This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Heimann T. Bioeconomy and SDGs: Does the Bioeconomy Support the Achievement of the SDGs? Earths Future 2018:7(1):43–57. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018EF001014Search in Google Scholar
De Besi M., McCormick K. Towards a bioeconomy in Europe: National, regional and industrial strategies. Sustainability (Switzerland) 2015:7(8). https://doi.org/10.3390/su70810461Search in Google Scholar
Thorenz A., et al. Assessment of agroforestry residue potentials for the bioeconomy in the European Union. J Clean Prod 2018:176:348–359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.143Search in Google Scholar
Sanz-Hernández A., Esteban E., Garrido P. Transition to a bioeconomy: Perspectives from social sciences. J Clean Prod 2019:224:107–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.168Search in Google Scholar
Maraveas C. Production of sustainable and biodegradable polymers from agricultural waste. Polymers 2020:12(5):1127. https://doi.org/10.3390/POLYM12051127Search in Google Scholar
Awasthi M. K., et al. Agricultural waste biorefinery development towards circular bioeconomy. Renewable Sustainable Energy Reviews 2022:158:112122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2022.112122Search in Google Scholar
Gil A., et al. Mixture optimization of anaerobic co-digestion of tomato and cucumber waste. Env Tech 2015:36:2628–2636. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593330.2015.1041425Search in Google Scholar
Yaashikaa P. R., et al. Valorization of agro-industrial wastes for biorefinery process and circular bioeconomy: A critical review. Bioresour Technol 2022:343(2):126126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2021.126126Search in Google Scholar
Prakash K. S., et al. Utilization of Agricultural Waste Biomass and Recycling Towards Circular Bioeconomy. Environ Sci Pollut Res 202:30:8526–85392. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-20669-1Search in Google Scholar
Lau W. W. Y., et al. Evaluating scenarios toward zero plastic pollution. Science 2020:369(6510):1455–1461. https://doi.org/10.1126/SCIENCE.ABA9475Search in Google Scholar
Chia W. Y., et al. Nature’s fight against plastic pollution: Algae for plastic biodegradation and bioplastics production. Env Sci Ecotech 2020:4:100065. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ese.2020.100065Search in Google Scholar
Gowthaman N. S. K., et al. Chapter 15 - Advantages of biopolymers over synthetic polymers: social, economic, and environmental aspects. Biopol Ind App 2021:351–372. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-819240-5.00015-8Search in Google Scholar
Talan A., et al. Biorefinery strategies for microbial bioplastics production: Sustainable pathway towards Circular Bioeconomy. Bioresour Technol Rep 2022:17:100875. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biteb.2021.100875Search in Google Scholar
Patel N., Feofilovs M., Blumberga D. Agro Biopolymer: A Sustainable Future of Agriculture-State of Art Review. Env Clim Techn 2022:26:499–511. https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2022-0038Search in Google Scholar
Lin R., et al. Sustainability prioritization framework of biorefinery: A novel multi-criteria decision-making model under uncertainty based on an improved interval goal programming method. J Clean Prod 2020:251:119729. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119729Search in Google Scholar
Krzyżaniak M., Stolarski M. J. Life cycle assessment of camelina and crambe production for biorefinery and energy purposes. J Clean Prod 2019:237:117755. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117755Search in Google Scholar
Papadaskalopoulou C., et al. Comparative life cycle assessment of a waste to ethanol biorefinery system versus conventional waste management methods. Resour Conserv Recycl 2019:149:130–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.05.006Search in Google Scholar
Karayılan S., et al. Prospective evaluation of circular economy practices within plastic packaging value chain through optimization of life cycle impacts and circularity. Resour Conserv Recycl 2021:173:105691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105691Search in Google Scholar
Van de velde K., Kiekens P. Biopolymers: Overview of several properties and consequences on their applications. Polym Test 2002:21(4):433–442. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9418(01)00107-6Search in Google Scholar
Wellisch M., et al. Biorefinery systems-potential contributors to sustainable innovation. Biof Bioprod Bioref 2010:4(3):275–286. https://doi.org/10.1002/bbb.217Search in Google Scholar
Budzinski M., Nitzsche R. Comparative economic and environmental assessment of four beech wood based biorefinery concepts. Bioresour Technol 2016:216:613–621. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2016.05.111Search in Google Scholar
Helbig C., et al. Extending the geopolitical supply risk indicator: Application of life cycle sustainability assessment to the petrochemical supply chain of polyacrylonitrile-based carbon fibers. J Clean Prod 2016:137:1170–1178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.07.214Search in Google Scholar
Gironi F., Piemonte V. Bioplastics and petroleum-based plastics: Strengths and weaknesses. En Sour Part A: Recov, Utiliz Env Ef 2011:33(21):1949–1959. https://doi.org/10.1080/15567030903436830Search in Google Scholar
Vlachokostas C., et al. Supporting decision making to achieve circularity via a biodegradable waste-to-bioenergy and compost facility. J Environ Manage 2021:285:112215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112215Search in Google Scholar
Agarwal S. Major factors affecting the characteristics of starch based biopolymer films. Eur Polym J 2021:160:110788. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2021.110788Search in Google Scholar
Hertwich E. G., et al. Human toxicity potentials for life-cycle assessment and toxics release inventory risk screening. Environ Toxicol Chem 2001:20(4):928–939. https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.5620200431Search in Google Scholar
Taherimehr M., et al. Trends and challenges of biopolymer-based nanocomposites in food packaging. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf 2021:20(6):5321–5344. https://doi.org/10.1111/1541-4337.12832Search in Google Scholar
Marvin A. W., et al. Economic Optimization of a Lignocellulosic Biomass-to-Ethanol Supply Chain. Chem Eng Sci 2012:67(1):68–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2011.05.055Search in Google Scholar
Mtibe A., et al. Synthetic Biopolymers and Their Composites: Advantages and Limitations an Overview. Macromol Rapid Commun 2021:42(15):2100130. https://doi.org/10.1002/marc.202100130Search in Google Scholar
Galiano F., et al. Advances in biopolymer-based membrane preparation and applications. J Memb Sci 2018:564:562–586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2018.07.059Search in Google Scholar
Momani B. L. Assessment of the Impacts of Bioplastics: Energy Usage, Fossil Fuel Usage, Pollution, Health Effects, Effects on the Food Supply, and Economic Effects Compared to Petroleum Based Plastics. Worcester: Worcester Polytechnic Institute, 2009.Search in Google Scholar
Spierling S., et al. Bio-based plastics - A review of environmental, social and economic impact assessments. J Clean Prod 2018:185:476–491. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.014Search in Google Scholar
Emadian S. M, Onay T. T., Demirel B. Biodegradation of bioplastics in natural environments. Waste Manag 2017:59:526–536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2016.10.006Search in Google Scholar
Jem K. J., Tan B. The development and challenges of poly (lactic acid) and poly (glycolic acid). Adv Ind Eng Pol Res 2020:3(2):60–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aiepr.2020.01.002Search in Google Scholar
Maraveas C. Production of sustainable and biodegradable polymers from agricultural waste. Polymers 2020:12(5):1127. https://doi.org/10.3390/POLYM12051127Search in Google Scholar
Rezvani G. E., et al. The life cycle assessment for polylactic acid (PLA) to make it a low-carbon material. Polymers 2021:13(11):1854. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13111854Search in Google Scholar
Chalermthai B., et al. Life cycle assessment of bioplastic production from whey protein obtained from dairy residues. Bioresour Technol Rep 2021:15:100695. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biteb.2021.100695Search in Google Scholar
Wellenreuther C., Wolf A., Zander N. Cost structure of bio-based plastics: A Monte-Carlo-analysis for PLA. HWWI Res Pap 2021:197. http://hdl.handle.net/10419/235600Search in Google Scholar
Lackner M. Biopolymers. Handbook of Climate Change Mitigation and Adaptation. New York: Springer, 2015.Search in Google Scholar
EUBP_Facts_and_figures [Online]. [Accessed 18.10. 2022]. Available: http://www.european-bioplastics.org/Search in Google Scholar
McAdam B., et al. Production of polyhydroxybutyrate (PHB) and factors impacting its chemical and mechanical characteristics. Polymers 2020:12(12):2908. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12122908Search in Google Scholar
Harding K. G., et al. Environmental analysis of plastic production processes: Comparing petroleum-based polypropylene and polyethylene with biologically-based poly-β-hydroxybutyric acid using life cycle analysis. J Biotechnol 2007:130(1):57–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiotec.2007.02.012Search in Google Scholar
Nonato R., Mantelatto P., Rossell C. Integrated production of biodegradable plastic, sugar and ethanol. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2001:57:1–5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002530100732Search in Google Scholar
Vilpoux O., Averous L. Starch-based plastics. Technology, use and potentialities of Latin American starchy tubers. Book 3, Chapter 18. Sao Paolo: NGO Raízes and Cargill Foundation, 2004:521–553.Search in Google Scholar
Hazrol M. D., et al. Corn starch (Zea mays) biopolymer plastic reaction in combination with sorbitol and glycerol. Polymers 2021:13(2):242. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13020242Search in Google Scholar
Yusoff N.H., et al.Recent trends on bioplastics synthesis and characterizations: Polylactic acid (PLA) incorporated with tapiocastarch for packaging applications. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molstruc.2021.129954Search in Google Scholar
DeLéis C. M., et al. Environmental and energy analysis of biopolymer film based on cassavastarch in Brazil.J Clean Prod 2017:143:76–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.147Search in Google Scholar
Singh R., Kaur S., Sachdev P.A.A cost effective technology for isolation of potato starch and its utilization in formulation of ready to cook, non-cereal, and non-glutinous soup mix.J Food Meas Char2021:15:3168–3181. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11694-021-00887-wSearch in Google Scholar
Muneer F., et al.Preparation, Properties, Protein Cross-Linking and Biodegradability of Plasticizer-Solvent Free Hemp Fibre Reinforced Wheat Gluten, Glutenin, and Gliadin Composites.Bioresources2014:9(3):5246–5261. http://dx.doi.org/10.15376/biores.9.3.5246-5261Search in Google Scholar
Jones A., Mandal A., Sharma S. Protein-based bioplastics and their antibacterial potential.J Appl Polym Sci 2015:132(18):41931. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.41931Search in Google Scholar
Carvalho-Silva L. B.,Vissotto F. Z., Amaya-Farfan J. Physico-Chemical Properties of Milk Whey Protein Agglomerates for Usein Oral Nutritional Therapy.Food Nutr Sci2013:4:9B. https://doi.org/10.4236/fns.2013.49a2010Search in Google Scholar
Thammahiwes S., Riyajan S. A., Kaewtatip K. Preparation and properties of wheat gluten based bioplastics with fish scale.J Cereal Sci2017:75:186–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcs.2017.04.003Search in Google Scholar
Chalermthai B., et al.Techno-economic assessment of whey protein-based plastic production from a co-polymerization process.Polymers 2020:12(4):847. https://doi.org/10.3390/POLYM12040847Search in Google Scholar
Foroughi F., et al. A review onthe life cycle assessment of cellulose: From properties to the potential of making it a low carbonmaterial.Materials2021:14(4):714. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14040714Search in Google Scholar
Tejado A., et al. Energy requirements for the disintegration of cellulose fibers into cellulose nanofibers.Cellulose 2012:19:831–842. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-012-9694-4Search in Google Scholar
Mohanty A. K., et al. Development of Renewable Resource-Based Cellulose Acetate Bioplastic: Effect of Process Engineering on the Performance of CellulosicPlastics.Polym Eng Sci2003:43(5):1151–1161. https://doi.org/10.1002/pen.10097Search in Google Scholar
Rentoy F., et al. Development of Cellulose-based Bioplastic from Corn Stalks. 2018.Search in Google Scholar
Yadav P., et al. Assessment of the environmental impact of polymeric membrane production. J Memb Sci 2021:622:118987. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2020.118987Search in Google Scholar
Amaral H. R., et al. Production of high-purity cellulose, cellulose acetate and cellulose-silica composite from babassu coconut shells. Carbohydr Polym 2019:210:127–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2019.01.061Search in Google Scholar
Molenveld K., et al. Biobased plastics 2020. Wageningen: Wageningen Food & Biobased Research, 2020.Search in Google Scholar
Kurka T. Application of the analytic hierarchy process to evaluate the regional sustainability of bioenergy developments. Energy 2013:62:393–402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2013.09.053Search in Google Scholar
Pamucar D., Bozanic D., Kurtov D. Fuzzification of the Saaty’s scale and a presentation of the hybrid fuzzy AHPTOPSIS model: An example of the selection of a brigade artillery group firing position in a defensive operation. Vojnotehnicki Glasnik 2016:64(4):966–986. https://doi.org/10.5937/vojtehg64-9262Search in Google Scholar
Szybowski J., Kułakowski K., Prusak A. New inconsistency indicators for incomplete pairwise comparisons matrices. Math Soc Sci 2020:108:138–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2020.05.002Search in Google Scholar
Ahmed S., Vedagiri P., KrishnaRao K. V. Prioritization of pavement maintenance sections using objective based Analytic Hierarchy Process. Int J Pav Res Tech 2017:10(2):158–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijprt.2017.01.001Search in Google Scholar
Laininen P., Hämäläinen R. P. Analyzing AHP-matrices by regression. Eur J Oper Res 2003:148(3):514–524. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(02)00430-7Search in Google Scholar
Sahabuddin M., Khan I. Multi-criteria decision analysis methods for energy sector’s sustainability assessment: Robustness analysis through criteria weight change. Sustainable Energy Tech Assessments 2021:47:101380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2021.101380Search in Google Scholar
Dymova L., Sevastjanov P., Tikhonenko A. A direct interval extension of TOPSIS method. Expert Syst Appl 2013:40(12):4841–4847. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2013.02.022Search in Google Scholar
Gadakh V. S. Application of MOORA method for parametric optimization of milling process. Int J Appl Eng Res 2011:1(4):743–758.Search in Google Scholar
Thakkar J. J. Complex Proportion Assessment Method (COPRAS). Mul-Crit Dec Mak 2021:336:219–237. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-4745-8_13Search in Google Scholar
Sayadi M. K., Heydari M., Shahanaghi K. Extension of VIKOR method for decision making problem with interval numbers. Appl Math Model 2009:33(5):2257–2262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2008.06.002Search in Google Scholar
Zlaugotne B., et al. Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis Methods Comparison. Env Clim Tech 2020:24(1):454–471. https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2020-0028Search in Google Scholar
French S., Roy B. Multi-criteria Methodology for Decision Aiding. J Oper Res Soc 1997:48(12):1257–1258. https://doi.org/10.2307/3010757Search in Google Scholar
Chang Y. H., Yeh C. H., Chang Y. W. A new method selection approach for fuzzy group multi-criteria decision making. App S Comp J 2013:13(4):2179–2187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2012.12.009Search in Google Scholar
Zanakis S. H., et al. Multi-attribute decision making: A simulation comparison of select methods. Eur J Oper Res 1998:107(3):507–529. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(97)00147-1Search in Google Scholar
Ozcan T., Elebi N., Esnaf A. Comparative analysis of multi-criteria decision making methodologies and implementation of a warehouse location selection problem. Expert Syst Appl 2011:38(8):9773–9779. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.02.022Search in Google Scholar
Lakshmi T. M., Venkatesan V. P., Martin A. An Identification of Better Engineering College with Conflicting Criteria using Adaptive TOPSIS. Int J Mod Educ Comp Sc 2016:8(5):19–31. https://doi.org/10.5815/ijmecs.2016.05.03Search in Google Scholar
Wątróbski J., et al. Generalised framework for multi-criteria method selection. Omega 2019:86:107–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2018.07.004Search in Google Scholar
Farah S., Anderson D. G., Langer R. Physical and mechanical properties of PLA, and their functions in widespread applications. A comprehensive review. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2016:107:367–392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2016.06.012Search in Google Scholar
Nandakumar A., Chuah J. A., Sudesh K. Bioplastics: A boon or bane? Ren Sust En Rev 2021:147:111237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.111237Search in Google Scholar
Venkatachalam H., Palaniswamy R. Bioplastic World: A Review. J Adv Sci Res 2020:11(3):43–53. http://sciensage.info/index.php/JASR/article/view/505Search in Google Scholar
Ilyas R. A., et al. Polylactic acid (Pla) biocomposite: Processing, additive manufacturing and advanced applications. Polymers 2021:13(8):1326. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13081326Search in Google Scholar
Sayyed R. Z., et al. Production of biodegradable polymer from agro-wastes in alcaligenes sp. and pseudomonas sp. Molecules 2021:26(9):2443. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26092443Search in Google Scholar
Sharma V., Sehgal R., Gupta R. Polyhydroxyalkanoate (PHA): Properties and Modifications. Polymer 2021:212:123161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2020.123161Search in Google Scholar
Liu H., et al. Biopolymer poly-hydroxyalkanoates (PHA) production from apple industrial waste residues: A review. Chemosphere 2021:284:131427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.131427Search in Google Scholar
Birania S., et al. Advances in development of biodegradable food packaging material from agricultural and agroindustry waste. J Food Proc Eng 2022:45(1):e13930. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfpe.13930Search in Google Scholar
Nazrin A., et al. Nanocellulose Reinforced Thermoplastic Starch (TPS), Polylactic Acid (PLA), and Polybutylene Succinate (PBS) for Food Packaging Applications. Front Chem 2020:8:213. https://doi.org/10.3389/fchem.2020.00213Search in Google Scholar
Ranganathan S., et al. Utilization of food waste streams for the production of biopolymers. Heliyon 2020:6(9):e04891. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04891Search in Google Scholar
Motaung T. E., Linganiso L. Z. Critical review on agrowaste cellulose applications for biopolymers. Int J Plas Tech 2018:22:185–216. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12588-018-9219-6Search in Google Scholar
Makarov I. S., et al. Structure, Morphology, and Permeability of Cellulose Films. Membranes 2022:12(3):297. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes12030297Search in Google Scholar