1. bookTom 26 (2022): Zeszyt 1 (January 2022)
Informacje o czasopiśmie
License
Format
Czasopismo
eISSN
2255-8837
Pierwsze wydanie
26 Mar 2010
Częstotliwość wydawania
2 razy w roku
Języki
Angielski
access type Otwarty dostęp

Hydrothermal Carbonisation of Biomass Wastes as a Tool for Carbon Capture

Data publikacji: 21 Jun 2022
Tom & Zeszyt: Tom 26 (2022) - Zeszyt 1 (January 2022)
Zakres stron: 415 - 427
Informacje o czasopiśmie
License
Format
Czasopismo
eISSN
2255-8837
Pierwsze wydanie
26 Mar 2010
Częstotliwość wydawania
2 razy w roku
Języki
Angielski
Abstract

Replacing fossil resources with bioresources is one of the promising directions for more environmentally friendly energy production, but the production and processing of biomass generates a large amount of waste with limited use and recycling possibilities. In this respect Hydrothermal Carbonisation (HTC) offers a sustainable and cost-effective solution for disposal and creation of new products from biomass through resource recovery and through climate-neutral process. In this study the impact of biomass type and HTC conditions on the yield and properties of artificial humic substances and hydrochar to achieve carbon capture aim has investigated. A major impact on the yield of HTC products do have the duration and temperature of the treatment, as well as catalyst used (pH of the reaction) and changing the carbonisation conditions it is possible to design the desirable composition of obtained products. During HTC process significant changes of the biomass composition happens resulting in the removal of most labile components. Although the carbon dioxide sorption capacity of hydrochar is relatively low, after activation efficient sorbent (activated carbon) can be obtained, prospective for carbon capture aims.

Keywords

[1] Pavone V., Goven, J. Bioeconomies. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2017.10.1007/978-3-319-55651-2 Search in Google Scholar

[2] Fowles M. Black carbon sequestration as an alternative to bioenergy. Biomass and Bioenergy 2007:31(6):426–432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2007.01.012 Search in Google Scholar

[3] Werner C., et al. Biogeochemical potential of biomass pyrolysis systems for limiting global warming to 1.5 °C. Environmental Research Letters 2018:13(4):044036. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aabb0e Search in Google Scholar

[4] Khan T. A., et al. Hydrothermal carbonization of lignocellulosic biomass for carbon rich material preparation: A review. Biomass and Bioenergy 2019:130:105384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2019.105384 Search in Google Scholar

[5] Zhai Y., et al. Hydrothermal carbonisation of sewage sludge for char production with different waste biomass: Effects of reaction temperature and energy recycling. Energy 2017:127:167–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.03.116 Search in Google Scholar

[6] Saqib N. U., et al. Valorisation of food waste via hydrothermal carbonisation and techno-economic feasibility assessment. Science of the Total Environment 2019:690:261–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.06.48431288117 Search in Google Scholar

[7] Nicolae S. A., et al. Recent advances in hydrothermal carbonisation: from tailored carbon materials and biochemicals to applications and bioenergy. Green Chemistry 2020:22(15):4747–4800. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0GC00998A Search in Google Scholar

[8] Ischia G., Fiori L. Hydrothermal carbonization of organic waste and biomass: A review on process, reactor, and plant modeling. Waste and Biomass Valorization 2021:12:2797–2824. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-020-01255-3 Search in Google Scholar

[9] Hammerton J.M., Ross A. B. Inorganic salt catalysed hydrothermal carbonisation (HTC) of cellulose. Catalysts 2022:12(5):492. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal12050492 Search in Google Scholar

[10] Zhang Z., et al. Insights into biochar and hydrochar production and applications: a review. Energy 2019:171:581–598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2019.01.035 Search in Google Scholar

[11] Zhang Q., et al. Efficient phosphorus recycling and heavy metal removal from wastewater sludge by a novel hydrothermal humification-technique. Chemical Engineering Journal 2020:394:124832. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2020.124832 Search in Google Scholar

[12] Yang F., et al. A hydrothermal process to turn waste biomass into artificial fulvic and humic acids for soil remediation. Science of the Total Environment 2019:686:1140–1151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.06.04531412510 Search in Google Scholar

[13] Schmidt M. W. I., et al. Persistence of soil organic matter as an ecosystem property. Nature 2011:478(7367):49–56. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature1038621979045 Search in Google Scholar

[14] Lehmann J., Kleber M. The contentious nature of soil organic matter. Nature 2015:528(7580):60–68. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature1606926595271 Search in Google Scholar

[15] Klavins M., et al. A comparative study of the properties of industrially produced humic substances. Agronomy Research 2020:18(3):2076–2086. https://doi.org/10.15159/AR.20.185 Search in Google Scholar

[16] Yang F., Antonietti M. Artificial Humic Acids: Sustainable Materials against Climate Change. Advanced Science 2020:7(5):1–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.201902992705556332154079 Search in Google Scholar

[17] Yang F., et al. Conjugation of artificial humic acids with inorganic soil matter to restore land for improved conservation of water and nutrients. Land Degradation & Development 2020:31(7):884–893. https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.3486 Search in Google Scholar

[18] Du Q., et al. Activation of porous magnetized biochar by artificial humic acid for effective removal of lead ions. Journal of Hazardous Materials 2020:389(2019):122115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.12211532006936 Search in Google Scholar

[19] dos Santos J. V., et al. Humic-like acids from hydrochars: Study of the metal complexation properties compared with humic acids from anthropogenic soils using PARAFAC and time-resolved fluorescence. Science of the Total Environment 2020:722:137815. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.13781532179299 Search in Google Scholar

[20] MacDermid-Watts K., Pradhan R., Dutta A. Catalytic hydrothermal carbonization treatment of biomass for enhanced activated carbon: A Review. Waste and Biomass Valorization 2021:12:2171–2186. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-020-01134-x Search in Google Scholar

[21] Ameen M., et al. Effect of acid catalysts on hydrothermal carbonization of Malaysian oil palm residues (leaves, fronds, and shells) for hydrochar production. Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery 2021:12:103–114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-020-01201-2 Search in Google Scholar

[22] Reza M. T., et al. Hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) of wheat straw: Influence of feedwater pH prepared by acetic acid and potassium hydroxide. Bioresource Technology 2015:182:336–344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2015.02.02425710573 Search in Google Scholar

[23] Gonzalez B., Manya J. J. Activated olive mill waste-based hydrochars as selective adsorbents for CO2 capture under postcombustion conditions. Chemical Engineering and Processing - Process Intensification 2020:149:107830. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cep.2020.107830 Search in Google Scholar

[24] Fagnani H. M. C., et al. CO2 adsorption in hydrochar produced from waste biomass. SN Applied Sciences 2019:1:1031. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-019-1055-6 Search in Google Scholar

Polecane artykuły z Trend MD

Zaplanuj zdalną konferencję ze Sciendo