1. bookTom 18 (2018): Zeszyt 3 (September 2018)
Informacje o czasopiśmie
License
Format
Czasopismo
eISSN
1804-1663
Pierwsze wydanie
19 Feb 2010
Częstotliwość wydawania
4 razy w roku
Języki
Angielski
access type Otwarty dostęp

Income Self-Sufficiency and Profitability of Professional Theatres in the Czech Republic

Data publikacji: 11 Sep 2018
Tom & Zeszyt: Tom 18 (2018) - Zeszyt 3 (September 2018)
Zakres stron: 285 - 299
Otrzymano: 04 Jan 2070
Przyjęty: 19 May 2018
Informacje o czasopiśmie
License
Format
Czasopismo
eISSN
1804-1663
Pierwsze wydanie
19 Feb 2010
Częstotliwość wydawania
4 razy w roku
Języki
Angielski
Abstract

The paper assesses the professional theatres operating under the Association of Professional Theatres in the Czech Republic in the period 2011-2015 using the financial analysis, particularly the profitability indicator ratio (ROA, ROCE, ROE, ROS) and the rate of income self-sufficiency. The reason for this economic exploration of theatres is in the fact that the service they provide fall under collectively provided public goods (a common feature of most cultural institutions), and that the market is not able to effectively secure these goods on the profit principle. The J. K. Tyl Theatre in Pilsen, the Drak Theatre in Hradec Králové and the Moravian Slovakia Theatre in Uherské Hradiště have reported the best results of profitability indicators. Whereas the worst results in profitability have been reported for the North Bohemian Theatre of Opera and Ballet in Ústí nad Labem, the Antonín Dvořák Theatre in Příbram and the South Bohemian Theatre in České Budějovice. The rate of income self-sufficiency within 2011-2015 ranges from 12-55% of the total budget volume, and volume and shows a strong dependency of professional theatres on foreign resources, particularly from public resources of the local levels of the government being the most common funder of these cultural institutions. It turns out that, from the economic point of view, it is illogical to transform non-profit contributory organizations in culture with a public funder into a different legal form when the purpose of the establishment and the funder remain preserved. Better results are generally obtained from single-genre theatres and, in terms of the auditorium size, smaller theatres focusing on drama or children's production.

Keywords

BADIA, F., BORIN, E. (2012). Opportunities and Critical Points for the Introduction of Performance Measurement Systems in Theatres - A Comparison between Theoretical Assumptions and Empirical Realities. Journal of Cultural Management and Policy. Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 45-59.Search in Google Scholar

BÉNARD, J. (1990). Veřejná ekonomika I. Prague: EÚ ČSAV.Search in Google Scholar

BEUTLING, L. (1986). Company Accounting and Accounting of Public TheatresSearch in Google Scholar

as Instruments for Securing of thein Profitability or more Economic-efficiency inSearch in Google Scholar

Theatres - The End of the Arts. Betriebswirtschaftliche forschung ung praxis. Vol. 38. Issue 1. Pp 80-91.Search in Google Scholar

BORG, R. P. (2017). A Methodology for the Quality Assessment of the Theatre. In V. A. Cremona (ed.), Capitalising on culture? Malta and the European capital of culture. pp. 77-96. Msida: Malta University Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

BRIGHAM, E. R., EHRHARDT, M. C. (2011). Financial Management. Theory andSearch in Google Scholar

Practice. 13 th ed. South - Western Cengage Learning, 1152 p. ISBN 978-1-4390- 7809-9.Search in Google Scholar

CHIARAVALLOTI, F. (2014). Performance Evaluation in the Arts and Cultural Sector: A Story of Accounting at Its Margins. The Journal of Arts Management, Law, and Society, 44(2), 61-89. ISSN 1063-2921. DOI: 10.1080/10632921.2014.90540010.1080/10632921.2014.905400Otwórz DOISearch in Google Scholar

CORBOS, R. A., POPESCU, R. I. (2013). Study regarding Theatres' role in increasing urban competitiveness. Administratie si Management Public. no. 20, pp. 78 - 96. ISSN 15839583.Search in Google Scholar

Del BARRIO, MJ., HERRERO, LC. (2014). Evaluating the Efficiency of Museums Multiple Using Multiple Outputs: Evidence from Regional System of Museums in Spain. International Journal of Cultural Policy. Vol. 20, Issue 2. Pp. 221-238. DOI: 10.1080/10286632.2013.76429010.1080/10286632.2013.764290Otwórz DOISearch in Google Scholar

DLUHOŠOVÁ, D. et al. (2010). Finanční řízení a rozhodování podniku. 3rd ed. Prague: Ekopress, p. 225. ISBN 978-80-86929-68-2.Search in Google Scholar

DOSTÁL, P., KISLINGEROVÁ, E. (2012). Ekonomika kultury: efektivní metody a nástroje sektoru kultury. 1st ed. Prague: Oeconomica. ISBN 978-80-245-1886-2.Search in Google Scholar

GRÜNWALD, R., HOLEČKOVÁ, J. (2009). Finanční analýza a plánování podniku. 1st ed. Prague: Ekopress, p. 318. ISBN 978-80-86929-26-2.Search in Google Scholar

HAMERNÍKOVÁ, B. (1995). Kultura a masmédia v tržních podmínkách. 1st ed.Search in Google Scholar

Prague: VŠE. 207 s. ISBN 80-7079-857-2.Search in Google Scholar

JULIEN, M. (2017). Community, viability: Theatre past and present. Canadian Theatre Review. No. 169, p. 78 - 83. ISSN 03150836. DOI: 10.3138/ctr.169.01310.3138/ctr.169.013Otwórz DOISearch in Google Scholar

KISLINGEROVÁ, E. et.al. (2010). Manažerské finance. 3rd ed. Prague: C. H. Beck. 864 s. ISBN 978-80-7400-194-9.Search in Google Scholar

KRAFTOVÁ, I. (2002). Finanční analýza municipální firmy. Prague: C. H. Beck, 2002, 206 p. ISBN 80-7179-778-2.Search in Google Scholar

KRAFTOVÁ, I., PRÁŠILOVÁ, P. (2013). Prosperující podnik v regionálním kontextu. Prague: Wolters Kluwer ČR. ISBN 978-80-7357-989-0.Search in Google Scholar

LOACH, K., ROWLEY, J., GRIFFITHS. J. (2017). Cultural sustainability as a strategy for the survival of museums and libraries. International Journal of Cultural Policy. Vol. 23, Issue 2, Pages 186-198. ISSN 1028-6632.10.1080/10286632.2016.1184657Search in Google Scholar

MEINECK, P. (2010). Page and stage: Theater, tradition, and culture in America. Classical World. no. 103, issue 2, p. 221 - 226. ISSN 00098418. DOI: 10.1353/clw.0.017310.1353/clw.0.0173Search in Google Scholar

MIHAIU, D. (2014). Measuring Performance in The Public Sector: Between Necessity and Difficulty. Studies in Business and Economics, Vol. 9, No. 2, pp. 40-50.Search in Google Scholar

MINISTERSTVO KULTURY ČR. (2015). Státní kulturní politika na léta 2015 - 2020. [online]. [cit. 2017-11-27]. Available at: https://www.mkcr.cz/statni-kulturni-politika-69.html.Search in Google Scholar

MORÁVEK, Z., PROKŮPKOVÁ, D. (2015). Příspěvkové organizace 2015. 2. vyd. Prague: Wolters Kluwer ČR. 290 p. ISBN 978-80-7478-833-8.Search in Google Scholar

MUSGRAVE, R. A. (1959). The Theory of Public Finance. New York: McGraw-Hill.Search in Google Scholar

NIPOS: Statistical data in publications - Culture statistics. [online]. [cit. 2018-04-15]. Available from: https://statistikakultury.cz/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/Statistika-2016- divadla.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

OCHRANA, F. et al. (2007). Efektivnost zabezpečování vybraných veřejných služeb na úrovni obcí. Prague: Oeconomica.Search in Google Scholar

PEKOVÁ, J., PILNÝ, J., JETMAR, M. (2012). Veřejný sektor - řízení a financování.Prague: Wolters Kluwer ČR. 485 p. ISBN 978-80-7357-936-4.Search in Google Scholar

POTŮČEK, M. et al. (2005). Veřejná politika. Prague: Sociologické nakladatelství (SLON). 399 p. ISBN 80-86429-50-4.Search in Google Scholar

RICHTER, V. (2015). Srovnávání knihoven se vyplatí. Čtenář. Vol. 67, No.5, pp. 163-166.Search in Google Scholar

ŘEŽUCHOVÁ, M. (2010). Partnerství veřejného a soukromého sektoru: AnalýzaSearch in Google Scholar

možností efektivního zabezpečování veřejných služeb. Disertační práce. Brno: Masaryková univerzita Brno. Available: http://is.muni.cz/th/77468/esf_d/Search in Google Scholar

SCHILD, CJ., WREDE, M. (2015). Cultural identity, mobility and decentralization. Journal of Comparative Economics. Vol. 43. Issue 2. pp 323-333.10.1016/j.jce.2014.05.002Search in Google Scholar

SCHNEIDER, M. (1987). Local Budgets and the Maximization of Local PropertySearch in Google Scholar

Wealth in the System of Suburban Government. The Journal of Politics, 49(4) DOI: 10.2307/213078710.2307/2130787Otwórz DOISearch in Google Scholar

SEDLÁČEK, J. (2011). Finanční analýza podniku. 2nd ed. Brno: Computer Press. p. 160. ISBN 978-80-251-3386-6.Search in Google Scholar

SEDMIHRADSKÁ, L., BAKOŠ, E. (2016). Municipal Tax Autonomy and Tax Mimicking in Czech Municipalities. Lex Localis - Journal of Local Self-Government. 14(1), 75-92.10.4335/14.1.75-92(2016)Search in Google Scholar

STIGLITZ, J. E., ROSENGARD, J. K. (2015). Economics of the Public Sector. 4th ed. New York: W. W. Norton Company.Search in Google Scholar

STEJSKAL, J. et al. (2013). Měření hodnoty služeb (na příkladu veřejných knihoven). Prague: Wolters Kluwer ČR.Search in Google Scholar

ŠKARABELOVÁ, S., NESHYBOVÁ, J., REKTOŘÍK, J. (2007). Ekonomika kultury a masmédií. 1st ed.: ESF MU. 210 p. ISBN 978-80-210-4267-4.Search in Google Scholar

THROSBY, D. (2004). Assessing the impacts of a cultural industry. Journal of Arts Management, Law Society, 34(3), 188-204. DOI: 10.3200/JAML.34.3.188-20410.3200/JAML.34.3.188-204Otwórz DOISearch in Google Scholar

TOMÁNEK, P. (2015). Aspects of spatial distribution of tax revenues in terms of usage in regional budgets. In: Theoretical and Practical Aspects of Public Finance 2015: proceedings of the 20th international conference. Praha: Oeconomica, 2015. pp. 267-272. ISBN 978-80-245-2094-0.Search in Google Scholar

TURBIDE, J., LAURIN, C. (2009). Performance Measurement in the Arts Sector: The Case of the Performing Arts. International Journal of Arts Management. 2009, Vol. 11, No. 2, pp. 56-70.Search in Google Scholar

UNESCO. (2009). Measuring the economic contribution of cultural industries. A review and assessment of current methodological approaches. [online]. 2009 [cit. 2017-11-20]. Available: http://uis.unesco.org/sites/default/files/documents/measuring-the-economiccontribution- of-cultural-industries-a-review-and-assessment-of-current-methodologicalapproaches- en_1.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

VAN DER POL, H. (2008). Key role of cultural and creative industries in the economy. In Statistics, Knowledge and Policy. Measuring and Fostering the Progress of Societies. Paris and Washington, D.C. OECD. 343-353.Search in Google Scholar

VARADZIN, F., BEČICA, J. (2016). Sídla a produkční potenciál. (fungování a ekonomický potenciál obcí v ČR s příklady z území Moravskoslezského kraje). Prague: Professional Publishing. 180 p. ISBN 978-80-906594-0-7.Search in Google Scholar

VAVREK, R., ADMISIN, P., KOTULIC, R. (2014). Impact of Indicator Weight of Topsis Technique in Assessing of Municipalities. In: 12th International Conference on Hradec Economic Days (HED 2014): Economic Development and Management of Regions Location. Hradec Kralove: Univ Hradec Kralove. pp. 373-382. ISBN 978-80- 7435-368-0.Search in Google Scholar

VRABKOVÁ, I., et al. (2017). Příspěvkové organizace: postavení, úkoly a technická efektivnost, SAEI, vol. 47. Ostrava: VSB-TU Ostrava. ISBN 978-80-248-4028-4.Search in Google Scholar

WANG, S., et.al. (2016). Using DEA Models to Measure the Performance of Public Culture Services in China. In Computational Science and Computational Intelligence (CSCI), Las Vegas, pp. 1-10.10.1109/CSCI.2016.0091Search in Google Scholar

ŽÁKOVÁ, E. et al. (2017). Mapování kulturních a kreativních průmyslů v ČR - Vymezení, kvantitativní mapování a strategické dokumenty. [online]. [cit. 2017-11-18]. Available: http://www.idu.cz/cs/mapovani-kulturnich-a-kreativnich-prumyslu-v-cr.Search in Google Scholar

Polecane artykuły z Trend MD

Zaplanuj zdalną konferencję ze Sciendo