A MCDA-Based Assessment of Biomethane Generation and Use in Sardinia

[1] Pakere I., Prodanuks T., Kamenders A., Veidenbergs I., Holler S., Villere A., Blumberga D. Ranking EU climate and energy policies. Environmental and Climate Technologies 2021:25:1:367–381. https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2021-0027 Search in Google Scholar

[2] Londoño-Pineda A. A., Cano J. A. Assessments under the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals: A bibliometric analysis. Environmental and Climate Technologies 2022:26:1:166–181. https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2022-0014 Search in Google Scholar

[3] Directive 2018/2001/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2018 on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources (Renewable Energy Directive II). Official Journal of European Union 2018:L 328/82–209. Search in Google Scholar

[4] IEA International Energy Agency. Outlook for biogas and biomethane. Prospects for organic growth [Online]. [Accessed: 21.03.2023]. Available: https://www.iea.org/reports/outlook-for-biogas-and-biomethane-prospects-for-organic-growth/an-introduction-to-biogas-and-biomethane Search in Google Scholar

[5] Vilardi G., Bassano C., Deiana P., Verdone N. Exergy and energy analysis of three upgrading processes. Energy Conversion and Management 2020:224:113323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2020.113323 Search in Google Scholar

[6] Chen X. Y., Vinh-Thang H., Ramirez A. A., Rodrigue D., Kaliaguine S. Membrane gas separation technologies for biogas upgrading. RSC Advances 2015:5:24399. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5RA00666J Search in Google Scholar

[7] Hosseinipour S. A., Mehrpooya M. Comparison of the biogas upgrading methods as a transportation fuel. Renewable Energy 2019:130:641–655. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2018.06.089 Search in Google Scholar

[8] Pavičić J., Novak Mavar K., Brkić V., Simon K. Biogas and biomethane production and usage: Technology development, advantages and challenges in Europe. Energies 2022:15(8):2940. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15082940 Search in Google Scholar

[9] Bauer F., Hulteberg C., Persson T., Tamm D. Biogas upgrading: Review of commercial technologies. Svenskt Gastekniskt CenterAB. SGC Rapport, 2013. Search in Google Scholar

[10] Biogas to biomethane technology review. In: Promotion of bio-methane and its market development through local and regional partnership. Task 3.1.1. TU Wien (Technische Universität Wien). Intelligent Energy European programme project, 2012. Search in Google Scholar

[11] Vo T. T. Q., Wall D. M., Ring D., Rajendran K., Murphy J. D. Techno-economic analysis of biogas upgrading via amine scrubber, carbon capture and ex-situ methanation. Applied Energy 2018:212:1191–1202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.12.099 Search in Google Scholar

[12] Valdmanis G., Bazbauers G., Bataitis M., Bohvalovs G., Lilo J., Blumberga A., Blumberga D. CO₂-to-fuel: Business and institutional aspects of implementation dynamics. Environmental and Climate Technologies 2022:26:1:1182–1195. https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2022-0089 Search in Google Scholar

[13] Alvarez-Huamani M., Paredes-Zavala J., Davila-del-Carpio G. Sustainability-based life cycle analysis of biomethane as a transportation fuel compared to Diesel and natural gas in Arequipa. Preprints 2021:2021110001. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202111.0001.v1 Search in Google Scholar

[14] Ishizaka A., Nemery P. Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis. Methods and Software. West Sussex (United Kingdom): Wiley, 2013. Search in Google Scholar

[15] Paturska A., Repele M., Bazbauers G. Economic assessment of biomethane supply system based on natural gas infrastructure. Energy Procedia 2015: 72:71-78. doi: 10.1016/j.egypro.2015.06.011 Search in Google Scholar

[16] Verbeeck K., Buelens L. C., Galvita V. V., Marin G. B., Van Geem K. M., Rabaey K. Upgrading the value of anaerobic digestion via chemical production from grid injected biomethane. Energy and Environmental Science 2018:11:1788–1802. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8EE01059E Search in Google Scholar

[17] Niesner J., Jecha D., Stehlik P. Biogas upgrading techniques: State of art review in European region. Chemical Engineering Transactions 2013:35:517–522. https://doi.org/10.3303/CET1335086 Search in Google Scholar

[18] Dzene I., Romagnoli F., Seile G., Blumberga D. Comparison of different biogas use pathways for Latvia: Biogas use in CHP vs. biogas upgrading. 9^th International Conference Environmental Engineering, Vilnius, 2014. https://doi.org/10.3846/enviro.2014.017 Search in Google Scholar

[19] Slišāne D., Gaumigs G., Lauka D., Blumberga D. Assessment of energy sustainability in statistical regions of Latvia using Energy Sustainability Index. Environmental and Climate Technologies 2020:24:2:160–169. https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2020-0069 Search in Google Scholar

[20] Cinelli M., Coles S. R., Kirwan K. Analysis of the potentials of multi criteria decision analysis methods to conduct sustainability assessment. Ecological Indicators 2014:46:138–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.06.011 Search in Google Scholar

[21] Vo T. T. Q., Xia A., Rogan F., Wall D. M., Murphy J. D. Sustainability assessment of large-scale storage technologies for surplus electricity using group multi-criteria decision analysis. Clean Technology Environmental Policy 2017: 19:689–703. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-016-1250-8 Search in Google Scholar

[22] Myllyviita T., Holma A., Antikainen R., Lähtinen K., Leskinen P. Assessing environmental impacts of biomass production chains: Application of life cycle assessment (LCA) and multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA). Journal of Cleaner Production 2012:29–30:238–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.01.019 Search in Google Scholar

[23] Martín-Gamboa M., Dias L. C., Quinteiro P., Freire F., Arroja L., Dias A. C. Multi-criteria and life cycle assessment of wood-based bioenergy alternatives for residential heating: A sustainability analysis. Energies 2019:12(22):4391. https://doi.org/10.3390/en12224391 Search in Google Scholar

[24] Kheybari S., Rezaie F. M. Selection of biogas, solar, and wind power plants’ locations: An MCDA approach. Journal of Supply Chain Management Science 2020:1:1–2. http://dx.doi.org/10.18757/jscms.2020.4805 Search in Google Scholar

[25] Taraszkiewicz N. Agricultural biogas plant location selection using MCDA methods. Proceedings 2019:16:7. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2019016007 Search in Google Scholar

[26] Bhowmik C., Kaviani M. A., Ray A., Ocampo L. An integrated entropy: TOPSIS methodology for evaluating green energy sources. In: Research anthology on clean energy management and solutions. Hershey (PA): IGI Global, 2021. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-9152-9.ch010 Search in Google Scholar

[27] Şengül Ü., Eren M., Shiraz S. E., Gezder V., Şengül A. B. Fuzzy TOPSIS method for ranking renewable energy supply systems in Turkey. Renewable Energy 2015:75:617–625. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2014.10.045 Search in Google Scholar

[28] Hajduk S., Jelonek D. A decision-making approach based on TOPSIS method for ranking smart cities in the context of urban energy. Energies 2021:14(9):2691. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14092691 Search in Google Scholar

[29] Irfan M., Elavarasan R. M., Ahmad M., Mohsin M., Dagar V., Hao Y. Prioritizing and overcoming biomass energy barriers: Application of AHP and G-TOPSIS approaches. Technological Forecasting & Social Change 2022:177:121524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121524 Search in Google Scholar

[30] Chakraborty S. TOPSIS and Modified TOPSIS: A comparative analysis. Decision Analytics Journal 2022:2:100021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dajour.2021.100021 Search in Google Scholar

[31] Karklina K., Slisane D., Romagnoli F., Blumberga D. Social life cycle assessment of biomethane production and distribution in Latvia. Environmental Technology Proceedings of the International Scientific and Practical Conference, 2015. https://doi.org/10.17770/etr2015vol2.628 Search in Google Scholar

[32] Kuleli Pak B., Albayrak Y. E., Erensal Y. C. Renewable energy perspective for Turkey using sustainability indicators. International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems 2015:8:1:187–197. https://doi.org/10.2991/ijcis.2015.8.1.15 Search in Google Scholar

[33] GSE. Atlaimpianti, 2023 [Online]. [Accessed 27.03.2023]. Available: https://www.gse.it/dati-e-scenari/atlaimpianti Search in Google Scholar

[34] Ammenberg J., Gustafsson, M., O’Shea R., Gray, N., Lyng K-A., Eklund M., Murphy J. D. Perspectives on biomethane as a transport fuel within a circular economy, energy, and environmental system. Ammenberg, J; Murphy, J.D. (Ed.) IEA Bioenergy Task 37 2021:12. Search in Google Scholar

[35] Balcioglu G., Jeswani H.K., Azapagic A. Evaluating the environmental and economic sustainability of energy from anaerobic digestion of different feedstocks in Turkey. Sustainable Production and Consumption 2022:32:924–941. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2022.06.011 Search in Google Scholar

[36] Bellini R., Bassani I., Vizzarro A., Azim A. A., Vasile N. S., Pirri C. F., Verga F., Menin B. Biological aspects, advancaments and techno-economical evaluation of biological methanation for the recycling and valorization of CO₂. Energies 2022:15(11):4064. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15114064 Search in Google Scholar

[37] Goulding D., Power N. Which is the preferable biogas utilisation technology for anaerobic digestion of agricultural crops in Ireland: Biogas to CHP or biomethane as a transport fuel? Renewable Energy 2013:53:121–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2012.11.001 Search in Google Scholar

[38] Lawson N., Alvarado-Morales M. Tsapekos P., Angelidaki I. Techno-Economic Assessment of Biological Biogas Upgrading Based on Danish Biogas Plants. Energies 2021:14(24):8252. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14248252 Search in Google Scholar

[39] Murphy J. D., McKeogh E., Kiely G. Technical/economic/environmental analysis of biogas utilization. Applied Energy 2004:77(4):407–427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2003.07.005 Search in Google Scholar

[40] Rotunno P., Lanzini A., Leone P. Energy and economic analysis of a water scrubbing based biogas upgrading process for biomethane injection into the gas grid or use as transportation fuel. Renewable Energy 2017:102(PB):417–432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2016.10.062 Search in Google Scholar

[41] Bienert K., Schumacher B., Rojas Arboleda M., Billig E., Shakya S., Rogstrand G., Zieliński M., Dębowski M. Multi-Indicator assessment of innovative small-scale biomethane technologies in Europe. Energies 2019:12(7):1321. https://doi.org/10.3390/en12071321 Search in Google Scholar

[42] Miltner M., Makaruk A., Harasek M. Review on available biogas upgrading technologies and innovations towards advanced solutions. Journal of Cleaner Production 2017:161:1329–1337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.06.045 Search in Google Scholar

[43] Johansson N. Production of liquid biogas, LBG, with cryogenic and conventional upgrading technology: Description of systems and evaluations of energy balances. Master Thesis, 2008, Lunds Universitet. Search in Google Scholar

[44] Tauber J., Parravicini V., Svardal K., Krampe J. Quantifying methane emissions from anaerobic digesters. Water Science & Technology 2019:80(9):1654–1661. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2019.415 Search in Google Scholar

[45] Capra F., Magli F., Gatti M. Biomethane liquefaction: A systematic comparative analysis of refrigeration technologies. Applied Thermal Engineering 2019:158:113815. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2019.113815 Search in Google Scholar

[46] Gantenbein A., Kröcher O., Biollaz S. M. A., Schildhauer T. J. Techno-economic evaluation of biological and fluidised-bed based methanation process chains for grid-ready biomethane production. Frontiers in Energy Research 2022:9:775259. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2021.775259 Search in Google Scholar

[47] Dupnock T. L., Deshusses M. A. Biological co-treatment of H₂S and reduction of CO₂ to methane in an anoxic biological trickling filter upgrading biogas. Chemosphere 2020:256:127078. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.127078 Search in Google Scholar

[48] Kougias P. G., Treu L., Peñailillo Benavente D., Boe K., Campanaro S., Angelidaki I. Ex-situ biogas upgrading and enhancement in different reactor systems. Bioresource Technology 2017:225:429–437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2016.11.124 Search in Google Scholar

[49] Ma Y., Guo H., Selyanchyn R., Wang B., Deng L., Dai Z., Jiang X. Hydrogen sulfide removal from natural gas using membrane technology: A review. Journal of Material Chemistry A 2021:9:20211–20240. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1TA04693D Search in Google Scholar

[50] Rusmanis D., O’Shea R., Wall D. M., Murphy J. D. Biological hydrogen methanation systems: An overview of design and efficiency. Bioengineered 2019:10(1):604–634. https://doi.org/10.1080/21655979.2019.1684607 Search in Google Scholar

[51] Voelklein M. A., Rusmanis D., Murphy J. D. Biological methanation: Strategies for in-situ and ex-situ upgrading in anaerobic digestion. Applied Energy 2019:235:1061–1071. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.11.006 Search in Google Scholar

[52] Antukh T., Lee I., Joo S. and Kim H. Hydrogenotrophs-based biological biogas upgrading technologies. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology 2022:10:833482. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2022.833482 Search in Google Scholar

[53] CIB Consorzio Italiano Biogas. Biogas 2020. Position paper [Online]. [Accessed 16.02.2023]. Available: https://www.consorziobiogas.it/pubblicazioni-2/ Search in Google Scholar

[54] Cucchiella F., D’Adamo I., Gastaldi M., Miliacca M. A profitability analysis of small-scale plants for biomethane injection into the gas grid. Journal of Cleaner Production 2018:184:179–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.243 Search in Google Scholar

[55] Moschini M. Upgrading to biomethane and power production in SOFC-based cogeneration system: An exergo-economic comparison of biogas conversion alternatives. Tesi di Laurea Magistrale in Ingegneria Energetica e Nucleare, Politecnico di Torino, 2017. Search in Google Scholar

[56] Valli C., Cavaliere A., Ferravante L., Scagliotti M. Un approfondimento sulla metanazione biologica per l’upgrading del biogas a biometano: Fattibilità tecnico-economica e possibile ruolo nella gestione delle rinnovabili non programmabili. (An insight into biological methanation for the upgrading of biogas to biomethane: Technical-economic feasibility and possible role in the management of non-programmable renewables). Ricerca sul Sistema Energetico RSE S.p.A. [Online]. [Accessed: 15.04.2023]. Available: https://www.rse-web.it/rapporti/18007798/ (In Italian). Search in Google Scholar

[57] Ardolino F., Cardamone G. F., Parillo F., Arena U. Biogas-to-biomethane upgrading: A comparative review and assessment in a life cycle perspective. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2021:139:110588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2020.110588 Search in Google Scholar

[58] Badr S., Frutiger J., Hungerbuehler K., Papadokonstantakis S. A framework for the environmental, health and safety hazard assessment for amine-based post combustion CO₂ capture. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 2017:56:202–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2016.11.013 Search in Google Scholar

[59] Jia J., Chen Y., Che G., Zhu J., Wang F., Jia P. Experimental study on the explosion characteristics of hydrogen-methane premixed gas in complex pipe networks. Scientific Reports 2021:11:21204. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-00722-8 Search in Google Scholar

[60] Kotek L., Trávníček P., Blecha P. Accident analysis of European biogas stations. Chemical Engineering Transactions 2015:43:1933-1938. https://doi.org/10.3303/CET1543323 Search in Google Scholar

[61] Scarponi G. E., Guglielmi D., Casson Moreno V., Cozzani V. Risk assessment of a biogas production and upgrading plant. Chemical Engineering Transactions 2015:43:1921–1926. https://doi.org/10.3303/CET1543321 Search in Google Scholar

[62] Seay J., Lunghi E., Rehman A., Fabiano B. Analysis of accident data for the bioenergy sector based on second generation feedstock. Chemical Engineering Transaction 2017:57:871–876. https://doi.org/10.3303/CET1757131 Search in Google Scholar

[63] EBA European Biogas Association. Companies Catalogue: Members of the European Biogas association [Online]. [Accessed 16.02.2023]. Available: https://www.europeanbiogas.eu/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/Companies-Catalogue-EBA-2018.pdf Search in Google Scholar

[64] Electrochaea GmbH. Electroarchaea Fact Sheet 2019:10 [Online]. [Accessed 16.02.2023]. Available: http://www.electrochaea.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/20191030_Press-Kit_Electrochaea.pdf Search in Google Scholar

[65] Hashemi S. E., Kim D., Austbø B. Objective function evaluation for optimization of an amine-based biogas upgrading and liquefaction process. Industrial and Engineering Chemical Research 2022:61(19):6562–6574. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.1c04378 Search in Google Scholar

[66] Kulla M., Novotný L., Pregi L. The role and perception of biogas in the energy transformation in Slovakia. Geographia Cassoviensis 2022:16(1). https://doi.org/10.33542/GC2022-1-04 Search in Google Scholar

[67] Navigant Netherlands B. V. Gas for climate: Job creation by scaling up renewable gas in Europe. Prepared for: Gas for climate: A path to 2050. Reference No. 203997 [Online]. [Accessed 15^th April 2023]. Available: https://gasforclimate2050.eu/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/Navigant-Gas-for-Climate-Job-creation-by-scaling-up-renewable-gas-in-Europe.pdf Search in Google Scholar

[68] Sala S. Triple bottom line, sustainability and sustainability assessment, an overview. In: Biofuels for a more sustainable future. Life Cycle Assessment and Multi-Criteria Decision Making. Amsterdam (The Netherlands): Elsevier Inc., 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-815581-3.00003-8 Search in Google Scholar

[69] Cucchiella F., D’Adamo I., Gastaldi M. Biomethane: A renewable resource as vehicle fuel. Resources 2017:6(4):58. https://doi.org/10.3390/resources6040058 Search in Google Scholar

[70] Herbes C., Chouvellon S., Lacombe J. Towards marketing biomethane in France: French consumers’ perception of biomethane. Energy, Sustainability and Society 2018:8:37. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13705-018-0179-7 Search in Google Scholar

[71] Soltanzadeh A., Mahdinia M., Golmohammadpour H., Pourbabaki R., Mohammad-Ghasemi M., Sadeghi-Yarandi M. Evaluating the potential severity of biogas toxic release, fire and explosion: Consequence modeling of biogas dispersion in a large urban treatment plant. International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics 2022. https://doi.org/10.1080/10803548.2022.2041846 Search in Google Scholar

[72] Schroeder V., Schalau B., Molnarne M. Explosion protection in biogas and hybrid power plants. Procedia Engineering 2014:84:259–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2014.10.433 Search in Google Scholar

[73] Lauri R. Biomethane production: Pressure influence on classification of Atex zones. Chemical Engineering Transactions 2022:91. https://doi.org/10.3303/CET2291013 Search in Google Scholar

[74] Severi C. A., Pérez V., Pascual C., Muñoz R., Lebrero R. Identification of critical operational hazards in a biogas upgrading pilot plant through a multi-criteria decision-making and FTOPSIS-HAZOP approach. Chemosphere 2022:307:135845. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.135845 Search in Google Scholar

[75] Priedniece V., Kirsanovs V., Prodanuks T., Veidenbergs I., Blumberga D. Treatment of particulate matter pollution: People’s attitude and readiness to act. Environmental and Climate Technologies 2020:24(2):231–246. https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2020-0069 Search in Google Scholar