Validity of Weak-Form Market Efficiency in Central and Eastern European Countries (CEECs): Evidence from Linear and Nonlinear Unit Root Tests

ABRAHAM, A., FAZAL, J., SULAIMAN, A. (2002). Testing the random walk behavior and efficiency of the Gulf stock markets. The Financial Review, 37, 469-480. DOI: 10.1111/0732-8516.0000810.1111/0732-8516.00008Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

ALEXEEV, V., TAPON, F. (2011). Testing weak-form efficiency on the Toronto stock exchange. Journal of Empirical Finance, 18(4), 661-691. DOI: 10.1016/j.jempfin.2011.05.00210.1016/j.jempfin.2011.05.002Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

AL-LOUGHANI, N., CHAPPELL, D. (1997). On the validity of the weak-form efficient markets hypothesis applied to the London stock exchange. Applied Financial Economics, 7(2), 173-176. DOI: 10.1080/09603109733373610.1080/096031097333736Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

ALOM, K., RAQUIB, M. (2014). Capital market efficiency and portfolio equity inflows in Bangladesh. World Vision Research Journal, 8(1), 202-215.Search in Google Scholar

ANANZEH, I. E. N. (2014). Testing the weak-form of efficient market hypothesis: Empirical evidence from Jordan. International Business and Management, 9(2), 119-123. DOI: 10.3968/552410.3968/5524Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

ANANZEH, I.E.N. (2016). Weak-form efficiency of the Amman stock exchange: An empirical analysis (2000-2013). International Journal of Business and Management, 11(1), 173-180. DOI: 10.5539/ijbm.v11n1p17310.5539/ijbm.v11n1p173Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

ANLAS, T., TORAMAN, C. (2016). Analysing the efficiency of the Turkish stock market with multiple structural breaks. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 6(12), 721-740. DOI: 10.6007/IJARBSS/v6-i12/253110.6007/IJARBSS/v6-i12/2531Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

ANORUO, E., MURTHY, V.N.R. (2014). Testing nonlinear inflation convergence for the central African economic and monetary community. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 4(1), 1-7.Search in Google Scholar

ATAKAN, T. (2008). Testing the day-of-the-week effect and January effect anomalies at Istanbul stock exchange with arch-garch models. Istanbul University Journal of the School of Business Administration, 37(2), 98-110.Search in Google Scholar

ATAN, S.D., OZDEMIR, Z.A., ATAN, M. (2009). Weak efficiency on the stock exchange market: An empirical study on ISE. Dokuz Eylul University, Journal of the Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, 24(2), 33-48.Search in Google Scholar

BASHIR, T., ILYAS, M., FURRUKH, A. (2011). Testing the weak-form efficiency of Pakistani stock markets: An empirical study in banking sector. European Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Sciences, 31, 160-175.Search in Google Scholar

BORGES, M.R. (2010). Efficient market hypothesis in European stock markets. The European Journal of Finance, 16(7), 711-726. DOI: 10.1080/1351847X.2010.49547710.1080/1351847X.2010.495477Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

BOZKURT, C., OKUMUS, I. (2016). Are fluctuations in oil consumption permanent or transitory? Evidence from linear and nonlinear unit root test in BRICS-T countries. Cukurova University, Journal of the Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, 20(1), 27-37.Search in Google Scholar

BROOKS, C. (2014). Modelling long-run relationships in finance. In: Introductory Econometrics for Finance (3rd edition). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

BUGUK, C., BRORSEN, B.W. (2003). Testing weak-form market efficiency: Evidence from ISE. International Review of Financial Analysis, 12(5): 579-590. DOI: 10.1016/S1057-5219(03)00065-610.1016/S1057-5219(03)00065-6Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

CELIK, T.T., TAS, O. (2007). Efficient market hypothesis and emerging markets. İstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi Dergisi, Sosyal Bilimler, 4(2), 11-22.Search in Google Scholar

CHAN, K.C., GUP, B.E., PAN, M.S. (1997). International stock market efficiency and integration: A study of eighteen nations. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 24(6), 803-813. DOI: 10.1111/1468-5957.0013410.1111/1468-5957.00134Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

CHAUDHURI, K., WU, Y. (2003). Random walk versus breaking trend in stock prices: Evidence from emerging markets. Journal of Banking and Finance, 27, 575-592. DOI: 10.1016/S0378-4266(01)00252-7.10.1016/S0378-4266(01)00252-7Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

CHOUDHRY, T. (1997) Stochastic trends in stock prices: Evidence from Latin American markets. Journal of Macroeconomics, 19(2), 285-304. DOI: 10.1016/S0164-0704(97)00016-510.1016/S0164-0704(97)00016-5Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

CHUVAKHIN, N. (2001). Efficient market hypothesis and behavioral finance is a compromise in sight. Available at http://ncbase.com/papers/EMH-BF.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

CONKAR, M.K, CANBAZ, M.F., ARIFOGLU, A. (2018). Causality relationship between the credits of commercial and Islamic banks and economic growth: An econometric analysis. Afyon Kocatepe University Journal of Economics and Administrative Sciences, 20(1), 1-11. DOI: 10.5578/jeas.61920.10.5578/jeas.61920Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

ELLIOT, G., ROTHENBERG, T.J., STOCK, J.H. (1996). Efficient test for an autoregressive unit root. Econometrica, 64(4), 813-836. DOI: 10.2307/217184610.2307/2171846Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

EZEPUE, P.O., OMAR, M.T. (2012). Weak-form market efficiency of the Nigerian stock market in the context of financial reforms and global financial crises. Journal of African Business, 13(3), 209-220. DOI: 10.1080/15228916.2012.727750.10.1080/15228916.2012.727750Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

DRAGOTA, V., TILICA, E. (2014). Market efficiency of the post-communist east european stock markets. Central European Journal of Operations Research, 22(2), 307-337. DOI: 10.1007/s10100-013-0315-610.1007/s10100-013-0315-6Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

FAMA, E. F. (1965). The behavior of stock market prices. The Journal of Business, 38(1), 34-105. DOI: 10.1086/29474310.1086/294743Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

FAMA, E.F. (1970). Efficient capital markets: A review of theory and empirical works. Journal of Finance, 25(2), 383-417. DOI: 10.2307/232548610.2307/2325486Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

FAMA, E.F. (1991). Efficient capital markets: II. The Journal of Finance, V.XLVI(5), 1575-1576. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1991.tb04636.x10.1111/j.1540-6261.1991.tb04636.xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

GEMICI, E., POLAT, M. (2018). Random walk hypothesis in MIST stock markets. Eskisehir Osmangazi University Journal of Economics and Administrative Sciences, 13(1), 129-142.10.17153/oguiibf.344882Search in Google Scholar

GILANI, R.T.S., NAWAZ, M., SHAKOOR, M. I., ASAB, M. Z. (2015). Testing the weak-form efficiency of Islamabad stock exchange. Developing Country Studies, 4(11), 79-86.10.18034/gdeb.v4i2.137Search in Google Scholar

GOURISHANKAR, S.H., SADATH, A., KAMAIAH, B. (2009). On the random walk characteristics of stock returns in India. Artha Vijnana, 51(1), 85-96.10.21648/arthavij/2009/v51/i1/115429Search in Google Scholar

GOZBASI, O. (2014). Testing weak-form efficiency of the Borsa Istanbul stock market: a nonlinear approach. Verimlilik Dergisi, 0(4), 7-18.Search in Google Scholar

GOZBASI, O., KUÇUKKAPLAN, I. NAZLIOGLU, S. (2014). Re-examining the Turkish stock market efficiency: Evidence from nonlinear unit root tests, Economic Modelling, 38, 381-384. DOI: 10.1016/j.econmod.2014.01.021.10.1016/j.econmod.2014.01.021Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

GUMUS, F.B., ZEREN, F. (2014). Analyzing the efficient market hypothesis with the fourier unit root tests: Evidence from G-20 countries. Ekonomski Horizonti, 16(3), 225-237. DOI: 10.5937/ekonhor1403225g10.5937/ekonhor1403225gOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

HAQUE, A., LIU, H-C., NISA, F-U. (2011). Testing the weak-form efficiency of Pakistani stock market (2000–2010). International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 1(4), 153-162.Search in Google Scholar

HARRIS, D., MCCABE, B.P., LEYBOURNE, S.J. (2003). Same limit theory for auto-covariances whose order depends on sample size. Econometric Theory, 10, 829-864.10.1017/S0266466603195060Search in Google Scholar

HARVEY, D.I., LEYBOURNE, S.J. (2007). Testing for time series linearity. Econometrics Journal, 10(1), 149-165. DOI: 10.1111/j.1368-423X.2007.00203.x10.1111/j.1368-423X.2007.00203.xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

HARVEY, D.I., LEYBOURNE, S.J., XIAO, B. (2008). A powerful test for linearity when the order of integration is unknown. Studies Nonlinear Dynamics and Econometrics, 12(3), 1-24. DOI: 10.2202/1558-3708.158210.2202/1558-3708.1582Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

HASANOV, M., OMAY, T. (2007). Are the transition stock markets efficient? Evidence from non-linear unit root tests. Central Bank Review, 2(2007), 1-12.Search in Google Scholar

HEPSAG, A., AKCALI, B.Y. (2015). The analysis of weak-form efficiency with asymmetric nonlinear unit root test: The case of G-7 and E-7 countries. BDDK Bankacılık ve Finansal Piyasalar, 9(2), 73-90.Search in Google Scholar

HOOI, L., SMYTH, R. (2007). Are Asian real exchange rates mean reverting? Evidence from univariate and panel LM unit root tests with one and two structural breaks. Applied Economics, 39, 2109-2120. DOI: 10.1080/0003684060072233110.1080/00036840600722331Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

HUSSAIN, S., NATH, S.K.D., BHUIYAN, Y.A. (2016). Weak-form efficiency of the Chittagong stock exchange: An empirical analysis (2006-2016). International Journal of Business and Social Research, 6(11), 58-66. DOI: 10.18533/ijbsr.v6i11.1015.10.18533/ijbsr.v6i11.1015Search in Google Scholar

ILALAN, D. (2018). An empirical study of BIST 100 index with nonlinear unit root testing. International Journal of Management Economics and Business, 14(3), 656-665.10.17130/ijmeb.2018343116Search in Google Scholar

IRFAN, M., MARIA, I., MUHAMMAD, A. (2010). Investigating the weak-form efficiency of an emerging market using parametric tests: Evidence from Karachi stock market of Pakistan. Electronic Journal of Applied Statistical Analysis, 3(1), 52-64.Search in Google Scholar

KAPETANIOS, G., SHIN, Y., SNELL, A. (2003). Testing for a unit root in the nonlinear STAR framework. Journal of Econometrics, 112(2), 359-379. DOI: 10.1016/S0304-4076(02)00202-610.1016/S0304-4076(02)00202-6Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

KARAN, M.B. (2004). Yatırım analizi ve portföy yönetimi, Ankara: Gazi Kitabevi.Search in Google Scholar

KAWAKATSU, H., MOREY, M.R. (1999). Financial liberalization and stock market efficiency: An empirical examination of nine emerging market countries. Journal of Multinational Financial Management, 9(3-4), 353-371. DOI: 10.1016/S1042-444X(99)00007-910.1016/S1042-444X(99)00007-9Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

KHAN, N.U, KHAN, S. (2016). Weak-form of efficient market hypothesis evidence from Pakistan. Business & Economic Review, 8, 1-18.10.22547/BER/8.SE.1Search in Google Scholar

KIM, J.H., SHAMSUDDIN, A., LIM, K.P. (2011). Stock return predictability and the adaptive markets hypothesis: Evidence from century-long U.S. data. Journal of Empirical Finance, 18(5), 868-879. DOI: 10.1016/j.jempfin.2011.08.00210.1016/j.jempfin.2011.08.002Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

KIM, S-W., MOLLICK, A.V., NAM, K. (2008). Common nonlinearities in long-horizon stock returns: Evidence from the G-7 stock markets, Global Finance Journal, 19(1), 19-31.10.1016/j.gfj.2007.09.002Search in Google Scholar

KIYILAR, M. (1997). Etkin pazar kuramı ve ektin pazar kuramının IMKB’de irdelenmesi ve test edilmesi. Ankara: Sermaye Piyasası Kurulu, No. 86.Search in Google Scholar

KIYILAR, M. (1998). Etkin pazar kuramının test edilmesi. Yönetim, 9(29), 34-51.Search in Google Scholar

KOFARBAI, H.Z., ZUBAIRU, M. (2016). Efficient market hypothesis in emerging market-a conceptual analysis. European Scientific Journal, 12(25), 260-270. DOI: 10.19044/esj.2016.v12n25p26010.19044/esj.2016.v12n25p260Search in Google Scholar

KRUSE, R. (2011). A new unit root test against ESTAR based on a class of modified statistics. Statistic Papers, 52(1), 71-85. DOI: 10.1007/s00362-009-0204-110.1007/s00362-009-0204-1Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

LEAN, H.H., SMYTH, R. (2007). Do Asian stock markets follow a random walk? Evidence from LM unit root tests with one and two structural breaks. Review of Pacific Basin Financial Markets and Policies, 10, 15-31. DOI: 10.1142/S021909150700093310.1142/S0219091507000933Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

LEE, C., LEE, J., LEE, C. (2010). Stock prices and the efficient market hypothesis: Evidence from a panel stationary test with structural breaks. Japan and the World Economy, 22(1), 49-58. DOI: 10.1016/j.japwor.2009.04.00210.1016/j.japwor.2009.04.002Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

LEE, J., STRAZICICH, M.C. (2003). Minimum LM unit root test with two structural breaks. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 85(4), 1082-1089. DOI: 10.1162/00346530377281596110.1162/003465303772815961Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

LEE, C., TSONG, C., LEE, C. (2014). Testing for the efficient market hypothesis in stock prices: International evidence from nonlinear heterogeneous panels. Macroeconomic Dynamics, 18(4), 943-958. DOI: 10.1017/S136510051200069710.1017/S1365100512000697Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

LI, W.K., LAM, K. (1995). Modelling asymmetry in stock returns by a threshold autoregressive conditional heteroscedastic model. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 44(3), 333-341.10.2307/2348704Search in Google Scholar

LIU, T. (2010). Stock Market Development and Market Efficiency on China Stock Market. Euro Journals Publishing, Inc.Search in Google Scholar

LO, A.W., MACKINLAY, A.C. (1988). Stock market prices do not follow random walks: Evidence from a simple specification test. The Review of Financial Studies, 1(1), 41-66. DOI: 10.1093/rfs/1.1.4110.1093/rfs/1.1.41Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

MANASSEH, C.O., OZUZU, C.K., OGBUABOR, J.E. (2016). Semi strong form efficiency test of the Nigerian stock market: Evidence from event study analysis of bonus issues. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 6(4), 1474-1490.Search in Google Scholar

MALCIOGLU, G., AYDIN, M. (2016). Analysis of market efficiency at Borsa Istanbul: Harvey linearity test. Journal of Accounting, Finance and Auditing Studies, 2(1), 112-123.Search in Google Scholar

MALHOTRA, N., TANDON, K., TANDON, D. (2015). Testing the empirics of weak-form of efficient market hypothesis: Evidence from Asia-Pacific markets. IUP Journal of Applied Finance, 21(4), 18-37.Search in Google Scholar

MCMILLAN, D.G. (2005). Non-linear dynamics in international stock market returns. Review of Financial Economics, 14 (1), 81-91. DOI: 10.1016/j.rfe.2004.09.00110.1016/j.rfe.2004.09.001Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

MEHMOOD, M.S., MEHMOOD, A., MUJTABA, B.G. (2012). Stock market prices follow the random walks: Evidence from the efficiency of Karachi stock exchange. European Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative, 51, 71-80.Search in Google Scholar

MISHRA, P.K. (2011). Weak-form market efficiency: Evidence from emerging and developed world. The Journal of Commerce, 3(2), 26-34.Search in Google Scholar

MOLLAH, A.S. (2007). Testing weak-form market efficiency in emerging market: Evidence from Botswana stock exchange. International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance, 10(6), 1077-1094. DOI: 10.1142/S021902490700455X10.1142/S021902490700455XOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

MUNIR, Q., MANSUR, K. (2009). Is Malaysian stock market efficient? Evidence from threshold unit root tests. Economics Bulletin, 29(2), 1359-1370.Search in Google Scholar

NARAYAN, P.K. (2005) Are the Australian and New Zealand stock prices nonlinear with a unit root?. Applied Economics, 37(18), 2161-2166. DOI: 10.1080/0003684050021788710.1080/00036840500217887Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

NARAYAN, P.K. (2006). The behaviour of US stock prices: Evidence from a threshold autoregressive model. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, 71(2), 103-108. DOI: 10.1016/j.matcom.2005.11.01610.1016/j.matcom.2005.11.016Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

NARAYAN, P.K. (2008). Do shocks to G7 stock prices have a permanent effect? Evidence from panel unit root tests with structural change. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, 77(4), 369-373. DOI: 10.1016/j.matcom.2007.03.00310.1016/j.matcom.2007.03.003Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

NARAYAN, P., PRASAD, A. (2007). Mean reversion in stock prices: New evidence from panel unit root tests for seventeen European countries. Economics Bulletin, 3, 1-16.10.1108/10867370710817419Search in Google Scholar

NARAYAN, P.K., SMYTH, R. (2004). Is South Korea's stock market efficient?. Applied Economics Letters, 11(1), 707-710. DOI: 10.1080/135048504200023656610.1080/1350485042000236566Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

NARAYAN, P.K., SMYTH, R. (2007). Mean reversion versus random walk in G-7 stock prices evidence from multiple trend break unit root tests. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 17(2017), 152-166. DOI: 10.1016/j.intfin.2005.10.00210.1016/j.intfin.2005.10.002Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

NISAR, S., HANIF, M. (2012). Testing weak-form of efficient market hypothesis: Empirical evidence from South-Asia. World Applied Sciences Journal, 17(4), 414-427.Search in Google Scholar

NOVICKYTE, L., DEGUTIS, A. (2014). The efficient market hypothesis: A critical review of literature and methodology. Ekonomika, 93(2), 7-23. DOI: 10.15388/Ekon.2014.2.354910.15388/Ekon.2014.2.3549Search in Google Scholar

NWACHUKWU, J.C., SHITTA, O. (2015). Testing the weak-form efficiency of stock markets: A comparative study of emerging and industrialised economies. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 10(3), 409-426. DOI: 10.1108/IJoEM-07-2013-011510.1108/IJoEM-07-2013-0115Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

OZDEMIR, Z.A. (2008). Efficient market hypothesis: Evidence from a small open-economy. Applied Economics, 40 (5), 633-641. DOI: 10.1080/0003684060072231510.1080/00036840600722315Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

PELE, D.T., VOINEAGU, V. (2008). Testing market efficiency via decomposition of stock return: Application to Romanian capital market. Romanian Journal of Economic Forecasting, 5(3), 63-79.Search in Google Scholar

PERVEZ, M., RASHID, H.U., CHOWDHURY, A.I., RAHAMAN, M. (2018). Predicting the stock market efficiency in weak-form: A study on Dhaka stock exchange. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 8(5), 88-95.Search in Google Scholar

PHILLIPS P.C.B., PERRON, P. (1988). Testing for a unit root in time series regression, Biometrika, 75(2), 335-346. DOI: 10.1093/biomet/75.2.33510.1093/biomet/75.2.335Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

PHIRI, A. (2015). Efficient market hypothesis in South Africa: Evidence from linear and nonlinear unit root tests. Managing Global Transitions, 13(4), 369-387.Search in Google Scholar

RAHMAN, M.S., SIMON, H.M., HOSSAIN, M.M. (2016). An empirical analysis of weak-form market efficiency: Evidence from Chittagong stock exchange (CSE) of Bangladesh. Journal of Statistics Applications & Probability, 5(3), 535-542. DOI: 10.18576/jsap/05031710.18576/jsap/050317Search in Google Scholar

RYALY, V.R., KUMAR, K.K., URLANKULA, B. (2014). A study on weak-form of market efficiency in selected Asian stock markets. Indian Journal of Finance, 8(11), 34-43. DOI: 10.17010/ijf/2014/v8i11/7184210.17010/ijf/2014/v8i11/71842Search in Google Scholar

SAID, A., HARPER, A. (2015). The efficiency of the Russian stock market: A revisit of the random walk hypothesis. Academy of Accounting and Finance Studies Journal, 19(1), 42-48.Search in Google Scholar

SAKARYA, S., ZEREN, F., AKKUS, H. T. (2018). Testing the weak form market efficiency in participation indices: An application on Turkey. AKU Journal of Economics and Administrative Sciences, 20(1), 101-11310.5578/jeas.67163Search in Google Scholar

SAMUELSON, P. (1965). Proof that properly anticipated prices fluctuate randomly. Industrial Management Review, Spring 6, 41-49.Search in Google Scholar

SARIKAMIS, C. (2000). Sermaye pazarları. Istanbul: Alfa Yayinlari, Genisletilmis 4. Baskı.Search in Google Scholar

SMITH, G., RYOO, H-J. (2003). Variance ratio tests of the random walk hypothesis for European emerging stock markets. European Journal of Finance, 9(3), 290-300. DOI: 10.1080/135184702100002577710.1080/1351847021000025777Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

TARI, R. (2014). Ekonometri, Kocaeli: Umuttepe Yayinlari.Search in Google Scholar

TOKIĆ, S., BOLFEK, B., PEŠA, A. R. (2018). Testing efficient market hypothesis in developing eastern european countries. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 15(2), 281-291. DOI: 10.21511/imfi.15(2).2018.2510.21511/imfi.15(2).2018.25Search in Google Scholar

WORTHINGTON, A., HIGGS, H. (2004). Random walks and market efficiency in European equity markets. Global Journal of Finance and Economics, 1(1), 59-78.Search in Google Scholar

WORTHINGTON, A., HIGGS, H. (2006). Weak-form market efficiency in Asian emerging and developed equity markets: Comparative tests of random walk behavior. Accounting Research Journal, 19(1), 54-63.Search in Google Scholar

VASCONCELOS, C.B.F., JUNIOR, L.A.L. (2016). Validity of purchasing power parity for selected Latin American countries: Linear and non-linear unit root tests. EconomiA, 17(1), 114-125. DOI: 10.1016/j.econ.2015.11.00110.1016/j.econ.2015.11.001Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

YANG, G.J-A., LEE, C., LEE, C-H. (2015). Random walk in the MIST. Journal of Asia-Pacific Business, 16(2), 92-104. DOI: 10.1080/10599231.2015.102830310.1080/10599231.2015.1028303Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

YARTEY, C., ADJASI, C.K. (2007). Stock market development in Sub-Saharan Africa: Critical issue and challenges. International Monetary Fund Working Paper, No. 07/209.10.2139/ssrn.1012992Search in Google Scholar

YUCEL, O. (2016). Financial market efficiency: A study on Borsa Istanbul. International Review of Economics and Management, 4(3), 107-123.Search in Google Scholar

ZAUBIA, K., ALNAHLEH, M. (2010). Financial markets efficiency: Empirical evidence from some Middle East & North Africa countries (MENA). International Research Journal of Finance and Economics, 49, 180-193.Search in Google Scholar

ZEREN, F., KONUK, F. (2013). Testing the random walk hypothesis for emerging markets: Evidence from linear and non-linear unit root tests. Romanian Economic and Business Review, 8(4), 61-71.Search in Google Scholar