1. bookTom 28 (2022): Zeszyt 3 (September 2022)
Informacje o czasopiśmie
License
Format
Czasopismo
eISSN
1898-0309
Pierwsze wydanie
30 Dec 2008
Częstotliwość wydawania
4 razy w roku
Języki
Angielski
Otwarty dostęp

The influence of the used applicators on organ and target doses for cervical cancer patients treated with HDR brachytherapy

Data publikacji: 30 Sep 2022
Tom & Zeszyt: Tom 28 (2022) - Zeszyt 3 (September 2022)
Zakres stron: 139 - 149
Otrzymano: 30 Mar 2022
Przyjęty: 08 Aug 2022
Informacje o czasopiśmie
License
Format
Czasopismo
eISSN
1898-0309
Pierwsze wydanie
30 Dec 2008
Częstotliwość wydawania
4 razy w roku
Języki
Angielski

1. Zhang X, Zeng Q, Cai W, Ruan W. Trends of cervical cancer at global, regional, and national level: data from the Global Burden of Disease study 2019. BMC Public Health. 2021;21(1):894. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-10907-5 Search in Google Scholar

2. Green J, Kirwan J, Tierney J et al. Survival and recurrence after concomitant chemotherapy and radiotherapy for cancer of the uterine cervix: a systematic review and meta-analysis. The Lancet. 2001;358(9284):781-786. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(01)05965-7 Search in Google Scholar

3. Vinin N, Jones J, Ajas V et al. Organ at Risk Doses during High Dose Rate Intracavitary Brachytherapy for Cervical Cancer: A Dosimetric Study. International Journal of Medical Physics, Clinical Engineering and Radiation Oncology. 2018;07(04):472-478. https://doi.org/10.4236/ijmpcero.2018.78040 Search in Google Scholar

4. Pötter R, Haie-Meder C, Van Limbergen E et al. Recommendations from gynaecological (GYN) GEC ESTRO working group (II): concepts and terms in 3D image-based treatment planning in cervix cancer brachytherapy-3D dose volume parameters and aspects of 3D image-based anatomy, radiation physics, radiobiology. Radiotherapy and Oncology. 2006;78(1):67-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2005.11.014 Search in Google Scholar

5. Nag S, Erickson B, Thomadsen B et al. The American Brachytherapy Society recommendations for high-dose-rate brachytherapy for carcinoma of the cervix. International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics. 2000;48(1):201-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0360-3016(00)00497-1 Search in Google Scholar

6. Swamidas J, Mahantshetty U. ICRU report 89: prescribing, recording, and reporting brachytherapy for cancer of the cervix. Journal of Medical Physics. 2017;42(suppl1);48. Search in Google Scholar

7. Romano K, Hill C, Trifiletti D et al. High dose-rate tandem and ovoid brachytherapy in cervical cancer: dosimetric predictors of adverse events. Radiation Oncology. 2018;13(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13014-018-1074-2604883830012164 Search in Google Scholar

8. Tornero-López A, Guirado D. Radiobiological considerations in combining doses from external beam radiotherapy and brachytherapy for cervical cancer. Reports of Practical Oncology & Radiotherapy. 2018;23(6):562-573. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rpor.2018.05.007627727230534020 Search in Google Scholar

9. Wang C, Huang E, Sun L et al. Clinical comparison of two linear-quadratic model-based isoeffect fractionation schemes of high-dose-rate intracavitary brachytherapy for cervical cancer. International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics. 2004;59(1):179-189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2003.10.02515093915 Search in Google Scholar

10. Vinin N, Dharmarajan A, Sahin PM et al. Dosimetric comparison of tandem and ovoids with tandem and ring for intracavitary brachytherapy for carcinoma cervix. Oncology and Radiotherapy. 2019;46(1):39-42. Search in Google Scholar

11. Rangarajan R. Dosimetric evaluation of image based brachytherapy using tandem ovoid and tandem ring applicators. Reports of Practical Oncology & Radiotherapy. 2018;23(1):57-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rpor.2017.12.006576784429348735 Search in Google Scholar

12. Levin D, Menhel J, Rabin T, Pfeffer M, Symon Z. Dosimetric Comparison of Tandem and Ovoids vs. Tandem and Ring for Intracavitary Gynecologic Applications. Medical Dosimetry. 2008;33(4):315-320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meddos.2008.06.00318973861 Search in Google Scholar

13. Erickson B, Jones R, Rownd J et al. Is the tandem and ring applicator a suitable alternative to the high dose rate selectron tandem and ovoid applicator? Journal of Brachytherapy International. 2000;16(2):131-144. Search in Google Scholar

14. Harmon G, Diak A, Shea S, Yacoub J, Small W, Harkenrider M. Point A vs. HR-CTV D90 in MRI-based cervical brachytherapy of small and large lesions. Brachytherapy. 2016;15(6):825-831. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brachy.2016.08.010 Search in Google Scholar

15. Dumane V, Yuan Y, Sheu R, Gupta V. Computed tomography-based treatment planning for high-dose-rate brachytherapy using the tandem and ring applicator: influence of applicator choice on organ dose and inter-fraction adaptive planning. J Contemp Brachytherapy. 2017;3:279-286. https://doi.org/10.5114/jcb.2017.68519 Search in Google Scholar

16. Noyes W, Peters N, Thomadsen B et al. Impact of “optimized” treatment planning for tandem and ring, and tandem and ovoids, using high dose rate brachytherapy for cervical cancer. International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics. 1995;31(1):79-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/0360-3016(94)00401-6 Search in Google Scholar

17. Siavashpour Z, Aghamiri M, Jaberi R et al. A comparison of organs at risk doses in GYN intracavitary brachytherapy for different tandem lengths and bladder volumes. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2016;17(3):5-13. https://doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v17i3.5584569092727167253 Search in Google Scholar

18. Suryadevara A, Kumar M, Vasundhara E, Alluri K, Ahamed S, Guduru S. A dosimetric comparison between applicators used for brachytherapy in carcinoma cervix – A single-institute prospective study. Indian J Cancer. 2018;55(3):230. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijc.ijc_659_17 Search in Google Scholar

Polecane artykuły z Trend MD

Zaplanuj zdalną konferencję ze Sciendo