[
Allen, J., Sheate, W. and Diaz-Chavez, R. (2012). Community-based renewable energy in the Lake District National Park — local drivers, enablers, barriers and solutions. Local Environment: The International Journal of Justice and Sustainability 17(3): 261–280.10.1080/13549839.2012.665855
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Aylett, A. (2013) Networked urban climate governance: Neighborhood-scale residential solar energy systems and the example of Solarize Portland, Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 31(5): 858–875.10.1068/c11304
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Baines, S. and J. Wheelock. (2000) Work and employment in small businesses: Perpetuating and challenging gender traditions, Gender, Work and Organization 7 (1): 45 — 55 Baker, T. & Nelson, R.E. (2005) Creating something from nothing: Resource construction through entrepreneurial bricolage. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(3): 329–366.10.2189/asqu.2005.50.3.329
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Berglund, H. and Sandström, C. (2013) ‘Business model innovation from an open systems perspective: structural challenges and managerial solutions’, Int. J. Product Development, 8, (3/4): 274–285.10.1504/IJPD.2013.055011
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bound, K, and Thornton, I. (2012) OUR FRUGAL FUTURE: Lessons from India’s innovation system, London, NESTA http://www.nesta.org.uk/publications/our-frugal-future-lessons-india%C2%92s-innovation-system
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Brandsen, T, Evers, A Cattacin, S and Zimmer, A (2016) Social Innovation: A Sympathetic and Critical Interpretation, in Bransden, T, A Cattacin, S, Evers, and Zimmer, A (eds) Social Innovations in the Urban Context, Springer International Publishing, pp 3 — 20.10.1007/978-3-319-21551-8_1
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Brandsen, T. Steen, T. & Verschuere, B (2018). Co-creation and co-production in public services: Urgent Issues in practice and research. In Brandsen, T. Steen, T & Verschuere, B. (eds.), Co-production and co-creation: Definitions and theoretical perspectives Rout-ledge, pp. 3–8.y10.4324/9781315204956-1
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Brummer, V. (2018) Community energy — benefits and barriers: a comparative literature review of Community Energy in the UK, Germany and the USA, the benefits it provides for society and the barriers it faces Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 94:187–19610.1016/j.rser.2018.06.013
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chambers, R. and Conway, G. (1992). Sustainable rural livelihoods: practical concepts for the 21st century. Institute of Development Studies (UK).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cherif, H., Miled, B. (2013). Are brand communities influencing brands through co-creation? A cross-national example of the brand AXE: In France and in Tunisia. International Business Research, 6, 14–2910.5539/ibr.v6n9p14
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chesbrough, H. (2011). Open services innovation: Rethinking your business to grow and compete in a new era. Wiley.10.1007/978-88-470-1980-5_11
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Committee of the Regions of the European Union (2015) Fostering innovation at regional level: lessons from the European Entrepreneurial Region (EER) experience http://book-shop.europa.eu/en/fostering-innovation-at-regional-level-pbQG0415264/
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Curley, M (2016) Twelve Principles for Open Innovation 2.0. Nature, 533(7603): 314–316.10.1038/533314a
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Davidson, E, Packham, C and Goldstraw, K (2014) A Sustainable Livelihoods Analysis of a Small Voluntary Organisation CAEC, Manchester Metropolitan University.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Devine-Wright, P. and Devine-Wright, H. (2009) Public Engagement with Community-Based Energy Service Provision: An Exploratory Case Study, Energy & Environment, 20 (3): 303–317.10.1260/095830509788066402
]Search in Google Scholar
[
DEFRA (2011) Anaerobic Digestion Strategy and Action Plan https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/69400/anaerobic-digestion-strat-action-plan.pdf
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Di Domenico, H., Haugh, H. and Tracey, P. (2010), Social bricolage: theorizing social value creation in social enterprise, Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 34 (4): 681–703.10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00370.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fox, C., Baines, S., Wilson, R., Jalonen,H., Narbutaite Aflaki, I., Prandini, R., Bassi, A., Ganugi, G. & Aramo-Immonen, H. (2021) A New Agenda for Co-Creating Public Services, Turku University of Applied Sciences http://julkaisut.turkuamk.fi/isbn9789522167842.pdf
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fisher, G. (2012) Effectuation, Causation, and Bricolage: A Behavioral Comparison of Emerging Theories in Entrepreneurship Research, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36 (5):1019–1051.10.1111/j.1540-6520.2012.00537.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Folbre, N. (1994) Who Cares for the Kids? Gender and the Structures of Constraint. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203168295
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gibson-Graham, J.K. (2006) Postcapitalist politics. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Grimm, R, Fox, C., Baines, S, and Albertson, K. (2013) Social innovation, an answer to contemporary societal challenges? Locating the concept in theory and practice Th e European Journal of Social Sciences, 26 (4): 463 — 455.10.1080/13511610.2013.848163
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hulme, M. (2020) One Earth, Many Futures, No Destination, One Earth, 2(4): 309–311.10.1016/j.oneear.2020.03.005
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hulme, M. (2009) Why we disagree about climate change, Cambridge University Press Jones, O. and Jayawarna, D. (2010) Resourcing new businesses: social networks, bootstrapping and firm performance, Venture Capital: An International Journal of Entrepreneurial Finance, 12 (2): 127–15210.1080/13691061003658886
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lincoln, Y.S. (1995) Emerging criteria for quality in qualitative and interpretive research, Qualitative Inquiry 1: 275–289.10.1177/107780049500100301
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Marques, P., Morgan, K. and Richardson, R. (2017) Social innovation in question: Th e theoretical and practical implications of a contested concept, Environment and Planning C, 36 (3): 496–51210.1177/2399654417717986
]Search in Google Scholar
[
May C, Brown G, Cooper N, Brill L (2009) The Sustainable Livelihoods Handbook: An Assets based approach to Poverty Church Action on Poverty, Manchester.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
McLoughlin, I.,Maniatopoulos, G., Wilson, R. and Martin, M, (2012) Inside a ‘Digital Experiment’, Co-producing Telecare Services for Older People, Scandanavian Journal of Information Systems, 24 (2), Article 1
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Moore, M. and Hartley, J. (2008). Innovations in Governance, Public Management Review 10(1): 3 — 20.10.1080/14719030701763161
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Morrison, C., & Ramsey, E. (2019). Power to the People: Developing Networks through Rural Community Energy Schemes. Journal of Rural Studies, 70, 169–178.10.1016/j.jrurstud.2018.07.006
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Moulaert, F., MacCallum, D. & Mehmood. A. (2013). (eds.) The International Handbook on Social Innovation: Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.10.4337/9781849809993
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Moulaert, F. & MacCallum, D. (2019) Advanced Introduction to Social Innovation, Edward Elgar
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mumford, M.D. (2002) Social innovation: ten cases from Benjamin Franklin. Creativity research journal, 14 (2): 253–266.10.1207/S15326934CRJ1402_11
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Nicholls, A., Simon, J. & Gabriel, M. (2015) Introduction: Dimensions of Social Innovation, In Nicholls, A., Simon, J & Gabriel, M (eds.) New Frontiers in Social Innovation Research, Springer.10.1057/9781137506801
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Osborne, S., Radnor, Z. & Strokosch, K. (2016). Co-production and the co-creation of value in public services: A suitable case for treatment? Public Management Review, 18(5): 639–653.10.1080/14719037.2015.1111927
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Oughton, E., & Wheelock, J. (2003). A capabilities approach to a sustainable household, Review of Social Economy, 61(1), 1–22.10.1080/0034676032000050248
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Phills, J.A; Deiglmeier, K; Miller, D.T. (2008) Rediscovering social innovation. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 6 (4): 34–43
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ragin, C. (1989) The Comparative Method: Moving Beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies, University of California Pres s
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ram, M. and Holliday, R. (1993) Relative merits: family culture and kinship in small firms, Sociology, 27(4): 629–648.10.1177/0038038593027004005
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sabel, C., Zeitlin, J. and Quack, S. (2017) Capacitating Services and the Bottom-Up Approach to Social Investment, in Hemerijck, A (Ed) The Uses of Social Investment, Oxford: Oxford University Press10.1093/oso/9780198790488.003.0012
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Scoones I (1998) Sustainable Rural Livelihoods: a framework for analysis, IDS working paper, http://mobile.opendocs.ids.ac.uk/opendocs/bitstream/handle/123456789/3390/Wp72.pdf?sequence=1
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Scoones, I. (2009). Livelihoods perspectives and rural development. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 36(1): 171–196.10.1080/03066150902820503
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sen AK (1985) Commodities and Capabilities Oxford University Press, Oxford.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Seyfang, G. and Haxeltine, A. (2012) Growing grassroots innovations: exploring the role of community-based initiatives in governing sustainable energy transitions, Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 30(3): 381–400.10.1068/c10222
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Stake, R. (1995). The Art of Case Study Research, Thousand Oaks, Calif. Sage Publications
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Torfing, J., Sørensen, E., & Røiseland, A. (2019) Transforming the Public Sector Into an Arena for Co-Creation: Barriers, Drivers, Benefits, and Ways Forward. Administration & Society, 51(5), 795–825.10.1177/0095399716680057
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Voorberg, W.H., Bekkers, V.J. and Tummers, L.G. (2015) A systematic review of co-creation and co-production: Embarking on the social innovation journey, Public Management Review, 17(9), pp.1333–1357.10.1080/14719037.2014.930505
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Walker, G. and Cass, N. (2007). Carbon reduction, ‘the public’ and renewable energy: engaging with socio-technical configurations. Area 39(4): 458–469.10.1111/j.1475-4762.2007.00772.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Willis, R. (2006). Grid 2.0: the next generation. Green Alliance file:///C:/Users/55985010/OneDrive%20-%20MMU/Proposals/Horizon/Grid%202%200.pdf
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Willis, R., Webb, M. and Wilsden, J. (2007). The Disrupters: Lessons for low-carbon innovation from the new wave of environmental pioneers. London, NESTA.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Yin, R. K. (2003) Case study research: design and methods Thousand Oaks, Calif. Sage Publications, 3rd edition
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Yunus, M., Moingeon, B. and Lehmann-Ortega, L (2010). Building Social Business Models: Lessons from the Grameen Experience. Long Range Planning 43(2–3): 308–32510.1016/j.lrp.2009.12.005
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zuboff, S. and Maxmin, J. (2004) The Support Economy: Why corporations are failing individuals and the next episode of capitalism, Penguin Books.
]Search in Google Scholar
, 