[
AUERBACH, A. J., DEVEREUX, M. P., KEEN M., VELLA, J. (2017). International Tax Planning under the Destination-Based Cash Flow Tax. National Tax Journal, 70(4), 783–802, https://doi.org/10.17310/ntj.2017.4.04
]Search in Google Scholar
[
CERIONI, L. (2016). The Quest for a New Corporate Taxation Model and for an Effective Fight against International Tax Avoidance within the EU. Intertax, 44(6-7), 463-480. ISSN 0165-2826
]Search in Google Scholar
[
CONRAD, R. F. (2006). Interjurisdictional taxation and attribution rules. Public Finance Review, 34(5), 505-526. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1091142106289029
]Search in Google Scholar
[
CORRADO, C. A., SICHEL, D. E., HULTEN, C. R. (2009). Intangible Capital and U.S. Economic Growth. The Review of Income and Wealth, 55(3), 661–685, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4991.2009.00343.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
COTTANI, G. (2016). Formulary Apportionment: A Revamp in the Post-Base Erosion and Profit Shifting Era? Intertax, 44(10), 755-760. ISSN 0165-2826
]Search in Google Scholar
[
DANCAKOVÁ, D. SOPKO, J., GLOVA, J. ANDREJOVSKÁ, A. (2022). The Impact of Intangible Assets on the Market Value of Companies: Cross-Sector Evidence. Mathematics, 10(20), 3819, https://doi.org/10.3390/math10203819
]Search in Google Scholar
[
DE WILDE, M. (2020). On the future of business income taxation in Europe. World Tax Journal, 12(1), 79-128
]Search in Google Scholar
[
DEVEREUX, M. P., FUEST, C. (2010). Corporate income tax coordination in the European Union. Transfer-European Review of Labour and Research, 16(1), 23-28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1024258909357699
]Search in Google Scholar
[
DEVEREUX, M. P., LORETZ, S. (2008). The Effects of EU Formula Apportionment on Corporate Tax Revenues. Fiscal Studies, 29(1), 1–33, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-5890.2008.00067.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
DEVEREUX, M. P., VELLA, J. (2017). Implications of Digitalization for International Corporate Tax Reform. Oxford University Centre for Business Taxation. Working paper 17/07, https://oxfordtax.web.ox.ac.uk/files/wp17-07pdf
]Search in Google Scholar
[
EGGERT, W., HAUFLER, A. (2006). Fiscal policy in action - Company-tax coordination cum tax-rate competition in the European Union. Finanzarchiv, 62(4), 579-601. http://dx.doi.org/10.1628/001522106X172706
]Search in Google Scholar
[
EICHNER, T., RUNKEL, M. (2008). Why the European Union should adopt formula apportionment with a sales factor. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 110(3), 567-589. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9442.2008.00551.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
FUEST, C. (2008). The European Commission’s proposal for a common consolidated corporate tax base. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 24(4), 720-739. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/grn032
]Search in Google Scholar
[
GORDON, R., WILSON, J. D. (1986). An Examination of Multijurisdictional Corporate-Income Taxation Under Formula Apportionment. Econometrica, 54(6), 1357-1373. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1914303
]Search in Google Scholar
[
GUJARATI, D. (2003). Basic econometrics (4th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill. ISBN 978-0-07-233542-2
]Search in Google Scholar
[
HERZIG, N., TESCHKE, M., JOISTEN, C. (2010). Between Extremes: Merging the Advantages of Separate Accounting and Unitary Taxation. Intertax, 38(6-7), 334-349. https://doi.org/10.54648/taxi2010037
]Search in Google Scholar
[
HINES, J. R. (2008). Income Misattribution under Formula Apportionment. European Economic Review, 54(1), 108–120, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2009.08.011
]Search in Google Scholar
[
HUNDSDOERFER, J., WAGNER, J. (2020). How accurately does the CCCTB apportionment formula allocate profits? An evaluation of the European Commission proposal. Journal of Business Economics, 90(4), 495-536, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11573-019-00962-1
]Search in Google Scholar
[
IVANOV, D., DOLGUI, A., SOKOLOV, B. (2022). Cloud supply chain: Integrating Industry 4.0 and digital platforms in the “Supply Chain-as-a-Service”. Transportation Research Part E,160(2022), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2022.102676
]Search in Google Scholar
[
KENNEY, M., BEARSON, D., ZYSMAN, J. (2021). The platform economy matures: Measuring pervasiveness and exploring power, Socio-Economic Review, 19(4), 1451–1483, https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwab014
]Search in Google Scholar
[
KENNEY, M., ZYSMAN, J. (2020). The platform economy: restructuring the space of capitalist accumulation. Cambridge Journal of Regions. Economy and Society, 13(2020), 55–76, https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsaa001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
KHAN NIAZI, S. U. (2017). Re-Launch of the Proposal for a Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base (CCCTB) in the EU: A Shift in Paradigm. Legal Issues of Economic Integration, 44(3), 293-314
]Search in Google Scholar
[
KRCHNIVÁ, K. (2015). The Czech evidence for the explanatory power of formula factors on profitability. Ekonomická revue, 18(3), 135–142, http://dx.10.7327/cerei.2015.09.03
]Search in Google Scholar
[
KRCHNIVÁ, K., NERUDOVÁ, D. (2015): The Influence of Allocation Formula on Generation of Profit in Different Economy Sectors. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 63(6), 1961–1967, http://dx.doi.org/10.11118/actaun201563061961
]Search in Google Scholar
[
KRCHNIVÁ, K., NERUDOVÁ, D. (2018). The CCCTB Allocation Formula Game: The Performance of Economics Sectors. Prague Economic Papers, 27(4), 427–448, http://dx.doi.org/10.18267/j.pep.660
]Search in Google Scholar
[
LEHOUX, L., DUCK, H., AKHMADEEV, R., MOROZOVA, T., BYKANOVA, O. (2019). Sustainable development facets: Taxation solutions for the energy industry. Journal of Security and Sustainability Issues, 9(2), 457-472. http://dx.doi.org/10.9770/jssi.2019.9.2(8)
]Search in Google Scholar
[
MARROCU, E., PACI, R., PONTIS, M. (2012). Intangible capital and firms’ productivity. Industrial and Corporate Change, 21(2), 377–402, https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtr042
]Search in Google Scholar
[
MARTINS, A., TABORDA, D. (2022). BEFIT and Formulary Apportionment: Should Intangibles Be Included in the Formula? EC Tax Review, 31(3), 131–139, https://doi.org/10.54648/ECTA2022013
]Search in Google Scholar
[
MATHESON, T., BEER, S., COELHO, M., LIU, L., LUCA, O. (2021). Formulary Apportionment in Theory and Practice. In R. DE MOOIJ, A. KLEMM, and V. PERRY (Eds.), Corporate Income Taxes under Pressure - Corporate Income Taxes under Pressure. Why Reform Is Needed and How It Could Be Designed, 283–252. International Monetary Fund, ISBN 9781513511771
]Search in Google Scholar
[
MAYER, S. (2009). Formulary Apportionment for the Internal Market. IBFD Doctoral Series. ISBN 789087220488
]Search in Google Scholar
[
MCGAUGHEY, S. L., RAIMONDOS, P. (2019). Shifting MNE taxation from national to global profits: A radical reform long overdue. Journal of International Business Studies, 50(9), 1668-1683. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/s41267-019-00233-9
]Search in Google Scholar
[
MINTZ, J. (2008). Europe Slowly Lurches to a Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base: Issues at Stake. In: Lang, M. et al. (Eds): A Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base for Europe. Alemanha: Springer, 128–138, ISBN 978 3 540 79483 7
]Search in Google Scholar
[
NERUDOVÁ, D., SOLILOVÁ, V. (2015). Quantification of the Impact on the Total Corporate Tax Basis in the Czech Republic Caused by the Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base Implementation in EU28. Politická ekonomie, 63(4), 322–339, https://doi.org/10.18267/j.polek.1030
]Search in Google Scholar
[
NERUDOVÁ, D., SOLILOVÁ, V. (2016). Implementation of Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base and its Implications for Non-participating Country: A Case Study for the Czech Republic. Journal of Economics, 64(3), 282–298, ISSN 0013-3035
]Search in Google Scholar
[
OLBERT, M., SPENGEL, C. (2019). Taxation in the Digital Economy – Recent Policy Developments and the Question of Value Creation. ZEW - Centre for European Economic Research Discussion Paper No. 19-010, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3368092
]Search in Google Scholar
[
PARKER, G. G., ALSTYNE, W. M. V., CHOUDARY, S. P. (2016). Platform Revolution: How Networked Markets Are Transforming the Economy and How to Make Them Work for You. W. W. Norton & Company, New York. ISBN 978-0-393-35435-5
]Search in Google Scholar
[
PENMAN, S. (2023). Accounting for Intangible Assets: Thinking It Through. Australian Accounting Review, 33(1), 1(2023),1-105. https://doi.org/10.1111/auar.12394
]Search in Google Scholar
[
PETKOVA, K., WEICHENRIEDER, A. J. (2020). The relevance of depreciation allowances as a fiscal policy instrument: A hybrid approach to CCCTB? Empirica, 47(3), 579-610. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10663-019-09441-w
]Search in Google Scholar
[
POLEZHAROVA, L. V., KRASNOBAEVA, A. M. (2020). E-Commerce Taxation in Russia: Problems and Approaches. Journal of Tax Reform, 6(2), 104-123. http://dx.doi.org/10.15826/jtr.2020.6.2.077
]Search in Google Scholar
[
QUENTIN, D. (2017). Corporate tax reform and “value creation”: Towards unfettered diagonal re-allocation across the global inequality chain. Accounting, Economics and Law, 7(1). http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/ael-2016-0020
]Search in Google Scholar
[
ROGGEMAN, A., VERLEYEN, I. CAUWENBERGE, V. P., Coppens, C. (2012). An Empirical Investigation into the Design of an EU Apportionment Formula Related to Profit Generating Factors. Transformations in Business & Economics, 11(27), 36–56, ISSN 1648 4460
]Search in Google Scholar
[
RUSSO, A. (2005). Formulary Apportionment for Europe: An Analysis and A Proposal. Intertax, 33(1), 2-31. https://doi.org/10.54648/taxi2005001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
SCHREIBER, U., FUHRICH, G. (2009). European group taxation-the role of exit taxes. European Journal of Law and Economics, 27(3), 257-274. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10657-008-9090-6
]Search in Google Scholar
[
SOLILOVÁ, V., NERUDOVÁ, D. (2018). Revenue Potential of the CCCTB in the European Union. Politická ekonomie, 66(1), 78–98, https://doi.org/10.18267/j.polek.1177
]Search in Google Scholar
[
TABACHNICK, B. G., FIDELL, L. (2012). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). Boston: Pearson Education Limited. ISBN-13 9781292021317
]Search in Google Scholar
