<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">

This paper presents a qualitative–quantitative study that investigates whether an active and collaborative design can help university students positively evaluate the course, even in a large-size online class for special ed teachers.
The analysis of the collected data (a fact-finding questionnaire created on purpose; a standard questionnaire for the course evaluation; field notes, design documentation; a class climate analysis questionnaire; an individual opinion poll about the educational activities; in-chat reflections of trainees) clearly testifies that trainees greatly appreciated the active and collaborative design. Some of the students hoped to be able to repeat a similar instructional design in their own classes, even though they underlined that this type of design often requires much more commitment, for the student and the teacher, than what is foreseen by the recognised credits.
The results that can be achieved, in terms of Students’ Evaluation of Teaching (SET), are relevant if the teacher is properly trained to the introduction of pedagogical innovation, as also recalled by the European Union.
</abstract>

This paper presents a qualitative–quantitative study that investigates whether an active and collaborative design can help university students positively evaluate the course, even in a large-size online class for special ed teachers.
The analysis of the collected data (a fact-finding questionnaire created on purpose; a standard questionnaire for the course evaluation; field notes, design documentation; a class climate analysis questionnaire; an individual opinion poll about the educational activities; in-chat reflections of trainees) clearly testifies that trainees greatly appreciated the active and collaborative design. Some of the students hoped to be able to repeat a similar instructional design in their own classes, even though they underlined that this type of design often requires much more commitment, for the student and the teacher, than what is foreseen by the recognised credits.
The results that can be achieved, in terms of Students’ Evaluation of Teaching (SET), are relevant if the teacher is properly trained to the introduction of pedagogical innovation, as also recalled by the European Union.

Online and active learning design in large-size classes: a phenomenological study

University of Verona and University of Trento

Research on Education and Media

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

This paper presents a qualitative–quantitative study that investigates whether an active and collaborative design can help university students positively...

Online and active learning design in large-size classes: a phenomenological study

Data publikacji: 15 gru 2022

Zakres stron: 22 - 32

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/rem-2022-0018

Słowa kluczowe
eLearning, curriculum development, teacher education, group learning, university

© 2022 Giovanna Malusà et al., published by Sciendo

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Online and active learning design in large-size classes: a phenomenological study

Data publikacji: 15 gru 2022

Zakres stron: 22 - 32

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/rem-2022-0018

Słowa kluczoweeLearning, curriculum development, teacher education, group learning, university

© 2022 Giovanna Malusà et al., published by Sciendo

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Słowa kluczowe
eLearning, curriculum development, teacher education, group learning, university