[Adolph, K. E. (2008). Learning to move. Current directions in psychological science, 17, 213-218.10.1111/j.1467-8721.2008.00577.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Ayer, A. J. (2001/1936). Language, truth and logic. London: Penguin.]Search in Google Scholar
[Barwise, J., Perry. J. (1983). Situation and attitudes. Cambridge: The MIT Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Borchmann, S. (2007). Hvad skriver vi om -topik på sætningsniveau. In P. Widell & H. Jørgensen (Eds.), Det bedre argument (pp. 53-85). Århus: Wessel & Huitfeldt.]Search in Google Scholar
[Borchmann, S. (2013). Det mentale cockpit -en epistemologisk og psykologisk karakteristik af den meddelelsesstrukturelle konstituent variablen. Møde om Udforskningen af Dansk Sprog, 14, 77-101.]Search in Google Scholar
[Borchmann, S. (2015). ”Fordi man ved aldrig” - emne, fokus og kohærens i informativ udøversprogbrug. Skandinaviske Sprogstudier, 6(4), 17-109.10.7146/sss.v6i4.22983]Search in Google Scholar
[Borchmann, S. (2016). En funktionel semantik baseret på økologisk psykologi. NyS 50 - Nydansk sprogstudier (pp. 183-220). Frederiksberg: Dansk Sprognævn. Borchmann, S. (in press). The spectator bias in the linguistic descriptions of information structure. Language sciences.]Search in Google Scholar
[Brentano, F. (1925). Vorstellung und Urteil, zwei Klassen. Psychologie vom empirischen Standpunkt (pp. 38-82). Leipzig: Felix Meiner.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bühler, K., (1965/1934). Sprachtheorie, die Darstellung der Sprache. Stuttgart: Gustav Fischer.]Search in Google Scholar
[Chafe, W. (1976). Givenness, Contrastiveness, Defineteness, Subjects Topics, and Point of View. In C. N. Li (Ed.), Subject and topic (pp. 25-55). Academic Press: London.]Search in Google Scholar
[Chemero, A. (2011). Radical embodied cognitive science. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Clark, H. H. & Bangerter, A. (2004). Changing ideas about reference. In I. A. Noveck & D. Sperber (Eds.), Experimental pragmatics (pp. 25-49). New York, NY: Palgrave, Macmillan.]Search in Google Scholar
[Cowley, S. (2011). Distributed language. In S. Cowley (Ed.), Distributed language (pp. 1-14). Amsterdam & Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.10.1075/bct.34]Search in Google Scholar
[Cowley, S. (2009). Distributed language and dynamics. Pragmatics & cognition 17(3), 495-507.10.1075/pc.17.3.01cow]Search in Google Scholar
[Deacon, T. (1997). The symbolic species. The co-evolution of language and the brain. New York, NY: WW. Norton & Company.]Search in Google Scholar
[Dekker, S. (2014). The field guide to understanding ‘human error’. London: CRC Press. Taylor & Francis Group.]Search in Google Scholar
[Federal Aviation Administration, U.S. Department of transportation (2006). Performance specification PC based Runway Visual Range (RVR) system. Lighting Systems Office RVR Product Team (AJW-46).]Search in Google Scholar
[Federal Aviation Administration, U.S. Department of transportation (2010). Air Traffic Organization policy, order JO 7110.65T.]Search in Google Scholar
[Federal Aviation Administration, U.S. Department of transportation (2014A). Approach plate: CHICAGO MIDWAY INTL(MDW), 41°47'N-87°45'W ILS or LOC/DME RWY 31C.]Search in Google Scholar
[Federal Aviation Administration, U.S. Department of transportation (2014B). Approach plate: BILL AND HILLARY CLINTON NATIONAL/ADAMS FIELD (LIT), 34°44'N-92°13'W ILS or LOC RWY 4R.]Search in Google Scholar
[Federal Aviation Administration, U.S. Department of transportation (2013). Standards for airport markings 150/5340-1L. Flach, J. M. & J. Rasmussen (2000). Cognitive engineering. designing for situation awareness. In N. B. Sarter & R. Amalberti (Eds.), Cognitive engineering in the aviation domain (pp. 153-179). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates Publishers.]Search in Google Scholar
[Flach, J. M., Jacques, P. F., Patrick, D. L., Amelink, M. H. J., Van Paassen, M. M., and Mulder, M. (2003). A Search for Meaning: A Case Study of the Approach-to-Landing. In E. Hollnagel (Ed.), Handbook of cognitive task analysis (pp. 171-191). Mahwan, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.]Search in Google Scholar
[Frankfurt, H. (2005/1986). On bullshit. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[von der Gabelentz, G. (1869). Ideen zu einer vergleichenden Syntax. Zeitschrift für Völkerpsychologie und Sprachwissenschaft, 6, 376-384.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gibson, E. J. & Rader, N. (1979). Attention: The perceiver as performer. In G. A. Hale & M. Lewis (Eds.), Attention and cognitive development (pp. 1-21). New York, NY & London: Plenum Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gibson, E. J. & Pick, A. D. (2000). An ecological approach to perceptual learning and development. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gibson, J. J. (1986). The ecological approach to visual perception. New York, NY: Psychology Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Golonka, S. (2015). Laws and conventions in language-related behaviors. Ecological psychology, 27(3), 236-250.10.1080/10407413.2015.1068654]Search in Google Scholar
[Gregor, J. A. (2006). Specialist’s factual specialist report of investigation, DCA06MA009. National Transportation Safety Board, Vehicle Recorders Division: Washington, D.C. 20594]Search in Google Scholar
[Grice, H. P. (2001/1975) Logic and conversation. In C. Henriksen (Ed.), Can you reach the salt? Gylling (pp. 199-219). Frederiksberg: Roskilde Universitetsforlag.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gundel, J. K. & Fretheim, T. (2005). Topic and focus. In L. R. Horn & G. Ward (Eds.), The handbook of pragmatics (pp. 174-196). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gundel, J. K. (2012). Pragmatics and information structure. In K. Allen & M. M. Jaszczolt (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of pragmatics (pp. 585- 598). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Haberland, H. (2006). Thetic-categorial distinction. In K. Brown (Ed.), Encyclopedia of language and linguistics 2nd edition 12 (pp. 676-677). Oxford: Pergamon Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Halliday, M. A. K. & Matthiessn, C. M. I. M. (2014). Halliday’s introduction to functional grammar. London: Routhledge, Taylor & Francis Group.10.4324/9780203783771]Search in Google Scholar
[Halliday, M. A. K. (1994/1985). An introduction to functional grammar. London: Arnold.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hansen, E. & Heltoft, L. (2011). Grammatik over det danske sprog. Det Danske Sprog- og Litteraturselskab. Syddansk Universitetsforlag.]Search in Google Scholar
[Harder, P (2010). Meaning in mind and society. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110216059]Search in Google Scholar
[Hjelmslev, L. (1993/1943). Omkring Sprogteoriens Grundlæggelse. København: The Linguistic Circle of Copenhagen.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hodges, B. H., Steffensen, S. V., & Martin, J. E. (2012). Caring, conversing, and realizing values: New directions in language studies. Language sciences, 34, 499-506.10.1016/j.langsci.2012.03.006]Search in Google Scholar
[Hodges, B. H. (2009). Ecological pragmatics: Values, dialogical arrays, complexity, and caring. Pragmatics & cognition, 17(3), 628-652.10.1075/pc.17.3.08hod]Search in Google Scholar
[Hodges, B. H. (2007). Good prospects: ecological and social perspectives on conforming, creating, and caring in conversation. Language sciences, 29, 584-604.10.1016/j.langsci.2007.01.003]Search in Google Scholar
[Hodges, B. H. & Baron, R. M. (1992). Values as constraints on affordances: perceiving and acting properly. Journal for the theory of social behavior, 22, 263-294.10.1111/j.1468-5914.1992.tb00220.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. James, W. (1890/1950). Principles of psychology, 1 & 2. New York, NY: Dover.]Search in Google Scholar
[Klein, G. (2009). Streetlights and shadows. Searching for the keys to adaptive decision making. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/8369.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[Klein, G. (1999). Sources of power. How people make decisions. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kristoffersen, J. F., Rasmussen, D. S. L., & Mikkelsen, K. B. (2016). Ja og der er masser af plads til jer og så skyd for helvede udefra en pragmatisk analyse af fokus og emne i tetiske sætninger og imperativsætninger. Roskilde Universitet. Retrived from: http://docplayer.dk/25132983-Ja-og-der-er-masser-af-plads-til-jer-og-saa-skyd-for-helvede-udefra.html]Search in Google Scholar
[Kuno, S. (1972). Functional sentence perspective: A case study from Japanese and English. Linguistic inquiry, 3, 269-320.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kuroda, S.-Y. (1972). The categorical and the thetic judgment. Foundations of language, 9, 153-185.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kuroda, S.-Y. (2005). Focusing on the matter of topic: A study of Wa and Ga in Japanese. Journal of east asian linguistics, 14(1), 1-58.10.1007/s10831-004-2701-5]Search in Google Scholar
[Lambrecht, K. (1994). Information structure and sentence form. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511620607]Search in Google Scholar
[Leibowitz, H. W. (1988). The human senses in flight. In E. L. Wiener & D. C. Nagel (Eds.), Human factors in aviation (pp. 83-110). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lyons, J. (1977). Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Malinowski, B. (1946/1923). The problem of meaning in primitive languages. In C.K. Ogden & I. A. Richards (Eds.), The meaning of meaning: a study of the influence of language upon thought and of the science of symbolism (pp.m 296-336). Eighth edition. New York, NY: Harcourt, Brace & World.]Search in Google Scholar
[Marty, A. (1940). Von den logisch begründeten Synsemantika beim Urteilsausdruck. Psyche und Sprachstruktur. Bern: A. Francke.]Search in Google Scholar
[Mathesius, V. (1975/1961). A functional analysis of present day english on a general linguistic basis. The Hague/Paris: Mouton.10.1515/9783110813296]Search in Google Scholar
[Millikan, R. (2000). On clear and confused ideas. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511613296]Search in Google Scholar
[National Transportation Safety Board (2001). Runway overrun during landing American Airlines flight 1420 McDonnell Douglas MD-82, N215AA Little Rock, Arkansas June 1, 1999. Aircraft accident report NTSB/AAR-01/02. Washington, DC.]Search in Google Scholar
[National Transportation Safety Board (2007). Runway overrun and collision, Southwest Airlines flight 1248, Boeing 737-7H4, N471WN, Chicago Midway International Airport, Chicago, Illinois, December 8, 2005. Aircraft accident report NTSB/AAR-07/06. Washington, DC.]Search in Google Scholar
[Odling-Smee, J. F., Laland, K. N., & Feldman, M. W. (2003). Niche Construction: The Neglected Process in Evolution. New Jersey, NJ: Princeton University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Plumert, J. M., Kearney, J. K., & Cremer, J. F. (2004). Children’s perception of gap affordances: Bicycling across traffic-filled intersections in an immersive virtual environment. Child development, 75, 4.10.1111/j.1467-8624.2004.00736.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Raczazek-Leonardi, J. (2009). The structuring role of dynamics and self-organization in natural language. Pragmatics & cognition, 17(3), 653-676.10.1075/pc.17.3.09ras]Search in Google Scholar
[Rasmussen, J., Pejtersen, A. M. & Goodstein, L. P. (1993). Cognitive systems engineering. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.]Search in Google Scholar
[Reed, E. S. (1996). Encountering the world. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Reimer, M. & Michaelson, E. (2017). Reference. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. [retrived from: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2017/entries/reference/]]Search in Google Scholar
[Reinhart, T. (1982) Pragmatics and linguistics. Analysis of sentence topics. Philosophica, 27, 53-94.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ritchie, M. (1988). General Aviation. In E. L. Wiener & D. C. Nagel (Eds.), Human factors in aviation (pp. 561-589). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Rosengren, I. (1997). The thetic/categorical distinction revisited once more. Linguistics, 35, 439-479.10.1515/ling.1997.35.3.439]Search in Google Scholar
[Sasse, H. J. (1987). The thetic/categorical distinction revisited. Linguistics, 25, 511-580.10.1515/ling.1987.25.3.511]Search in Google Scholar
[Searle, J. (1969). Speech acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139173438]Search in Google Scholar
[Seibt, J. (2016). Process Philosophy. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy, winter edition. [retrived from: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2016/entries/process-philosophy/]]Search in Google Scholar
[Seidlhofer, B. (1995). Approaches to summarization: Discourse analysis and language education. Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag.]Search in Google Scholar
[Strawson, P. F. (2004/1950). On referring, logico-linguistic papers. Ashgate: Aldershote.10.1093/mind/LIX.235.320]Search in Google Scholar
[Strawson, P. F. (1974). Subject and predicate in logic and grammar. London: Methuen.]Search in Google Scholar
[Sullivan, A. (2012). Referring in discourse. In A. Keith & M. M. Jaszczolt (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of pragmatics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Talmy, L. (2000). Toward a cognitive semantics, Volume I: Concept structuring systems. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Tomasello, M. (2003). Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.,]Search in Google Scholar
[Tomasello, M. (2008). Origins of human communication, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/7551.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[Turvey, M. T., Shaw, R., Reed, E., & Mace, W. (1981). Ecological laws of perceiving and acting: In reply to Fodor and Pylyshyn (1981). Cognition, 9, 237-304.10.1016/0010-0277(81)90002-0]Search in Google Scholar
[Verstraete, J.-C. (in press) Formal criteria for subordination in the Germanic languages: in search of an explanation. In B. Cornillie, D. Divjak, P. Mertens, & P. Swiggers (Eds.), Structuring linguistic form (Orbis supplementa). Leuven: Peeters.]Search in Google Scholar
[Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. the development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Wilkinson, S. (1994). The november Oscar incident. Air & space, march, 80-87. Wilson, A. D. & Golonka, S. (2013). Embodied cognition is not what you think it is. Frontiers in psychology, 4, 1-13.]Search in Google Scholar
[Wittgenstein, L. (1968/1953). Philosophische Untersuchungen, Philosophical investigations. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.]Search in Google Scholar
[Zukow-Goldring, P. & Arbib, M. A. (2007). Affordances, effectivities, and assisted imitation: Caregivers and the directing of attention, Neurocomputing, 70, 2181-2193.10.1016/j.neucom.2006.02.029]Search in Google Scholar
