SIMU-RAD programme: a learning tool for radiation (photons and charged particles) interaction

[1] Harrison RL. Introduction to Monte Carlo Simulation. AIP Conf Proc. 2010;1204:17-21.10.1063/1.3295638Search in Google Scholar

[2] Metropolis N, Ulam S. The Monte Carlo Method. J Am Stat Assoc. 1949;44(247)335-341.10.1080/01621459.1949.10483310Search in Google Scholar

[3] Hirayama H, Namito Y. Lecture Notes of Radiation Transport Calculation by Monte Carlo Method. KEK Internal.2001;2000-20.Search in Google Scholar

[4] Dimov IT, Tonev OI. Monte Carlo Algorithms: Performance Analysis for Some Computer Architectures. J Comput Appl Math. 1993;48(3):253-277.10.1016/0377-0427(93)90024-6Search in Google Scholar

[5] Peter Ziegenhein, Pirner S, Ph Kamerling C, Oelfke U. Fast CPU-based Monte Carlo Simulation for Radiotherapy Dose Calculation. Phys Med Biol. 2015;60(15):6097-6111.10.1088/0031-9155/60/15/609726216484Search in Google Scholar

[6] Kara U, Tekin HO. Estımatıon of Absorbed Dose Dıstrıbutıon in Dıfferent Organs durıng the CT Scan: Monte Carlo Study. Austin J Radiol. 2017;4(1):1063.10.26420/austinjradiol.2017.1063Search in Google Scholar

[7] Larsson E, Ljungberg M, Strand SE, Jonsson BA. Monte Carlo Calculations of Absorbed Doses In Tumours using A Modified Moby Mouse Phantom for Pre-Clinical Dosimetry Studies. Acta Oncol. 2011;50:6,973-980.10.3109/0284186X.2011.582517Search in Google Scholar

[8] Sukara S, Rimjeam S. Simulation of Gamma Rays Attenuation Through Matters using the Monte Carlo Program. J Phys: Conf Ser. 2017;901:012141.10.1088/1742-6596/901/1/012141Search in Google Scholar

[9] Hirayama H, Namito Y, Bielajew AF, et al. The EGS5 Code System. 2005; SLAC-Report-730.10.2172/877459Search in Google Scholar

[10] Nelson WR, Field C. Comparison of EGS5 Simulations with Experiment. Nuclear Instrument and Methods in Physics Research. 2007;572(3):1083-1093.10.1016/j.nima.2007.01.015Search in Google Scholar

[11] Tajudin SM, Namito Y, Sanami T, Hirayama H. Quasi-monoenergetic 200 keV Photon Field using a Radioactive Source with Backscatter Layout. Japan J Appl Phys. 2014;53(11):116401.10.7567/JJAP.53.116401Search in Google Scholar

[12] Malik AH, Shimazoe K, Takahashi H. EGS5 Simulations for the Development of Non-Contacting System to Online Measure the Radiotracer Concentration in Blood. Prog Nucl Sci Technol. 2014;4:290-293.10.15669/pnst.4.290Search in Google Scholar

[13] Hubbell JH, Seltzer SM. X-Ray Mass Attenuation Coefficients. NISTIR 5632. https://www.nist.gov/pml/x-ray-mass-attenuation-coefficients.Search in Google Scholar

[14] Berger MJ, Hubbell JH, Seltzer SM, et al. XCOM: Photon Cross Sections Database. NBSIR 87-3597. http://www.nist.gov/pml/data/xcom/index.cfm.Search in Google Scholar

[15] Pawar PP. Measurement of Mass and Linear Attenuation Coefficients of Gamma-Rays of AL for 514, 662 and 1280 keV Photons. J Chem Pharm Res. 2011;3(4): 899-903.Search in Google Scholar

[16] Tekin HO, Manici T. Simulations of Mass Attenuation Coefficients for Shielding Materials using The MCNP-X code. Nucl Sci Techniques. 2017;28:95.10.1007/s41365-017-0253-4Search in Google Scholar

[17] Zhang L, Jia MC, Gong JJ, Xia WM. Simulation of Photon Attenuation Coefficients for High Effective Shielding Material Lead-Boron Polyethyene. IOP Conf Ser: Earth Environ Sci. 2017; 100:012137.10.1088/1755-1315/100/1/012137Search in Google Scholar

[18] Ferreira CC, Ximenes RE, Garcia CAB, et al. Total Mass Attenuation Coefficient Evaluation of Ten Materials Commonly used to Simulate Human Tissue. J Phys: Conf Ser. 2010;249:012029.10.1088/1742-6596/249/1/012029Search in Google Scholar

[19] Knoll GF. Radiation Detection and Measurement. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2010.Search in Google Scholar

[20] Suffian MT, Adila Hanim AS. Simu-Rad. Poster presented at Putra InnoCreative Carnival in Teaching and Learning (PicTL’18); 2018; Universiti Putra Malaysia, Malaysia.Search in Google Scholar

[21] CGVIEW Particle Trajectory and Geometry Display Program. http://rcwww.kek.jp/research/egs/kek/cgview/Search in Google Scholar