The Versatility of the Bioeconomy. Sustainability Aspects of the Use of Bran

[1] Kardung M., et al. Development of the Circular Bioeconomy: Drivers and Indicators. Sustainability 2021:13(1):413. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU13010413 Search in Google Scholar

[2] Wohlgemuth R., Twardowski T., Aguilar A. Bioeconomy moving forward step by step – A global journey. New Biotechnology 2021:61:22–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.NBT.2020.11.00633197617 Search in Google Scholar

[3] Valin H., et al. The future of food demand: understanding differences in global economic models. Agricultural Economics 2014:45(1):51–67. https://doi.org/10.1111/AGEC.12089 Search in Google Scholar

[4] Roth M., Jekle M., Becker T. Opportunities for upcycling cereal byproducts with special focus on Distiller’s grains. Trends in Food Science & Technology 2019:91:282–293. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TIFS.2019.07.041 Search in Google Scholar

[5] Comino E., Dominici L., Perozzi D. Do-it-yourself approach applied to the valorisation of a wheat milling industry’s by-product for producing bio-based material. Journal of Cleaner Production 2021:318:128267. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2021.128267 Search in Google Scholar

[6] Ghisellini P., Cialani C., Ulgiati S. A review on circular economy: the expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems. Journal of Cleaner Production 2016:114:11–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2015.09.007 Search in Google Scholar

[7] Loy A. C. M., et al. Life-cycle assessment of hydrogen production via catalytic gasification of wheat straw in the presence of straw derived biochar catalyst. Bioresource Technology 2021:341:125796. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BIORTECH.2021.125796 Search in Google Scholar

[8] Bledzki A. K., Mamun A. A., Volk J. Physical, chemical and surface properties of wheat husk, rye husk and soft wood and their polypropylene composites. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing 2010:41(4):480–488. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMPOSITESA.2009.12.004 Search in Google Scholar

[9] Barbieri V., Lassinantti Gualtieri M., Siligardi C. Wheat husk: A renewable resource for bio-based building materials. Construction and Building Materials 2020:251:118909. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2020.118909 Search in Google Scholar

[10] Bheel N. et al. Fresh and mechanical properties of concrete made of binary substitution of millet husk ash and wheat straw ash for cement and fine aggregate. Journal of Materials Research and Technology 2021:13:872–893. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JMRT.2021.04.095 Search in Google Scholar

[11] Safaripour M., et al. Environmental impact tradeoff considerations for wheat bran-based biocomposite. Science of The Total Environment 2021:781:146588. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SCITOTENV.2021.146588 Search in Google Scholar

[12] Probst K. V., Vadlani P. V. Production of single cell oil from Lipomyces starkeyi ATCC 56304 using biorefinery byproducts. Bioresource Technology 2015:198:268–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BIORTECH.2015.09.018 Search in Google Scholar

[13] United Nations. The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. [Online]. [Accessed 17.03.2022]. Available: https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/development-agenda/ Search in Google Scholar

[14] European Commission, et al. Guidance on cascading use of biomass with selected good practice examples on woody biomass. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2018. Search in Google Scholar

[15] Lokesh K., Ladu L., Summerton L. Bridging the Gaps for a ‘Circular’ Bioeconomy: Selection Criteria, Bio-Based Value Chain and Stakeholder Mapping. Sustainability 2018:10(6):1695. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU10061695 Search in Google Scholar

[16] Eurostat. Crop Production in EU Standard Humidity. [Online]. [Accessed 24.04.2022]. Available: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/APRO_CPSH1__custom_2567217/default/table?lang=en Search in Google Scholar

[17] Ministry of Agriculture of the Republic of Latvia. LATVIJAS LAUKSAIMNIECĪBA 2020 (LATVIAN AGRICULTURE 2020). https://www.zm.gov.lv/public/files/CMS_Static_Page_Doc/00/00/02/12/76/2021_lauksaimniecibas_gada_zin.pdf Search in Google Scholar

[18] Commission Regulation (EU) No 242/2010 of 19 March 2010 creating the Catalogue of feed materials. Official Journal of European Union 2010: L 77/17. Search in Google Scholar

[19] Riga Regional Environmental Board. Atļauja B kategorija piesārņojošai darbībai Nr.RI10IB0039 (Permit for category B polluting activity No.RI10IB0039). 2010. (in Latvian) Search in Google Scholar

[20] Khan T. S., Mubeen U. Wheat Straw: A Pragmatic Overview. Article in Current Research Journal of Biological Sciences 2012:12:236. Search in Google Scholar

[21] Pan X., Sano Y. Fractionation of wheat straw by atmospheric acetic acid process. Bioresource Technology 2005:96(11):1256–1263. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BIORTECH.2004.10.01815734313 Search in Google Scholar

[22] Corp. ‘Dobeles Dzirnavnieks’. Veidlapa ‘Nr.3-Atkritumi. Pārskats par atkritumiem’ 2020. gadā (Form ‘No.3-Waste. Waste Review 2020). 2020 [Online]. [Accessed 09.03.2022]. Available: http://parissrv.lvgmc.lv/#viewType=wasteReportViewversija2020t1&reportid=1611396294807&incrementCounter=3 (in Latvian) Search in Google Scholar

[23] Dzirnavnieks.lv. ‘Dobeles dzirnavniekam’ rekordliels eksporta apgrozījums (‘Dobeles dzirnavnieks’ has a record export turnover). [Online]. [Accessed 24.04.2022]. Available: https://dzirnavnieks.lv/news/dobeles-dzirnavniekamrekordliels-eksporta-apgrozijums/ (in Latvian) Search in Google Scholar

[24] Yilmaz-Turan S., et al. Bio-based films from wheat bran feruloylated arabinoxylan: Effect of extraction technique, acetylation and feruloylation. Carbohydrate Polymers 2020:250:116916. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CARBPOL.2020.11691633049888 Search in Google Scholar

[25] Berthet M. A., et al. Exploring the potentialities of using lignocellulosic fibres derived from three food by-products as constituents of biocomposites for food packaging. Industrial Crops and Products 2015:69:110–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.INDCROP.2015.01.028 Search in Google Scholar

[26] Serrano L., et al. Bio-Degradable Polyurethane Foams Produced by Liquefied Polyol from Wheat Straw Biomass. Polymers 2020:12(11):2646. https://doi.org/10.3390/POLYM12112646770901933182792 Search in Google Scholar

[27] Hernández-Martínez D., et al. Obtaining and characterisation of silicon (Si) from wheat husk ash for its possible application in solar cells. Journal of Cleaner Production 2020:271:122698. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2020.122698 Search in Google Scholar

[28] Katileviciute A., et al. A Sight to Wheat Bran: High Value-Added Products. Biomolecules 2019:9(12):887. https://doi.org/10.3390/BIOM9120887 Search in Google Scholar

[29] Chung W. J., Shim J., Ravindran B. Application of wheat bran based biomaterials and nano-catalyst in textile wastewater. Journal of King Saud University – Science 2022:34(2):101775. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JKSUS.2021.101775 Search in Google Scholar

[30] Ríos-Badrán I. M., et al. Production and characterisation of fuel pellets from rice husk and wheat straw. Renewable Energy 2020:145:500–507. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RENENE.2019.06.048 Search in Google Scholar

[31] Barbieri V., et al. Lightweight concretes based on wheat husk and hemp hurd as bio-aggregates and modified magnesium oxysulfate binder: Microstructure and technological performances. Construction and Building Materials 2021:284:122751. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2021.122751 Search in Google Scholar

[32] Muthuraj R., et al. Sustainable thermal insulation biocomposites from rice husk, wheat husk, wood fibers and textile waste fibers: Elaboration and performances evaluation. Industrial Crops and Products 2019:135:238–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.INDCROP.2019.04.053 Search in Google Scholar

[33] Sisti L., et al. Valorisation of wheat bran agro-industrial byproduct as an upgrading filler for mycelium-based composite materials. Industrial Crops and Products 2021:170:113742. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.INDCROP.2021.113742 Search in Google Scholar

[34] Domínguez-Robles J., et al. Isolation and characterisation of lignins from wheat straw: Application as binder in lithium batteries. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules 2017:104(A):909–918. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJBIOMAC.2017.07.01528687383 Search in Google Scholar

[35] Cui J., et al. Preparation of siliceous lignin microparticles from wheat husks with a facile method. Industrial Crops and Products 2015:74:689–696. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.INDCROP.2015.05.061 Search in Google Scholar

[36] Porrang S., et al. Preparation and in-vitro evaluation of mesoporous biogenic silica nanoparticles obtained from rice and wheat husk as a biocompatible carrier for anti-cancer drug delivery. European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences 2021:163:105866. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EJPS.2021.10586633957220 Search in Google Scholar

[37] Bondam A. F., et al. Phenolic compounds from coffee by-products: Extraction and application in the food and pharmaceutical industries. Trends in Food Science & Technology 2022:123:172–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TIFS.2022.03.013 Search in Google Scholar

[38] Fiallos-Cárdenas M., Pérez-Martínez S., Ramirez A. D. Prospectives for the development of a circular bioeconomy around the banana value chain. Sustainable Production and Consumption 2022:30:541–555. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SPC.2021.12.014 Search in Google Scholar

[39] Brandão A. S., Gonçalves A., Santos J. M. R. C. A. Circular bioeconomy strategies: From scientific research to commercially viable products. Journal of Cleaner Production 2021:295:126407. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2021.126407 Search in Google Scholar

[40] Corrado S., Sala S. Food waste accounting along global and European food supply chains: State of the art and outlook. Waste Management 2018:79:120–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.WASMAN.2018.07.032 Search in Google Scholar

[41] Chong K. J. A methodology for the generation and evaluation of biorefinery process chains, in order to identify the most promising biorefineries for the EU. Birmingham: Aston University, 2011. Search in Google Scholar

[42] Pieratti E., et al. Assessing the forest-wood chain at local level: A Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) based on the circular bioeconomy principles. Annals of Forest Research 2019:62(1):123–138. https://doi.org/10.15287/afr.2018.1238 Search in Google Scholar

[43] Rahman A., et al. Utilisation of wheat-bran cellulosic fibers as reinforcement in bio-based polypropylene composite. Industrial Crops and Products 2021:172:114028. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.INDCROP.2021.114028 Search in Google Scholar

[44] Gupta V. K., Jain R., Varshney S. Removal of Reactofix golden yellow 3 RFN from aqueous solution using wheat husk—An agricultural waste. Journal of Hazardous Materials 2007:142(1–2):443–448. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JHAZMAT.2006.08.04817010514 Search in Google Scholar

[45] Leishan C., et al. A new and environmentally friendly route for preparation of carbon microspheres from wheat straw. The Scientific World Journal 2013. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/146930383076224288457 Search in Google Scholar

[46] de Wild P. J., Huijgen W. J. J., Heeres H. J. Pyrolysis of wheat straw-derived organosolv lignin. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis 2012:93:95–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JAAP.2011.10.002 Search in Google Scholar

[47] Al Jibouri A. K. H., et al. Ozone pretreatment of humid wheat straw for biofuel production. Energy Science & Engineering 2015:3(6):541–548. https://doi.org/10.1002/ESE3.93 Search in Google Scholar

[48] Ahmad S., Iqbal Y., Muhammad R. Effects of coal and wheat husk additives on the physical, thermal and mechanical properties of clay bricks. Boletín de La Sociedad Española de Cerámica y Vidrio 2017:56(3):131–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BSECV.2017.02.001 Search in Google Scholar

[49] Krull S., et al. Itaconic acid production from wheat chaff by Aspergillus terreus. Process Biochemistry 2017:63:169–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PROCBIO.2017.08.010 Search in Google Scholar

[50] Guerrini A., et al. Antioxidant and antimicrobial extracts obtained from agricultural by-products: Strategies for a sustainable recovery and future perspectives. Food and Bioproducts Processing 2020:124:397–407. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.FBP.2020.10.003 Search in Google Scholar

[51] Yegin S., et al. Exploitation of Agricultural Wastes and By-Products for Production of Aureobasidium pullulans Y- 2311-1 Xylanase: Screening, Bioprocess Optimization and Scale Up. Waste and Biomass Valorisation 2017:8:999–1010. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-016-9646-6 Search in Google Scholar

[52] Zlaugotne B., et al. Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis Methods Comparison. Environmental and Climate Technologies 2020:24:(1):454–471. https://doi.org/10.2478/RTUECT-2020-0028 Search in Google Scholar

[53] Peiyue L., et al. Sensitivity analysis of TOPSIS method in water quality assessment: I. Sensitivity to the parameter weights. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 2013:185(3):2453–2461. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10661-012-2723-922752962 Search in Google Scholar

[54] Yang K., et al. Activated Carbon Microsphere from Sodium Lignosulfonate for Cr(VI) Adsorption Evaluation in Wastewater Treatment. Polymers 2020:12(1):236. https://doi.org/10.3390/POLYM12010236702358331963778 Search in Google Scholar

[55] HORIZON 2020 – WORK PROGRAMME 2014-2015 General Annexes G. Commission Decision C(2014)4995. Technology readiness levels (TRL). Brussels: EU, 2014. Search in Google Scholar

[56] Jones M., et al. Engineered mycelium composite construction materials from fungal biorefineries: A critical review. Materials & Design 2020:187:108397. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MATDES.2019.108397 Search in Google Scholar

[57] Uitterhaegen E., et al. Performance, durability and recycling of thermoplastic biocomposites reinforced with coriander straw. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing 2018:113:254–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMPOSITESA.2018.07.038 Search in Google Scholar

[58] van den Oever M., et al. Bio-based and biodegradable plastics: facts and figures: focus on food packaging in the Netherlands. Wageningen Food & Biobased Research; No. 1722, 2017. https://doi.org/10.18174/408350 Search in Google Scholar

[59] Mussatto S. I., et al. Techno-economic analysis for brewer’s spent grains use on a biorefinery concept: The Brazilian case. Bioresource Technology 2013:148:302–310. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BIORTECH.2013.08.046 Search in Google Scholar

[60] Koutinas A. A., et al. Design and techno-economic evaluation of microbial oil production as a renewable resource for biodiesel and oleochemical production. Fuel 2014:116:566–577. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.FUEL.2013.08.045 Search in Google Scholar

[61] Verified Market Research. Global Biocomposites Market Size By Fiber (Wooden Fiber and Non-wood Fiber), By End- User(Building & Construction, Automotive, Consumer Goods), By Geographic Scope And Forecast. [Online]. [Accessed 23.04.2022]. Available: https://www.verifiedmarketresearch.com/product/biocomposite-market/ Search in Google Scholar

[62] BlueWeave. Global Adsorbents Market is Flourishing—Projected to Reach worth USD 5.9 billion in 2027. [Online]. [Accessed 23.04.2022]. Available: https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2021/12/08/2348536/0/en/Global-Adsorbents-Market-is-Flourishing-Projected-to-Reach-worth-USD-5-9-billion-in-2027-BlueWeave.html Search in Google Scholar

[63] Ponnappan A., Mandon P., Prasad E. Bioplastics Market by Type (Biodegradable Plastic and Non-Biodegradable Plastic) and Application (Packaging, Agriculture, Consumer Durables, Textile, and Others): Global Opportunity Analysis and Industry Forecast, 2021–2030. 2021. Search in Google Scholar

[64] Manjrekar S., Wadekar T., Sumant O. Enzymes Market Type (Protease, Carbohydrase, Lipase, Polymerase and Nuclease, and Other Types), Source (Microorganisms, Plants, and Animals), Reaction Type (Hydrolase, Oxidoreductase, Transferase, Lyase, and Other Reaction Types), and Application (Food and Beverages, Household Care, Bioenergy, Pharmaceutical and Biotechnology, Feed, and Other Applications) - Global Opportunity Analysis and Industry Forecast, 2020–2027. 2021. Search in Google Scholar

[65] Vantage Market Research. Organic Acids Market by Type (Acetic Acid, Citric Acid, Formic Acid, Lactic Acid), by Application (Food & Beverages, Feed, Pharmaceuticals, Industrial), by Region (North America, Europe, Asia Pacific, Middle East & Africa) - Global Industry Assessment (2016 - 2021) & Forecast (2022 - 2028). Redding: Meticoulus research, 2017. Search in Google Scholar

[66] Fortune Business Insights. Oleochemicals Market Size, Share and COVID-19 Impact Analysis, By Type (Fatty Acids, Fatty Alcohols, Methyl Esters, and Glycerin), By Application (Food and Beverages, Chemicals, Animal Feed, and Others), and Regional Forecast, 2021-2028. [Online]. [Accessed 23.04.2022]. Available: https://www.fortunebusinessinsights.com/infographics/oleochemicals-market-106250 Search in Google Scholar

[67] Pubule J., et al. Analysis of the environmental impact assessment of power energy projects in Latvia. Management of Environmental Quality 2012:23(2):190–203. https://doi.org/10.1108/14777831211204930 Search in Google Scholar

[68] Asdrubali F., D’Alessandro F., Schiavoni S. A review of unconventional sustainable building insulation materials. Sustainable Materials and Technologies 2015:4:1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SUSMAT.2015.05.002 Search in Google Scholar

[69] Firoozi Nejad B., et al. Carbon and energy footprints of high-value food trays and lidding films made of common biobased and conventional packaging materials. Cleaner Environmental Systems 2021:3:100058. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CESYS.2021.100058 Search in Google Scholar