[
1. Le Conte, S.; Le Moyne, S.; Ollivier, F. Modal analysis comparison of two violins made by A. Stradivari. Acoustics, Nantes, France 2012, hal-00811010
]Search in Google Scholar
[
2. Fiocco, G.; Gonzalez, S.; Invernizzi, C.; Rovetta, T.; Albano, M.; Dondi, P.; Licchelli, M.; Antonacci, F.; Malagodi, M. Compositional and Morphological Comparison among Three Coeval Violins Made by Giuseppe Guarneri “del Gesù” in 1734. Coatings 2021, 11, 884. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings1108088410.3390/coatings11080884
]Search in Google Scholar
[
3. Lehmann, E. H.; Mannes, D. Wood investigations by means of radiation transmission techniques. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 2012, 13(3), S35 – S4310.1016/j.culher.2012.03.017
]Search in Google Scholar
[
4. Stoel, B.C.; Borman, T.M. A Comparison of Wood Density between Classical Cremonese and Modern Violins. PLoS ONE. 2008. 3(7): e2554. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.000255410.1371/journal.pone.0002554
]Search in Google Scholar
[
5. Nia, H.T.; Jain, A. D.; Liu, Y.; Alam, M. R.; Barnas, R.; Makris, N. C. The evolution of air resonance power efficiency in the violin and its ancestors. Proc Math Phys Eng Sci. 2015. 471, 2014090510.1098/rspa.2014.0905
]Search in Google Scholar
[
6. Cattani, C.; Dunbar, R. L. M.; Shapira, Z. Value Creation and Knowledge Loss: The Case of Cremonese Stringed Instruments. Organization Science. 2012. 24(3), 813-830 https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1120.076810.1287/orsc.1120.0768
]Search in Google Scholar
[
7. Marcon, B.; Goli, G.; Fioravanti, M. Modelling wooden cultural heritage. The need to consider each artefact as unique as illustrated by the Cannone violin. Herit Sci. 2020. 8, 24, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40494-020-00368-110.1186/s40494-020-00368-1
]Search in Google Scholar
[
8. Bucur, V. (2006). Acoustic of wood. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg New York, ISBN-13 978-3-540-26123-0, p.173-21610.1007/3-540-30594-7
]Search in Google Scholar
[
9. Hutchins, C. M. The physics of violins. Scientific American, 207(5) (1962) 78– 9310.1038/scientificamerican1162-78
]Search in Google Scholar
[
10. Bissinger, G. Structural Acoustics of Good and Bad Violins. J Acoust. Soc. Am.; 124 (2008) 1764 –177310.1121/1.2956478
]Search in Google Scholar
[
11. Gough, C. The violin: Chladni patterns, plates, shells and sounds. The European Physical Journal Special Topics 145(1) (2007) 77–10110.1140/epjst/e2007-00149-0
]Search in Google Scholar
[
12. Stanciu, M.D. Cosereanu, C.; Dinulica, F.; Bucur V. Effect of wood species on vibration modes of violins plates. Eur. J. Wood Prod. 78 (2020) 785–79910.1007/s00107-020-01538-5
]Search in Google Scholar
[
13. Gliga, V. Gh., Stanciu, M. D., Nastac, S. M., Campean, M. Modal Analysis of Violin Bodies with Back Plates Made of Different Wood Species. BioResources 15(4) (2020) 7687–771310.15376/biores.15.4.7687-7713
]Search in Google Scholar
[
14. Saitis, C.; Fritz, C.; Scavone, G. P. Sounds like melted chocolats. How muzicians conceptualize violin sound richness. Proceedings of ISMA 2019, International Sympozium on Music Acoustics, 13 – 17 September, Detmold, Germany, 50-57, 2019
]Search in Google Scholar
[
15. Tai, H-C.; Shen, Y-P.; Lin, J-H.; Chung, D-T. Acoustic evolution of old Italian violins from Amati to Stradivari, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(23):201800666, DOI:10.1073/pnas.1800666115, 201810.1073/pnas.1800666115
]Search in Google Scholar
[
16. Giraldo S, Waddell G, Nou I, Ortega A, Mayor O, Perez A, Williamon A and Ramirez R Automatic Assessment of Tone Quality in Violin, 201910.3389/fpsyg.2019.00334
]Search in Google Scholar
[
17. Saitis, C., Fritz, C., Scavone, G. P., Guastavino, C., and Dubois, D. Perceptual evaluation of violins: a psycholinguistic analysis of preference verbal descriptions by experienced musicians. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 141, 2746–2757. doi: 10.1121/1.4980143, 201710.1121/1.4980143
]Search in Google Scholar
