Buhovac, A. R. (2014). Making sustainability work: Best practices in managing and measuring corporate social, environmental, and economic impacts. Berrett-Koehler Publishers.Search in Google Scholar

Figge, F., Hahn, T., Schaltegger, S., & Wagner, M. (2002). The sustainability balanced scorecard–linking sustainability management to business strategy. Business strategy and the Environment, 11(5), 269-284.10.1002/bse.339Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Gianni, M., Gotzamani, K., & Tsiotras, G. (2017). Multiple perspectives on integrated management systems and corporate sustainability performance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 168, 1297-1311.10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.061Search in Google Scholar

Hahn, T., Figge, F., Pinkse, J., & Preuss, L. (2010). Trade-offs in corporate sustainability: you can’t have your cake and eat it. Business Strategy and the Environment, 19(4), 217-229.10.1002/bse.674Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Haywood, L. K., & Van der Watt, C. (2016). Building resilience into business strategy, management and reporting: Principles and maturity tool to facilitate resilience in business, 2016. https://researchspace.csir.co.za.Search in Google Scholar

Hubbard, G. (2009). Measuring Organizational Performance: Beyond the Triple Bottom Line. Business Strategy and the Environment, 18(3), 177-191.10.1002/bse.564Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Ivory, S. B., & Brooks, S. B. (2018). Managing corporate sustainability with a paradoxical lens: Lessons from strategic agility. Journal of Business Ethics, 148(2), 347-361.10.1007/s10551-017-3583-6Search in Google Scholar

Kates, R. W., Clark, W. C., Corell, R., Hall, J. M., Jaeger, C. C., Lowe, I., ... & Faucheux, S. (2001). Sustainability science. Science, 292(5517), 641-642.10.1126/science.1059386Search in Google Scholar

Lubin, D. A., & Esty, D. C. (2010). The Sustainability Imperative. Harvard Business Review, 88(5), 42-50.Search in Google Scholar

Montiel, I., & Delgado-Ceballos, J. (2014). Defining and measuring corporate sustainability: Are we there yet?. Organization & Environment, 27(2), 113-139.10.1177/1086026614526413Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Nguyen, D. K., & Slater, S. F. (2010). Hitting the sustainability sweet spot: Having it all. Journal of Business Strategy, 31(3), 5-11.10.1108/02756661011036655Search in Google Scholar

Norton, B. G. (2005). Sustainability: A philosophy of adaptive ecosystem management. University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226595221.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Pal, M., & Jenkins, J. J. (2014). Reimagining Sustainability: An Interrogation of the Corporate Knights’ Global 100. Environmental Communication, 8(3), 388-405.10.1080/17524032.2014.906477Search in Google Scholar

Pinelli, M., & Maiolini, R. (2017). Strategies for Sustainable Development: Organizational Motivations, Stakeholders’ Expectations and Sustainability Agendas. Sustainable Development, 25(4), 288-298.10.1002/sd.1653Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Popa, F., Guillermin, M., & Dedeurwaerdere, T. (2015). A pragmatist approach to transdisciplinarity in sustainability research: From complex systems theory to reflexive science. Futures, 65, 45-56.10.1016/j.futures.2014.02.002Search in Google Scholar

RobecoSAM Corporate Sustainability Assessment (CSA). http://www.robecosam.com/en/sustainability-insights/about-sustainability/corporate-sustainability-assessment/index.jsp.Search in Google Scholar

Searcy, C. (2016). Without a definition of corporate sustainability, how to measure performance?. LSE Business Review. http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/73582/1/blogs.lse.ac.uk-Without%20a%20definition%20of%20corporate%20sustainability%20how%20to%20measure%20performance.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

Skjølsvold, T. M. (2013). What we disagree about when we disagree about sustainability. Society & Natural Resources, 26(11), 1268-1282.10.1080/08941920.2013.797527Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

United Nations (UN). (2015). Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/post2015/transformingourworld.Search in Google Scholar

United Nations (UN). (1987). Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future. http://www.un-documents.net/wced-ocf.htm.Search in Google Scholar

Van Marrewijk, M., & Werre, M. (2003). Multiple levels of corporate sustainability. Journal of Business ethics, 44(2-3), 107-119.10.1023/A:1023383229086Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Verstegen, S. W., & Hanekamp, J. C. (2005). The sustainability debate: Idealism versus conformism–the controversy over economic growth. Globalizations, 2(3), 349-362.10.1080/14747730500367843Search in Google Scholar

Vos, R. O. (1997). Introduction: competing approaches to sustainability: Dimensions of Controversy. Flashpoints in Environmental Policymaking: Controversies in Achieving Sustainabiliw, 1-26.Search in Google Scholar

Willard, B. (2012). The new sustainability advantage: seven business case benefits of a triple bottom line. New Society Publishers.Search in Google Scholar

York, J. G. (2009). Pragmatic sustainability: Translating environmental ethics into competitive advantage. Journal of Business Ethics, 85(1), 97-109.10.1007/s10551-008-9950-6Search in Google Scholar