General versus regional anesthesia for emergency cesarean delivery in a high-volume high-resource referral center: A retrospective cohort study

[e1] NHS Maternity Statistics, England 2017-18 - NHS Digital [Internet]. NHS Digital. 2019 [cited 11 June 2019]. Available from: https://digital.nhs.uk/data-and-information/publications/statistical/nhs-maternity-statistics/2017–8NHS Maternity Statistics, England 2017-18 - NHS Digital [Internet]. NHS Digital2019[cited 11 June 2019]. Available fromhttps://digital.nhs.uk/data-and-information/publications/statistical/nhs-maternity-statistics/2017–8Search in Google Scholar

[2]Boerma T, Ronsmans C, Melesse DY, Barros AJD, Barros FC, Juan L et al. Global epidemiology of use of and disparities in caesarean sections. Lancet 2018; 392: 1341–1348. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31928-7BoermaTRonsmansCMelesseDYBarrosAJDBarrosFCJuanLet alGlobal epidemiology of use of and disparities in caesarean sectionsLancet20183921341134810.1016/S0140-6736(18)31928-7Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[3]Barber EL, Lundsberg LS, Belanger K, Pettker CM, Funai EF, Illuzzi JL. Indications contributing to the increasing cesarean delivery rate. Obstet Gynecol 2011; 118: 29–38. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31821e5f65BarberELLundsbergLSBelangerKPettkerCMFunaiEFIlluzziJLIndications contributing to the increasing cesarean delivery rateObstet Gynecol2011118293810.1097/AOG.0b013e31821e5f65375119221646928Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[4]Cunningham F, Leveno K, Bloom S, Hoffman B, Casey B, Spong C. Williams Obstetrics, 25e. 25th ed. New York, N.Y.: McGraw Hill Medical, 2018CunninghamFLevenoKBloomSHoffmanBCaseyBSpongCWilliams Obstetrics, 25e. 25th edNew York, N.YMcGraw Hill Medical2018Search in Google Scholar

[5]Boyle A, Reddy UM, Landy HJ, Huang CC, Driggers RW, Laughon SK. Primary cesarean delivery in the United States. Obstet Gynecol 2013; 122: 33–40. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182952242BoyleAReddyUMLandyHJHuangCCDriggersRWLaughonSKPrimary cesarean delivery in the United StatesObstet Gynecol2013122334010.1097/AOG.0b013e3182952242371363423743454Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[6]Caesarean section | Guidance | NICE [Internet]. Nice.org.uk.2019 [cited June 11, 2019]. Available from: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg132/chapter/1-GuidanceCaesarean section | Guidance | NICE [Internet]Nice.org.uk.2019[cited June 11, 2019]. Available fromhttps://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg132/chapter/1-GuidanceSearch in Google Scholar

[7]Lucas DN, Yentis SM, Kinsella SM, Holdcroft A, May AE, Wee M et al. Urgency of caesarean section: a new classification. J R Soc Med 2000; 93: 346-50. doi: 10.1177/014107680009300703LucasDNYentisSMKinsellaSMHoldcroftAMayAEWeeMet alUrgency of caesarean section: a new classificationJ R Soc Med2000933465010.1177/014107680009300703129805710928020Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[8][Internet]. Rcog.org.uk 2019 [cited June 11, 2019]. Available from: https://www.rcog.org.uk/globalassets/documents/guide-lines/goodpractice11classificationofurgency.pdf[Internet]Rcog.org.uk2019[cited June 11, 2019]. Available fromhttps://www.rcog.org.uk/globalassets/documents/guide-lines/goodpractice11classificationofurgency.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

[9]Halpern SH, Soliman A, Yee J, Angle P, Ioscovich A. Conversion of epidural labour analgesia to anaesthesia for Caesarean section: a prospective study of the incidence and determinants of failure. British Journal of Anaesthesia 2009; 102: 240–243. doi: 10.1093/bja/aen352HalpernSHSolimanAYeeJAnglePIoscovichAConversion of epidural labour analgesia to anaesthesia for Caesarean section: a prospective study of the incidence and determinants of failureBritish Journal of Anaesthesia200910224024310.1093/bja/aen35219073611Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[10]Bucklin BA, Hawkins JL, Anderson JR, Ullrich FA. Obstetric anesthesia workforce survey: twenty-year update. Anesthesiology 2005; 103: 645–53. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200509000-00030BucklinBAHawkinsJLAndersonJRUllrichFAObstetric anesthesia workforce survey: twenty-year updateAnesthesiology20051036455310.1097/00000542-200509000-0003016129992Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[11]Hawkins JL, Chang J, Palmer SK, Gibbs CP, Callaghan WM. Anesthesia-related maternal mortality in the United States: 1979-2002. Obstetrics & Gynecology 2011; 117: 69–74. 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31820093a9HawkinsJLChangJPalmerSKGibbsCPCallaghanWMAnesthesia-related maternal mortality in the United States: 1979-2002Obstetrics & Gynecology2011117697410.1097/AOG.0b013e31820093a910.1097/01.aoa.0000410759.43471.f3Search in Google Scholar

[12]Dongare P, Nataraj M. Anaesthetic management of obstetric emergencies. Indian Journal of Anaesthesia 2018; 62: 704. doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_590_18DongarePNatarajMAnaesthetic management of obstetric emergenciesIndian Journal of Anaesthesia20186270410.4103/ija.IJA_590_18614455830237596Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[13]Mushambi MC, Kinsella SM, Popat M, Swales H, Ramaswamy KK, Winton AL et al. Obstetric Anaesthetists’ Association and Difficult Airway Society guidelines for the management of difficult and failed tracheal intubation in obstetrics. Anaesthesia 2015; 70: 1286–306. doi: 10.1111/anae.13260MushambiMCKinsellaSMPopatMSwalesHRamaswamyKKWintonALet alObstetric Anaesthetists’ Association and Difficult Airway Society guidelines for the management of difficult and failed tracheal intubation in obstetricsAnaesthesia201570128630610.1111/anae.13260460676126449292Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[14]Difficult airway: C-section [Internet]. Openanesthesia.org 2019 [cited September 22, 2019]. Available from: https://www.open-anesthesia.org/difficult_airway_c-section/Difficult airway: C-section [Internet]Openanesthesia.org2019[cited September 22, 2019]. Available fromhttps://www.open-anesthesia.org/difficult_airway_c-section/Search in Google Scholar

[15]Pandit JJ, Andrade J, Bogod DG, Hitchman JM, Jonker WR, Lucas N. 5th National Audit Project (NAP5) on accidental awareness during general anaesthesia: summary of main findings and risk factors. Br J Anaesth 2014; 113: 549–59. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeu313PanditJJAndradeJBogodDGHitchmanJMJonkerWRLucasN5th National Audit Project (NAP5) on accidental awareness during general anaesthesia: summary of main findings and risk factorsBr J Anaesth20141135495910.1093/bja/aeu31325204697Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[16]Afolabi BB, Lesi FE. Regional versus general anaesthesia for caesarean section. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012; 10: CD004350. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004350.pub3AfolabiBBLesiFERegional versus general anaesthesia for caesarean sectionCochrane Database Syst Rev201210CD00435010.1002/14651858.CD004350.pub3Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[17]Orbach-Zinger S, Friedman L, Avramovich A, Ilgiaeva N, Orvieto R, Sulkes J et al. Risk factors for failure to extend labor epidural analgesia to epidural anesthesia for Cesarean section. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2006; 50: 1014–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2006.01095.xOrbach-ZingerSFriedmanLAvramovichAIlgiaevaNOrvietoRSulkesJet alRisk factors for failure to extend labor epidural analgesia to epidural anesthesia for Cesarean sectionActa Anaesthesiol Scand2006501014810.1111/j.1399-6576.2006.01095.xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

[18]Reuveni A, Orbach-Zinger S, Eidelman LA, Ginosar Y, Ioscovich A. Peripartum anesthetic management of patients with Factor XI deficiency. J Perinat Med 2014; 42: 295–300. doi: 10.1515/jpm-2013-0144ReuveniAOrbach-ZingerSEidelmanLAGinosarYIoscovichAPeripartum anesthetic management of patients with Factor XI deficiencyJ Perinat Med20144229530010.1515/jpm-2013-0144Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[19]Shrof R, Thompson AC, McCrum A, Rees SG. Prospective multidisciplinary audit of obstetric general anaesthesia in a district general hospital. J Obstet Gynaecol 2004; 24: 641–6. doi: 10.1080/01443610400007877ShrofRThompsonACMcCrumAReesSGProspective multidisciplinary audit of obstetric general anaesthesia in a district general hospitalJ Obstet Gynaecol200424641610.1080/01443610400007877Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[20]Bernstein K, Baer A, Pollack M, Sebrow D, Elstein D, Ioscovich A. Retrospective audit of outcome of regional anesthesia for delivery in women with thrombocytopenia. J Perinat Med 2008; 36: 120–3. doi: 10.1515/JPM.2008.020BernsteinKBaerAPollackMSebrowDElsteinDIoscovichARetrospective audit of outcome of regional anesthesia for delivery in women with thrombocytopeniaJ Perinat Med200836120310.1515/JPM.2008.020Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[21]Quinn A, Kilpatrick A. Emergency caesarean section during labour: response times and type of anaesthesia. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology 1994; 54: 25–29. doi: 10.1016/0028-2243(94)90077-9QuinnAKilpatrickAEmergency caesarean section during labour: response times and type of anaesthesiaEuropean Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology199454252910.1016/0028-2243(94)90077-9Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[22]Hein A, Thalen D, Eriksson Y, Jakobsson JG. The decision to delivery interval in emergency caesarean sections: Impact of anaesthetic technique and work shift. F1000Res 2017; 6: 1977. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.13058.2HeinAThalenDErikssonYJakobssonJGThe decision to delivery interval in emergency caesarean sections: Impact of anaesthetic technique and work shiftF1000Res20176197710.12688/f1000research.13058.2571038929225780Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[23]Aksoy H, Aksoy Ü, Yücel B, Özyurt SS, Açmaz G, Babayiğit MA et al. Blood loss in elective cesarean section: is there a difference related to the type of anesthesia? A randomized prospective study. J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc 2015; 16: 158–63. doi: 10.5152/jtgga.2015.15034AksoyHAksoyÜYücelBÖzyurtSSAçmazGBabayiğitMAet alBlood loss in elective cesarean section: is there a difference related to the type of anesthesia? A randomized prospective studyJ Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc2015161586310.5152/jtgga.2015.15034456047326401109Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[24]Helman S, Drukker L, Fruchtman H, Ioscovich A, Farkash R, Avitan T et al. Revisit of risk factors for major obstetric hemorrhage: insights from a large medical center. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2015; 292: 819–28. doi: 10.1007/s00404-015-3725-yHelmanSDrukkerLFruchtmanHIoscovichAFarkashRAvitanTet alRevisit of risk factors for major obstetric hemorrhage: insights from a large medical centerArch Gynecol Obstet20152928192810.1007/s00404-015-3725-y25903520Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[25]Traynor AJ, Aragon M, Ghosh D, Choi RS, Dingmann C, Vu Tran Z, et al. Obstetric Anesthesia Workforce Survey: A 30-Year Update. Anesth Analg 2016; 122: 1939–46. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001204TraynorAJAragonMGhoshDChoiRSDingmannCVuTran Zet alObstetric Anesthesia Workforce Survey: A 30-Year UpdateAnesth Analg201612219394610.1213/ANE.000000000000120427088993Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[26]Beckmann M, Calderbank S. Mode of anaesthetic for category 1 caesarean sections and neonatal outcomes. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2012; 52: 316–320. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-828X.2012.01457.xBeckmannMCalderbankSMode of anaesthetic for category 1 caesarean sections and neonatal outcomesAustralian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology20125231632010.1111/j.1479-828X.2012.01457.x22676478Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[27]Kinsella SM, Walton B, Sashidharan R, Draycott T. Category-1 caesarean section: a survey of anaesthetic and peri-operative management in the UK. Anaesthesia 2010; 65: 362–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2010.06265.xKinsellaSMWaltonBSashidharanRDraycottTCategory-1 caesarean section: a survey of anaesthetic and peri-operative management in the UKAnaesthesia201065362810.1111/j.1365-2044.2010.06265.x20402875Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[28][Internet]. Rcoa.ac.uk. 2020 [cited 14 January 2020]. Available from: https://www.rcoa.ac.uk/sites/default/files/documents/2019-09/CSQ-ARB-2012_0.pdf[Internet]. Rcoa.ac.uk2020[cited 14 January 2020]. Available fromhttps://www.rcoa.ac.uk/sites/default/files/documents/2019-09/CSQ-ARB-2012_0.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

[29]Staboulidou I, Beslic J, Kuehnle E, Kaisenberg C, Hillemanns P, Schippert C. Neonatal and Maternal Short-Term Outcome after Emergency Caesarean Section in Comparison to Elective and Second Stage Caesareans: Results of A Retrospective 10-Year Survey. International Journal of Women’s Health and Wellness 2018; 4: 080. doi: 10.23937/2474-1353/1510080StaboulidouIBeslicJKuehnleEKaisenbergCHillemannsPSchippertCNeonatal and Maternal Short-Term Outcome after Emergency Caesarean Section in Comparison to Elective and Second Stage Caesareans: Results of A Retrospective 10-Year SurveyInternational Journal of Women’s Health and Wellness2018408010.23937/2474-1353/1510080Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[30]Popham P, Buettner A, Mendola M. Anaesthesia for Emergency Caesarean Section, 2000–2004, at the Royal Women’s Hospital, Melbourne. Anaesthesia and Intensive Care 2007; 35: 74–79. doi: 10.1177/0310057X0703500110PophamPBuettnerAMendolaMAnaesthesia for Emergency Caesarean Section, 2000–2004, at the Royal Women’s Hospital, MelbourneAnaesthesia and Intensive Care200735747910.1177/0310057X070350011017323670Open DOISearch in Google Scholar