1. bookTom 26 (2022): Zeszyt 1 (January 2022)
Informacje o czasopiśmie
License
Format
Czasopismo
eISSN
2255-8837
Pierwsze wydanie
26 Mar 2010
Częstotliwość wydawania
2 razy w roku
Języki
Angielski
access type Otwarty dostęp

Incorporating User Behaviour Into System Dynamics Modelling: A Case Study of Private vs. Public Transport in Latvia

Data publikacji: 06 Jun 2022
Tom & Zeszyt: Tom 26 (2022) - Zeszyt 1 (January 2022)
Zakres stron: 294 - 305
Informacje o czasopiśmie
License
Format
Czasopismo
eISSN
2255-8837
Pierwsze wydanie
26 Mar 2010
Częstotliwość wydawania
2 razy w roku
Języki
Angielski
Abstract

In this paper, a newly developed dynamic simulation model for transport user behaviour analysis is presented. The study aims to evaluate the impact of various factors on human behavioural intentions, identify the inconvenience costs of public transport, and identify the necessary improvements to shift the demand for population mobility from private cars to public transport. The assessment of such aspects as travel time and travel cost is presented. Modelling assumptions are based on a specially designed public survey allowing to improve the reliability of the developed system dynamics model. Modelling results highlight the multiplicative effect of factors influencing mode shift.

Keywords

[1] Directive (EU) 2018/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2018 on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources. Official Journal of the European Union L 328/82, 2018. Search in Google Scholar

[2] European Environment Agency. Use of renewable energy for transport in Europe. [Online]. [Accessed 13. 04. 2021]. Available: https://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/use-of-cleaner-and-alternative-fuels-2/assessment. Search in Google Scholar

[3] Barisa A., Rosa M. Scenario analysis of CO2 emission reduction potential in road transport sector in Latvia. Energy Procedia 2018:147:86–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2018.07.03610.1016/j.egypro.2018.07.036 Search in Google Scholar

[4] Yang Chao and Miao Zishan. System Dynamics Model of Shanghai Passenger Transportation Structure Evolution. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences 2013:96:1110–1118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.08.12710.1016/j.sbspro.2013.08.127 Search in Google Scholar

[5] McKenzie E. C., Durango-Cohen P. L. Environmental life-cycle assessment of transit buses with alternative fuel technology. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment. 2012:17(1):39–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2011.09.00810.1016/j.trd.2011.09.008 Search in Google Scholar

[6] Yanzhi Xu., Gbologah F. E., Dong-Yeon Lee., Haobing Liu., Rodgers M. O, Randall L.Guensler. Assessment of alternative fuel and powertrain transit bus options using real-workd operations data: Life-fyfle fuel and emissions modeling. Applied Energy 2015:154:143–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.04.11210.1016/j.apenergy.2015.04.112 Search in Google Scholar

[7] Central Statistical Bureau of Latvia. Mobility Survey of Latvia Population. 2018. [Online]. [Accessed 12. 01. 2021.] Available: https://www.csb.gov.lv/en/statistics/statistics-by-theme/transport-tourism/transport/search-in-theme/357-results-survey-mobility-survey-latvia. Search in Google Scholar

[8] Holmgren J., Ivehammar P. Mode choice in home-to-work travel in mid-size towns: The competitiveness of public transport when bicycling and walking are viable options. Transportation Research Procedia 2020:48:1635–1643. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2020.08.20410.1016/j.trpro.2020.08.204 Search in Google Scholar

[9] Oña de J., Estévez E., Oña R. Public transport users versus private vehicle users: Differences about quality of service, satisfaction and attitudes toward public transport in Madrid (Spain). Travel Behaviour and Society 2021:23:76–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbs.2020.11.00310.1016/j.tbs.2020.11.003 Search in Google Scholar

[10] Tyrinopoulos J., Antoniou C. Public transit user satisfaction: Variability and policy implications. Transport Policy 2008:15(4):260–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2008.06.00210.1016/j.tranpol.2008.06.002 Search in Google Scholar

[11] Oña de J., Estévez E., Oña R. Public transport users versus private vehicle users: Differences about quality of service, satisfaction and attitudes toward public transport in Madrid (Spain). Travel Behaviour and Society 2021:23:76–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbs.2020.11.00310.1016/j.tbs.2020.11.003 Search in Google Scholar

[12] Tyrinopoulos Y., Antoniou C. Public transit user satisfaction: Variability and policy implications. Transport Policy 2008:15(4):260–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2008.06.00210.1016/j.tranpol.2008.06.002 Search in Google Scholar

[13] Chauhan V., Gupta A., Parida M. Demystifying service quality of Multimodal Transportation Hub (MMTH) through measuring users’ satisfaction of public transport. Transport Policy 2021:102:47–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2021.01.00410.1016/j.tranpol.2021.01.004 Search in Google Scholar

[14] Bull O., Muñoz J. C., Silva H. E. The impact of fare-free public transport on travel behavior: Evidence from a randomized controlled trial. Regional Science and Urban Economics 2021:86:103616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2020.10361610.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2020.103616 Search in Google Scholar

[15] Fearnley N. Free Fares Policies: Impact on Public Transport Mode Share and Other Transport Policy Goals. International Journal of Transportation 2013:1(1):75–90. https://doi.org/10.14257/ijt.2013.1.1.0510.14257/ijt.2013.1.1.05 Search in Google Scholar

[16] Baum H. J. Free public transport. The proposal in the Federal Republic of Germany. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy 1973:7(1):3–19. Search in Google Scholar

[17] Urbanek A. Potential of modal shift from private cars to public transport: A survey on the commuters’ attitudes and willingness to switch – A case study of Silesia Province, Poland. Research in Transportation Economics 2021:85:101008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.retrec.2020.10100810.1016/j.retrec.2020.101008 Search in Google Scholar

[18] Holmgren J., Ivehammar P. Mode choice in home-to-work travel in mid-size towns: The competitiveness of public transport when bicycling and walking are viable options. Transportation Research Procedia 2020:48:1635–1643. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2020.08.20410.1016/j.trpro.2020.08.204 Search in Google Scholar

[19] Barisa A., Rosa M. A system dynamics model for CO2 emission mitigation policy design in road transport sector. Energy Procedia 2018:147:419–427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2018.07.11210.1016/j.egypro.2018.07.112 Search in Google Scholar

[20] Urbanek A. Potential of modal shift from private cars to public transport: A survey on the commuters’ attitudes and willingness to switch – A case study of Silesia Province, Poland. Research in Transportation Economics 2021:85:101008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.retrec.2020.10100810.1016/j.retrec.2020.101008 Search in Google Scholar

Polecane artykuły z Trend MD

Zaplanuj zdalną konferencję ze Sciendo