Dosimetry and efficiency comparison of knowledge-based and manual planning using volumetric modulated arc therapy for craniospinal irradiation

1. Seidel C, Heider S, Hau P, Glasow A, Dietzsch S, Kortmann RD. Radiotherapy in medulloblastoma-evolution of treatment, current concepts and future perspectives. Cancers 2021; 13: 5945. doi: 10.3390/cancers13235945 SeidelC HeiderS HauP GlasowA DietzschS KortmannRD Radiotherapy in medulloblastoma-evolution of treatment, current concepts and future perspectives Cancers 2021 13 5945 10.3390/cancers13235945 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

2. Kiltie AE, Povall JM, Taylor RE. The need for the moving junction in craniospinal irradiation. Br J Radiol 2000; 73: 650–4. doi: 10.1259/bjr.73.870.10911789 KiltieAE PovallJM TaylorRE The need for the moving junction in craniospinal irradiation Br J Radiol 2000 73 650 4 10.1259/bjr.73.870.10911789 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

3. Mani KR, Sapru S, Maria Das KJ, Basu A. A supine cranio-spinal irradiation technique using moving field junctions. Pol J Med Phys Eng 2016; 22: 79–83. doi: 10.1515/pjmpe-2016-0014 ManiKR SapruS Maria DasKJ BasuA A supine cranio-spinal irradiation technique using moving field junctions Pol J Med Phys Eng 2016 22 79 83 10.1515/pjmpe-2016-0014 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

4. Mancosu P, Cozzi L, Muren LP. Total marrow irradiation for hematopoietic malignancies using volumetric modulated arc therapy: a review of treatment planning studies. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol 2019; 11: 47–53. doi: 10.1016/j.phro.2019.08.001 MancosuP CozziL MurenLP Total marrow irradiation for hematopoietic malignancies using volumetric modulated arc therapy: a review of treatment planning studies Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol 2019 11 47 53 10.1016/j.phro.2019.08.001 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

5. Seravalli E, Bosman M, Lassen-Ramshad Y, Vestergaard A, Oldenburger F, Visser J, et al. Dosimetric comparison of five different techniques for craniospinal irradiation across 15 European centers: analysis on behalf of the SIOP-E-BTG (radiotherapy working group). Acta Oncol 2018; 57: 1240–9. doi: 10.1080/0284186X.2018.1465588 SeravalliE BosmanM Lassen-RamshadY VestergaardA OldenburgerF VisserJ Dosimetric comparison of five different techniques for craniospinal irradiation across 15 European centers: analysis on behalf of the SIOP-E-BTG (radiotherapy working group) Acta Oncol 2018 57 1240 9 10.1080/0284186X.2018.1465588 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

6. Prabhu RS, Dhakal R, Piantino M, Bahar N, Meaders KS, Fasola CE, et al. Volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) craniospinal irradiation (CSI) for children and adults: a practical guide for implementation. Pract Radiat Oncol 2022; 12: e101–e9. doi: 10.1016/j.prro.2021.11.005 PrabhuRS DhakalR PiantinoM BaharN MeadersKS FasolaCE Volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) craniospinal irradiation (CSI) for children and adults: a practical guide for implementation Pract Radiat Oncol 2022 12 e101 e9 10.1016/j.prro.2021.11.005 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

7. Sarkar B, Pradhan A. Choice of appropriate beam model and gantry rotational angle for low-dose gradient-based craniospinal irradiation using volumetric-modulated arc therapy. J Radiother Pract 2016; 16: 53–64. doi: 10.1017/s146039691600042x SarkarB PradhanA Choice of appropriate beam model and gantry rotational angle for low-dose gradient-based craniospinal irradiation using volumetric-modulated arc therapy J Radiother Pract 2016 16 53 64 10.1017/s146039691600042x Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

8. Sarkar B, Munshi A, Manikandan A, Roy S, Ganesh T, Mohanti BK, et al. A low gradient junction technique of craniospinal irradiation using volumetric-modulated arc therapy and its advantages over the conventional therapy. Cancer Radiother 2018; 22: 62–72. doi: 10.1016/j.canrad.2017.07.047 SarkarB MunshiA ManikandanA RoyS GaneshT MohantiBK A low gradient junction technique of craniospinal irradiation using volumetric-modulated arc therapy and its advantages over the conventional therapy Cancer Radiother 2018 22 62 72 10.1016/j.canrad.2017.07.047 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

9. Hussein M, Heijmen BJM, Verellen D, Nisbet A. Automation in intensity modulated radiotherapy treatment planning-a review of recent innovations. Br J Radiol 2018; 91: 20180270. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20180270 HusseinM HeijmenBJM VerellenD NisbetA Automation in intensity modulated radiotherapy treatment planning-a review of recent innovations Br J Radiol 2018 91 20180270 10.1259/bjr.20180270 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

10. Ma C, Huang F. Assessment of a knowledge-based RapidPlan model for patients with postoperative cervical cancer. Prec Radiat Oncol 2017; 1: 102–7. doi: 10.1002/pro6.23 MaC HuangF Assessment of a knowledge-based RapidPlan model for patients with postoperative cervical cancer Prec Radiat Oncol 2017 1 102 7 10.1002/pro6.23 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

11. Fogliata A, Reggiori G, Stravato A, Lobefalo F, Franzese C, Franceschini D, et al. RapidPlan head and neck model: the objectives and possible clinical benefit. Radiat Oncol 2017; 12: 73. doi: 10.1186/s13014-017-0808-x FogliataA ReggioriG StravatoA LobefaloF FranzeseC FranceschiniD RapidPlan head and neck model: the objectives and possible clinical benefit Radiat Oncol 2017 12 73 10.1186/s13014-017-0808-x Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

12. Hu J, Liu B, Xie W, Zhu J, Yu X, Gu H, et al. Quantitative comparison of knowledge-based and manual intensity modulated radiation therapy planning for nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Front Oncol 2020; 10: 551763. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.551763 HuJ LiuB XieW ZhuJ YuX GuH Quantitative comparison of knowledge-based and manual intensity modulated radiation therapy planning for nasopharyngeal carcinoma Front Oncol 2020 10 551763 10.3389/fonc.2020.551763 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

13. Castriconi R, Fiorino C, Passoni P, Broggi S, Di Muzio NG, Cattaneo GM, et al. Knowledge-based automatic optimization of adaptive early-regression-guided VMAT for rectal cancer. Phys Med 2020; 70: 58–64. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2020.01.016 CastriconiR FiorinoC PassoniP BroggiS Di MuzioNG CattaneoGM Knowledge-based automatic optimization of adaptive early-regression-guided VMAT for rectal cancer Phys Med 2020 70 58 64 10.1016/j.ejmp.2020.01.016 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

14. Shaw E, Kline R, Gillin M, Souhami L, Hirschfeld A, Dinapoli R, et al. Radiation Therapy Oncology Group: radiosurgery quality assurance guidelines. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1993; 27: 1231–9. doi: 10.1016/0360-3016(93)90548-a ShawE KlineR GillinM SouhamiL HirschfeldA DinapoliR Radiation Therapy Oncology Group: radiosurgery quality assurance guidelines Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1993 27 1231 9 10.1016/0360-3016(93)90548-a Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

15. Boutilier JJ, Craig T, Sharpe MB, Chan TC. Sample size requirements for knowledge-based treatment planning. Med Phys 2016; 43: 1212–21. doi: 10.1118/1.4941363 BoutilierJJ CraigT SharpeMB ChanTC Sample size requirements for knowledge-based treatment planning Med Phys 2016 43 1212 21 10.1118/1.4941363 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

16. Cagni E, Botti A, Wang Y, Iori M, Petit SF, Heijmen BJM. Pareto-optimal plans as ground truth for validation of a commercial system for knowledge-based DVH-prediction. Phys Med 2018; 55: 98–106. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2018.11.002 CagniE BottiA WangY IoriM PetitSF HeijmenBJM Pareto-optimal plans as ground truth for validation of a commercial system for knowledge-based DVH-prediction Phys Med 2018 55 98 106 10.1016/j.ejmp.2018.11.002 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

17. Wang M, Gu H, Hu J, Liang J, Xu S, Qi Z. Evaluation of a highly refined prediction model in knowledge-based volumetric modulated arc therapy planning for cervical cancer. Radiat Oncol 2021; 16: 58. doi: 10.1186/s13014-021-01783-9 WangM GuH HuJ LiangJ XuS QiZ Evaluation of a highly refined prediction model in knowledge-based volumetric modulated arc therapy planning for cervical cancer Radiat Oncol 2021 16 58 10.1186/s13014-021-01783-9 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

18. Tol JP, Delaney AR, Dahele M, Slotman BJ, Verbakel WF. Evaluation of a knowledge-based planning solution for head and neck cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2015; 91: 612–20. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2014.11.014 TolJP DelaneyAR DaheleM SlotmanBJ VerbakelWF Evaluation of a knowledge-based planning solution for head and neck cancer Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2015 91 612 20 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2014.11.014 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

19. Yu CY, Chou WT, Liao YJ, Lee JH, Liang JA, Hsu SM. Impact of radiation attenuation by a carbon fiber couch on patient dose verification. Sci Rep 2017; 7: 43336. doi: 10.1038/srep43336 YuCY ChouWT LiaoYJ LeeJH LiangJA HsuSM Impact of radiation attenuation by a carbon fiber couch on patient dose verification Sci Rep 2017 7 43336 10.1038/srep43336 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

20. Sarkar B, Munshi A, Ganesh T, Manikandan A, Mohanti BK. Dosimetric comparison of short and full arc in spinal PTV in volumetric-modulated arc therapy-based craniospinal irradiation. Med Dosim 2020; 45: 1–6. doi: 10.1016/j.meddos.2019.03.003 SarkarB MunshiA GaneshT ManikandanA MohantiBK Dosimetric comparison of short and full arc in spinal PTV in volumetric-modulated arc therapy-based craniospinal irradiation Med Dosim 2020 45 1 6 10.1016/j.meddos.2019.03.003 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

21. Dietzsch S, Braesigk A, Seidel C, Remmele J, Kitzing R, Schlender T, et al. Pretreatment central quality control for craniospinal irradiation in nonmetastatic medulloblastoma: first experiences of the German radiotherapy quality control panel in the SIOP PNET5 MB trial. Strahlenther Onkol 2021; 197: 674–82. doi: 10.1007/s00066-020-01707-8 DietzschS BraesigkA SeidelC RemmeleJ KitzingR SchlenderT Pretreatment central quality control for craniospinal irradiation in nonmetastatic medulloblastoma: first experiences of the German radiotherapy quality control panel in the SIOP PNET5 MB trial Strahlenther Onkol 2021 197 674 82 10.1007/s00066-020-01707-8 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

22. Uehara T, Monzen H, Tamura M, Ishikawa K, Doi H, Nishimura Y. Dose-volume histogram analysis and clinical evaluation of knowledge-based plans with manual objective constraints for pharyngeal cancer. J Radiat Res 2020; 61: 499–505. doi: 10.1093/jrr/rraa021 UeharaT MonzenH TamuraM IshikawaK DoiH NishimuraY Dose-volume histogram analysis and clinical evaluation of knowledge-based plans with manual objective constraints for pharyngeal cancer J Radiat Res 2020 61 499 505 10.1093/jrr/rraa021 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

23. Ge Y, Wu QJ. Knowledge-based planning for intensity-modulated radiation therapy: a review of data-driven approaches. Med Phys 2019; 46: 2760–75. doi: 10.1002/mp.13526 GeY WuQJ Knowledge-based planning for intensity-modulated radiation therapy: a review of data-driven approaches Med Phys 2019 46 2760 75 10.1002/mp.13526 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

24. Wu H, Jiang F, Yue H, Zhang H, Wang K, Zhang Y. Applying a RapidPlan model trained on a technique and orientation to another: a feasibility and dosimetric evaluation. Radiat Oncol 2016; 11: 108. doi: 10.1186/s13014-016-0684-9 WuH JiangF YueH ZhangH WangK ZhangY Applying a RapidPlan model trained on a technique and orientation to another: a feasibility and dosimetric evaluation Radiat Oncol 2016 11 108 10.1186/s13014-016-0684-9 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

25. Castriconi R, Fiorino C, Broggi S, Cozzarini C, Di Muzio N, Calandrino R, et al. Comprehensive Intra-Institution stepping validation of knowledge-based models for automatic plan optimization. Phys Med 2019; 57: 231–7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2018.12.002 CastriconiR FiorinoC BroggiS CozzariniC Di MuzioN CalandrinoR Comprehensive Intra-Institution stepping validation of knowledge-based models for automatic plan optimization Phys Med 2019 57 231 7 10.1016/j.ejmp.2018.12.002 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

26. Kamima T, Ueda Y, Fukunaga JI, Shimizu Y, Tamura M, Ishikawa K, et al. Multi-institutional evaluation of knowledge-based planning performance of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for head and neck cancer. Phys Med 2019; 64: 174–81. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2019.07.004 KamimaT UedaY FukunagaJI ShimizuY TamuraM IshikawaK Multi-institutional evaluation of knowledge-based planning performance of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for head and neck cancer Phys Med 2019 64 174 81 10.1016/j.ejmp.2019.07.004 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

27. Fogliata A, Cozzi L, Reggiori G, Stravato A, Lobefalo F, Franzese C, et al. RapidPlan knowledge based planning: iterative learning process and model ability to steer planning strategies. Radiat Oncol 2019; 14: 187. doi: 10.1186/s13014-019-1403-0 FogliataA CozziL ReggioriG StravatoA LobefaloF FranzeseC RapidPlan knowledge based planning: iterative learning process and model ability to steer planning strategies Radiat Oncol 2019 14 187 10.1186/s13014-019-1403-0 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

28. Wells DM, Walrath D, Craighead PS. Improvement in tangential breast planning efficiency using a knowledge-based expert system. Med Dosim 2000; 25: 133–8. doi: 10.1016/s0958-3947(00)00039-x WellsDM WalrathD CraigheadPS Improvement in tangential breast planning efficiency using a knowledge-based expert system Med Dosim 2000 25 133 8 10.1016/s0958-3947(00)00039-x Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

29. Visak J, McGarry RC, Randall ME, Pokhrel D. Development and clinical validation of a robust knowledge-based planning model for stereotactic body radiotherapy treatment of centrally located lung tumors. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2021; 22: 146–55. doi: 10.1002/acm2.13120 VisakJ McGarryRC RandallME PokhrelD Development and clinical validation of a robust knowledge-based planning model for stereotactic body radiotherapy treatment of centrally located lung tumors J Appl Clin Med Phys 2021 22 146 55 10.1002/acm2.13120 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

30. Masi K, Archer P, Jackson W, Sun Y, Schipper M, Hamstra D, et al. Knowledge-based treatment planning and its potential role in the transition between treatment planning systems. Med Dosim 2018; 43: 251–7. doi: 10.1016/j.meddos.2017.10.001 MasiK ArcherP JacksonW SunY SchipperM HamstraD Knowledge-based treatment planning and its potential role in the transition between treatment planning systems Med Dosim 2018 43 251 7 10.1016/j.meddos.2017.10.001 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

31. Chatterjee A, Serban M, Abdulkarim B, Panet-Raymond V, Souhami L, Shenouda G, et al. Performance of knowledge-based radiation therapy planning for the glioblastoma disease site. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2017; 99: 1021–8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.07.012 ChatterjeeA SerbanM AbdulkarimB Panet-RaymondV SouhamiL ShenoudaG Performance of knowledge-based radiation therapy planning for the glioblastoma disease site Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2017 99 1021 8 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.07.012 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

32. Amaloo C, Hayes L, Manning M, Liu H, Wiant D. Can automated treatment plans gain traction in the clinic? J Appl Clin Med Phys 2019; 20: 29–35. doi: 10.1002/acm2.12674 AmalooC HayesL ManningM LiuH WiantD Can automated treatment plans gain traction in the clinic? J Appl Clin Med Phys 2019 20 29 35 10.1002/acm2.12674 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

33. Chang ATY, Hung AWM, Cheung FWK, Lee MCH, Chan OSH, Philips H, et al. Comparison of planning quality and efficiency between conventional and knowledge-based algorithms in nasopharyngeal cancer patients using intensity modulated radiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2016; 95: 981–90. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2016.02.017 ChangATY HungAWM CheungFWK LeeMCH ChanOSH PhilipsH Comparison of planning quality and efficiency between conventional and knowledge-based algorithms in nasopharyngeal cancer patients using intensity modulated radiation therapy Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2016 95 981 90 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2016.02.017 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar