[
Bergmann, J. & Sams, A. (2012). Flip Your Classroom. Reach Every Student in Every Class Every Day. Washington: ISTE.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Biscaro, F., & Maglioni, M. (2014). La classe capovolta. Innovare la didattica con la flipped classroom, Trento: Erickson.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bonnes. C., Leiser. C., Schmidt-Hertha. B., Rott. K.J., Hochholdinger. S. (2020), The relationship between trainers’ media-didactical competence and media-didactical self-efficacy, attitudes and use of digital media in training, International Journal of Training and Development, 24, 1, 74-88.10.1111/ijtd.12171
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Carenzio, A., Marangi, M., Miranda, I., & Veronelli, A. (2021). Corpo, tecnologia, comunità, In Rivoltella, P. C. (Ed.), La scala e il tempio. Metodi e strumenti per costruire comunità con le tecnologie. (55-74). Milano: Franco Angeli.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Demetrio, D. (2020). Micropedagogia. La ricerca qualitativa in educazione. Milano: Raffaello Cortina.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hargreaves, A., Lieberman, A., Fullan, M., Hopkins, D. (Eds.) (2010). Second International Handbook of Educational Change. Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/978-90-481-2660-6
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fullan, M. (2011). Change Leader: Learning to do what matters most. U.S.A: Jossey-Bass Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hattie, J. (2009). Visible Learning: A Synthesis of Over 800 Meta-Analyses Relating to Achievement. London-New York: Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jenkins, H. et. al. (2009). Confronting the Challenges of Participatory Culture. Media Education of the 2st Century, Cambridge (MA): MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/8435.001.0001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Manzini, E. (2018). Politiche del quotidiano. Roma: Edizioni Comunità.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Moore, G. M. (1995). The Death of Distance, The American Journal of Distance Education, IX, 3, 1-4.10.1080/08923649509526893
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Nanz, P., & Fritsche, M. (2012). La partecipazione dei cittadini: un manuale. Metodi partecipativi: protagonisti, opportunità e limiti. Bonn: Bundeszentrale.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Niederhauser, D.S., Perkmen, S. (2008). Validation of the intrapersonal technology integration scale: Assessing the influence of intrapersonal factors that influence technology integration, Computers in the Schools, 25, 98-111.10.1080/07380560802157956
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rivoltella, P. C. (2021). La scala e il tempio. Metodi e strumenti per costruire comunità con le tecnologie. Milano: Franco Angeli.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Smith, S.U, Hayes, S., & Shea, P. (2017). A Critical Review of the Use of Wenger’s Community of Practice (CoP) Theoretical Framework in Online and Blended Learning Research. 2000-2014, Online Learning, (21) 1, 209-237.10.24059/olj.v21i1.963
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Spinelli, A. (2016). Processi formativi per i volontari di protezione civile: il modello Anpas Nazionale, EPALE Journal on Adult Learning and Continuing Education, 5, 23-28.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Spinelli, A. (2019). La formazione nel volontariato fra realtà e possibilità. Milano: Franco Angeli.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Trinchero, R. (2004). I metodi della ricerca educativa. Roma-Bari: Laterza.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wadmany, R., Kliachko, S. (2014). The Significance of Digital Pedagogy: Teachers’ Perceptions and the Factors Influencing their Abilities as Digital Pedagogues, i-manager’s Journal of Educational Technology, 11, 3, 22-33.10.26634/jet.11.3.3007
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511803932
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wenger, E. (2000). Communities of practice and social learning systems, Organization, 7(2), 225–246.10.1177/135050840072002
]Search in Google Scholar
