[1. Kuşku H., Yiğit M., Ergün S., YiğitÜ., Taylor N. (2018): Acoustic Noise Pollution from Marine Industrial Activities: Exposure and Impacts. Aquatic Research, 1(4), 148–161, DOI: 10.3153/AR18017.10.3153/AR18017]Search in Google Scholar
[2. Tournadre J. (2014): Anthropogenic pressure on the open ocean: The growth of vessel traffic revealed by altimeter data analysis. Geophysical Research Letters,41(22),7924–7932, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GL061786.10.1002/2014GL061786]Search in Google Scholar
[3. SOLAS (2000): Safety of Life at Sea, Chapter V, Regulation 19, 470–473.]Search in Google Scholar
[4. Mazzarella F., Vespe M.,Alessandrini A., Tarchi D., Aulicino G., Vollero A.(2017): A novel anomaly detection approach to identify intentional AIS on-off switching. Expert Systems with Applications, 78, 110–123, DOI: 10.1016/j. eswa.2017.02.011.10.1016/j.eswa.2017.02.011]Search in Google Scholar
[5. Riveiro M., Falkman G., Ziemke T.(2008): Improving maritime anomaly detection and situation awareness through interactive visualization. 11th International Conference on Information Fusion, Cologne, 1–8, IEEE Xplore.]Search in Google Scholar
[6. Häkkien J. M., Posti A. I. (2013): Overview of Maritime Accidents Involving Chemicals Worldwide in the Baltic Sea. In: Marine Transport & Shipping – Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation, Weintrit A. & Neumann T. (Eds.),15–25, CRC Press, DOI: 10.12716/1001.08.02.16.10.12716/1001.08.02.16]Search in Google Scholar
[7. Hassanzadeh M. A. (2013): Port Safety; Requirements & Economic Outcomes. In: Marine Transport & Shipping – Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation, Weintrit A. & Neumann T. (Eds.), 117–121, CRC Press.10.1201/b14960-20]Search in Google Scholar
[8. Marcjan K., Gucma L. (2015): A concept of a vessel domain for the use of navigational safety assessment. Journal of KONBiN, 33(1), 19–28,DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jok-2015-0002.10.1515/jok-2015-0002]Search in Google Scholar
[9. Parnell K. E., Kofoed-Hansen H. (2001): Wakes from largehigh-speed ferries in confined coastal waters: Management approaches with examples from New Zealand and Denmark. Coastal Management, 29(3), 217–237, DOI: 10.1080/08920750152102044.10.1080/08920750152102044]Search in Google Scholar
[10. Baztan J., Chouinard O., Jorgensen B., Tett P., Vanderlinden J. P., Vasseur L. (2015): Coastal Zones, Solutions for the 21st Century. Elsevier.]Search in Google Scholar
[11. Haelters J., Norro A., Jacques Th. (2009): Underwater noise emission during the Phase I construction of the C-Power wind farm and baseline for the Belwind wind farm. In: Offshore wind farms in the Belgian part of the North Sea: State of the art after two years of environmental monitoring, Royal Belgian Institute for Natural Sciences, Management Unit of the North Sea Mathematical Models, Degraer, S.; Brabant, R. (Eds.), pp. 17–37.]Search in Google Scholar
[12. Kozaczka E., Grelowska G. (2018): Propagation of vessel-generated noise in a shallow sea. Polish Maritime Research, 25(2), 37–46, DOI: 10.2478/pomr-2018-0052.10.2478/pomr-2018-0052]Search in Google Scholar
[13. Kozaczka E., Grelowska G. (2017): Theoretical model of acoustic wave propagation in shallow water. Polish Maritime Research, 24(2), 48–55, DOI: 10.1515/pomr-2017-0049.10.1515/pomr-2017-0049]Search in Google Scholar
[14. Faltinsen O. M. (2005): Hydrodynamics of High-Speed Marine Vehicles. Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511546068]Search in Google Scholar
[15. Islam H., GuedesSoares C. (2018): Estimation of hydrodynamic derivatives of a container vessel using PMM simulation in OpenFOAM. Ocean Engineering,164, 414–425, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2018.06.063.10.1016/j.oceaneng.2018.06.063]Search in Google Scholar
[16. Altomare C., Crespo A. J. C., Dominguez J. M., Gómez-Gesteira M., Suzuki T.,Verwaest T.(2015): Applicability of smoothed particle hydrodynamics for estimation of sea wave impact on coastal structures. Coastal Engineering, 96, 1–12, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coastaleng.2014.11.001.10.1016/j.coastaleng.2014.11.001]Search in Google Scholar
[17. Higuera P., Lara J. L., Losada I. J. (2013): Simulating coastal engineering processes with OpenFOAM. Coastal Engineering, 71, 119–134, DOI: 10.1016/j.coastaleng.2012.06.002.10.1016/j.coastaleng.2012.06.002]Search in Google Scholar
[18. Carlton J. S., Vlasić D. (2005): Ship vibration and noise: Some topical aspects. Lloyd’s Technical Papers, 1st International Ship Noise and Vibration Conference: London, June 20–21, 2005, Lloyd’s Register Technical Papers.]Search in Google Scholar
[19. Gloza I., Malinowski S. J. (2002): Identification of the vessels underwater noise sources in the coastal region. Hydroacoustics, 5, 9–16.]Search in Google Scholar
[20. Gloza I., Buszman K. (2014): Sound intensity distribution as an underwater acoustic investigation process. Hydroacoustics, 17, 57–62.]Search in Google Scholar
[21. Park I. R. (2015): Numerical analysis of flow around the hull and the propeller of a vessel advancing in shallow water. Journal of Computational Fluids Engineering, 20(4), 93–101, DOI: 10.6112/kscfe.2015.20.4.093.10.6112/kscfe.2015.20.4.093]Search in Google Scholar
[22. Koronowicz T., Krzemianowski Z. (2007): Investigations of the influence of screw propeller operation on water flow around stern part of vessel hull. Polish Maritime Research,14(1), 3–8, DOI: 10.2478/v10012-007-0001-5.10.2478/v10012-007-0001-5]Search in Google Scholar
[23. Bertram V. (2012): Practical vessel hydrodynamics, 2nd Edition, Elsevier.]Search in Google Scholar
[24. Gloza I., Buszman K. (2011): The multi-influence passive module for underwater environment monitoring. Hydroacoustics, 14, 47–54.]Search in Google Scholar
[25. Buszman K. (2013): Examination of acoustic wave propagation in real conditions. Hydroacoustics, 16, 11–18.]Search in Google Scholar
[26. Figurski M., Nykiel G. (2018): Satellite geodesy – Polish COSPAR Report 2018. Space Research in Poland Report to Committee on Space Research, 3–91.]Search in Google Scholar
[27. Makar A. (2018): Dynamic tests of ASG-EUPOS receiver in the hydrographic application, 18th International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConferenceSGEM 2018, Albena, Bulgaria, 2018, DOI: 10.5593/sgem2018/2.2/S09.094.10.5593/sgem2018/2.2/S09.094]Search in Google Scholar
[28. Vujović I., Kuzmanić I. (2018): Investigation of weather conditions’ influence to the maritime zone surveillance – Ground truth generation. 21st International Research/Expert Conference on Trends in the Development of Machinery and Associated Technology TMT,Karlovy Vary, Czech Republic, 2018.]Search in Google Scholar
[29. Massel S. R. (1989): Hydrodynamics of Coastal Zones, 48, Elsevier, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112090222149.10.1017/S0022112090222149]Search in Google Scholar
[30. Tan W.Y. (1992): Mathematical theory and numerical solution for a two-dimensional system of shallow-water equations. Shallow Water Hydrodynamics, 55, Elsevier.]Search in Google Scholar
[31. Ferretti G., Barani S., Scafidi D., Capello M., Besio G. (2018): Near real-time monitoring of significant sea wave height through microseism recordings: An application in the Ligurian Sea (Italy). Ocean & Coastal Management, 165, 185–194,DOI: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2018.08.023.10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2018.08.023]Search in Google Scholar