This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Popma JJ, Deeb GM, Yakubov SJ, Mumtaz M, Gada H, O’Hair D, Bajwa T, Heiser JC, Merhi W, Kleiman NS, et al. Transcatheter aortic-valve replacement with a self-expanding valve in low-risk patients. N Engl J Med 2019; 380:1706–1715. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1816885.PopmaJJDeebGMYakubovSJMumtazMGadaHO’HairDBajwaTHeiserJCMerhiWKleimanNSTranscatheter aortic-valve replacement with a self-expanding valve in low-risk patients. N Engl J Med2019; 380:1706–1715. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1816885.Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Mack MJ, Leon MB, Thourani VH, Makkar R, Kodali SK, Russo M, Kapadia SR, Malaisrie SC, Cohen DJ, Pibarot P, et al. Transcatheter aorticvalve replacement with a balloon-expandable valve in low-risk patients. N Engl J Med 2019; 380:1695–1705. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1814052.MackMJLeonMBThouraniVHMakkarRKodaliSKRussoMKapadiaSRMalaisrieSCCohenDJPibarotPTranscatheter aorticvalve replacement with a balloon-expandable valve in low-risk patients. N Engl J Med2019; 380:1695–1705. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1814052.Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Braghiroli J, Kapoor K, Thielhelm TP, Ferreira T, Cohen MG. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement in low risk patients: A review of PARTNER 3 and Evolut low risk trials. Cardiovascular Diagnosis and Therapy 2020. doi:10.21037/cdt.2019.09.12.BraghiroliJKapoorKThielhelmTPFerreiraTCohenMG.Transcatheter aortic valve replacement in low risk patients: A review of PARTNER 3 and Evolut low risk trials. Cardiovascular Diagnosis and Therapy2020. doi:10.21037/cdt.2019.09.12.Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Akins CW, Miller DC, Turina MI, Kouchoukos NT, Blackstone EH, Grunkemeier GL, Takkenberg JJ, David TE, Butchart EG, Adams DH, et al. Guidelines for reporting mortality and morbidity after cardiac valve interventions. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2008; 135:732–738. doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2007.12.002.AkinsCWMillerDCTurinaMIKouchoukosNTBlackstoneEHGrunkemeierGLTakkenbergJJDavidTEButchartEGAdamsDHGuidelines for reporting mortality and morbidity after cardiac valve interventions. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg2008; 135:732–738. doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2007.12.002.Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Capodanno D, Petronio AS, Prendergast B, Eltchaninoff H, Vahanian A, Modine T, Lancellotti P, Sondergaard L, Ludman PF, Tamburino C, et al. Standardized definitions of structural deterioration and valve failure in assessing long-term durability of transcatheter and surgical aortic bioprosthetic valves: A consensus statement from the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI) endorsed by the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J 2017; 38:3382–3390. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehx303.CapodannoDPetronioASPrendergastBEltchaninoffHVahanianAModineTLancellottiPSondergaardLLudmanPFTamburinoCStandardized definitions of structural deterioration and valve failure in assessing long-term durability of transcatheter and surgical aortic bioprosthetic valves: A consensus statement from the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI) endorsed by the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J2017; 38:3382–3390. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehx303.Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Pibarot P, Magne J, Leipsic J, Côté N, Blanke P, Thourani VH, Hahn R. Imaging for predicting and assessing prosthesis-patient mismatch after aortic valve replacement. JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging 2019; 12. doi:10.1016/j.jcmg.2018.10.020.PibarotPMagneJLeipsicJCôtéNBlankePThouraniVHHahnR.Imaging for predicting and assessing prosthesis-patient mismatch after aortic valve replacement. JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging2019; 12. doi:10.1016/j.jcmg.2018.10.020.Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Ternacle J, Pibarot P, Herrmann HC, Kodali S, Leipsic J, Blanke P, Jaber W, Mack MJ, Clavel MA, Salaun E, et al. Prosthesis-patient mismatch after aortic valve replacement in the PARTNER 2 trial and registry. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2021; 14:1466–1477. doi:10.1016/j.jcin.2021.03.069.TernacleJPibarotPHerrmannHCKodaliSLeipsicJBlankePJaberWMackMJClavelMASalaunEProsthesis-patient mismatch after aortic valve replacement in the PARTNER 2 trial and registry. JACC Cardiovasc Interv2021; 14:1466–1477. doi:10.1016/j.jcin.2021.03.069.Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Catalano MA, Rutkin B, Koss E, Maurer G, Berg J, Hartman A, Yu PJ. Accuracy of predicted effective orifice area in determining incidence of patient-prosthesis mismatch after transcatheter aortic valve replacement. J Card Surg 2021; 36:191–196. doi:10.1111/jocs.15148.CatalanoMARutkinBKossEMaurerGBergJHartmanAYuPJ.Accuracy of predicted effective orifice area in determining incidence of patient-prosthesis mismatch after transcatheter aortic valve replacement. J Card Surg2021; 36:191–196. doi:10.1111/jocs.15148.Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Bleiziffer S, Rudolph TK. Patient prosthesis mismatch after SAVR and TAVR. Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine 2022; 9. doi:10.3389/fcvm.2022.761917.BleizifferSRudolphTK.Patient prosthesis mismatch after SAVR and TAVR. Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine2022; 9. doi:10.3389/fcvm.2022.761917.Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Herrmann HC, Daneshvar SA, Fonarow GC, Stebbins A, Vemulapalli S, Desai ND, Malenka DJ, Thourani VH, Rymer J, Kosinski AS. Prosthesispatient mismatch in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement: From the STS/ACC TVT Registry. J Am Coll Cardiol 2018; 72:2701–2711. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2018.09.001.HerrmannHCDaneshvarSAFonarowGCStebbinsAVemulapalliSDesaiNDMalenkaDJThouraniVHRymerJKosinskiAS.Prosthesispatient mismatch in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement: From the STS/ACC TVT Registry. J Am Coll Cardiol2018; 72:2701–2711. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2018.09.001.Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Van Linden A, Kempfert J, Blumenstein J, Rastan A, Holzhey D, Lehmann S, Mohr FW, Walther T. Prosthesis-patient mismatch after transcatheter aortic valve implantation using the Edwards SAPIEN prosthesis. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2013; 61:414–420. doi:10.1055/s-0032-1311534.Van LindenAKempfertJBlumensteinJRastanAHolzheyDLehmannSMohrFWWaltherT.Prosthesis-patient mismatch after transcatheter aortic valve implantation using the Edwards SAPIEN prosthesis. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg2013; 61:414–420. doi:10.1055/s-0032-1311534.Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Pibarot P, Weissman NJ, Stewart WJ, Hahn RT, Lindman BR, McAndrew T, Kodali SK, Mack MJ, Thourani VH, Miller DC, et al. Incidence and sequelae of prosthesis-patient mismatch in transcatheter versus surgical valve replacement in high-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis: A PARTNER trial cohort analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2014; 64:1323–1334. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2014.06.1195.PibarotPWeissmanNJStewartWJHahnRTLindmanBRMcAndrewTKodaliSKMackMJThouraniVHMillerDCIncidence and sequelae of prosthesis-patient mismatch in transcatheter versus surgical valve replacement in high-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis: A PARTNER trial cohort analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol2014; 64:1323–1334. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2014.06.1195.Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Parasca CA, Calin A, Cadil D, Mateescu A, Rosca M, Botezatu SB, Enache R, Beladan C, Ginghina C, Deleanu D, et al. Right ventricle to pulmonary artery coupling after transcatheter aortic valve implantation - determinant factors and prognostic impact. Front Cardiovasc Med 2023; 10:1150039. doi:10.3389/fcvm.2023.1150039.ParascaCACalinACadilDMateescuARoscaMBotezatuSBEnacheRBeladanCGinghinaCDeleanuDRight ventricle to pulmonary artery coupling after transcatheter aortic valve implantation - determinant factors and prognostic impact. Front Cardiovasc Med2023; 10:1150039. doi:10.3389/fcvm.2023.1150039.Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Lang RM, Badano LP, Mor-Avi V, Afilalo J, Armstrong A, Ernande L, Flachskampf FA, Foster E, Goldstein SA, Kuznetsova T, et al. Recommendations for cardiac chamber quantification by echocardiography in adults: An update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2015; 16:233–270. doi:10.1093/ehjci/jev014.LangRMBadanoLPMor-AviVAfilaloJArmstrongAErnandeLFlachskampfFAFosterEGoldsteinSAKuznetsovaTRecommendations for cardiac chamber quantification by echocardiography in adults: An update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging2015; 16:233–270. doi:10.1093/ehjci/jev014.Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Lancellotti P, Pibarot P, Chambers J, Edvardsen T, Delgado V, Dulgheru R, Pepi M, Cosyns B, Dweck MR, Garbi M, et al. Recommendations for the imaging assessment of prosthetic heart valves: A report from the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging endorsed by the Chinese Society of Echocardiography, the Inter-American Society of Echocardiography, and the Brazilian Department of Cardiovascular Imaging. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2016; 17:589–590. doi:10.1093/ehjci/jew025.LancellottiPPibarotPChambersJEdvardsenTDelgadoVDulgheruRPepiMCosynsBDweckMRGarbiMRecommendations for the imaging assessment of prosthetic heart valves: A report from the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging endorsed by the Chinese Society of Echocardiography, the Inter-American Society of Echocardiography, and the Brazilian Department of Cardiovascular Imaging. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging2016; 17:589–590. doi:10.1093/ehjci/jew025.Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Hahn RT, Leipsic J, Douglas PS, Jaber WA, Weissman NJ, Pibarot P, Blanke P, Oh JK. Comprehensive echocardiographic assessment of normal transcatheter valve function. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2019; 12:25–34. doi:10.1016/j.jcmg.2018.04.010.HahnRTLeipsicJDouglasPSJaberWAWeissmanNJPibarotPBlankePOhJK.Comprehensive echocardiographic assessment of normal transcatheter valve function. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging2019; 12:25–34. doi:10.1016/j.jcmg.2018.04.010.Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Leone PP, Fazzari F, Cannata F, Sanz-Sanchez J, Mangieri A, Monti L, Cozzi O, Stefanini GG, Bragato R, Colombo A, et al. Clinical and technical challenges of prosthesis-patient mismatch after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Front Cardiovasc Med 2021; 8:670457. doi:10.3389/fcvm.2021.670457.LeonePPFazzariFCannataFSanz-SanchezJMangieriAMontiLCozziOStefaniniGGBragatoRColomboAClinical and technical challenges of prosthesis-patient mismatch after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Front Cardiovasc Med2021; 8:670457. doi:10.3389/fcvm.2021.670457.Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Schofer N, Deuschl F, Rubsamen N, Skibowski J, Seiffert M, Voigtlander L, Schaefer A, Schneeberger Y, Schirmer J, Reichenspurner H, et al. Prosthesis-patient mismatch after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: Prevalence and prognostic impact with respect to baseline left ventricular function. EuroIntervention 2019; 14:1648–1655. doi:10.4244/EIJ-D-18-00827.SchoferNDeuschlFRubsamenNSkibowskiJSeiffertMVoigtlanderLSchaeferASchneebergerYSchirmerJReichenspurnerHProsthesis-patient mismatch after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: Prevalence and prognostic impact with respect to baseline left ventricular function. EuroIntervention2019; 14:1648–1655. doi:10.4244/EIJ-D-18-00827.Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Miyasaka M, Tada N, Taguri M, Kato S, Enta Y, Otomo T, Hata M, Watanabe Y, Naganuma T, Araki M, et al. Incidence, predictors, and clinical impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch following transcatheter aortic valve replacement in Asian patients: The OCEAN-TAVI registry. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2018; 11:771–780. doi:10.1016/j.jcin.2018.01.273.MiyasakaMTadaNTaguriMKatoSEntaYOtomoTHataMWatanabeYNaganumaTArakiMIncidence, predictors, and clinical impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch following transcatheter aortic valve replacement in Asian patients: The OCEAN-TAVI registry. JACC Cardiovasc Interv2018; 11:771–780. doi:10.1016/j.jcin.2018.01.273.Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Head SJ, Reardon MJ, Deeb GM, Van Mieghem NM, Popma JJ, Gleason TG, Williams MR, Radhakrishnan S, Fremes S, Oh JK, et al. Computed tomography-based indexed aortic annulus size to predict prosthesis-patient mismatch. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2019; 12. doi:10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.118.007396.HeadSJReardonMJDeebGMVan MieghemNMPopmaJJGleasonTGWilliamsMRRadhakrishnanSFremesSOhJKComputed tomography-based indexed aortic annulus size to predict prosthesis-patient mismatch. Circ Cardiovasc Interv2019; 12. doi:10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.118.007396.Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Ternacle J, Guimaraes L, Vincent F, Cote N, Cote M, Lachance D, Clavel MA, Abbas AE, Pibarot P, Rodes-Cabau J. Reclassification of prosthesis-patient mismatch after transcatheter aortic valve replacement using predicted vs. measured indexed effective orifice area. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2021; 22:11–20. doi:10.1093/ehjci/jeaa235.TernacleJGuimaraesLVincentFCoteNCoteMLachanceDClavelMAAbbasAEPibarotPRodes-CabauJ.Reclassification of prosthesis-patient mismatch after transcatheter aortic valve replacement using predicted vs. measured indexed effective orifice area. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging2021; 22:11–20. doi:10.1093/ehjci/jeaa235.Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Hase H, Yoshijima N, Yanagisawa R, Tanaka M, Tsuruta H, Shimizu H, Fukuda K, Naganuma T, Mizutani K, Yamawaki M, et al. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement with Evolut R versus Sapien 3 in Japanese patients with a small aortic annulus: The OCEAN-TAVI registry. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2021; 97. doi:10.1002/ccd.29259.HaseHYoshijimaNYanagisawaRTanakaMTsurutaHShimizuHFukudaKNaganumaTMizutaniKYamawakiMTranscatheter aortic valve replacement with Evolut R versus Sapien 3 in Japanese patients with a small aortic annulus: The OCEAN-TAVI registry. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv2021; 97. doi:10.1002/ccd.29259.Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Bleiziffer S, Hettich I, Hutter A, Wagner A, Deutsch MA, Piazza N, Lange R. Incidence and impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. J Heart Valve Dis 2013; 22:309–316.BleizifferSHettichIHutterAWagnerADeutschMAPiazzaNLangeR.Incidence and impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. J Heart Valve Dis2013; 22:309–316.Search in Google Scholar
Unbehaun A, Pasic M, Drews T, Buz S, Dreysse S, Kukucka M, Mladenow A, Ivanitskaja-Kuhn E, Hetzer R. New 29-mm balloon-expandable prosthesis for transcatheter aortic valve implantation in large annuli. Ann Thorac Surg 2013; 95:1982–1990. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.02.038.UnbehaunAPasicMDrewsTBuzSDreysseSKukuckaMMladenowAIvanitskaja-KuhnEHetzerR.New 29-mm balloon-expandable prosthesis for transcatheter aortic valve implantation in large annuli. Ann Thorac Surg2013; 95:1982–1990. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.02.038.Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Okuno T, Khan F, Asami M, Praz F, Heg D, Winkel MG, Lanz J, Huber A, Grani C, Raber L, et al. Prosthesis-patient mismatch following transcatheter aortic valve replacement with supra-annular and intra-annular prostheses. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2019; 12:2173–2182. doi:10.1016/j.jcin.2019.07.027.OkunoTKhanFAsamiMPrazFHegDWinkelMGLanzJHuberAGraniCRaberLProsthesis-patient mismatch following transcatheter aortic valve replacement with supra-annular and intra-annular prostheses. JACC Cardiovasc Interv2019; 12:2173–2182. doi:10.1016/j.jcin.2019.07.027.Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Voigtlander L, Kim WK, Mauri V, Gossling A, Renker M, Sugiura A, Linder M, Schmidt T, Schofer N, Westermann D, et al. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation in patients with a small aortic annulus: Performance of supra-, intra- and infra-annular transcatheter heart valves. Clin Res Cardiol 2021; 110:1957–1966. doi:10.1007/s00392-021-01918-8.VoigtlanderLKimWKMauriVGosslingARenkerMSugiuraALinderMSchmidtTSchoferNWestermannDTranscatheter aortic valve implantation in patients with a small aortic annulus: Performance of supra-, intra- and infra-annular transcatheter heart valves. Clin Res Cardiol2021; 110:1957–1966. doi:10.1007/s00392-021-01918-8.Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Abbas AE, Mando R, Kadri A, Khalili H, Hanzel G, Shannon F, Al-Azizi K, Waggoner T, Kassas S, Pilgrim T, et al. Comparison of transvalvular aortic mean gradients obtained by intraprocedural echocardiography and invasive measurement in balloon and self-expanding transcatheter valves. J Am Heart Assoc 2021; 10. doi:10.1161/JAHA.120.021014.AbbasAEMandoRKadriAKhaliliHHanzelGShannonFAl-AziziKWaggonerTKassasSPilgrimTComparison of transvalvular aortic mean gradients obtained by intraprocedural echocardiography and invasive measurement in balloon and self-expanding transcatheter valves. J Am Heart Assoc2021; 10. doi:10.1161/JAHA.120.021014.Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Miyasaka M, Tada N, Taguri M, Kato S, Enta Y, Hata M, Watanabe Y, Naganuma T, Yamawaki M, Yamanaka F, et al. Incidence and predictors of prosthesis-patient mismatch after TAVI using SAPIEN 3 in Asian: Differences between the newer and older balloon-expandable valve. Open Heart 2021; 8. doi:10.1136/openhrt-2020-001531.MiyasakaMTadaNTaguriMKatoSEntaYHataMWatanabeYNaganumaTYamawakiMYamanakaFIncidence and predictors of prosthesis-patient mismatch after TAVI using SAPIEN 3 in Asian: Differences between the newer and older balloon-expandable valve. Open Heart2021; 8. doi:10.1136/openhrt-2020-001531.Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Kazuno Y, Maeno Y, Kawamori H, Takahashi N, Abramowitz Y, Babak H, Kashif M, Chakravarty T, Nakamura M, Cheng W, et al. Comparison of SAPIEN 3 and SAPIEN XT transcatheter heart valve stent-frame expansion: Evaluation using multi-slice computed tomography. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2016; 17:1054–1062. doi:10.1093/ehjci/jew032.KazunoYMaenoYKawamoriHTakahashiNAbramowitzYBabakHKashifMChakravartyTNakamuraMChengWComparison of SAPIEN 3 and SAPIEN XT transcatheter heart valve stent-frame expansion: Evaluation using multi-slice computed tomography. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging2016; 17:1054–1062. doi:10.1093/ehjci/jew032.Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Niederberger J, Schima H, Maurer G, Baumgartner H. Importance of pressure recovery for the assessment of aortic stenosis by Doppler ultrasound. Role of aortic size, aortic valve area, and direction of the stenotic jet in vitro. Circulation 1996; 94:1934–1940. doi:10.1161/01.cir.94.8.1934.NiederbergerJSchimaHMaurerGBaumgartnerH.Importance of pressure recovery for the assessment of aortic stenosis by Doppler ultrasound. Role of aortic size, aortic valve area, and direction of the stenotic jet in vitro. Circulation1996; 94:1934–1940. doi:10.1161/01.cir.94.8.1934.Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Hatoum H, Hahn RT, Lilly S, Dasi LP. Differences in pressure recovery between balloon-expandable and self-expandable transcatheter aortic valves. Ann Biomed Eng 2020; 48:860–867. doi:10.1007/s10439-019-02425-8.HatoumHHahnRTLillySDasiLP.Differences in pressure recovery between balloon-expandable and self-expandable transcatheter aortic valves. Ann Biomed Eng2020; 48:860–867. doi:10.1007/s10439-019-02425-8.Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Hite A, Karabon P, Mando R, Hanzel G, Shannon F, Abbas AE. The impact of energy loss index and body mass index on prosthesis patient mismatch. Structural Heart 2021; 5:376–381. doi:10.1080/24748706.2021.1 912444.HiteAKarabonPMandoRHanzelGShannonFAbbasAE.The impact of energy loss index and body mass index on prosthesis patient mismatch. Structural Heart2021; 5:376–381. doi:10.1080/24748706.2021.1 912444.Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Hahn RT, Pibarot P, Webb J, Rodes-Cabau J, Herrmann HC, Williams M, Makkar R, Szeto WY, Main ML, Thourani VH, et al. Outcomes with postdilation following transcatheter aortic valve replacement: The PARTNER I trial (placement of aortic transcatheter valve). JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2014; 7:781–789. doi:10.1016/j.jcin.2014.02.013.HahnRTPibarotPWebbJRodes-CabauJHerrmannHCWilliamsMMakkarRSzetoWYMainMLThouraniVHOutcomes with postdilation following transcatheter aortic valve replacement: The PARTNER I trial (placement of aortic transcatheter valve). JACC Cardiovasc Interv2014; 7:781–789. doi:10.1016/j.jcin.2014.02.013.Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Thomas L, Marwick TH, Popescu BA, Donal E, Badano LP. Left atrial structure and function, and left ventricular diastolic dysfunction: JACC state-of-the-art review. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 2019; 73. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2019.01.059.ThomasLMarwickTHPopescuBADonalEBadanoLP.Left atrial structure and function, and left ventricular diastolic dysfunction: JACC state-of-the-art review. Journal of the American College of Cardiology2019; 73. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2019.01.059.Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Singh A, Medvedofsky D, Mediratta A, Balaney B, Kruse E, Ciszek B, Shah AP, Blair JE, Maffessanti F, Addetia K, et al. Peak left atrial strain as a single measure for the non-invasive assessment of left ventricular filling pressures. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2019; 35:23–32. doi:10.1007/s10554-018-1425-y.SinghAMedvedofskyDMedirattaABalaneyBKruseECiszekBShahAPBlairJEMaffessantiFAddetiaKPeak left atrial strain as a single measure for the non-invasive assessment of left ventricular filling pressures. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging2019; 35:23–32. doi:10.1007/s10554-018-1425-y.Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Amorim PA, Diab M, Walther M, Farber G, Hagendorff A, Bonow RO, Doenst T. Limitations in the assessment of prosthesis-patient mismatch. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2020; 68:550–556. doi:10.1055/s-0038-1676814.AmorimPADiabMWaltherMFarberGHagendorffABonowRODoenstT.Limitations in the assessment of prosthesis-patient mismatch. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg2020; 68:550–556. doi:10.1055/s-0038-1676814.Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Vriesendorp MD, Deeb GM, Reardon MJ, Kiaii B, Bapat V, Labrousse L, Rao V, Sabik JF, Gearhart E, Klautz RJM. Why the categorization of indexed effective orifice area is not justified for the classification of prosthesis-patient mismatch. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2022; 164:822-829 e826. doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2020.10.123.VriesendorpMDDeebGMReardonMJKiaiiBBapatVLabrousseLRaoVSabikJFGearhartEKlautzRJM.Why the categorization of indexed effective orifice area is not justified for the classification of prosthesis-patient mismatch. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg2022; 164:822–829 e826. doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2020.10.123.Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Coisne A, Ninni S, Edmé JL, Modine T, Mouton S, Pilato R, Ridon H, Richardson M, Klein C, Ortmans S, et al. Obesity paradox in the clinical significance of effective prosthetic orifice area after aortic valve replacement. JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging 2019; 12. doi:10.1016/j.jcmg.2018.04.018.CoisneANinniSEdméJLModineTMoutonSPilatoRRidonHRichardsonMKleinCOrtmansSObesity paradox in the clinical significance of effective prosthetic orifice area after aortic valve replacement. JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging2019; 12. doi:10.1016/j.jcmg.2018.04.018.Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Brown J, Shah P, Stanton T, Marwick TH. Interaction and prognostic effects of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction and patient-prosthesis mismatch as determinants of outcome after isolated aortic valve replacement. Am J Cardiol 2009; 104:707–712. doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2009.04.035.BrownJShahPStantonTMarwickTH.Interaction and prognostic effects of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction and patient-prosthesis mismatch as determinants of outcome after isolated aortic valve replacement. Am J Cardiol2009; 104:707–712. doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2009.04.035.Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Weber J, Bond K, Flanagan J, Passick M, Petillo F, Pollack S, Robinson N, Petrossian G, Cao JJ, Barasch E. The prognostic value of left atrial global longitudinal strain and left atrial phasic volumes in patients undergoing transcatheter valve implantation for severe aortic stenosis. Cardiology 2021; 146:489–500. doi:10.1159/000514665.WeberJBondKFlanaganJPassickMPetilloFPollackSRobinsonNPetrossianGCaoJJBaraschE.The prognostic value of left atrial global longitudinal strain and left atrial phasic volumes in patients undergoing transcatheter valve implantation for severe aortic stenosis. Cardiology2021; 146:489–500. doi:10.1159/000514665.Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Singh A, Addetia K, Maffessanti F, Mor-Avi V, Lang RM. LA strain for categorization of LV diastolic dysfunction. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2017; 10:735–743. doi:10.1016/j.jcmg.2016.08.014.SinghAAddetiaKMaffessantiFMor-AviVLangRM.LA strain for categorization of LV diastolic dysfunction. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging2017; 10:735–743. doi:10.1016/j.jcmg.2016.08.014.Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Aalaei-Andabili SH, Bavry AA. Left ventricular diastolic dysfunction and transcatheter aortic valve replacement outcomes: A review. Cardiology and Therapy 2019; 8. doi:10.1007/s40119-019-0134-5.Aalaei-AndabiliSHBavryAA.Left ventricular diastolic dysfunction and transcatheter aortic valve replacement outcomes: A review. Cardiology and Therapy2019; 8. doi:10.1007/s40119-019-0134-5.Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Nozohoor S, Nilsson J, Luhrs C, Roijer A, Sjogren J. Influence of prosthesis-patient mismatch on diastolic heart failure after aortic valve replacement. Ann Thorac Surg 2008; 85:1310–1317. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2007.12.069.NozohoorSNilssonJLuhrsCRoijerASjogrenJ.Influence of prosthesis-patient mismatch on diastolic heart failure after aortic valve replacement. Ann Thorac Surg2008; 85:1310–1317. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2007.12.069.Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Dismorr M, Glaser N, Franco-Cereceda A, Sartipy U. Effect of prosthesis-patient mismatch on long-term clinical outcomes after bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement. J Am Coll Cardiol 2023; 81:964–975. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2022.12.023.DismorrMGlaserNFranco-CerecedaASartipyU.Effect of prosthesis-patient mismatch on long-term clinical outcomes after bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement. J Am Coll Cardiol2023; 81:964–975. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2022.12.023.Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Pibarot P, Magne J, Leipsic J, Côté N, Blanke P, Thourani VH, Hahn R. Imaging for predicting and assessing prosthesis-patient mismatch after aortic valve replacement. JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging 2019; 12:149–162. doi:10.1016/j.jcmg.2018.10.020.PibarotPMagneJLeipsicJCôtéNBlankePThouraniVHHahnR.Imaging for predicting and assessing prosthesis-patient mismatch after aortic valve replacement. JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging2019; 12:149–162. doi:10.1016/j.jcmg.2018.10.020.Open DOISearch in Google Scholar