Patient survival after resection of skeletal metastases and endoprosthetic reconstruction: a nation-wide cohort study in a single oncological institution
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Gosheger G, Gebert C, Ahrens H, Streitbuerger A, Winkelmann W, Hardes J. Endoprosthetic reconstruction in 250 patients with sarcoma. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006; 450: 164-71. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000223978.36831.39GoshegerGGebertCAhrensHStreitbuergerAWinkelmannWHardesJ.Endoprosthetic reconstruction in 250 patients with sarcoma. Clin Orthop Relat Res2006; 450: 164-71. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000223978.36831.39Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Batta V, Coathup MJ, Parratt MT, Pollock RC, Aston WJ, Cannon SR, et al. Uncemented, custom-made, hydroxyapatitecoated collared distal femoral endoprostheses: Up to 18 years’ follow-up. Bone Joint J 2014; 96-B: 263-9. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.96B2.32091BattaVCoathupMJParrattMTPollockRCAstonWJCannonSRUncemented, custom-made, hydroxyapatitecoated collared distal femoral endoprostheses: Up to 18 years’ follow-up. Bone Joint J2014; 96-B: 263-9. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.96B2.32091Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Pala E, Trovarelli G, Angelini A, Maraldi M, Berizzi A, Ruggieri P. Megaprosthesis of the knee in tumor and revision surgery. Acta Biomed 2017; 88(2S): 129-38. doi: 10.23750/abm.v88i2-S.6523PalaETrovarelliGAngeliniAMaraldiMBerizziARuggieriP.Megaprosthesis of the knee in tumor and revision surgery. Acta Biomed2017; 88(2S): 129-38. doi: 10.23750/abm.v88i2-S.6523Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Sevelda F, Schuh R, Hofstaetter JG, Schinhan M, Windhager R, Funovics PT. Total femur replacement after tumor resection: Limb salvage usually achieved but complications and failures are common. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2015; 473: 2079-87. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4282-1SeveldaFSchuhRHofstaetterJGSchinhanMWindhagerRFunovicsPT.Total femur replacement after tumor resection: Limb salvage usually achieved but complications and failures are common. Clin Orthop Relat Res2015; 473: 2079-87. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4282-1Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Sørensen MS, Gerds TA, Hindsø K, Petersen MM. External validation and optimization of the spring model for prediction of survival after surgical treatment of bone metastases of the extremities. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2018; 476: 1591-9. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000534678.44152.eeSørensenMSGerdsTAHindsøKPetersenMM.External validation and optimization of the spring model for prediction of survival after surgical treatment of bone metastases of the extremities. Clin Orthop Relat Res2018; 476: 1591-9. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000534678.44152.eeOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar
Novak M, Blatnik O, Pižem J, Zagar T, Jagodic M, Zadravec Zaletel L, et al. Recommendations for the diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of patients with soft tissue and bone sarcomas. Onkologija 2018; 22: 52-81. doi: 10.25670/oi2018-022onNovakMBlatnikOPižemJZagarTJagodicMZadravec ZaletelLRecommendations for the diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of patients with soft tissue and bone sarcomas. Onkologija2018; 22: 52-81. doi: 10.25670/oi2018-022onOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar
Gebert C, Wessling M, Götze C, Gosheger G, Hardes J. The Modular Universal Tumour and Revision System (MUTARS®) in endoprosthetic revision surgery. Int Orthop 2010; 34: 1261-5. doi: 10.1007/s00264-010-1007-7GebertCWesslingMGötzeCGoshegerGHardesJ.The Modular Universal Tumour and Revision System (MUTARS®) in endoprosthetic revision surgery. Int Orthop2010; 34: 1261-5. doi: 10.1007/s00264-010-1007-7Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Hardes J, Henrichs MP, Gosheger G, Gebert C, Höll S, Dieckmann R, Hauschild G, et al. Endoprosthetic replacement after extraarticular resection of bone and soft-tissue tumours around the knee. Bone Joint J 2013; 95-B: 1425-1431. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.95B10.31740HardesJHenrichsMPGoshegerGGebertCHöllSDieckmannRHauschildGEndoprosthetic replacement after extraarticular resection of bone and soft-tissue tumours around the knee. Bone Joint J2013; 95-B: 1425-1431. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.95B10.31740Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Choi HS, Nho JH, Kim CH, Kwon SW, Park JS, Suh YS. Revision arthroplasty using a MUTARS® prosthesis in comminuted periprosthetic fracture of the distal femur. Yonsei Med J 2016; 57: 1517-22. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2016.57.6.1517ChoiHSNhoJHKimCHKwonSWParkJSSuhYS.Revision arthroplasty using a MUTARS® prosthesis in comminuted periprosthetic fracture of the distal femur. Yonsei Med J2016; 57: 1517-22. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2016.57.6.1517Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Schmolders J, Koob S, Schepers P, Gravius S, Wirtz DC, Burger C, et al. The role of a Modular Universal Tumour and Revision System (MUTARS®) in lower limb endoprosthetic revision surgery-Outcome analysis of 25 patients. Z Orthop Unfall 2017; 155: 61-6. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-114704SchmoldersJKoobSSchepersPGraviusSWirtzDCBurgerCThe role of a Modular Universal Tumour and Revision System (MUTARS®) in lower limb endoprosthetic revision surgery-Outcome analysis of 25 patients. Z Orthop Unfall2017; 155: 61-6. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-114704Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Kamiński P, Szmyd J, Ambroży J, Jaworski JM, Frańczuk B. Comparison of outcomes of treatment with resection prosthesis of the hip in revision and oncological surgery. Ortop Traumatol Rehabil 2017; 19: 145-56. doi: 10.5604/15093492.1238002KamińskiPSzmydJAmbrożyJJaworskiJMFrańczukB.Comparison of outcomes of treatment with resection prosthesis of the hip in revision and oncological surgery. Ortop Traumatol Rehabil2017; 19: 145-56. doi: 10.5604/15093492.1238002Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Hardes J, Henrichs MP, Gosheger G, Guder W, Nottrott M, Andreou D, et al. Tumour endoprosthesis replacement in the proximal tibia after intraarticular knee resection in patients with sarcoma and recurrent giant cell tumour. Int Orthop 2018; 42: 2475-81. doi: 10.1007/s00264-018-3893-zHardesJHenrichsMPGoshegerGGuderWNottrottMAndreouDTumour endoprosthesis replacement in the proximal tibia after intraarticular knee resection in patients with sarcoma and recurrent giant cell tumour. Int Orthop2018; 42: 2475-81. doi: 10.1007/s00264-018-3893-zOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar
Heisel C, Kinkel S, Bernd L, Ewerbeck V. Megaprostheses for the treatment of malignant bone tumours of the lower limbs. Int Orthop 2006; 30: 452-7. doi: 10.1007/s00264-006-0207-7HeiselCKinkelSBerndLEwerbeckV.Megaprostheses for the treatment of malignant bone tumours of the lower limbs. Int Orthop2006; 30: 452-7. doi: 10.1007/s00264-006-0207-7Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Bus MP, van de Sande MA, Fiocco M, Schaap GR, Bramer JA, Dijkstra PD. What are the long-term results of MUTARS ® modular endoprostheses for reconstruction of tumor resection of the distal femur and proximal tibia? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2017; 475: 708-18. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4644-8BusMPvan de SandeMAFioccoMSchaapGRBramerJADijkstraPD.What are the long-term results of MUTARS ® modular endoprostheses for reconstruction of tumor resection of the distal femur and proximal tibia?Clin Orthop Relat Res2017; 475: 708-18. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4644-8Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Witte D, Bernd L, Bruns J, Gosheger G, Hardes J, Hartwig E, et al. Limb-salvage reconstruction with MUTARS® hemipelvic endoprosthesis: A prospective multicenter study. Eur J Surg Oncol 2009; 35: 1318-25. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2009.04.011WitteDBerndLBrunsJGoshegerGHardesJHartwigELimb-salvage reconstruction with MUTARS® hemipelvic endoprosthesis: A prospective multicenter study. Eur J Surg Oncol2009; 35: 1318-25. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2009.04.011Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Raiss P, Kinkel S, Sauter U, Bruckner T, Lehner B. Replacement of the proximal humerus with MUTARS tumor endoprostheses. Eur J Surg Oncol 2010; 36: 371-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2009.11.001RaissPKinkelSSauterUBrucknerTLehnerB.Replacement of the proximal humerus with MUTARS tumor endoprostheses. Eur J Surg Oncol2010; 36: 371-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2009.11.001Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Dieckmann R, Liem D, Gosheger G, Henrichs MP, Höll S, Hardes J, et al. Evaluation of a reconstruction reverse shoulder for tumour surgery and tribological comparision with an anatomical shoulder arthroplasty. Int Orthop 2013; 37: 451-6. doi: 10.1007/s00264-012-1771-7DieckmannRLiemDGoshegerGHenrichsMPHöllSHardesJEvaluation of a reconstruction reverse shoulder for tumour surgery and tribological comparision with an anatomical shoulder arthroplasty. Int Orthop2013; 37: 451-6. doi: 10.1007/s00264-012-1771-7Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Rubio D, Serrano M, Wang E. Tumour endoprosthetic reconstruction for primary aggressive and malignant bone tumours of the distal femur. (2013) Malaysian Orthop J 2013; 7: 1-5. doi: 10.5704/moj.1311.007RubioDSerranoMWangE.Tumour endoprosthetic reconstruction for primary aggressive and malignant bone tumours of the distal femur. (2013) Malaysian Orthop J2013; 7: 1-5. doi: 10.5704/moj.1311.007Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Haijie L, Dasen L, Tao J, Yi Y, Xiaodong T, Wei G. Implant survival and complication profiles of endoprostheses for treating tumor around the knee in adults: a systematic review of the literature over the past 30 years. J Arthroplasty 2018; 33: 1275-87. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.10.051HaijieLDasenLTaoJYiYXiaodongTWeiG.Implant survival and complication profiles of endoprostheses for treating tumor around the knee in adults: a systematic review of the literature over the past 30 years. J Arthroplasty2018; 33: 1275-87. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.10.051Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Guo W, Ji T, Yang R, Tang X, Yang Y. Endoprosthetic replacement for primary tumours around the knee: Experience from Peking University. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2008; 90: 1084-9. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.90B8.20240GuoWJiTYangRTangXYangY.Endoprosthetic replacement for primary tumours around the knee: Experience from Peking University. J Bone Joint Surg Br2008; 90: 1084-9. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.90B8.20240Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Medellin MR, Fujiwara T, Clark R, Stevenson JD, Parry M, Jeys L. Mechanisms of failure and survival of total femoral endoprosthetic replacements. Bone Joint J 2019; 101-B: 522-8. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.101B5.BJJ-2018-1106.R1MedellinMRFujiwaraTClarkRStevensonJDParryMJeysL.Mechanisms of failure and survival of total femoral endoprosthetic replacements. Bone Joint J2019; 101-B: 522-8. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.101B5.BJJ-2018-1106. R1Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Chauhan A, Joshi GR, Chopra BK, Ganguly M, Reddy GR. Limb salvage surgery in bone tumors: A retrospective study of 50 cases in a single center. Indian J Surg Oncol 2013; 4: 248-54. doi: 10.1007/s13193-013-0229-8ChauhanAJoshiGRChopraBKGangulyMReddyGR.Limb salvage surgery in bone tumors: A retrospective study of 50 cases in a single center. Indian J Surg Oncol2013; 4: 248-54. doi: 10.1007/s13193-013-0229-8Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Puri A, Gulia A. The results of total humeral replacement following excision for primary bone tumour. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2012; 94: 1277-81. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.94B9.29697PuriAGuliaA.The results of total humeral replacement following excision for primary bone tumour. J Bone Joint Surg Br2012; 94: 1277-81. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.94B9.29697Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Wang B, Xie X, Yin J, Zou C, Wang J, Huang G, et al. Reconstruction with modular hemipelvic endoprosthesis after pelvic tumor resection: A report of 50 consecutive cases. PLoS One 2015; 10: e0127263. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0127263WangBXieXYinJZouCWangJHuangGReconstruction with modular hemipelvic endoprosthesis after pelvic tumor resection: A report of 50 consecutive cases. PLoS One2015; 10: e0127263. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0127263Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Houdek MT, Watts CD, Wyles CC, Rose PS, Taunton MJ, Sim FH. Functional and oncologic outcome of cemented endoprosthesis for malignant proximal femoral tumors. J Surg Oncol 2016; 114: 501-6. doi: 10.1002/jso.24339HoudekMTWattsCDWylesCCRosePSTauntonMJSimFH.Functional and oncologic outcome of cemented endoprosthesis for malignant proximal femoral tumors. J Surg Oncol2016; 114: 501-6. doi: 10.1002/jso.24339Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Erol B, Sofulu O, Sirin E, Saglam F, Buyuktopcu O. Reconstruction after periacetabular tumor resection with Lumic® endoprosthesis: What are the midterm results? J Surg Oncol 2021; 123: 532-43. doi: 10.1002/jso.26318ErolBSofuluOSirinESaglamFBuyuktopcuO.Reconstruction after periacetabular tumor resection with Lumic® endoprosthesis: What are the midterm results?J Surg Oncol2021; 123: 532-43. doi: 10.1002/jso.26318Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Zou C, Zhao Z, Lin T, Huang Y, Xie X, Yin J, et al. Long-term outcomes of limb salvage treatment with custom-made extendible endoprosthesis for bone sarcoma around the knee in children. J Orthop Surg Res 2020; 15: 14. doi: 10.1186/s13018-019-1534-xZouCZhaoZLinTHuangYXieXYinJLong-term outcomes of limb salvage treatment with custom-made extendible endoprosthesis for bone sarcoma around the knee in children. J Orthop Surg Res2020; 15: 14. doi: 10.1186/s13018-019-1534-xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar
Nakashima H, Katagiri H, Takahashi M, Sugiura H. Survival and ambulatory function after endoprosthetic replacement for metastatic bone tumor of the proximal femur. Nagoya J Med Sci 2010; 72: 13-21. doi: 10.18999/nagjms.72.1-2.13NakashimaHKatagiriHTakahashiMSugiuraH.Survival and ambulatory function after endoprosthetic replacement for metastatic bone tumor of the proximal femur. Nagoya J Med Sci2010; 72: 13-21. doi: 10.18999/nagjms.72.1-2.13Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Cappellari A, Trovarelli G, Crimì A, Pala E, Angelini A, Berizzi A, et al. New concepts in the surgical treatment of actual and impending pathological fractures in metastatic disease. Injury 2023; 54S1: S31-S35. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2020.11.025CappellariATrovarelliGCrimìAPalaEAngeliniABerizziANew concepts in the surgical treatment of actual and impending pathological fractures in metastatic disease. Injury2023; 54S1: S31-S35. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2020.11.025Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Scott E, Klement MR, Brigman BE, Eward WC. Beyond Mirels: Factors influencing surgical outcome of metastasis to the extremities in the modern era. J Surg Orthop Adv 2018; 27: 178-86. PMID: 30489242ScottEKlementMRBrigmanBEEwardWC.Beyond Mirels: Factors influencing surgical outcome of metastasis to the extremities in the modern era. J Surg Orthop Adv2018; 27: 178-86. PMID: 30489242Search in Google Scholar
Guzik G. Oncological and functional results after surgical treatment of bone metastases at the proximal femur. BMC Surg 2018; 18: 5. doi: 10.1186/s12893-018-0336-0GuzikG.Oncological and functional results after surgical treatment of bone metastases at the proximal femur. BMC Surg2018; 18: 5. doi: 10.1186/s12893-018-0336-0Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Angelini A, Trovarelli G, Berizzi A, Pala E, Breda A, Maraldi M, et al. Ruggieri P. Treatment of pathologic fractures of the proximal femur. Injury 2018; 49(Suppl 3): S77-83. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2018.09.044AngeliniATrovarelliGBerizziAPalaEBredaAMaraldiMRuggieri P. Treatment of pathologic fractures of the proximal femur. Injury2018; 49(Suppl 3): S77-83. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2018.09.044Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
de Geyer A, Bourgoin A, Rousseau C, Ropars M, Bonnevialle N, Bouthors C, et al. Retrospective, multicenter, observational study of 112 surgically treated cases of humerus metastasis. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2020; 106: 1047-57. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2020.02.025de GeyerABourgoinARousseauCRoparsMBonnevialleNBouthorsCRetrospective, multicenter, observational study of 112 surgically treated cases of humerus metastasis. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res2020; 106: 1047-57. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2020.02.025Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Errani C, Cosentino M, Ciani G, Ferra L, Alfaro PA, Bordini B, et al. C-reactive protein and tumour diagnosis predict survival in patients treated surgically for long bone metastases. Int Orthop 2021; 45: 1337-46. doi: 10.1007/s00264-020-04921-2GErraniCCosentinoMCianiGFerraLAlfaroPABordiniBC-reactive protein and tumour diagnosis predict survival in patients treated surgically for long bone metastases. Int Orthop2021; 45: 1337-46. doi: 10.1007/s00264-020-04921-2GOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar