Impact of Tunnel Stern Design on Hydrodynamic Characteristics of Catamarans

1 Dubrovsky V, Lyakhovitsky A. Multi-hull ships. Backbone Publishing, Fair Lawn, NJ, USA, 2001. Search in Google Scholar

2 Quang PK, Hung PV, Cong NC, Tung TX. Effects of Rudder and Blade Pitch on Hydrodynamic Performance of Marine Propeller Using CFD. Polish Maritime Research, 29(2), pp. 55-63, 2022. https://doi.org/10.2478/pomr-2022-0017 Search in Google Scholar

3 Zinati A, Ketabdari MJ, Zeraatgar H. Effects of Propeller Fouling on the Hydrodynamic Performance of a Marine Propeller. Polish Maritime Research, 30(4), pp. 61-73, 2023. https://doi.org/10.2478/pomr-2023-0059 Search in Google Scholar

4 Yang J, Sun H, Li X, Liu X. Flow Field Characteristic Analysis of Cushion System of Partial Air Cushion Support Catamaran in Regular Waves. Polish Maritime Research, 29(3), pp. 21-32, 2022. https://doi.org/10.2478/pomr-2022-0024 Search in Google Scholar

5 Haase M, Zurcher K, Davidson G, Binns JR, Thomas G, Bose N. Novel CFD-based full-scale resistance prediction for large medium-speed catamarans. Ocean Engineering, 111, pp. 198-208, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2015.10.018 Search in Google Scholar

6 Zlatev Z, Milanov E, Chotukova V, Sakamoto N, Stern F. Combined Model Scale EFD-CFD Investigation of the Maneuvering Characteristic of a High Speed Catamaran, 2009. Search in Google Scholar

7 Litwin W, Piątek D, Leśniewski W, Marszałkowski K. 50’ Sail Catamaran with Hybrid Propulsion, Design, Theoretical and Experimental Studies. Polish Maritime Research, 29(2), pp. 12-18, 2022. https://doi.org/10.2478/pomr-2022-0012 Search in Google Scholar

8 Molland AF, Wellicome JF, Couser PR. Resistance experiments on a systematic series of high speed displacement catamaran forms: variation of length-displacement ratio and breadth-draught ratio. Ship Science Report No.71, University of Southampton, 1994. Search in Google Scholar

9 Sahoo PK, Salas M, Schwetz A. Practical evaluation of resistance of high-speed catamaran hull forms—Part I. Ships and Offshore Structures, 2(4), pp. 307-324, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1080/17445300701594237 Search in Google Scholar

10 Moghaddas A, Zeraatgar H. Numerical Investigation of the Effects of Aspect Ratio on the Hydrodynamic Performance of a Semi-Planing Catamaran. Polish Maritime Research, 31(3), pp. 25-33, 2024. https://doi.org/10.2478/pomr-2024-0033 Search in Google Scholar

11 Savitsky D, Dingee D. Some interference effects between two flat surfaces planing parallel to each other at high speed. Journal of the Aeronautical Sciences, 21(6), pp. 419-420, 1954. https://doi.org/10.2514/8.3057 Search in Google Scholar

12 Bari GS, Matveev KI. Hydrodynamic modelling of planing catamarans with symmetric hulls. Ocean Engineering, 115, pp. 60-66, 2016. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2016.01.035 Search in Google Scholar

13 Insel M, Molland AF. An investigation into the resistance components of high speed displacement catamarans. Trans. RINA, 134, pp. 1-20, 1992. Search in Google Scholar

14 Souto-Iglesias A, Zamora-Rodrıguez R, Fernandez-Gutierrez D., Perez-Rojas L. Analysis of the wave system of a catamaran for CFD validation. Experiments in Fluids, 42(2), pp. 321-332, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-006-0244-4). Search in Google Scholar

15 Broglia R, Jacob B, Zaghi S, Stern F, Olivieri A. Experimental investigation of interference effects for high-speed catamarans. Ocean Engineering, 76, pp. 75-85, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10,1016/j.oceaneng.2013.12.003 Search in Google Scholar

16 He W, Castiglione T, Stern F, Kandasamy M. Numerical analysis of the interference effects on resistance, sinkage and trim of a fast catamaran. Journal of Marine Science and Technology, 20(2), pp. 292-308, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00773-014-0283-0 Search in Google Scholar

17 Hu J, Zhang Y, Wang P, Qin F. Numerical and experimental study on resistance of asymmetric catamaran with different layouts. Brodogradnja: Teorija i praksa brodogradnje i pomorske tehnike, 71(2), pp. 91-110, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.21278/brod71206. Search in Google Scholar

18 Ge S, Zeng J, Jin B, Zhou W, Qin X. Design Wave Calculation of a Passenger Catamaran Under Multiple Load Control Parameters. Polish Maritime Research, 29(2), pp. 3-11, 2022. https://doi.org/10.2478/pomr-2022-0011 Search in Google Scholar

19 Liu Y, Zhang LS, Sun LP, Li B. Numerical study on effects of buffer bulbous bow structure in collisions, in Recent Advances in Structural Integrity Analysis - Proceedings of the International Congress (APCF/SIF-2014), L. Ye, Editor, Woodhead Publishing: Oxford. pp. 168-172, 2014. Search in Google Scholar

20 Atlar M, Seo K, Sampson R, Danisman DB, Anti-slamming bulbous bow and tunnel stern applications on a novel Deep-V catamaran for improved performance. International Journal of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, 5(2), pp. 302-312, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/IJNAOE-2013-0134 Search in Google Scholar

21 Doi Y, Kajitani H, Miyata H, Kuzumi S. Characteristics of Stern Waves Generated by Ships of Simple Hull Form. First Report. Journal of the Society of Naval Architects of Japan, 1981(150), pp. 30-39, 1981. Search in Google Scholar

22 Rotteveel E, Hekkenberg R, van der Ploeg A. Inland ship stern optimisation in shallow water. Ocean Engineering, 141, pp. 555-569, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2017.06.028 Search in Google Scholar

23 Percival S, Hendrix D, Noblesse F. Hydrodynamic optimisation of ship hull forms. Applied Ocean Research, 23(6), pp. 337-355, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-1187(02)00002-0 Search in Google Scholar

24 Suzuki K, Kai H, Kashiwabara S. Studies on the optimisation of stern hull form based on a potential flow solver. Journal of Marine Science and Technology, 10, pp. 61-69, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00773-005-0198-x Search in Google Scholar

25 Tahara Y, Tohyama S, Katsui T. CFD-based multi-objective optimisation method for ship design, 52(5), pp. 499-527, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1002/fld.1178 Search in Google Scholar

26 Kostas KV, Ginnis AI, Politis CG, Kaklis PD. Ship-hull shape optimisation with a T-spline based BEM–isogeometric solver. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 284, pp. 611-622, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2014.10.030 Search in Google Scholar

27 Duy T-N, Hino T, Suzuki K. Numerical study on stern flow fields of ship hulls with different transom configurations. Ocean Engineering, 129, pp. 401-414, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2016.10.052 Search in Google Scholar

28 Blount DL. Design of propeller tunnels for high-speed craft. In Proceedings of 4th FAST Conference, 1997. Search in Google Scholar

29 Subramanian VA, Subramanyam PVV. Effect of tunnel on the resistance of high-speed planing craft. Journal of Naval Architecture and Marine Engineering, 2, 2009. https://doi.org/10.3329/jname.v2i1.2025 Search in Google Scholar

30 Kim S-W, Lee GW, Seo KC. The comparison on resistance performance and running attitude of asymmetric catamaran changing shape of tunnel stern exit region. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 383(1), p. 012047, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/383/1/012047 Search in Google Scholar

31 Roshan F, Dashtimanesh A, Bilandi RN. Hydrodynamic characteristics of tunneled planing hulls in calm water. Brodogradnja: Teorija i praksa brodogradnje i pomorske tehnike, 71(1), pp. 19-38, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.21278/brod71102 Search in Google Scholar

32 Anderson JD. Computational fluid dynamics: the basics with applications. Mechanical engineering series, 1995. Search in Google Scholar

33 Hughes G. Friction and form resistance in turbulent flow, and a proposed formulation for use in model and ship correlation. National Physical Laboratory, NPL, Ship Division, Presented at the Institution of Naval Architects, Paper No. 7, London, April, RINA Transactions 1954-16, 1954. Search in Google Scholar

34 Bailey D. The NPL high speed round bilge displacement hull series: resistance, propulsion, manoeuvring and seakeeping data. Royal Institution of Naval Architects, 1976. Search in Google Scholar

35 Schlichting H. Boundary layer theory. 7th edn. McGrawHill, New York, 1979. Search in Google Scholar

36 International Towing Tank Conference. I. ITTC–Recommended Procedures and Guidelines Practical Guidelines for Ship CFD Applications. In Rio de Janeiro, 26th International Towing Tank Conference, 2011. Search in Google Scholar

37 International Towing Tank Conference. I. ITTC–Recommended Procedures and Guidelines ITTC Quality System Manual Recommended Procedures and Guidelines Practical Guidelines for Ship CFD Applications ITTC – Recommended Procedures and Guidelines, 2014. Search in Google Scholar

38 Hirt CW, Nichols BD. Volume of fluid (VOF) method for the dynamics of free boundaries. Journal of Computational Physics, 39(1), pp. 201-225, 1981. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9991(81)90145-5 Search in Google Scholar

39 Fluent A. Theory guide, ANSYS, 2015. Search in Google Scholar

40 Boussinesq J. Essai sur la théorie des eaux courantes. Imprimerie nationale, 1877. Search in Google Scholar

41 Shih TH, Liou WW, Shabbir A, Yang Z, Zhu J. A new k- eddy viscosity model for high reynolds number turbulent flows. Computers & Fluids, 24(3), pp. 227-238, 1995. https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7930(94)00032-T Search in Google Scholar

42 Barth T, Jespersen D. The design and application of upwind schemes on unstructured meshes. In 27th Aerospace Sciences Meeting, 1989. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.1989-366 Search in Google Scholar