Robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: a case-control study

1Weeks JC, Nelson H, Gelber S, Sargent D, Schroeder G. Clinical outcomes of surgical therapy (COST) study group. Short-term quality-of-life outcomes following laparoscopic-assisted colectomy vs open colectomy for colon cancer: a randomized trial. JAMA 2020; 287: 321-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.287.3.321 Weeks JC Nelson H Gelber S Sargent D Schroeder G Clinical outcomes of surgical therapy (COST) study group Short-term quality-of-life outcomes following laparoscopic-assisted colectomy vs open colectomy for colon cancer: a randomized trial. JAMA 2020 287 321 8 10.1001/jama.287.3.32111790211Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

2Green BL, Marshall HC, Collinson F, Quirke P, Guillou P, Jayne DG, et al. Longterm follow-up of the medical research council CLASICC trial of conventional versus laparoscopically assisted resection in colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 2013; 100: 75-82. doi: 10.1002/bjs.8945 Green BL Marshall HC Collinson F Quirke P Guillou P Jayne DG et al Longterm follow-up of the medical research council CLASICC trial of conventional versus laparoscopically assisted resection in colorectal cancer Br J Surg 2013 100 75 82 10.1002/bjs.894523132548Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

3Deijen CL, Vasmel JE, de Lange-de Klerk ESM, Cuesta MA, Coene PLO, Lange JF, et al. Ten-year outcomes of a randomised trial of laparoscopic versus open surgery for colon cancer. Surg Endosc 2017; 31: 2607-15. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5270-6 Deijen CL Vasmel JE de Lange-de Klerk ESM Cuesta MA Coene PLO Lange JF et al Ten-year outcomes of a randomised trial of laparoscopic versus open surgery for colon cancer Surg Endosc 2017 31 2607 15 10.1007/s00464-016-5270-6544384627734203Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

4Fan CZ, Chu YP, Wei P, Dai H, Chen W. Comparison of survival of patients receiving laparoscopic and open radical resection for stage II colon cancer. Radiol Oncol 2011; 45: 273-8. doi: 10.2478/v10019-011-0029-0 Fan CZ Chu YP Wei P Dai H Chen W Comparison of survival of patients receiving laparoscopic and open radical resection for stage II colon cancer Radiol Oncol 2011 45 273 8 10.2478/v10019-011-0029-0342374822933965Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

5Wee IJY, Kuo LJ, NGU JCU. A systematic review of the true benefits of robotic surgery: ergonomics. Int J Med Robotics Comput Assist Surg 2020; 16: e2113. doi: 10.1002/rcs.2113 Wee IJY Kuo LJ NGU JCU A systematic review of the true benefits of robotic surgery: ergonomics Int J Med Robotics Comput Assist Surg 2020 16 e2113 10.1002/rcs.211332304167Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

6Sheetz KH, Claflin J, Dimick JB. Trends in the adoption of robotic surgery for common surgical procedures. JAMA Netw Open 2020; 3: e1018911. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.18911 Sheetz KH Claflin J Dimick JB Trends in the adoption of robotic surgery for common surgical procedures JAMA Netw Open 2020 3 e1018911 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.18911699125231922557Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

7Connelly TM, Malik Z, Sehgal R, Byrnes G, Coffey JC, Peirce C. The 100 most influential manuscripts in robotic surgery: a bibliometric analysis. J Robot Surg 2020; 14: 155-65. doi: 10.1007/s11701-019-00956-9 Connelly TM Malik Z Sehgal R Byrnes G Coffey JC Peirce C The 100 most influential manuscripts in robotic surgery: a bibliometric analysis J Robot Surg 2020 14 155 65 10.1007/s11701-019-00956-930949890Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

8Delaney CP, Lynch AC, Senagore AJ, Fazio VW. Comparison of robotically performed and traditional laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 2003; 46: 1633-9. doi: 10.1007/BF02660768 Delaney CP Lynch AC Senagore AJ Fazio VW Comparison of robotically performed and traditional laparoscopic colorectal surgery Dis Colon Rectum 2003 46 1633 9 10.1007/BF0266076814668588Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

9Speicher PJ, Englum BR, Ganapathi AM, Nussbaum DP, Mantyh CR, Migaly J. Robotic low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a national perspective on short-term oncologic outcomes. Ann Surg 2015; 262: 1040-5. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001017 Speicher PJ Englum BR Ganapathi AM Nussbaum DP Mantyh CR Migaly J Robotic low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a national perspective on short-term oncologic outcomes Ann Surg 2015 262 1040 5 10.1097/SLA.000000000000101725405559Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

10Jayne D, Pigazzi A, Marshall H, Croft J, Corrigan N, Copeland J, et al. Effect of robotic-assisted vs conventional laparoscopic surgery on risk of conversion to open laparotomy among patients undergoing resection for rectal cancer: The ROLARR randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2017; 318: 1569-80. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.7219 Jayne D Pigazzi A Marshall H Croft J Corrigan N Copeland J et al Effect of robotic-assisted vs conventional laparoscopic surgery on risk of conversion to open laparotomy among patients undergoing resection for rectal cancer: The ROLARR randomized clinical trial JAMA 2017 318 1569 80 10.1001/jama.2017.7219581880529067426Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

11Grosek J, Tomazic A. Key clinical appliacations for indocyanine green fluorescence imaging in minimally invasive colorectal surgery. J Minim Access Surg 2020; 16: 308-14. doi: 10.4103/jmas.JMAS_312_18 Grosek J Tomazic A Key clinical appliacations for indocyanine green fluorescence imaging in minimally invasive colorectal surgery J Minim Access Surg 2020 16 308 14 10.4103/jmas.JMAS_312_18759787131031317Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

12Janež J, Korać T, Kodre AR, Jelenc F, Ihan A. Laparoscopically assisted colorectal surgery provides better short-term clinical and inflammatory outcomes compared to open colorectal surgery. Arch Med Sci 2015; 11: 1217-26. doi: 10.5114/aoms.2015.56348 Janež J Korać T Kodre AR Jelenc F Ihan A Laparoscopically assisted colorectal surgery provides better short-term clinical and inflammatory outcomes compared to open colorectal surgery Arch Med Sci 2015 11 1217 26 10.5114/aoms.2015.56348469705626788083Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

13Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 2004; 240: 205-13. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae Dindo D Demartines N Clavien PA Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey Ann Surg 2004 240 205 13 10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae136012315273542Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

14Weiser MR. AJCC 8^th edition: Colorectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2018; 25: 1454-5. doi: 10.1245/s10434-018-6462-1 Weiser MR AJCC 8^th edition: Colorectal cancer Ann Surg Oncol 2018 25 1454 5 10.1245/s10434-018-6462-129616422Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

15Grosek J. How I do it: right colectomy with the Da Vinci Xi Robotic Platform. Surgery Surg Endos 2020; 2: 61-8. Grosek J How I do it: right colectomy with the Da Vinci Xi Robotic Platform Surgery Surg Endos 2020 2 61 8Search in Google Scholar

16Rahbari NN, Weitz J, Hohenberger W, Heald RJ, Moran B, Ulrich A, et al. Definition and grading of anastomotic leakage following anterior resection of the rectum: a proposal by the International study group of rectal cancer. Surgery 2010; 147: 339-51. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2009.10.012 Rahbari NN Weitz J Hohenberger W Heald RJ Moran B Ulrich A et al Definition and grading of anastomotic leakage following anterior resection of the rectum: a proposal by the International study group of rectal cancer Surgery 2010 147 339 51 10.1016/j.surg.2009.10.01220004450Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

17Ng KT, Tsia AKV, Chong VYL. Robotic versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis. World J Surg 2019; 43: 1146-61. doi: 10.1007/s00268-018-04896-7 Ng KT Tsia AKV Chong VYL Robotic versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis World J Surg 2019 43 1146 61 10.1007/s00268-018-04896-730610272Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

18Liao G, Zhao Z, Lin S, Li R, Yuan Y, Du S, et al. Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis of four randomized controlled studies. World J Surg 2014; 12: 1-11. doi: 10.1186/1477-7819-12-122 Liao G Zhao Z Lin S Li R Yuan Y Du S et al Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis of four randomized controlled studies World J Surg 2014 12 1 11 10.1186/1477-7819-12-122400258124767102Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

19Rawlings AL, Woodland JH, Vegunta RK, Crawford DL. Robotic versus laparoscopic colectomy. Surg Endosc 2007; 21: 1701-8. doi: 10.1007/s00464-007-9231-y Rawlings AL Woodland JH Vegunta RK Crawford DL Robotic versus laparoscopic colectomy Surg Endosc 2007 21 1701 8 10.1007/s00464-007-9231-y17353988Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

20Tam MS, Kaoutzanis C, Mullard AJ, Regen SE, Franz MG, et al. A population-based study comparing laparoscopic and robotic outcomes in colorectal surgery. Surg Endosc 2016; 30: 455-63. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4218-6 Tam MS Kaoutzanis C Mullard AJ Regen SE Franz MG et al A population-based study comparing laparoscopic and robotic outcomes in colorectal surgery Surg Endosc 2016 30 455 63 10.1007/s00464-015-4218-625894448Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

21Kim CW, Kim CH, Baik SH. Outcomes of robotic-assisted colorectal surgery compared with laparoscopic and open surgery: a systematic review. J Gastrointest Surg 2014; 18: 816-30. doi: 10.1007/s11605-014-2469-5 Kim CW Kim CH Baik SH Outcomes of robotic-assisted colorectal surgery compared with laparoscopic and open surgery: a systematic review J Gastrointest Surg 2014 18 816 30 10.1007/s11605-014-2469-524496745Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

22Halabi WJ, Kang CY, Jafari MD, Nguyen VQ, Carmichael JC, Mills S, et al. Robotic-assisted colorectal surgery in the United States: a nationwide analysis of trend and outcomes. World J Surg 2013; 37: 2782-90. doi: 10.1007/s00268-013-2024-7 Halabi WJ Kang CY Jafari MD Nguyen VQ Carmichael JC Mills S et al Robotic-assisted colorectal surgery in the United States: a nationwide analysis of trend and outcomes World J Surg 2013 37 2782 90 10.1007/s00268-013-2024-723564216Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

23Salman M, Bell T, Martin J, Bhuva K, Grim R, Ahuja V. Use, cost, complications and mortality of robotic versus nonrobotic general surgery procedures based on a nationwide database. Ann Surg 2013; 79: 553-60 Salman M Bell T Martin J Bhuva K Grim R Ahuja V Use, cost, complications and mortality of robotic versus nonrobotic general surgery procedures based on a nationwide database Ann Surg 2013 79 553 6010.1177/000313481307900613Search in Google Scholar

24Tyler JA, Fox JP, Desai MM, Perry WB, Glasgow SC. Outcome and cost associated with robotic colectomy in the minimally invasive era. Dis Colon Rectum 2013; 56: 458-66. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e31827085ec Tyler JA Fox JP Desai MM Perry WB Glasgow SC Outcome and cost associated with robotic colectomy in the minimally invasive era Dis Colon Rectum 2013 56 458 66 10.1097/DCR.0b013e31827085ec23478613Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

25Mushtaq HH, Shah SK, Agarwal AK. The current role of robotics in colorectal surgery. Curr Gastroenterol Rep 2019; 21: 11. doi: 10.1007/s11894-019-0676-7. Mushtaq HH Shah SK Agarwal AK The current role of robotics in colorectal surgery Curr Gastroenterol Rep 2019 21 11 10.1007/s11894-019-0676-730840156Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

26Shaw DD, Wright M, Taylor L, Bertelson NL, Shashidharan M, Menon P, et al. Robotic Colorectal Surgery Learning Curve and Case Complexity. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2018; 28: 1163-8. doi: 10.1089/lap.2016.0411 Shaw DD Wright M Taylor L Bertelson NL Shashidharan M Menon P et al Robotic Colorectal Surgery Learning Curve and Case Complexity J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2018 28 1163 8 10.1089/lap.2016.041129733247Open DOISearch in Google Scholar