Otwarty dostęp

Conflicting Nature of Social-Pragmatic Cues with Mutual Exclusivity Regarding Three-Year-Olds’ Label-Referent Mappings


Zacytuj

Baldwin, D. A. (1991). Infants’ contribution to the achievement of joint reference. Child Development, 62, 875-890.10.1111/j.1467-8624.1991.tb01577.xSearch in Google Scholar

Baldwin, D. A. (1993). Infants’ ability to consult the speaker for clues to word reference. Journal of Child Language, 20, 395-418.10.1017/S0305000900008345Search in Google Scholar

Banigan, R. L., & Mervis, C. B. (1988). Role of adult input in young children’s category evolution: An experimental study. Journal of Child Language, 15, 493-504.10.1017/S0305000900012526Search in Google Scholar

Birch, S. A. J., Vauthier, S. A., & Bloom, P. (2008). Three- and four-year-olds spontaneously use others’ past performance to guide their learning. Cognition, 107(3), 1018-1034.10.1016/j.cognition.2007.12.008Search in Google Scholar

Clark, E. V. (1988). On the logic of contrast. Journal of Child Language, 15, 317–35.10.1017/S0305000900012393Search in Google Scholar

Clark, E. V. (1997). Conceptual perspective and lexical choice in acquisition. Cognition, 64, 1–37.10.1016/S0010-0277(97)00010-3Search in Google Scholar

Diesendruck, G., & Markson, L. (2001). Children’s avoidance of lexical overlap: A pragmatic account. Developmental Psychology, 37, 630–41.10.1037/0012-1649.37.5.630Search in Google Scholar

Gollek, C., & Doherty, M. J. (2016). Metacognitive developments in word learning: Mutual exclusivity and theory of mind. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 148, 51-69.10.1016/j.jecp.2016.03.007Search in Google Scholar

Graham, S. A., Nilsen, E. S., Collins, S., & Olineck, K. (2010). The role of gaze direction and mutual exclusivity in guiding 24-month-olds’ word mappings. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 28, 449-465.10.1348/026151009X424565Search in Google Scholar

Graham, S. A., Stock, H., & Henderson, A. M. E. (2006). Nineteen-month-olds’ understanding of the conventionality of object labels versus desires. Infancy, 9, 341–350.10.1207/s15327078in0903_5Search in Google Scholar

Grassmann, S., & Tomasello, M. (2010). Young children follow pointing over words in interpreting acts of reference. Developmental Science, 13, 252–263.10.1111/j.1467-7687.2009.00871.xSearch in Google Scholar

Grassmann, S., Schulze, C., & Tomasello, M. (2015). Children’s level of word knowledge predicts their exclusion of familiar objects as referents of novel words. Frontiers in Psychology, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.0120010.3389/fpsyg.2015.01200Search in Google Scholar

Haryu, E., & Imai, I. (1999). Controlling the application of the mutual exclusivity assumption in the acquisition of lexical hierarchies. Japanese Psychological Research, 41, 21–34.10.1111/1468-5884.00102Search in Google Scholar

Henderson, A. M. E., & Graham, S. A. (2005). Two-year-olds’ appreciation of the shared nature of novel object labels. Journal of Cognition and Development, 6, 381–402.10.1207/s15327647jcd0603_4Search in Google Scholar

Jaswal, V. K. (2010). Explaining the disambiguation effect: Don’t exclude mutual exclusivity. Journal of Child Language, 37, 95-113. doi:10.1017/S030500090900951910.1017/S0305000909009519Search in Google Scholar

Jaswal, V. K., & Hansen, M. B. (2006). Learning words: Children disregard some pragmatic information that conflicts with mutual exclusivity. Developmental Science, 9(2), 158–65.10.1111/j.1467-7687.2006.00475.xSearch in Google Scholar

Kalashnikova, M., Mattock, K., & Monaghan, P. (2014). Disambiguation of novel labels and referential facts: A developmental perspective. First Language, 34(2), 125–135.10.1177/0142723714525946Search in Google Scholar

Kalashnikova, M., Mattock, K., & Monaghan, P. (2016). Mutual exclusivity develops as a consequence of abstract rather than particular vocabulary knowledge. First Language, 36(5), 1-14. doi: 10.1177/014272371664885010.1177/0142723716648850Search in Google Scholar

Markman, E. M. (1989). Categorization and naming in children: Problems of induction. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Markman, E. M. (1992). Constraints on word learning: Speculations about their nature, origins, and domain specificity. In M. R. Gunnar, & M. Maratsos (Eds.), Modularity and constraints in language and cognition, 59–101. LEA.Search in Google Scholar

Markman, E. M., & Wachtel, G. F. (1988). Children’s use of mutual exclusivity to constrain the meanings of words. Cognitive Psychology, 20, 121–57.10.1016/0010-0285(88)90017-5Search in Google Scholar

Piccin, T. B., & Blewitt, P. (2007). Resource conservation as a basis for the mutual exclusivity effect in children’s word learning. First Language, 27(1), 5-28.10.1177/0142723707067544Search in Google Scholar

Sabbagh, M. A., & Henderson, A. M. E. (2007). How an appreciation of conventionality shapes early word learning. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 115, 25–37.10.1002/cd.180Search in Google Scholar

Tomasello, M. (2000). The social-pragmatic theory of word learning. Pragmatics, 10(4), 401-413.10.1075/prag.10.4.01tomSearch in Google Scholar

Waxman, S. R., & Hatch, T. (1992). Beyond the basics: Preschool children label objects flexibly at multiple hierarchical levels. Journal of Child Language, 19, 153-166. doi:10.1017/S030500090001367210.1017/S0305000900013672Search in Google Scholar

eISSN:
2083-8506
Język:
Angielski
Częstotliwość wydawania:
Volume Open
Dziedziny czasopisma:
Social Sciences, Psychology, Applied Psychology