[
Bernet, R. (1997). “Husserls Begriff des Phantasiebewusstseins als Fundierung von Freuds Begriff des Unbewussten”. In: Jamme, C. (Ed.). Grundlinien der Vernunftkritik. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 277-306.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bernet, R. (2012). “Phantasieren und Phantasma bei Husserl und Freud”. In: Lohmar, D., Brudzińska, J. (Eds.) Founding Psychoanalysis Phenomenologically: Phenomenological Theory of Subjectivity and the Psychoanalytic Experience. Dordrecht/Heidelberg/London/New York: Springer, 15-38.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Caracciolo, M. (2013). “Phenomenological Metaphors in Readers’ Engagement with Characters: The Case of Ian McEwan’s Saturday”. Lang Lit, 22, 1, 60–76.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Carruthers, P. and Smith, P. K. (1996). Theories of Theories of Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cohn, D. (1978). Transparent Minds: Narrative Modes for Presenting Consciousness in Fiction. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Depraz, N. (1995). Transcendance et incarnation. Paris: Vrin.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Derrida, J. (1993). La voix et le phénomène. Paris: PUF.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Davies, S. (2009). “Responding Emotionally to Fictions”. The Journal Of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 67, 3, 269-284.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ferencz-Flatz, C. (2014). “Zur ‘Anschaulichkeit’ der Einfühlung bei Husserl”. Tijdschrift voor Filosofie, 76, 87-118.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fodor, J. A. (1987). Psychosemantics. Cambridge: MIT Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gallagher, S. and Hutto, D. D. (2008). “Understanding Others Through Primary Interaction and Narrative Practice”. In: Zlatev, J.; Racine, T. P; Sinha, C. et al (Eds.). The Shared Mind: Perspectives on Intersubjectivity. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 17–38.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Goldman, A. I. (2006). Simulating Minds: The Philosophy, Psychology, and Neuroscience of Mindreading. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gopnik, A. and Wellman, H. M. (1994). “The Theory Theory”. In: Hirschfeld, L. A and Gelman. SA (eds.) Mapping the Mind: Domain Specificity in Cognition and Culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gordon, RM. (2005). “Intentional Agents like Myself”. In: Hurley, S. and Chater, N. (eds.) Perspectives on Imitation I. Cambridge: MIT Press, 95–106.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Husserl, E. (1963). Husserliana I: Cartesianische Meditationen. The Haag: Martinus Nijhoff,.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Husserl, E. (1976). Husserliana III: Ideen zu einer reinen Phänomenologie und phänomenologische Philosophie. Erster Buch: Allgemeine Einführung in die reine Phänomenologie. The Haag: Martinus Nijhoff.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Husserl, E. (1966). Husserliana X: Zur Phänomenologie des inneren Zeitbewusstseins. The Haag: Martinus Nijhoff.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Husserl, E. (1973). Husserliana XIII: Phänomenologie der Intersubjektivität I. The Haag: Martinus Nijhoff.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Husserl, E. (1973). Husserliana XIV: Phänomenologie der Intersubjektivität II. The Haag: Martinus Nijhoff.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Husserl, E. (1973). Husserliana XV: Phänomenologie der Intersubjektivität III. The Haag: Martinus Nijhoff.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Husserl, E. (1980). Husserliana XXIII: Phantasie, Bildbewusstsein, Erinnerung. The Haag: Martinus Nijhoff.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Husserl, E. (2013). Husserliana XLII: Grenzprobleme der Phänomenologie. Haag: Martinus Nijhoff.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Krueger, J., Overgaard, S. (2012). “Seeing Subjectivity: Defending A Perceptual Account of Other Minds”. ProtoSociol Conscious Subj, 47, 239–262.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Konrad, E. M., Petraschka, T., Werner, C. (2018). “The Paradox of Fiction - A Brief Introduction into Recent Developments, Open Questions, and Current Areas of Research, Including A Comprehensive Bibliography from 1975 to 2018”. J Lit Theory 12, 2, 193–203.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1945). Phénoménologie de la perception. Paris : Gallimard.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1964). Le visible et l’invisible. Paris : Gallimard.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Proust, M. (1992). In Search of Lost Time. Volume 1: Swann’s Way. New York: The Morden Library.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Richir, M. (2010). “Imagination et Phantasia chez Husserl”. In: J. Benoist and V. Gérard (ed.) Lectures de Husserl. Paris: Ellipses, 143-158.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Scheler, M. (1973). Wesen und Formen der Sympathie. Bern, München: A. Francke AG Verlag.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Shang, J. (2020) “Imaginative Empathy in Literature: On the Theory of Presentification in Husserl and its Application in Literary Reading”. Labyrinth 22, 1, 40-45.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Summa, M. (2014). Spatio-temporal Intertwining: Husserl’s Transcendental Aesthetic. Cham, Heidelberg, New York, Dordrecht, London: Springer.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Stein, E. (2012). On the Problem of Empathy. Dordrecht: Springer.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Stueber, KR. (2006). Rediscovering Empathy: Agency, Folk-psychology and the Human Sciences. Cambridge: MIT Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zahavi, D. (2014). Self and Other: Exploring Subjectivity, Empathy, and Shame. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
