Regional Development in Central-Eastern European Countries at the Beginning of the 21st Century: Path Dependence and Effects of EU Cohesion Policy
, , oraz
26 kwi 2018
O artykule
Data publikacji: 26 kwi 2018
Zakres stron: 77 - 92
Otrzymano: 28 wrz 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/quageo-2018-0017
Słowa kluczowe
© 2018 Wojciech Dyba et al., published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.
Fig. 1

Fig. 2

Fig. 3

Fig. 4

Fig. 5

The structure (% from budget of Member State) of the Cohesion policy budget by thematic objectives in CEECs 2014–2020, based on finances planned)_
Thematic objectives/Member state | PL | CZ | RO | HU | SK | HR | BG | LT | LV | EE | SI | CEECs |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Network infrastructures in transport, energy & ICT | 35 | 32 | 31 | 19 | 29 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 31 | 14 | 11 | 29 |
Climate & Environment | 21 | 23 | 33 | 27 | 25 | 33 | 38 | 27 | 25 | 21 | 24 | 25 |
Education & Employment | 13 | 14 | 14 | 22 | 12 | 13 | 12 | 20 | 14 | 19 | 17 | 14 |
Research & Innovation | 11 | 14 | 4 | 10 | 17 | 8 | 7 | 10 | 11 | 22 | 15 | 11 |
Social inclusion | 8 | 8 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 8 | 10 | 10 | 7 | 8 |
Competitiveness of SMEs | 9 | 5 | 3 | 9 | 3 | 12 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 19 | 7 |
Technical assistance | 3 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 3 |
Efficient public administration | 0 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 2 |
Total (100%) | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
Total (billion EUR) | 90.0 | 28.7 | 27.4 | 25.3 | 17.7 | 9.8 | 8.6 | 7.8 | 5.1 | 4.9 | 3.7 | 229.1 |
Mean values of clustered groups in relation to the CEE average (in %; CEE = 100)_
No. of regions | GFCF | EMP | PET | GERB | GERN | EEUCP | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Group 1 | 21 | 108.8 | 73.9 | 93.1 | 57.2 | 97.6 | 80.0 |
Group 2 | 13 | 237.8 | 182.9 | 13.7 | 113.7 | 123.8 | 101.9 |
Group 3 | 14 | –41.2 | 62.2 | 190.5 | 151.4 | 81.4 | 128.3 |
Correlations between EU funding and development indicators in groups of CEE regions
GFCF | EMP | PET | GERB | GERN | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Group 1 | EEUCP | 0.165 | –0.009 | –0.051 | 0.664 | 0.471 |
Group 2 | EEUCP | 0.418 | 0.319 | 0.204 | 0.692 | 0.275 |
Group 3 | EEUCP | 0.218 | 0.490 | –0.057 | 0.103 | –0.064 |
The structure of Cohesion policy budget by thematic objectives in CEECs 2007–2013 (% from budget of Member States allocated to selected aims, based on annual implementation report 2013)_
Thematic objectives/Member State | PL | HU | RO | CZ | SK | BG | LT | LV | SI | EE | CEECs |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Transport, Energy & IT | 47 | 36 | 26 | 37 | 37 | 30 | 36 | 33 | 29 | 23 | 38 |
Environment | 10 | 17 | 24 | 11 | 13 | 26 | 15 | 16 | 24 | 22 | 15 |
Social issues | 10 | 16 | 10 | 10 | 21 | 10 | 14 | 19 | 9 | 21 | 12 |
Innovation & RTD | 14 | 6 | 6 | 17 | 11 | 5 | 14 | 15 | 19 | 19 | 12 |
Capacity building | 3 | 4 | 18 | 4 | 4 | 12 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 6 |
Human capital | 7 | 4 | 3 | 8 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 3 | 5 | 3 | 6 |
Other SME and business support | 5 | 10 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
Culture, heritage and tourism | 3 | 4 | 2 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 3 |
Urban and territorial dimension | 2 | 3 | 8 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
Total (100%) | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
Total (in billion EUR) | 63.9 | 28.6 | 23.6 | 21 | 11.8 | 7.4 | 6.7 | 4.3 | 4.3 | 3.3 | 174.9 |
Correlations between the expenditures of EU Cohesion policy and development indicators across CEE regions_
GFCF | EMP | PET | GERB | GERN | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
EEUCP | 0.008 | 0.227 | 0.001 | 0.544 | 0.224 |
Development indicators under examination
Selected (mutually uncorrelated) | Unselected (correlated) |
---|---|
gross fixed capital formation (GFCF); employment (EMP); participation in education and training (PET); gross expenditure on research and development of the business enterprise sector (GERB); gross expenditure on research and development of the non-business enterprise sector (GERN) | gross domestic product; productivity of labour; compensation of employees; population size; age dependency ration; median age of population; education levels attained; employment in R&D; human resources in science and technology |