[
Andersen, C.U., Cox, G., & Papadopoulos, G. (2014). Postdigital research - Editorial. A Peer-Reviewed Journal About, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.7146/aprja.v3i1.116067
10.7146/aprja.v3i1.116067
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ausubel, D.P. (1968). Educational psychology. A cognitive view. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bandura, A. (1993). Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning. Educational Psychologist, 28, 117-148. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2802_3
10.1207/s15326985ep2802_3
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bayne, S., & Jandrić, P. (2017). From anthropocentric humanism to critical posthumanism in digital education. Knowledge Cultures, 5(2), 197–216.10.22381/KC52201712
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Blackley, S., & Howell, J. (2019). The Next Chapter in the STEM Education Narrative: Using Robotics to Support Programming and Coding, Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 44(4). http://dx.doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2018v44n4.4
10.14221/ajte.2018v44n4.4
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2012). Flip Your Classroom. Reach Every Student in Every Class Every Day. Washington DC: International Society for Technology in Education.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Berry, D.M., & Dieter, M. (Eds.) (2015). Postdigital aesthetics: Art, computation and design. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9781137437204
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Binkley, M., Erstad, O., Herman, J., Raizen, S., Ripley, M., Miller-Ricci, M., & Rumble, M. (2012). Defining twenty-first century skills. In P. Griffin, B. McGaw, & E. Care (Eds.), Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills (Vol. 1, pp. 17–66). Netherlands: Springer.10.1007/978-94-007-2324-5_2
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bishop, R., Gansing, K., Parikka, J., & Wilk, E. (Eds.) (2017). Across & beyond: A transmediale reader on post-digital practices, concepts, and institutions. Berlin: Sternberg Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bolter, D., & Grusin, R. (2000). Remediation: understanding new media. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cascone, K. (2000). The aesthetics of failure: ‘post-digital’ tendencies in contemporary computer music. Computer Music Journal, 24(4), 12–18. https://doi.org/10.1162/014892600559489
10.1162/014892600559489
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Coventry University. (2018). The centre for postdigital cultures (CPC). Retrieved from: http://www.coventry.ac.uk/research/areas-of-research/postdigital-cultures/
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Doppelt, Y. (2009). Assessing creative thinking in design-based learning. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 19(1), 55–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-006-9008-y
10.1007/s10798-006-9008-y
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dougherty, D. (2013). The Maker Mindset. In M. Honey, & D.E. Kanter (Eds.), Design, Make, Play: Growing the Next Generation of STEM Innovators (1st ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dougherty, D. (2016). Free to make: how the maker movement is changing our schools, our jobs, and our minds. Berkeley, CA: North Atlantic Books.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fishman, B., Penuel, W.R., Allen, A., & Cheng, B.H. (Eds.) (2013). Design-based implementation research: Theories, methods, and exemplars. National Society for the Study of Education Yearbook, 112(2). New York, NY: Teachers College Record.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Friday Institute for Educational Innovation (2012). Student Attitudes toward STEM SurveyUpper Elementary School Students. Raleigh: Author.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Giannandrea, L. (2021). Post umano, post digitale, terzo spazio. Riflessioni sulla didattica universitaria negli scenari che cambiano. In M. Stramaglia (Ed.), Pedagogia, didattica e futuro. Studi in onore di Michele Corsi. Lecce: Pensa MultiMedia.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gilbert, J. (2017). Educational makerspaces: disruptive, educative or neither. New Zealand Journal of Teachers’ Work, 14(2), 80–98.10.24135/teacherswork.v14i2.232
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gratani, F., & Giannandrea, L. (2021). Learning through practice: integrating the maker approach into primary school curriculum. EDULEARN21 Proceedings, 11378 - 11386. https://doi.org/10.21125/edulearn.2021.2372
10.21125/edulearn.2021.2372
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hall, G. (2013). Towards a post-digital humanities: Cultural analytics and the computational turn to data-driven scholarship. American Literature, 85(4), 781–809. http://dx.doi.org/10.1215/00029831-2367337
10.1215/00029831-2367337
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Halverson, E., & Sheridan, K. (2014). The Maker Movement in Education. Harvard Educational Review, 84(4), 495-504. http://dx.doi.org/10.17763/haer.84.4.34j1g68140382063
10.17763/haer.84.4.34j1g68140382063
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Martin, L. (2015). The Promise of the Maker Movement for Education. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research (J-PEER), 5(1), Article 4, 30-39. https://doi.org/10.7771/2157-9288.1099
10.7771/2157-9288.1099
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Martinez, S.L., & Stager, G. (2013). Invent to learn: Making tinkering and engineering in the classroom. Torrance, CA: Constructing Modern Knowledge Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
MIUR (2020). Valutazione periodica e finale degli apprendimenti delle alunne e degli alunni delle classi della scuola primaria. Retrieved from: https://www.istruzione.it/valutazione-scuola-primaria/allegati/ordinanza-172_4-12-2020.pdf
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Monoskop. (2018). Post-digital aesthetics. Retrieved from: https://monoskop.org/Post-digital_aesthetics
]Search in Google Scholar
[
UN (2015). Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Retrieved from: https://sdgs.un-.org/2030agenda
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pastorelli, C., & Picconi, L. (2001). Scala di Autoefficacia Scolastica Percepita. In G.V. Caprara (Ed.), La valutazione dell’autoefficacia (pp. 89-92). Trento: Erickson.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rossi, P.G. (2019). L’ambiente digitale come terzo spazio nella didattica universitaria. In P. Federighi, M. Ranieri & G. Bandini (Eds.), Digital scholarship tra ricerca e didattica. Studi, ricerche, esperienze (pp. 40-52). Milano: Fran-coAngeli.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rossi, P.G., Giannandrea, L., Gratani, F., Laici, C., Tarantino, A., & Paviotti, G. (2021). Assessment as learning: transforming practices with secondary school teachers. In L. Gómez Chova, A. López Martínez, I. Candel Torres (Eds.), ICERI2021 Proceedings (pp. 6543 – 6551). Valencia: IATED Academy. http://dx.doi.org/10.21125/iceri.2021.1483
10.21125/iceri.2021.1483
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Screpanti, L. (2020). Study, assessment and identification of Educational Robotics experiences at school. PhD Dissertation, Ancona, AN: Università Politecnica delle Marche.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Spiller, N. (2009). Plectic architecture: Towards a theory of the post-digital in architecture. Technoetic Arts: A Journal of Speculative Research, 7(2), 95–104. http://dx.doi.org/10.1386/tear.7.2.95/1
10.1386/tear.7.2.95/1
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Taffel, S. (2016). Perspectives on the postdigital: Beyond rhetorics of progress and novelty. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 22(3), 324–338. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856514567827
10.1177/1354856514567827
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Vinatier, I. (2013). Le travail de l’enseignant. Une approche par la didactique professionnelle. Bruxelles: DeBoeck.
]Search in Google Scholar
, 