Development of a computational pregnant female phantom and calculation of fetal dose during a photon breast radiotherapy

1Basta P, Bak A, Roszkowski K. Cancer treatment in pregnant women. Contemp Oncol 2015; 19: 354-60. doi: 10.5114/wo.2014.46236 Basta P Bak A Roszkowski K Cancer treatment in pregnant women Contemp Oncol 2015 19 354 60 doi 10.5114/wo.2014.46236470939426793018Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

2Botha MH, Rajaram S, Karunaratne K. Cancer in pregnancy. Int J Gynecol Obstet 2018; 143: 137-42. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.12621 Botha MH Rajaram S Karunaratne K Cancer in pregnancy Int J Gynecol Obstet 2018 143 137 42 doi 10.1002/ijgo.1262130306590Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

3Kal HB, Struikmans H. Radiotherapy during pregnancy: fact and fiction. Lancet Oncol 2005; 6: 328-33. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(05)70169-8 Kal HB Struikmans H Radiotherapy during pregnancy: fact and fiction Lancet Oncol 2005 6 328 33 doi 10.1016/S1470-2045(05)70169-815863381Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

4Fenig E, Mishaeli M, Kalish Y, Lishner M. Pregnancy and radiation. Cancer Treat Rev 2001; 27: 1-7. doi: 10.1053/ctrv.2000.0193 Fenig E Mishaeli M Kalish Y Lishner M. Pregnancy and radiation Cancer Treat Rev 2001 27 1 7 doi 10.1053/ctrv.2000.019311237773Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

5Leonardi M, Cecconi A, Luraschi R, Rondi E, Cattani F, Lazzari R, et al. Electron beam intraoperative radiotherapy (ELIOT) in pregnant women with breast cancer: from in vivo dosimetry to clinical practice. Breast Care 2017; 12: 396-400. doi: 10.1159/000479862 Leonardi M Cecconi A Luraschi R Rondi E Cattani F Lazzari R et al Electron beam intraoperative radiotherapy (ELIOT) in pregnant women with breast cancer: from in vivo dosimetry to clinical practice Breast Care 2017 12 396 400 doi 10.1159/000479862580371329456472Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

6Shlensky V, Hallmeyer S, Juarez L, Parilla B V. Management of breast cancer during pregnancy: are we compliant with current guidelines? Am J Perinatol Reports 2017; 7: e39-43. doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1599133 Shlensky V Hallmeyer S Juarez L Parilla B V Management of breast cancer during pregnancy: are we compliant with current guidelines? Am J Perinatol Reports 2017 7 e39 43 doi 10.1055/s-0037-1599133533079428255521Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

7De Santis M, Di Gianantonio E, Straface G, Cavaliere AF, Caruso A, Schiavon F, et al. Ionizing radiations in pregnancy and teratogenesis: a review of literature. Reprod Toxicol 2005; 20: 323-9. doi: 10.1016/j.reprotox.2005.04.004 De Santis M Di Gianantonio E Straface G Cavaliere AF Caruso A Schiavon F et al Ionizing radiations in pregnancy and teratogenesis: a review of literature Reprod Toxicol 2005 20 323 9 doi 10.1016/j.reprotox.2005.04.00415925481Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

8Burdorf A, Figà-Talamanca I, Jensen TK, Thulstrup AM. Effects of occupational exposure on the reproductive system: core evidence and practical implications. Occup Med 2006; 56: 516-20. doi: 10.1093/occmed/kql113 Burdorf A Figà-Talamanca I Jensen TK Thulstrup AM Effects of occupational exposure on the reproductive system: core evidence and practical implications Occup Med 2006 56 516 20 doi 10.1093/occmed/kql11317151386Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

9International Commission on Radiological Protection. Protection IC on R. ICRP publication 84 – pregnancy and medical radiation. Ann ICRP. 2000; 30(1): 43. International Commission on Radiological Protection. Protection IC on R ICRP publication 84 – pregnancy and medical radiation Ann ICRP 2000 301 43Search in Google Scholar

10Smith H, International Commission on Radiological Protection. 1990 recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP Publication 60. Oxford: Pergamon press; 1991. [cited 2022 Jun 15]. Available at: https://www.icrp.org/publication.asp?id=icrp%20publication%2060 Smith H International Commission on Radiological Protection 1990 recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection ICRP Publication 60 Oxford Pergamon press 1991 cited 2022 Jun 15 Available at https://www.icrp.org/publication.asp?id=icrp%20publication%2060Search in Google Scholar

11Organization for Occupational Radiation Safety in Interventional Fluoroscopy. Occupational exposure to ionizing radiation in interventional fluoroscopy: severity of adverse effects of a growing health problem. Washington D.C.: ORSIF; 2015. Organization for Occupational Radiation Safety in Interventional Fluoroscopy Occupational exposure to ionizing radiation in interventional fluoroscopy: severity of adverse effects of a growing health problem Washington D.C ORSIF 2015Search in Google Scholar

12Amant F, Han SN, Gziri MM, Vandenbroucke T, Verheecke M, Van Calsteren K. Management of cancer in pregnancy. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2015; 29: 741-53. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2015.02.006 Amant F Han SN Gziri MM Vandenbroucke T Verheecke M Van Calsteren K Management of cancer in pregnancy Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2015 29 741 53 doi 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2015.02.00625797199Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

13Wallack MK, Wolf Jr JA, Bedwinek J, Denes AE, Glasgow G, Kumar B, et al. Gestational carcinoma of the female breast. Curr Probl Cancer 1983; 7: 1-58. doi: 10.1016/s0147-0272(83)80006-3 Wallack MK Wolf Jr JA Bedwinek J Denes AE Glasgow G Kumar B et al Gestational carcinoma of the female breast Curr Probl Cancer 1983 7 1 58 doi 10.1016/s0147-0272(83)80006-36303698Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

14Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Pregnancy and breast cancer. RCOG Green-top Guidel No 12; 2011. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists Pregnancy and breast cancer RCOG Green-top Guidel No 12; 2011Search in Google Scholar

15Streffer C, Shore R, Konermann G, Meadows A, Holm LE, Stather J, et al. Biological effects after prenatal irradiation (embryo and fetus). A report of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. Ann ICRP 2003; 33(1-2): 5-206. PMID: 12963090 Streffer C Shore R Konermann G Meadows A Holm LE Stather J et al Biological effects after prenatal irradiation (embryo and fetus). A report of the International Commission on Radiological Protection Ann ICRP 2003 331-2 5 206 PMID: 1296309010.1016/S0146-6453(03)00021-614531414Search in Google Scholar

16Gorson RO, Brent RL, Moseley RD. Medical radiation exposure of pregnant and potentially pregnant women. Natl Counc Radiat Prot Meas Rep 1977; 54: 70-100. Gorson RO Brent RL Moseley RD Medical radiation exposure of pregnant and potentially pregnant women Natl Counc Radiat Prot Meas Rep 1977 54 70 100Search in Google Scholar

17Brent RL, Frush DP, Harms RW, Linet MS. Preconception and prenatal radiation exposure: health effects and protective guidance. NCRP No. 174. Sel Work Robert Brent 2013; 39. Brent RL Frush DP Harms RW Linet MS Preconception and prenatal radiation exposure: health effects and protective guidance. NCRP No. 174 Sel Work Robert Brent 2013 39Search in Google Scholar

18Antypas C, Sandilos P, Kouvaris J, Balafouta E, Karinou E, Kollaros N, et al. Fetal dose evaluation during breast cancer radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1998; 40: 995-9. doi: 10.1016/s0360-3016(97)00909-7 Antypas C Sandilos P Kouvaris J Balafouta E Karinou E Kollaros N et al Fetal dose evaluation during breast cancer radiotherapy Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1998 40 995 9 doi 10.1016/s0360-3016(97)00909-79531386Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

19Ngu SLC, DuvalL P, Collins C. Foetal radiation dose in radiotherapy for breast cancer. Australas Radiol 1992; 36: 321-2. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1673.1992. tb03209.x Ngu SLC DuvalL P Collins C Foetal radiation dose in radiotherapy for breast cancer Australas Radiol 1992 36 321 2 doi 10.1111/j.1440-1673.1992.tb03209.x1299192Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

20Van der Giessen P-H. Measurement of the peripheral dose for the tangential breast treatment technique with Co-60 gamma radiation and high energy X-rays. Radiother Oncol 1997; 42: 257-64. doi: 10.1016/s0167-8140(96)01884-1 Van der Giessen P-H. Measurement of the peripheral dose for the tangential breast treatment technique with Co-60 gamma radiation and high energy X-rays Radiother Oncol 1997 42 257 64 doi 10.1016/s0167-8140(96)01884-19155075Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

21Handbook of anatomical models for radiation dosimetry. Xu XG, Eckerman KF, editors. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2009. doi: 10.1201/EBK1420059793 Handbook of anatomical models for radiation dosimetry Xu XG Eckerman KF editors Boca Raton CRC Press 2009 doi 10.1201/EBK1420059793Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

22Anderson CA, Kelley KC, Goorley JT. Mesh human phantoms with MCNP. Los Alamos, NM (United States): Los Alamos National Lab.(LANL); 2012. Anderson CA Kelley KC Goorley JT. Mesh human phantoms with MCNP Los Alamos, NM (United States) Los Alamos National Lab.(LANL) 2012Search in Google Scholar

23Xu XG, Taranenko V, Zhang J, Shi C. A boundary-representation method for designing whole-body radiation dosimetry models: pregnant females at the ends of three gestational periods – RPI-P3,-P6 and-P9. Phys Med Biol 2007; 52: 7023-44. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/52/23/017 Xu XG Taranenko V Zhang J Shi C A boundary-representation method for designing whole-body radiation dosimetry models: pregnant females at the ends of three gestational periods – RPI-P3,-P6 and-P9 Phys Med Biol 2007 52 7023 44 doi 10.1088/0031-9155/52/23/01718029991Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

24Becker J, Zankl M, Fill U, Hoeschen C. Katja – the 24th week of virtual pregnancy for dosimetric calculations. Polish J Med Phys Eng 2008; 14: 13-20. doi: 10.2478/v10013-008-0002-4 Becker J Zankl M Fill U Hoeschen C Katja – the 24th week of virtual pregnancy for dosimetric calculations Polish J Med Phys Eng 2008 14 13 20 doi 10.2478/v10013-008-0002-4Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

25Maynard MR, Long NS, Moawad NS, Shifrin RY, Geyer AM, Fong G, et al. The UF Family of hybrid phantoms of the pregnant female for computational radiation dosimetry. Phys Med Biol 2014; 59: 4325-43. doi: 10.1088/00319155/59/15/4325 Maynard MR Long NS Moawad NS Shifrin RY Geyer AM Fong G et al The UF Family of hybrid phantoms of the pregnant female for computational radiation dosimetry Phys Med Biol 2014 59 4325 43 doi 10.1088/00319155/59/15/4325Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

26Paulbeck C, Griffin K, Lee C, Cullings H, Egbert SD, Funamoto S, et al. Dosimetric impact of a new computational voxel phantom series for the Japanese atomic bomb survivors: pregnant females. Radiat Res 2019; 192: 538-61. doi: 10.1667/RR15394.1 Paulbeck C Griffin K Lee C Cullings H Egbert SD Funamoto S et al Dosimetric impact of a new computational voxel phantom series for the Japanese atomic bomb survivors: pregnant females Radiat Res 2019 192 538 61 doi 10.1667/RR15394.131469615Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

27Xu XG. An exponential growth of computational phantom research in radiation protection, imaging, and radiotherapy: a review of the fifty-year history. Phys Med Biol 2014; 59: R233-302. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/59/18/R233 Xu XG An exponential growth of computational phantom research in radiation protection, imaging, and radiotherapy: a review of the fifty-year history Phys Med Biol 2014 59 R233 302 doi 10.1088/0031-9155/59/18/R233416987625144730Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

28International Commission on Radiological Protection. Basic anatomical and physiological data for use in radiological protection: reference values. ICRP Publication 89. Ann ICRP 2002; 32(3-4): 1-277. International Commission on Radiological Protection Basic anatomical and physiological data for use in radiological protection: reference values. ICRP Publication 89 Ann ICRP 2002 323-4 1 27710.1016/S0146-6453(03)00002-2Search in Google Scholar

29Kikinis R, Pieper SD, Vosburgh KG. 3D Slicer: a platform for subject-specific image analysis, visualization, and clinical support. In: Intraoperative imaging and image-guided therapy. Springer; 2014. p. 277-89. doi: 10.1007/978-14614-7657-3_19 Kikinis R Pieper SD Vosburgh KG 3D Slicer: a platform for subject-specific image analysis, visualization, and clinical support In Intraoperative imaging and image-guided therapy Springer 2014 p 277 89 doi 10.1007/978-14614-7657-3_19Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

30Prokop M. Spiral and multislice computed tomography of the body. Thieme Medical Publishers; 2003. Prokop M. Spiral and multislice computed tomography of the body Thieme Medical Publishers 200310.1055/b-002-79382Search in Google Scholar

31Virtanen P, Gommers R, Oliphant TE, Haberland M, Reddy T, Cournapeau D, et al. SciPy 1.0: fundamental algorithms for scientific computing in Python. Nat Methods 2020; 17: 261-72. doi: 10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2 Virtanen P Gommers R Oliphant TE Haberland M Reddy T Cournapeau D et al SciPy 1.0: fundamental algorithms for scientific computing in Python Nat Methods 2020 17 261 72 doi 10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2705664432015543Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

32White DR, Griffith RV, Wilson IN. ICRU Report 46. Photon, electron, proton and neutron interaction data for body tissues. J Int Comm Radiat Units Meas 1992; 1: NP. White DR Griffith RV Wilson IN ICRU Report 46. Photon, electron, proton and neutron interaction data for body tissues J Int Comm Radiat Units Meas 1992 1 NP10.1093/jicru/os24.1.Report46Search in Google Scholar

33Van Rossum G, Drake FL. Python reference manual. iUniverse Indiana; 2000. Van Rossum G Drake FL. Python reference manual iUniverse Indiana 2000Search in Google Scholar

34Werner CJ, Bull JS, Solomon CJ, Brown FB, McKinney GW, Rising ME, et al. MCNP version 6.2 Release notes. Report LA-UR-18-20808. Los Alamos Natl Lab; 2018. Werner CJ Bull JS Solomon CJ Brown FB McKinney GW Rising ME et al MCNP version 6.2 Release notes Report LA-UR-18-20808. Los Alamos Natl Lab 201810.2172/1419730Search in Google Scholar

35Brkić H, Ivković A, Kasabašić M, Poje Sovilj M, Jurković S, Štimac D, et al. The influence of field size and off-axis distance on photoneutron spectra of the 18 MV Siemens Oncor linear accelerator beam. Radiat Meas 2016; 93: 28-34. doi: 10.1016/j.radmeas.2016.07.002 Brkić H Ivković A Kasabašić M Poje Sovilj M Jurković S Štimac D et al The influence of field size and off-axis distance on photoneutron spectra of the 18 MV Siemens Oncor linear accelerator beam Radiat Meas 2016 93 28-34 doi 10.1016/j.radmeas.2016.07.002Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

36Ivković A, Faj D, Galić S, Karimi AH, Kasabašić M, Brkić H. Accuracy of empirical formulas in evaluation of neutron dose equivalent inside the ⁶⁰Co vaults reconstructed for medical linear accelerators. Int J Radiat Res 2020;18: 99-107. doi: 10.18869/acadpub.ijrr.18.1.99 Ivković A Faj D Galić S Karimi AH Kasabašić M Brkić H Accuracy of empirical formulas in evaluation of neutron dose equivalent inside the ⁶⁰Co vaults reconstructed for medical linear accelerators Int J Radiat Res 202018 99-107 doi 10.18869/acadpub.ijrr.18.1.99Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

37Kolacio MŠ, Brkić H, Faj D, Radojčić ĐS, Rajlić D, Obajdin N, et al. Validation of two calculation options built in Elekta Monaco Monte Carlo based algorithm using MCNP code. Radiat Phys Chem 2021; 179: 109237. doi: 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2020.109237 Kolacio MŠ Brkić H Faj D Radojčić ĐS Rajlić D Obajdin N et al Validation of two calculation options built in Elekta Monaco Monte Carlo based algorithm using MCNP code Radiat Phys Chem 2021 179 109237 doi 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2020.109237Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

38Vukovic B, Faj D, Poje M, Varga M, Radolic V, Miklavcic I, et al. A neutron track etch detector for electron linear accelerators in radiotherapy. Radiol Oncol 2010; 44: 62-6. 10.2478/v10019-010-0003-2 Vukovic B Faj D Poje M Varga M Radolic V Miklavcic I et al A neutron track etch detector for electron linear accelerators in radiotherapy Radiol Oncol 2010 44 62 6 10.2478/v10019-010-0003-2342367022933893Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

39Brkić H, Kasabašić M, Ivković A, Agić D, Krpan I, Faj D. Influence of head cover on the neutron dose equivalent in Monte Carlo simulations of high energy medical linear accelerator. Nucl Technol Radiat Prot 2018; 33: 217-22. doi: 10.2298/NTRP1802217B Brkić H Kasabašić M Ivković A Agić D Krpan I Faj D Influence of head cover on the neutron dose equivalent in Monte Carlo simulations of high energy medical linear accelerator Nucl Technol Radiat Prot 2018 33 217 22 doi 10.2298/NTRP1802217BOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

40Zankl M. Adult male and female reference computational phantoms (ICRP Publication 110). Japanese J Heal Phys 2010; 45: 357-69. 10.5453/ JHPS.45.357 Zankl M Adult male and female reference computational phantoms (ICRP Publication 110) Japanese J Heal Phys 2010 45 357 69 10.5453/JHPS.45.357Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

41Detwiler R, McConn R, Grimes T, Upton S, Engel E. Compendium of material composition data for radiation transport modeling [Internet]. Richland, WA (United States): Pacific Northwest National Lab. (PNNL); [cited 2022 May 15]. doi: 10.2172/1782721. Available from: https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1782721/ Detwiler R McConn R Grimes T Upton S Engel E Compendium of material composition data for radiation transport modeling [Internet]. Richland, WA (United States): Pacific Northwest National Lab (PNNL); [cited 2022 May 15] doi 10.2172/1782721 Available from https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1782721/Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

42Parisi A, Dabin J, Schoonjans W, Van Hoey O, Mégret P, Vanhavere F. Photon energy response of LiF: Mg, Ti (MTS) and LiF: Mg, Cu, P (MCP) thermoluminescent detectors: experimental measurements and microdosimetric modeling. Radiat Phys Chem 2019; 163: 67-73. doi: 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2019.05.021 Parisi A Dabin J Schoonjans W Van Hoey O Mégret P Vanhavere F Photon energy response of LiF: Mg, Ti (MTS) and LiF: Mg, Cu, P (MCP) thermoluminescent detectors: experimental measurements and microdosimetric modeling Radiat Phys Chem 2019 163 67 73 doi 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2019.05.021Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

43Bednarz B, Xu XG. A feasibility study to calculate unshielded fetal doses to pregnant patients in 6-MV photon treatments using Monte Carlo methods and anatomically realistic phantoms. Med Phys 2008; 35: 3054-61. doi: 10.1118/1.2938519 Bednarz B Xu XG A feasibility study to calculate unshielded fetal doses to pregnant patients in 6-MV photon treatments using Monte Carlo methods and anatomically realistic phantoms Med Phys 2008 35 3054 61 doi 10.1118/1.2938519280971318697528Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

44Mazonakis M, Tzedakis A, Damilakis J. Monte Carlo simulation of radiotherapy for breast cancer in pregnant patients: how to reduce the radiation dose and risks to fetus? Radiat Prot Dosimetry 2017; 175: 10-6. doi: 10.1093/rpd/ ncw260 Mazonakis M Tzedakis A Damilakis J Monte Carlo simulation of radiotherapy for breast cancer in pregnant patients: how to reduce the radiation dose and risks to fetus? Radiat Prot Dosimetry 2017 175 10 6 doi 10.1093/rpd/ncw26027613746Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

45Stovall M, Blackwell CR, Cundiff J, Novack DH, Palta JR, Wagner LK, et al. Fetal dose from radiotherapy with photon beams: report of AAPM Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group No. 36. Med Phys 1995; 22: 6382. doi: 10.1118/1.597525 Stovall M Blackwell CR Cundiff J Novack DH Palta JR Wagner LK et al Fetal dose from radiotherapy with photon beams: report of AAPM Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group No. 36 Med Phys 1995 22 6382 doi 10.1118/1.5975257715571Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

46Chofor N, Harder D, Willborn KC, Poppe B. Internal scatter, the unavoidable major component of the peripheral dose in photon-beam radiotherapy. Phys Med Biol 2012; 57: 1733-43. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/57/6/1733 Chofor N Harder D Willborn KC Poppe B Internal scatter, the unavoidable major component of the peripheral dose in photon-beam radiotherapy Phys Med Biol 2012 57 1733 43 doi 10.1088/0031-9155/57/6/173322398213Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

47Mazonakis M, Damilakis J. Estimation and reduction of the radiation dose to the fetus from external-beam radiotherapy. Phys Medica 2017; 43: 148-52. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2017.09.130 Mazonakis M Damilakis J Estimation and reduction of the radiation dose to the fetus from external-beam radiotherapy Phys Medica 2017 43 148 52 doi 10.1016/j.ejmp.2017.09.13028943130Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

48Schneider T, Stoll E. Molecular-dynamics study of a three-dimensional one-component model for distortive phase transitions. Phys Rev B 1978; 17: 1302. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.17.1302 Schneider T Stoll E Molecular-dynamics study of a three-dimensional one-component model for distortive phase transitions Phys Rev B 1978 17 1302 doi 10.1103/PhysRevB.17.1302Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

49De Saint-Hubert M, Tymińska K, Stolarczyk L, Brkić H. Fetus dose calculation during proton therapy of pregnant phantoms using MCNPX and MCNP6. 2 codes. Radiat Meas 2021; 149: 1-7. 106665. doi: 10.1016/j. radmeas.2021.106665 De Saint-Hubert M Tymińska K Stolarczyk L Brkić H Fetus dose calculation during proton therapy of pregnant phantoms using MCNPX and MCNP6. 2 codes Radiat Meas 2021 149 1 7 106665 doi 10.1016/j.radmeas.2021.106665Open DOISearch in Google Scholar