When Bioeconomy Development Becomes a Biomass Energy Competitor

[1] Wensing J., Carraresi L., Bröring S. Do pro-environmental values, beliefs and norms drive farmers’ interest in novel practices fostering the Bioeconomy? Journal of Environmental Management 2019:232:858–867. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.11.11410.1016/j.jenvman.2018.11.11430530276Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[2] Menéndez A. J. L., Pérez R., Moreno B. Environmental costs and renewable energy: Re-visiting the Environmental Kuznets Curve. Journal of Environmental Management 2014:145:368–373. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.07.01710.1016/j.jenvman.2014.07.01725124789Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[3] Caineng Z., Qun Z., Guosheng Z., Bo X. Energy revolution: From a fossil energy era to a new energy era. Natural Gas Industry B 2016:3(1):1–11. doi:10.1016/j.ngib.2016.02.00110.1016/j.ngib.2016.02.001Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[4] Blumberga D. Biotehonomika (Biotechonomy). Riga: RTU Izdevniecība, 2016. (in Latvian)Search in Google Scholar

[5] Björheden R. Drivers behind the development of forest energy in Sweden. Biomass and Bioenergy 2006:30(4):289–295. doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2005.07.00510.1016/j.biombioe.2005.07.005Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[6] Lewandowski I. Securing a sustainable biomass supply in a growing bioeconomy. Global Food Security 2015:6:34–42. doi:10.1016/j.gfs.2015.10.00110.1016/j.gfs.2015.10.001Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[7] European Union. Directive 2009/28/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009 on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources and amending and subsequently repealing Directives 2001/77/EC and 2003/30/EC. Official Journal of the European Union 2009:L140:16–62.Search in Google Scholar

[8] WBA 2017. Global Bioenergy Statistics 2017 [Online]. Available: https://worldbioenergy.org/uploads/WBA%20GBS%202017_hq.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

[9] UNECE/FAO 2018. Joint Wood Energy Enquiry [Online]. Available: https://www.unece.org/forests/jwee.htmlSearch in Google Scholar

[10] Eurostat 2019. Renewable energy statistics [Online]. Available: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Renewable_energy_statisticsSearch in Google Scholar

[11] Eurostat 2018. Primary production of renewable energy by type [Online]. Available: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/products-datasets/-/ten00081Search in Google Scholar

[12] Lauri P., Kallio A. M. I., Schneider U. A. Price of CO₂ emissions and use of wood in Europe. Forest Policy and Economics 2012:15:123–131. doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2011.10.00310.1016/j.forpol.2011.10.003Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[13] Moiseyev A., Solberg B., Kallio A. M. I. The impact of subsidies and carbon pricing on the wood biomass use for energy in the EU. Energy 2014:76:161–167. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2014.05.05110.1016/j.energy.2014.05.051Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[14] Buongiorno J., Raunikar R., Zhu S. Consequences of increasing bioenergy demand on wood and forests: An application of the Global Forest Products Model. Journal of Forest Economics 2011:17(2):214–229. 10.1016/j.jfe.2011.02.00810.1016/j.jfe.2011.02.008Search in Google Scholar

[15] Muizniece I., Blumberga D. Wood resources for energy production sector in Latvia. Is it a sustainable solution? Energy Procedia 2017:128:287–291. doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2017.09.07610.1016/j.egypro.2017.09.076Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[16] Muizniece I., Gravelsins A., Brauners I., Blumberga A., Blumberga D. Innovative bioproducts from forest biomass. Method of analysis. Energy Procedia 2017:113:434–441. doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2017.04.03510.1016/j.egypro.2017.04.035Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[17] Budzianowski W. M. High-value low-volume bioproducts coupled to bioenergies with potential to enhance business development of sustainable biorefineries. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2017:70:793–804. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.26010.1016/j.rser.2016.11.260Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[18] Zorb C., et al. Biobased Resources and Value Chains. In: Lewandowski I. Bioeconomy. Shaping the Transition to a Sustainable, Biobased Economy. Cham: Springer, 2018.10.1007/978-3-319-68152-8_5Search in Google Scholar

[19] Wang H., Pu Y., Ragauskas A., Yang B. From lignin to valuable products – strategies, challenges, and prospects. Bioresource Technology 2019:271:449–461. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2018.09.07210.1016/j.biortech.2018.09.07230266464Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[20] Tribot A., Amer G., Abdou Alio M., de Baynast H., Delattre C., Pons A., Mathias J. D., Callois J. M., Vial C., Michaud P., Dussap C. G. Wood-lignin: Supply, extraction process and use as bio-based material. European Polymer Journal 2019:112:228–240. doi:10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2019.01.00710.1016/j.eurpolymj.2019.01.007Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[21] Neis F. A., de Costa F., de Araujo Jr. A. T., Fett J. P., Fett-Neto A. G. Multiple industrial uses of non-wood pine products. Industrial Crops & Products 2019:130:248–258. doi:10.1016/j.indcrop.2018.12.08810.1016/j.indcrop.2018.12.088Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[22] Faraca G., Boldrin A., Astrup T. Resource quality of wood waste: The importance of physical and chemical impurities in wood waste for recycling. Waste Management 2019:87:135–147. doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2019.02.00510.1016/j.wasman.2019.02.00531109513Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[23] Vis M., Mantau U., Allen B. Study on the optimised cascading use of wood. Final report. Brussels: European Commission, 2016.Search in Google Scholar

[24] The Federal Facilities Council Ad Hoc Task Group on Integrating Sustainable Design. Sustainable federal facilities: a guide to integrating value engineering, life-cycle costing, and sustainable development. Life-Cycle Costing, and Value Engineering into Facilities Acquisition. Federal facilities council technical report No. 142. Washington: National academy press, 2001.Search in Google Scholar

[25] Kondratieff N. D., Stolper W. F. The long waves in economic life. The Review of Economics and Statistics 1935:17(6):105–115.10.2307/1928486Search in Google Scholar

[26] Coccia M. Foresight of technological determinants and primary energy resources of future economic long waves. Int. J. Foresight and Innovation Policy 2010:6(4):225–232.10.1504/IJFIP.2010.037468Search in Google Scholar

[27] Coccia M. A Theory of the General Causes of Long Waves: War, General Purpose Technologies, and Economic Change. Technological Forecasting & Social Change 2018:128:287–295. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2017.11.01310.1016/j.techfore.2017.11.013Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[28] IRENA. Bioenergy data [Online]. Available: https://www.irena.org/bioenergySearch in Google Scholar

[29] The Biorefinery fact sheet. IEA bioenergy task 42 Biorefining [Online]. Available: https://www.iea-bioenergy.task42-biorefineries.com/en/ieabiorefinery.htmSearch in Google Scholar

[30] Jungmeier G., Van Ree R., de Jong E., Stichnothe H., de Bari I., Jørgensen H., Wellisch M., Bell G., Spaeth J., Torr K., Kimura S. The biorefinery fact sheet and its application to Wood Based biorefining. IEA bioenergy task 42 Biorefining.Search in Google Scholar

[31] Stacy T. F., Taylor G. S. The levelized Cost of Electricity from Existing Generation Resources. Institute of Energy Research, 2015.Search in Google Scholar

[32] Namovicz C. Assessing the Economic Value of New Utility-Scale Generation Projects. EIA LCOE/LACE Workshop, 2013.Search in Google Scholar

[33] Lauka D. Sustainability analysis of renewable energy sources. PhD Thesis. Riga: RTU, 2018.Search in Google Scholar

[34] U.S. Energy Information Administration. Levelized Cost and Levelized Avoided Cost of New Generation Resources in the Annual Energy Outlook, 2018.Search in Google Scholar

[35] Hansen K. Decision-making based on energy costs: Comparing levelized cost of energy and energy system costs. Energy Strategy Reviews 2019:24:68–82. doi:10.1016/j.esr.2019.02.00310.1016/j.esr.2019.02.003Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[36] Sandvall F., Ahlgren E. O., Ekvall T. Cost-efficiency of urban heating strategies – modelling scale effects of low-energy building heat supply. Energy Strategy Reviews 2017:18:212–223. doi:10.1016/J.ESR.2017.10.00310.1016/J.ESR.2017.10.003Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[37] Renewable Energy Guidance. Guidance for assessing the greenhouse gas impacts of renewable energy policies. Appendix A: Overview of LCOE Method for RE Sources. Verra: New Climate Institute, 2018.Search in Google Scholar

[38] Wood Energy company Example financial projections [Online]. Available: http://www.woodenergy.com/media/77994/binder-brochure-low-res-v02.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

[39] Coccia M. The source and nature of general purpose technologies for supporting next K-waves: Global leadership and the case study of the U.S. Navy’s Mobile User Objective System. Technological Forecasting & Social Change 2017:116:331–339. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2016.05.01910.1016/j.techfore.2016.05.019Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[40] International Renewable Energy Agency. Renewable Power Generation Costs in 2017. Abu Dhabi: International Renewable Energy Agency, 2018.Search in Google Scholar

[41] Alam S. S., Nor N. F. M., Ahmad M., Hashim N. H. N. A Survey on Renewable Energy Development in Malaysia: Current Status, Problems and Prospects. Environmental and Climate Technologies 2016:17(1):5–17. doi:10.1515/rtuect-2016-000210.1515/rtuect-2016-0002Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[42] Klavins M., Bisters V., Burlakovs J. Small Scale Gasification Application and Perspectives in Circular Economy. Environmental and Climate Technologies 2018:22(1):42–54. doi:10.2478/rtuect-2018-000310.2478/rtuect-2018-0003Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[43] Höglmeier K., Steubing B., Weber-Blaschke G., Richter K. LCA-based optimization of wood utilization under special consideration of a cascading use of wood. Journal of Environmental Management 2015:152:158–170. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.01.01810.1016/j.jenvman.2015.01.01825660355Open DOISearch in Google Scholar