Otwarty dostęp

Factors of Divergence between Peripheral and Central Subregions: The Case of Mazovia Province, Poland

Tomasz Zaborowski

Tomasz Zaborowski

Faculty of Geography and Regional Studies, University of WarsawWarsaw, Poland
Profil Orcid
Wyszukaj tego autora
Sciendo|Google Scholar
Zaborowski, Tomasz
  
18 gru 2020
Factors of Divergence between Peripheral and Central Subregions: The Case of Mazovia Province, Poland's Cover Image
O artykule
Poprzedni artykuł
Następny artykuł
Zacytuj
Pobierz okładkę
Data publikacji: 18 gru 2020
Zakres stron: 39 - 51
Otrzymano: 10 cze 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/quageo-2020-0031
Słowa kluczowe
© 2020 Tomasz Zaborowski, published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Public License.

Fig. 1

Purchasing power of Polish subregions, 2016. Radom subregion and Mazovia Province are marked in yellow circles.Source: GfK (2019), own elaboration.
Purchasing power of Polish subregions, 2016. Radom subregion and Mazovia Province are marked in yellow circles.Source: GfK (2019), own elaboration.

Fig. 2

Research area. Radom subregion is marked in yellow circle.Source: own elaboration.
Research area. Radom subregion is marked in yellow circle.Source: own elaboration.

Fig. 3

Analysed subregions. The two city regions defined for this research are marked in yellow circles.Source: own elaboration.
Analysed subregions. The two city regions defined for this research are marked in yellow circles.Source: own elaboration.

Fig. 4

Mean values of the Pearson correlation coefficients between independent variables and development levels for the years 2005 and 2015* (DepVar 1).*2008 and 2016, respectively, in specified cases.Source: own elaboration.
Mean values of the Pearson correlation coefficients between independent variables and development levels for the years 2005 and 2015* (DepVar 1).*2008 and 2016, respectively, in specified cases.Source: own elaboration.

Fig. 5

Mean values of the Pearson correlation coefficients between independent variables and the absolute difference in development levels in the years 2005 and 2015* (DepVar 2).*2008 and 2016, respectively, in specified cases.Source: own elaboration.
Mean values of the Pearson correlation coefficients between independent variables and the absolute difference in development levels in the years 2005 and 2015* (DepVar 2).*2008 and 2016, respectively, in specified cases.Source: own elaboration.

Fig. 6

Mean values of the Pearson correlation coefficients between independent variables and the relative difference in development levels in the years 2005 and 2015* (DepVar 3).*2008 and 2016, respectively, in specified cases.
Mean values of the Pearson correlation coefficients between independent variables and the relative difference in development levels in the years 2005 and 2015* (DepVar 3).*2008 and 2016, respectively, in specified cases.

Mean values of the Pearson correlation coefficients_

MrIndVar1DepVar1 ... MrIndVar5DepVar3
Development levels for years 2005 and 2015*Absolute difference in development levels in 2005 and 2015*Relative difference in development levels in 2005 and 2015*
DepVar 1DepVar 2DepVar 3
Provincial capital status of largest cityIndVar 10.350.13−0.09
Level of centrality within provinceIndVar 20.240.11−0.02
Size of largest cityIndVar 30.460.09−0.13
Administrative status of largest cityIndVar 40.370.09−0.02
Level of centrality in countryIndVar 50.340.01−0.08
Język:
Angielski
Częstotliwość wydawania:
4 razy w roku
Dziedziny czasopisma:
Nauki o Ziemi, Geografia
Kanał RSS czasopisma