The implementation of a robotic surgical platform for the treatment of patients with malignant or pre-malignant pancreatic tumors at the University Medical Center Ljubljana
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Hays SB, Rojas AE, Hogg ME. Robotic pancreas surgery for pancreatic cancer. Int J Surg 2024; 110: 6100-10. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000000906HaysSBRojasAEHoggME.Robotic pancreas surgery for pancreatic cancer. Int J Surg2024; 110: 6100-10. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000000906Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Roulin D, McCarron FN, Chirichella TJ, Martinieet JB. Robotic pancreatic surgery: current status and techniques. Curr Surg Rep 2024; 12: 1-7. doi: 10.1007/s40137-023-00381-wRoulinDMcCarronFNChirichellaTJMartinieetJB.Robotic pancreatic surgery: current status and techniques. Curr Surg Rep2024; 12: 1-7. doi: 10.1007/s40137-023-00381-wOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar
Zhang T, Zhao ZM, Gao YX, Lau WY, Liu R. The learning curve for a surgeon in robot-assisted laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: a retrospective study in a high-volume pancreatic center. Surg Endosc 2019; 33: 2927-33. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6595-0ZhangTZhaoZMGaoYXLauWYLiuR.The learning curve for a surgeon in robot-assisted laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: a retrospective study in a high-volume pancreatic center. Surg Endosc2019; 33: 2927-33. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6595-0Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Shyr BU, Chen SC, Shyr YM, Wang SE. Learning curves for robotic pancreatic surgery-from distal pancreatectomy to pancreaticoduodenectomy. Medicine 2018; 97: e13000. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000013000ShyrBUChenSCShyrYMWangSE.Learning curves for robotic pancreatic surgery-from distal pancreatectomy to pancreaticoduodenectomy. Medicine2018; 97: e13000. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000013000Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Shakir M, Boone BA, Polanco PM, Zenati MS, Hogg ME, Tsung A, et al. The learning curve for robotic distal pancreatectomy: an analysis of outcomes of the first 100 consecutive cases at a high-volume pancreatic centre. HPB (Oxford) 2015; 17: 580-6. doi: 10.1111/hpb.12412ShakirMBooneBAPolancoPMZenatiMSHoggMETsungAThe learning curve for robotic distal pancreatectomy: an analysis of outcomes of the first 100 consecutive cases at a high-volume pancreatic centre. HPB (Oxford)2015; 17: 580-6. doi: 10.1111/hpb.12412Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Müller-Debus CF, Thomaschewski M, Zimmermann M, Wellner UF, Bausch D, Keck T. Robot-assisted pancreatic surgery: a structured approach to standardization of a program and of the operation. Visc Med 2020; 36: 104-12. doi: 10.1159/000506909Müller-DebusCFThomaschewskiMZimmermannMWellnerUFBauschDKeckT.Robot-assisted pancreatic surgery: a structured approach to standardization of a program and of the operation. Visc Med2020; 36: 104-12. doi: 10.1159/000506909Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Torphy RJ, Fujiwara Y, Schulick RD. Pancreatic cancer treatment: better, but a long way to go. Surg Today 2020; 50: 1117-25. doi: 10.1007/s00595-020- 02028-0TorphyRJFujiwaraYSchulickRD.Pancreatic cancer treatment: better, but a long way to go. Surg Today2020; 50: 1117-25. doi: 10.1007/s00595-020- 02028-0Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Augustinus S, Mackay TM, Andersson B, Beane JD, Busch OR, Gleeson EM, et al. Ideal outcome after pancreatoduodenectomy: a transatlantic evaluation of a harmonized composite outcome measure. Ann Surg 2023; 278: 740-7. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000006037AugustinusSMackayTMAnderssonBBeaneJDBuschORGleesonEMIdeal outcome after pancreatoduodenectomy: a transatlantic evaluation of a harmonized composite outcome measure. Ann Surg2023; 278: 740-7. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000006037Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Russell TB, Aroori S. Procedure-specific morbidity of pancreatoduodenectomy: a systematic review of incidence and risk factors. ANZ J Surg 2022; 92: 1347-55. doi: 10.1111/ans.17473RussellTBArooriS.Procedure-specific morbidity of pancreatoduodenectomy: a systematic review of incidence and risk factors. ANZ J Surg2022; 92: 1347-55. doi: 10.1111/ans.17473Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Ayasun R, Saridogan T, Gaber O, Sahin IH. Systemic therapy for patients with pancreatic cancer: current approaches and opportunities for novel avenues toward precision medicine. Clin Colorectal Cancer 2023; 22: 2-11. doi: 10.1016/j.clcc.2022.11.001AyasunRSaridoganTGaberOSahinIH.Systemic therapy for patients with pancreatic cancer: current approaches and opportunities for novel avenues toward precision medicine. Clin Colorectal Cancer2023; 22: 2-11. doi: 10.1016/j.clcc.2022.11.001Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Dulan G, Rege RV, Hogg DC, Gilberg-Fisher KM, Arain NA, Tesfay ST, et al. Developing a comprehensive, proficiency-based training program for robotic surgery. Surgery 2012; 152: 477-88. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2012.07.028DulanGRegeRVHoggDCGilberg-FisherKMArainNATesfaySTDeveloping a comprehensive, proficiency-based training program for robotic surgery. Surgery2012; 152: 477-88. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2012.07.028Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Radi I, Tellez JC, Alterio RE, Scott DJ, Sankaranarayanan G, Nagaraj MB, et al. Feasibility, effectiveness and transferability of a novel mastery-based virtual reality robotic training platform for general surgery residents. Surg Endosc 2022; 36: 7279-87. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09106-zRadiITellezJCAlterioREScottDJSankaranarayananGNagarajMBFeasibility, effectiveness and transferability of a novel mastery-based virtual reality robotic training platform for general surgery residents. Surg Endosc2022; 36: 7279-87. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09106-zOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar
Martin JA, Regehr G, Reznick R, MacRae H, Murnaghan J, Hutchison C, et al. Objective structured assessment of technical skill (OSATS) for surgical residents. Br J Surg 1997; 84: 273-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.1997.02502.xMartinJARegehrGReznickRMacRaeHMurnaghanJHutchisonCObjective structured assessment of technical skill (OSATS) for surgical residents. Br J Surg1997; 84: 273-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.1997.02502.xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar
Rail B, Abreu AA, Farah E, Scott DJ, Sankaranarayanan G, Zeh HJ 3rd, et al. Learning curve of a robotic bio-tissue intestinal anastomosis: implications for surgical training curricula. J Surg Educ 2024; 81: 103296. doi: 10.1016/j. jsurg.2024.09.015RailBAbreuAAFarahEScottDJSankaranarayananGZehHJ3rdLearning curve of a robotic bio-tissue intestinal anastomosis: implications for surgical training curricula. J Surg Educ2024; 81: 103296. doi: 10.1016/j. jsurg.2024.09.015Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Al Abbas AI, Zeh Iii HJ, Polanco PM. State of the art robotic distal pancreatectomy: a review of the literature. Updates Surg 2021; 73: 881-91. doi: 10.1007/s13304-021-01070-yAl AbbasAIZeh IiiHJPolancoPM.State of the art robotic distal pancreatectomy: a review of the literature. Updates Surg2021; 73: 881-91. doi: 10.1007/s13304-021-01070-yOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar
Giulianotti PC, Mangano A, Bustos RE, Gheza F, Fernandes E, Masrur MA, et al. Operative technique in robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy (RPD) at University of Illinois at Chicago (UIC): 17 steps standardized technique: lessons learned since the first worldwide RPD performed in the year 2001. Surg Endosc 2018; 32: 4329-36. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6228-7GiulianottiPCManganoABustosREGhezaFFernandesEMasrurMAOperative technique in robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy (RPD) at University of Illinois at Chicago (UIC): 17 steps standardized technique: lessons learned since the first worldwide RPD performed in the year 2001. Surg Endosc2018; 32: 4329-36. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6228-7Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Inoue Y, Sato T, Kato T, Oba A, Ono Y, Mise Y, et al. Reproduction of modified Blumgart pancreaticojejunostomy in a robotic environment: a simple clipless technique. Surg Endosc 2022; 36: 8684-9. doi: 10.1007/s00464- 022-09397-2InoueYSatoTKatoTObaAOnoYMiseYReproduction of modified Blumgart pancreaticojejunostomy in a robotic environment: a simple clipless technique. Surg Endosc2022; 36: 8684-9. doi: 10.1007/s00464- 022-09397-2Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Søreide K. A formula for survival in surgery. Patient Saf Surg 2023; 17: 13. doi: 10.1186/s13037-023-00362-zSøreideK.A formula for survival in surgery. Patient Saf Surg2023; 17: 13. doi: 10.1186/s13037-023-00362-zOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar
Asbun HJ, Moekotte AL, Vissers FL, Kunzler F, Cipriani F, Alseidi A, et al. The Miami international evidence-based guidelines on minimally invasive pancreas resection. Ann Surg 2020; 271: 1-14. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003590AsbunHJMoekotteALVissersFLKunzlerFCiprianiFAlseidiAThe Miami international evidence-based guidelines on minimally invasive pancreas resection. Ann Surg2020; 271: 1-14. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003590Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Abu Hilal M, van Ramshorst TME, Boggi U, Dokmak S, Edwin B, Keck T, et al. The Brescia internationally validated european guidelines on minimally invasive pancreatic surgery (EGUMIPS). Ann Surg 2024; 279: 45-57. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000006006Abu HilalMvan RamshorstTMEBoggiUDokmakSEdwinBKeckTThe Brescia internationally validated european guidelines on minimally invasive pancreatic surgery (EGUMIPS). Ann Surg2024; 279: 45-57. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000006006Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Niu X, Yu B, Yao L, Tian J, Guo T, Ma S, et al. Comparison of surgical outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy versus laparoscopic and open resections: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Asian J Surg 2019; 42: 32-45. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2018.08.011NiuXYuBYaoLTianJGuoTMaSComparison of surgical outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy versus laparoscopic and open resections: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Asian J Surg2019; 42: 32-45. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2018.08.011Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Zhao W, Liu C, Li S, Geng D, Feng Y, Sun M. Safety and efficacy for robot-assisted versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy and distal pancreatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Oncol 2018; 27: 468-78. doi: 10.1016/j.suronc.2018.06.001ZhaoWLiuCLiSGengDFengYSunM.Safety and efficacy for robot-assisted versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy and distal pancreatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Oncol2018; 27: 468-78. doi: 10.1016/j.suronc.2018.06.001Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Vining CC, Kuchta K, Berger Y, Paterakos P, Schuitevoerder D, Roggin KK, et al. Robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy decreases the risk of clinically relevant post-operative pancreatic fistula: a propensity score matched NSQIP analysis. HPB (Oxford) 2021; 23: 367-78. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2020.07.004ViningCCKuchtaKBergerYPaterakosPSchuitevoerderDRogginKKRobotic pancreaticoduodenectomy decreases the risk of clinically relevant post-operative pancreatic fistula: a propensity score matched NSQIP analysis. HPB (Oxford)2021; 23: 367-78. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2020.07.004Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Da Dong X, Felsenreich DM, Gogna S, Rojas A, Zhang E, Dong M, et al. Robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy provides better histopathological outcomes as compared to its open counterpart: a meta-analysis. Sci Rep 2021; 11: 3774. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-83391-xDa DongXFelsenreichDMGognaSRojasAZhangEDongMRobotic pancreaticoduodenectomy provides better histopathological outcomes as compared to its open counterpart: a meta-analysis. Sci Rep2021; 11: 3774. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-83391-xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar
Zureikat AH, Beane JD, Zenati MS, Al Abbas AI, Boone BA, Moser AJ, et al. 500 minimally invasive robotic pancreatoduodenectomies: one decade of optimizing performance. Ann Surg 2021; 273: 966-72. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003550ZureikatAHBeaneJDZenatiMSAl AbbasAIBooneBAMoserAJ500 minimally invasive robotic pancreatoduodenectomies: one decade of optimizing performance. Ann Surg2021; 273: 966-72. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003550Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Bencini L, Moraldi L, Miceli E, Risaliti M, Tofani L, Buccianti S, et al. Robotic versus open distal pancreatectomy: a propensity score matching analysis. Int J Med Robot 2024; 20: e70025. doi: 10.1002/rcs.70025BenciniLMoraldiLMiceliERisalitiMTofaniLBucciantiSRobotic versus open distal pancreatectomy: a propensity score matching analysis. Int J Med Robot2024; 20: e70025. doi: 10.1002/rcs.70025Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Korrel M, Jones LR, van Hilst J, Balzano G, Björnsson B, Boggi U, et al. Minimally invasive versus open distal pancreatectomy for resectable pancreatic cancer (DIPLOMA): an international randomised non-inferiority trial. Lancet Reg Health Eur 2023; 31: 100673. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2023.100673KorrelMJonesLRvan HilstJBalzanoGBjörnssonBBoggiUMinimally invasive versus open distal pancreatectomy for resectable pancreatic cancer (DIPLOMA): an international randomised non-inferiority trial. Lancet Reg Health Eur2023; 31: 100673. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2023.100673Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Korrel M, van Hilst J, Bosscha K, Busch ORC, Daams F, van Dam R, et al. Nationwide use and outcome of minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy in IDEAL Stage IV following a training program and randomized trial. Ann Surg 2024; 279: 323-30. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005900KorrelMvan HilstJBosschaKBuschORCDaamsFvan DamRNationwide use and outcome of minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy in IDEAL Stage IV following a training program and randomized trial. Ann Surg2024; 279: 323-30. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005900Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Vining CC, Hogg ME. How to train and evaluate minimally invasive pancreas surgery. J Surg Oncol 2020; 122: 41-8. doi: 10.1002/jso.25912ViningCCHoggME.How to train and evaluate minimally invasive pancreas surgery. J Surg Oncol2020; 122: 41-8. doi: 10.1002/jso.25912Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Santok GD, Raheem AA, Kim LH, Chang K, Chung BH, Choi YD, et al. Proctorship and mentoring: its backbone and application in robotic surgery. Investig Clin Urol 2016; 57(Suppl 2): S114-20. doi: 10.4111/icu.2016.57. S2.S114SantokGDRaheemAAKimLHChangKChungBHChoiYDProctorship and mentoring: its backbone and application in robotic surgery. Investig Clin Urol2016; 57(Suppl 2): S114-20. doi: 10.4111/icu.2016.57. S2.S114Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Radi I, Tellez JC, Alterio RE, Scott DJ, Sankaranarayanan G, Nagaraj MB, et al. Feasibility, effectiveness and transferability of a novel mastery-based virtual reality robotic training platform for general surgery residents. Surg Endosc 2022; 36: 7279-87. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09106-zRadiITellezJCAlterioREScottDJSankaranarayananGNagarajMBFeasibility, effectiveness and transferability of a novel mastery-based virtual reality robotic training platform for general surgery residents. Surg Endosc2022; 36: 7279-87. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09106-zOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar
Abreu AA, Rail B, Farah E, Alterio RE, Scott DJ, Sankaranarayanan G, et al. Baseline performance in a robotic virtual reality platform predicts rate of skill acquisition in a proficiency-based curriculum: a cohort study of surgical trainees. Surg Endosc 2023; 37: 8804-9. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10372-8AbreuAARailBFarahEAlterioREScottDJSankaranarayananGBaseline performance in a robotic virtual reality platform predicts rate of skill acquisition in a proficiency-based curriculum: a cohort study of surgical trainees. Surg Endosc2023; 37: 8804-9. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10372-8Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Karadza E, Haney CM, Limen EF, Müller PC, Kowalewski KF, Sandini M, et al. Development of biotissue training models for anastomotic suturing in pancreatic surgery. HPB (Oxford) 2023; 25: 625-35. doi: 10.1016/j. hpb.2023.02.002KaradzaEHaneyCMLimenEFMüllerPCKowalewskiKFSandiniMDevelopment of biotissue training models for anastomotic suturing in pancreatic surgery. HPB (Oxford)2023; 25: 625-35. doi: 10.1016/j. hpb.2023.02.002Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Cumpanas AA, Bardan R, Ferician OC, Latcu SC, Duta C, Lazar FO. Does previous open surgical experience have any influence on robotic surgery simulation exercises? Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne 2017; 12: 366-71. doi: 10.5114/wiitm.2017.72320CumpanasAABardanRFericianOCLatcuSCDutaCLazarFO.Does previous open surgical experience have any influence on robotic surgery simulation exercises?Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne2017; 12: 366-71. doi: 10.5114/wiitm.2017.72320Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Chahal B, Aydın A, Amin MSA, Ong K, Khan A, Khan MS, et al. Transfer of open and laparoscopic skills to robotic surgery: a systematic review. J Robot Surg 2023; 17: 1207-25. doi: 10.1007/s11701-022-01492-9ChahalBAydınAAminMSAOngKKhanAKhanMSTransfer of open and laparoscopic skills to robotic surgery: a systematic review. J Robot Surg2023; 17: 1207-25. doi: 10.1007/s11701-022-01492-9Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Boone BA, Zenati M, Hogg ME, Steve J, Moser AJ, Bartlett DL, et al. Assessment of quality outcomes for robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy: identification of the learning curve. JAMA Surg 2015; 150: 416-22. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2015.17BooneBAZenatiMHoggMESteveJMoserAJBartlettDLAssessment of quality outcomes for robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy: identification of the learning curve. JAMA Surg2015; 150: 416-22. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2015.17Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Chen S, Chen JZ, Zhan Q, Deng XX, Shen BY, Peng CH, et al. Robot-assisted laparoscopic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy: a prospective, matched, mid-term follow-up study. Surg Endosc 2015; 29: 3698-711. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4140-yChenSChenJZZhanQDengXXShenBYPengCHRobot-assisted laparoscopic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy: a prospective, matched, mid-term follow-up study. Surg Endosc2015; 29: 3698-711. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4140-yOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar
Napoli N, Kauffmann EF, Palmeri M, Miccoli M, Costa F, Vistoli F, et al. The learning curve in robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy. Dig Surg 2016; 33: 299-307. doi: 10.1159/000445015NapoliNKauffmannEFPalmeriMMiccoliMCostaFVistoliFThe learning curve in robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy. Dig Surg2016; 33: 299-307. doi: 10.1159/000445015Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Benizri EI, Germain A, Ayav A, Bernard JL, Zarnegar R, Benchimol D, et al. Short-term perioperative outcomes after robot-assisted and laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy. J Robot Surg 2014; 8: 125-32. doi: 10.1007/s11701- 013-0438-8BenizriEIGermainAAyavABernardJLZarnegarRBenchimolDShort-term perioperative outcomes after robot-assisted and laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy. J Robot Surg2014; 8: 125-32. doi: 10.1007/s11701- 013-0438-8Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Fung G, Sha M, Kunduzi B, Froghi F, Rehman S, Froghi S. Learning curves in minimally invasive pancreatic surgery: a systematic review. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2022; 407: 2217-32. doi: 10.1007/s00423-022-02470-3FungGShaMKunduziBFroghiFRehmanSFroghiS.Learning curves in minimally invasive pancreatic surgery: a systematic review. Langenbecks Arch Surg2022; 407: 2217-32. doi: 10.1007/s00423-022-02470-3Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Zwart MJW, Nota CLM, de Rooij T, van Hilst J, Te Riele WW, van Santvoort HC, et al. Outcomes of a multicenter training program in robotic pancreatoduodenectomy (LAELAPS-3). Ann Surg 2022; 276: e886-95. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004783ZwartMJWNotaCLMde RooijTvan HilstJTe RieleWWvan SantvoortHCOutcomes of a multicenter training program in robotic pancreatoduodenectomy (LAELAPS-3). Ann Surg2022; 276: e886-95. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004783Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Zwart MJW, van den Broek B, de Graaf N, Suurmeijer JA, Augustinus S, Te Riele WW, et al. The feasibility, proficiency, and mastery learning curves in 635 robotic pancreatoduodenectomies following a multicenter training program: “Standing on the shoulders of giants”. Ann Surg 2023; 278: e1232-41. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005928ZwartMJWvan den BroekBde GraafNSuurmeijerJAAugustinusSTe RieleWWThe feasibility proficiency, and mastery learning curves in 635 robotic pancreatoduodenectomies following a multicenter training program: “Standing on the shoulders of giants”. Ann Surg2023; 278: e1232-41. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005928Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Farrugia A, Muhammad QR, Ravichandran NT, Ali M, Marangoni G, Ahmad J. Proposed training pathway with initial experience to set up robotic hepatobiliary and pancreatic service. J Robot Surg 2022; 16: 65-71. doi: 10.1007/s11701-021-01207-6FarrugiaAMuhammadQRRavichandranNTAliMMarangoniGAhmadJ.Proposed training pathway with initial experience to set up robotic hepatobiliary and pancreatic service. J Robot Surg2022; 16: 65-71. doi: 10.1007/s11701-021-01207-6Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Dall’Olio T, Perri G, Reese T, Sparrelid E, Gilg S. Implementation of a robotic hepato-pancreato-biliary surgery program: a Swedish referral center’s experience. J Robot Surg 2025; 19: 101. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02241-4Dall’OlioTPerriGReeseTSparrelidEGilgS.Implementation of a robotic hepato-pancreato-biliary surgery program: a Swedish referral center’s experience. J Robot Surg2025; 19: 101. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02241-4Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Wang J, Lu P, Armstrong M, El-Hayek K, Cleary S, Asbun H, et al. Advancing minimally invasive hepato-pancreato-biliary surgery: ensuring safety with implementation. Surg Endosc 2024; 38: 4365-73. doi: 10.1007/s00464- 024-10957-xWangJLuPArmstrongMEl-HayekKClearySAsbunHAdvancing minimally invasive hepato-pancreato-biliary surgery: ensuring safety with implementation. Surg Endosc2024; 38: 4365-73. doi: 10.1007/s00464- 024-10957-xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar
Takagi K, Umeda Y, Yoshida R, Yagi T, Fujiwara T, Zureikat AH, et al. Surgical training model and safe implementation of robotic pancreatoduodenectomy in Japan: a technical note. World J Surg Oncol 2021; 19: 55. doi: 10.1186/s12957-021-02167-9TakagiKUmedaYYoshidaRYagiTFujiwaraTZureikatAHSurgical training model and safe implementation of robotic pancreatoduodenectomy in Japan: a technical note. World J Surg Oncol2021; 19: 55. doi: 10.1186/s12957-021-02167-9Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Søreide JA, Sandvik OM, Søreide K. Improving pancreas surgery over time: performance factors related to transition of care and patient volume. Int J Surg 2016; 32: 116-22. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.06.046SøreideJASandvikOMSøreideK.Improving pancreas surgery over time: performance factors related to transition of care and patient volume. Int J Surg2016; 32: 116-22. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.06.046Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Panni RZ, Panni UY, Liu J, Williams GA, Fields RC, Sanford DE, et al. Redefining a high volume center for pancreaticoduodenectomy. HPB (Oxford) 2021; 23: 733-8. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2020.09.009PanniRZPanniUYLiuJWilliamsGAFieldsRCSanfordDERedefining a high volume center for pancreaticoduodenectomy. HPB (Oxford)2021; 23: 733-8. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2020.09.009Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Latenstein AEJ, Mackay TM, van der Geest LGM, van Eijck CHJ, de Meijer VE, Stommel MWJ, et al. Effect of centralization and regionalization of pancreatic surgery on resection rates and survival. Br J Surg 2021; 108: 826-33. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znaa146LatensteinAEJMackayTMvan der GeestLGMvan EijckCHJde MeijerVEStommelMWJEffect of centralization and regionalization of pancreatic surgery on resection rates and survival. Br J Surg2021; 108: 826-33. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znaa146Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Wu CH, Chien KL, Lin JW, Tien YW. Superior surgical outcomes in high-volume centers despite longer waiting times for curative pancreatic surgery compared to shorter waits in low-volume centers: a population-based study. Curr Probl Surg 2025; 62: 101674. doi: 10.1016/j.cpsurg.2024.101674WuCHChienKLLinJWTienYW.Superior surgical outcomes in high-volume centers despite longer waiting times for curative pancreatic surgery compared to shorter waits in low-volume centers: a population-based study. Curr Probl Surg2025; 62: 101674. doi: 10.1016/j.cpsurg.2024.101674Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Sinyard RD, Rentas CM, Gunn EG, Etheridge JC, Robertson JM, Gleason A, et al. Managing a team in the operating room: the science of teamwork and non-technical skills for surgeons. Curr Probl Surg. 2022; 59: 101172. doi: 10.1016/j.cpsurg.2022.101172SinyardRDRentasCMGunnEGEtheridgeJCRobertsonJMGleasonAManaging a team in the operating room: the science of teamwork and non-technical skills for surgeons. Curr Probl Surg. 2022; 59: 101172. doi: 10.1016/j.cpsurg.2022.101172Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Mahendran V, Turpin L, Boal M, Francis NK. Assessment and application of non-technical skills in robotic-assisted surgery: a systematic review. Surg Endosc 2024; 38: 1758-74. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-10713-1MahendranVTurpinLBoalMFrancisNK.Assessment and application of non-technical skills in robotic-assisted surgery: a systematic review. Surg Endosc2024; 38: 1758-74. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-10713-1Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
